Is the national dialogue a futile exercise?
What do you think President Cyril Ramaphosa and colleagues mean when they talk about 'our people'? Do you feel included? Many don't.
There is reason for scepticism over Ramaphosa's plans for an inclusive national dialogue. His approach throughout his presidency has not been inclusive.
'Our people' usually means ANC.
Inclusivity is not evident in the list of 'eminent persons' whom he has named to guide 'a people-led, society-wide process to reflect on the state of our country in order for us to reimagine our future'.
People-led? Yet he chooses the leaders of the process. One example is Roelf Meyer, Ramaphosa's supposed adversary in the Codesa talks which preceded this country's first democratic elections.
Meyer may have taught Ramaphosa fly-fishing, but the National Party minister fell hook, line and sinker for ANC tricks.
ALSO READ: 'Bring all to dialogue': Experts insist national dialogue must be people-driven
His capitulation was so complete that the ANC in Soweto nominated Comrade Roelf for its parliamentary list in 1994.
Meyer declined but in 2004, he voted ANC and joined that party in 2006.
Ja, nee. By choosing Meyer, Ramaphosa will have alienated quite a few Afrikaners who won't feel included.
Why do we need a government-orchestrated national dialogue?
The nation is continually in dialogue.
We have regular elections and opinions are continually freely expressed across multiple platforms. Public participation is mandatory in many issues at all levels of government, even if this is often a tick-box exercise.
ALSO READ: Codesa 2 has many agendas to fill
South Africa is oversupplied with talk shops whose practical outcomes are negligible. We don't need more of that. And we can't afford it.
With economic growth at a low 0.8% in 2024 and unemployment now officially at 32.9%, it is reckless to splurge at least R700 million on this nebulous exercise.
After contestation over the national budget, you'd think Ramaphosa would be more circumspect about wasting money.
Big spenders of other people's money have no qualms about stretching price tags.
Starting at R700 million, the proposed national dialogue could easily end up costing more than the R1 billion spent on the Zondo inquiry into state capture. And what did we get for that? Zero significant prosecutions. In practical terms, this dialogue will yield even less.
This national dialogue is an attempt to shore up the ANC's political fortunes and boost Ramaphosa's legacy. If, as expected, the process takes about a year, it will segue into the local government elections.
ALSO READ: Thandiswa Mazwai says she would've accepted invite to national dialogue had Ramaphosa sent it
Ramaphosa's personally selected 'eminent persons' will have ample opportunity to sway opinions without appearing to be on the campaign trail. From this perspective, cashstrapped taxpayers could be funding the ANC's next local government election campaign.
Genuine dialogue requires a two-way exchange of ideas. Yet Ramaphosa and the ANC are implacably wedded to broad-based black economic empowerment (B-BBEE) in all its forms.
He recently defended it against arguments that B-BBEE stifles economic growth. A national dialogue would be beneficial if the ANC was able to listen, and to change course on B-BBEE.
A monologue or dialogue of the deaf won't help.
The aims of the national dialogue are to increase inclusivity, boost economic growth and create employment opportunities. The best way to do that is to scrap B-BBEE laws that are, by definition, exclusive.
Reimagine a future without race laws. Now you're talking.
NOW READ: Ramaphosa announces 'Eminent Persons Group' to guide national dialogue – These are the people appointed
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Call for Msunduzi councillor to be suspended following gun incident in council chamber
The Msunduzi Municipality Image: Doctor Ngcobo Independent Newspapers A call has been made for an ANC councillor in the Msunduzi Municipality to be suspended after he allegedly walked into the council chamber during a meeting with a gun. The incident occurred at the City Hall last Wednesday. The DA and the EFF said there is a pressing need to evaluate and overhaul the security at City Hall. While the African Christian Democratic Party (ACDP) councillor described the act as criminal in terms of council procedures and shocking. The City Hall building houses, among other key offices, the chamber, the mayor's office and the municipal manager's office, and it used to accommodate the offices of some members of the executive committee. DA councillor Garth Middleton said the party was demanding the immediate suspension of the councillor in question and the urgent institution of disciplinary processes that must lead to his removal. 'During a full sitting of the Msunduzi Municipal Council, a deeply disturbing and dangerous incident unfolded before councillors, senior officials, and notably, the Speaker of Council herself. 'An ANC ward councillor was seen to be armed with a firearm inside the council chambers — a space designated for constructive governance, not intimidation or acts that border on militarisation.' 'This conduct is a flagrant violation of the Councillors' Code of Conduct, particularly Chapter 11.41.4, which expressly prohibits the carrying of weapons within council premises. When the matter was raised, as the ANC councillor exited the chamber, the Speaker merely remarked, 'It's been dealt with,' providing no clarity or assurance to the council or the public,' Middleton continued. He stated that this response was grossly inadequate and suggested a dangerous pattern of impunity. 'Council chambers are spaces for robust debate, often marked by passionate disagreements. Introducing weapons into this environment puts every councillor, staff member, and official at direct risk. Are we now to fear for our lives while serving our residents?' He added that this incident was even more serious, as people from the councillor's ward had been protesting outside the council meeting. ACDP's Rienus Niemand stated that they found the act to be intimidating. He said he was also taken aback by the attempt to suppress any action to deal with the matter. 'The Rules of Order are promulgated law and clearly prohibit such actions. The ACDP insisted that the matter be addressed by the relevant authorities. It is particularly concerning that while the councillor was violating the law in the council chamber, there was a protest meeting outside the chamber held by members of the same councillor's ward,' he stated. Niemand added that the ACDP condemns intimidation and illegal actions by elected office bearers and will ensure that the ANC and its misbehaving members are brought to book. EFF councillor Chuma Wakeni said they have called for an investigation into the matter. 'We want to know how it is possible for the councillor to go from the parking lot all the way to the council chamber with a gun. We want an investigation conducted into the security because the council chamber is a gun-free zone.' He added that what was also troubling was the reason the councillor had a gun: 'There was a protest against him, and he was being heckled by community members, so (apparently) he was carrying a gun to protect himself against the people he represents. We had to call on the Speaker to ensure that the councillor does not harm the residents.' The municipality had not responded to a request for comment by the time of publication. THE MERCURY
The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
Mbalula accused of taking sides in Buffalo City leadership revolt
ANC Secretary General Fikile Mbalula is accused of defending Buffalo City metro mayor Princess Faku as councillors question her leadership. The ANC is to intervene in the strife-torn Buffalo City metro as political infighting among ANC councillors intensifies. Some party members are gunning for mayor Princess Faku and council speaker Humphrey Maxegwana. ANC secretary-general Fikile Mbalula said the infighting was spreading and becoming uncontrollable. He criticised those he said were disrupting council meetings and putting the party into disrepute, and threatened an intervention to fix the problem among ANC members in the metro. Factional divisions The councillors accused Faku of dividing them into two camps, with one supporting her. They accused Mbalula of failing to resolve the problem, although he had been alerted to the situation, claiming instead he sided with the Faku faction. Mbalula said the matter was on the national executive committee agenda for a decision about what should be done. Buffalo City, which used to thrive, previously receiving clean audits from the auditor-general and won several national Vuna awards for good governance under the late former mayor Sindisile Maclean, his former deputy Desmond Halley and then city manager Mxolisi Tsika. But the metro has since badly deteriorated into a centre of corruption and political infighting and has received only adverse and disclaimer reports from the AG for several years. Services have collapsed in the major urban centres of East London and Qonce, with massive potholes in the main Oxford and Buffalo streets, while most roads in the rural villages have dongas and are unusable by vehicles. Mbalula 'defending' Faku An ANC member opposed to Faku accused Mbalula of making 'uninformed' and 'reckless factional and dangerously premature' public comments. 'Instead of calling for facts, reports or accountability, the secretary-general has chosen a side. 'Not the side of the truth, nor the ANC constitution, nor even the suffering residents of Buffalo City, but the side of Faku, the mayor, and the faction that is bleeding the metro to death. 'Mbalula is defending the mayor, not because she is innocent, but because she is politically connected,' the member said anonymously. He said of the 61 ANC councillor in the city, 45 had rebelled against Faku, but he said Mbalula had allegedly tried to criminalise and discipline them, although he wanted accountability. 'He is protecting the wrongdoers, not the ANC,' the member said. Faku has did not respond to queries sent to her via WhatsApp. NOW READ: Churches reject Omotoso's Buffalo City crusade plans
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
ANC NEC meeting has no plans to stop US tariffs, say analysts
On the sidelines of Day 3 of the ordinary ANC NEC sitting at the Germiston Civic Centre in Ekurhuleni, Gauteng. Image: ANC THE ANC is unlikely to resolve its differences with the US in time to avert the impending 30% tariff on South African exports. This is according to some political analysts as the party held its National Executive Committee (NEC) meeting in Johannesburg at the weekend. The tariff is expected to take effect on August 7, as announced by the Trump administration on Thursday. South Africa is the only country from sub-Saharan Africa singled out in the announcement, reflecting the US's strained relationship with Pretoria. Other African nations, including Lesotho and Zimbabwe, have been hit with a 15% tariff, which will also come into effect in seven days. The decision is a huge blow to South Africa, as the US is its second-biggest trading partner and comes despite trying to agree a trade deal, which included buying US liquefied natural gas, simplifying rules for poultry imports and investing in US industries like mining. On Saturday, ANC NEC member Dr Kgosientsho Ramokgopa told journalists that there had been a focused discussion on the US tariffs, describing it as 'spirited and robust'. Ramokgopa said the negotiations between South Africa and the US were ongoing, adding that both countries would be able to find each other. However, political analyst Zakhele Ndlovu said although the NEC was expected to talk about the issue, there is not much that the ANC can do. He said Trump was not happy with many things including domestic and foreign policies. 'The ANC needs to figure out how to deal with generally hostile Republican administrations, and the Trump administration, in particular. Trump's beef with the ANC centres around domestic and foreign policies. On the domestic front, Trump is unhappy with the Expropriation bill, BEE and Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI). "On foreign policy, Trump is bitter about the decision to take Israel to the ICJ (International Court of Justice),'' Ndlovu said, adding that the time has come for the ANC to stop confusing its interests as the country's interests. 'I don't see the ANC coming up with any solution here. It is caught between a rock and a hard place,'' he said. Ramaphosa held talks with Trump in May in a bid to mend relations but this failed to make any headway. In July, the US House Foreign Affairs Committee passed a bill to review the US-South Africa relations due to objections over its foreign policy and potentially imposing sanctions on senior ANC leaders. The bill accuses the ANC of undermining US interests by maintaining close relationships with Russia and China, which are among its allies and trading partners. It also accuses South Africa of backing Palestinian militant group Hamas in its conflict in Gaza with Israel- an accusation South Africa has denied. Last week, Trump indicated he did not plan to attend the G20 summit taking place later this year in Johannesburg. Another political analyst, Ntsikelelo Breakfast, said the ANC is wasting time discussing the tariff imposed by the US, adding that there is nothing the party can do to avoid the situation. 'There is no way out here. The European Union (EU) signed for 15% this week, and who are we if the EU can give in. I thought we were able to convince Trump and his administration after the meeting in May but clearly Trump did not buy it and now there is legislation to sanction ANC leaders,' said Breakfast, adding that this means Trump has taken a hard stance towards South Africa and the ANC. Breakfast said that Trump's threat to skip the G20 summit also cemented his position about South Africa, saying 'this is a smack in the face'.
