logo
U.K.-U.S trade deal cutting tariffs on cars, beef, ethanol goes live

U.K.-U.S trade deal cutting tariffs on cars, beef, ethanol goes live

Miami Herald30-06-2025
June 30 (UPI) -- A tariff-busting trade deal between Britain and the United States came into force Monday, slashing U.S. tariffs on imports of British cars, including Jaguar, Range Rover, Aston Martin and Mini by 17.5% to 10% and eliminating a 10% tariff on aerospace sales such as jet engines and aircraft parts.
The Department of Business and Trade said in a news release that the "landmark" deal would protect significant numbers of British jobs and save two key industries hundreds of millions of dollars a year lost from higher prices to U.S. customers and stressed that Britain was the only country to have secured this deal with the United States.
It said the auto industry employed hundreds of thousands of people, while removing the 10% tariff on imports of aero engines and aircraft parts would make companies in the sector, including Rolls Royce, a major global manufacturer of jet engines, more competitive and enable them to keep driving technological advances.
The deal on cars is subject to a 100,000-unit annual quota, roughly equivalent to all vehicles sold to the United States in 2024, which were worth $12.4 billion with an average price of $121,000, according to Office for National Statistics figures.
In return, Britain will axe tariffs of 20% and 19% on imports of U.S. beef and ethanol and hike the tariff-free quota to 13,000 tons and 370 million gallons a year, respectively.
Hailing the so-called Economic Prosperity agreement, which was finalized with U.S. President Donald Trump two weeks ago on the sidelines of the G7 summit in Canada, Prime Minister Keir Starmer said the deal would benefit critical British industries.
"Our historic trade deal with the United States delivers for British businesses and protects U.K. jobs. From today, our world-class automotive and aerospace industries will see tariffs slashed, safeguarding key industries that are vital to our economy," he said.
"We will always act in the national interest -- backing British businesses and workers, delivering on our Plan for Change."
Britain was the first country to negotiate a deal after Trump announced what he said were reciprocal tariffs on the United States' trading partners on April 2, as high as 49%. Britain escaped with a baseline 10% goods tariff, the lowest of any major trade partner.
U.K. steel and aluminum exports to the United States were slapped with a 25% tariff, in line with all other countries, when Trump unveiled the new import duties in March -- which he said were aimed at reviving domestic production -- but received a interim exemption from a doubling to 50% imposed Trump on June 4.
The Business and Trade Department insisted negotiations to permanently remove the entire tariff were on track despite the waiver expiration date fast approaching in just over a week on July 9, saying Starmer and Trumo "again confirmed, we will continue go further and make progress towards 0% tariffs on core steel products as agreed."
Sheffield-based Marecgaglia told the BBC that even the initial 25% was making selling to the United States a "lot tougher," and that the potential hike to 50% would be a "massive headache."
The company's stainless steel products are made in the United States, but the materials such as rods and bars are shipped from the U.K.
"The lead times to get it to the plant are longer than the nine days left for the negotiations. That means I would be shipping something -- and a ship will probably have around $4.1 to $5.5 million of product on it -- and I don't know will I be paying $2.1 million duty on it or zero? said managing director Liam Bates.
"So it gives us an extremely hard decision to make as to how we can continue production in the US," he added.
Copyright 2025 UPI News Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Democratic states sue Trump administration over $6 billion in frozen education funds
Democratic states sue Trump administration over $6 billion in frozen education funds

CBS News

time3 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Democratic states sue Trump administration over $6 billion in frozen education funds

Democratic officials from 24 states and the District of Columbia sued the Trump administration on Monday seeking to restore access to billions of dollars in frozen education funding. The states lost out on funding for after-school and summer programs, teacher training, English language learners and support for the children of migrant farmworkers, among and other initiatives, as part of the June 30 freeze on more than $6 billion that the states say was allocated by Congress. In a complaint in U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island, lawyers for the states said the decision to freeze the funds had caused "chaos." The suit named as defendants Education Secretary Linda McMahon, President Trump and Russell Vought, director of the Office of Management and Budget. "States already have planned for the upcoming academic year — which is set to start in weeks in many areas — in reliance on the billions of dollars that are now frozen," they wrote. "The budgets for many local educational agencies (LEAs) have already been approved and staffing plans have been developed so that LEAs can perform their responsibilities for the impacted programs." California Attorney General Rob Bonta said in a press release that the funding freeze was done "with no rhyme or reason." His office said the freeze is blocking $939 million in funding for California alone. "Taken together with his other attacks on education, President Trump seems comfortable risking the academic success of a generation to further his own misguided political agenda," Bonta said. "But as with so many of his other actions, this funding freeze is blatantly illegal, and we're confident the court will agree." The latest legal fight between Democratic state officials and the federal government comes as Mr. Trump has promised to dismantle the federal Department of Education, an ambition supported by McMahon. A federal judge in Massachusetts blocked an executive order to unwind the department in May. The Education Department did not immediately reply to a request for comment on the lawsuit. The states joining Monday's legal action are Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington and Wisconsin. Many of the states are also parties to litigation filed earlier this year contesting layoffs at the federal agency and the White House's efforts to rollback diversity programming.

Blue states sue Trump administration in bid to undo freeze on billions in public education funds
Blue states sue Trump administration in bid to undo freeze on billions in public education funds

CNN

time4 minutes ago

  • CNN

Blue states sue Trump administration in bid to undo freeze on billions in public education funds

A slew of Democratic-led states asked a federal court on Monday to lift the Trump administration's freeze on nearly $7 billion in public education money, accusing the Department of Education of unlawfully locking up critical funds Congress set aside to help low-income and immigrant students, among others. The new suit represents the latest clash between states and the federal government over the Trump administration's decision to pause or claw back federal aid. In other cases dating back to the opening weeks of President Donald Trump's second term, federal courts have at times sided against the administration's efforts to freeze federal funds, though the administration scored a key win at the Supreme Court in April. In the case at hand, more than 20 Democratic state attorneys general and two Democratic governors are challenging the administration's decision late last month to pause disbursement of education funds for six programs pending a review of how consistent the programs are with Trump's own priorities. Among the targeted initiatives are ones that help immigrant students attain English proficiency, fund after-school and summer programs, and support the hiring and retention of teachers in low-income areas. The administration's withholding of the funds, the states say in the suit, runs afoul of Congress' decision over the years to provide the federal aid and the government's requirement to spend the money. Historically, the money has been made available to states starting around July 1. 'Defendants' actions now jeopardize these critical programs – the loss of which has irreparably harmed and will irreparably harm the Plaintiff States, their schools, and the students and families they serve,' the suit states. The states and attorneys general are asking a federal court in Rhode Island to rule that the funding freeze is unconstitutional and order the administration to stop implementing its plans. CNN has reached out to the Department of Education for comment on the lawsuit.

Why Trump Is Panicking Now, According To Ex-Aide
Why Trump Is Panicking Now, According To Ex-Aide

Buzz Feed

time5 minutes ago

  • Buzz Feed

Why Trump Is Panicking Now, According To Ex-Aide

A former White House insider said President Donald Trump 's lengthy rant on Truth Social urging supporters to forget all about late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein says a lot about his state of mind at the moment. 'He has to be panicking right now,' Sarah Matthews, who served as a press aide during the first Trump administration, said on MSNBC on Sunday. Trump's message on Truth Social was a sign of that panic as the president fired back at supporters who are angry after the Justice Department said last week that a long-rumored list of Epstein clients doesn't exist. 'Let's keep it that way, and not waste Time and Energy on Jeffrey Epstein, somebody that nobody cares about,' Trump wrote. Kypros But Matthews doesn't think that post will help. 'The thing is, is that he campaigned on this,' she said. 'He said that he was going to release the list and now his supporters are asking him to follow up and follow through.' Trump, Vice President JD Vance and many within Trump's orbit made the release of the list a central talking point. Earlier this year, Attorney General Pam Bondi said the list was on her desk for review as part of a 'directive by President Trump.' Pam Bondi in February: The Epstein client list is sitting on my desk right now to review. Pam Bondi today: There is no Epstein client list and no "further disclosure" of Epstein-related material "would be appropriate or warranted." — MeidasTouch (@MeidasTouch) July 7, 2025 Twitter: @MeidasTouch But now, Bondi says there is no list ― and even many hardcore MAGA supporters don't believe it. Former Trump ally Elon Musk said last month the reason Trump won't release the Epstein files is because Trump himself is in them. With the story not going away, Matthews said Trump will likely turn to his favorite tactic: distraction. 'If I had to make a prediction, I think that he is going to try to shift the news cycle this week by either saying something very controversial or doing something controversial,' she said. 'Because he does not want us to be talking about Jeffrey Epstein.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store