Ask Fuzzy: Who was Sister Elizabeth Kenny?
In June 1916, New York officially declared a polio epidemic and, in doing so, instigated a practice that we might find unacceptable today. Newspapers published the names and addresses of sufferers, placards were nailed to doors, and families quarantined.
Australians too, were affected. Polio became a notifiable disease in Tasmania and other states by 1922. Despite these measures, polio incidents continued to rise until 1938, when in Australia the number of cases peaked at 39 per 100,000.
Polio, sometimes called infantile paralysis, is a devastating disease that causes muscle fatigue and spasms in the limbs, often accompanied by severe pain.
When Elizabeth Kenny first encountered the disease, the accepted practice was to immobilise the patient.
With splints and plaster body casts to prevent muscle tightening, many paralysed patients lay for months at a time.
Unfortunately this would often atrophy both affected and healthy muscles.
The Australian Elizabeth Kenny (1880 -1952) became something of a maverick by developing what was then considered a radical treatment.
In 1913 Kenny opened a small hospital in Queensland, where her method was reportedly used with success.
To ease pain, she lay strips of hot moist cloth over the person's affected areas. And rather than immobilising her patients, she had them do exercises such as bending and flexing joints.
Several times a day, they'd move them through a limited range of motion.
In doing so, she went directly against the orthodoxy, but her methods are now thought to be a forerunner of modern physiotherapy.
However Elizabeth Kenny remains a tricky subject. In some ways, she resembles today's self-appointed heroes who reveal their groundbreaking treatment that busts open the orthodoxy. Kenny appears to have been a skilled self-promoter. She became famous in the United States and her story even featured in a 1946 Hollywood movie.
But some saw her as a tireless propagandist who manipulated, or even falsified, her results.
She claimed to have achieved an astounding 80 per cent recovery rate, but this was based on observation and intuition rather than any scientific study.
MORE ASK FUZZY:
Her approach was based on a fundamental misconception that the problem was a muscular one that could be corrected through "muscle re-education".
As some researchers thought at the time and has subsequently been proven, polio paralysis is actually a neurological condition.
As someone with direct experience of RSI (Repetitive Strain Injury) and Frozen Shoulder (adhesive capsulitis), I cannot imagine a worse treatment than to stop a person exercising.
Treatment today is more nuanced. As with the Kenny method, it includes hot moist packs and physical therapy. However, institutions such as the Mayo Clinic also include appropriate bed rest and even "splints or other devices to encourage good position of the spine and limbs".
The Fuzzy Logic Science Show is at 11am Sundays on 2xx 98.3FM.
Send your questions to AskFuzzy@Zoho.com; Podcast: FuzzyLogicOn2xx.Podbean.com
In June 1916, New York officially declared a polio epidemic and, in doing so, instigated a practice that we might find unacceptable today. Newspapers published the names and addresses of sufferers, placards were nailed to doors, and families quarantined.
Australians too, were affected. Polio became a notifiable disease in Tasmania and other states by 1922. Despite these measures, polio incidents continued to rise until 1938, when in Australia the number of cases peaked at 39 per 100,000.
Polio, sometimes called infantile paralysis, is a devastating disease that causes muscle fatigue and spasms in the limbs, often accompanied by severe pain.
When Elizabeth Kenny first encountered the disease, the accepted practice was to immobilise the patient.
With splints and plaster body casts to prevent muscle tightening, many paralysed patients lay for months at a time.
Unfortunately this would often atrophy both affected and healthy muscles.
The Australian Elizabeth Kenny (1880 -1952) became something of a maverick by developing what was then considered a radical treatment.
In 1913 Kenny opened a small hospital in Queensland, where her method was reportedly used with success.
To ease pain, she lay strips of hot moist cloth over the person's affected areas. And rather than immobilising her patients, she had them do exercises such as bending and flexing joints.
Several times a day, they'd move them through a limited range of motion.
In doing so, she went directly against the orthodoxy, but her methods are now thought to be a forerunner of modern physiotherapy.
However Elizabeth Kenny remains a tricky subject. In some ways, she resembles today's self-appointed heroes who reveal their groundbreaking treatment that busts open the orthodoxy. Kenny appears to have been a skilled self-promoter. She became famous in the United States and her story even featured in a 1946 Hollywood movie.
But some saw her as a tireless propagandist who manipulated, or even falsified, her results.
She claimed to have achieved an astounding 80 per cent recovery rate, but this was based on observation and intuition rather than any scientific study.
MORE ASK FUZZY:
Her approach was based on a fundamental misconception that the problem was a muscular one that could be corrected through "muscle re-education".
As some researchers thought at the time and has subsequently been proven, polio paralysis is actually a neurological condition.
As someone with direct experience of RSI (Repetitive Strain Injury) and Frozen Shoulder (adhesive capsulitis), I cannot imagine a worse treatment than to stop a person exercising.
Treatment today is more nuanced. As with the Kenny method, it includes hot moist packs and physical therapy. However, institutions such as the Mayo Clinic also include appropriate bed rest and even "splints or other devices to encourage good position of the spine and limbs".
The Fuzzy Logic Science Show is at 11am Sundays on 2xx 98.3FM.
Send your questions to AskFuzzy@Zoho.com; Podcast: FuzzyLogicOn2xx.Podbean.com
In June 1916, New York officially declared a polio epidemic and, in doing so, instigated a practice that we might find unacceptable today. Newspapers published the names and addresses of sufferers, placards were nailed to doors, and families quarantined.
Australians too, were affected. Polio became a notifiable disease in Tasmania and other states by 1922. Despite these measures, polio incidents continued to rise until 1938, when in Australia the number of cases peaked at 39 per 100,000.
Polio, sometimes called infantile paralysis, is a devastating disease that causes muscle fatigue and spasms in the limbs, often accompanied by severe pain.
When Elizabeth Kenny first encountered the disease, the accepted practice was to immobilise the patient.
With splints and plaster body casts to prevent muscle tightening, many paralysed patients lay for months at a time.
Unfortunately this would often atrophy both affected and healthy muscles.
The Australian Elizabeth Kenny (1880 -1952) became something of a maverick by developing what was then considered a radical treatment.
In 1913 Kenny opened a small hospital in Queensland, where her method was reportedly used with success.
To ease pain, she lay strips of hot moist cloth over the person's affected areas. And rather than immobilising her patients, she had them do exercises such as bending and flexing joints.
Several times a day, they'd move them through a limited range of motion.
In doing so, she went directly against the orthodoxy, but her methods are now thought to be a forerunner of modern physiotherapy.
However Elizabeth Kenny remains a tricky subject. In some ways, she resembles today's self-appointed heroes who reveal their groundbreaking treatment that busts open the orthodoxy. Kenny appears to have been a skilled self-promoter. She became famous in the United States and her story even featured in a 1946 Hollywood movie.
But some saw her as a tireless propagandist who manipulated, or even falsified, her results.
She claimed to have achieved an astounding 80 per cent recovery rate, but this was based on observation and intuition rather than any scientific study.
MORE ASK FUZZY:
Her approach was based on a fundamental misconception that the problem was a muscular one that could be corrected through "muscle re-education".
As some researchers thought at the time and has subsequently been proven, polio paralysis is actually a neurological condition.
As someone with direct experience of RSI (Repetitive Strain Injury) and Frozen Shoulder (adhesive capsulitis), I cannot imagine a worse treatment than to stop a person exercising.
Treatment today is more nuanced. As with the Kenny method, it includes hot moist packs and physical therapy. However, institutions such as the Mayo Clinic also include appropriate bed rest and even "splints or other devices to encourage good position of the spine and limbs".
The Fuzzy Logic Science Show is at 11am Sundays on 2xx 98.3FM.
Send your questions to AskFuzzy@Zoho.com; Podcast: FuzzyLogicOn2xx.Podbean.com
In June 1916, New York officially declared a polio epidemic and, in doing so, instigated a practice that we might find unacceptable today. Newspapers published the names and addresses of sufferers, placards were nailed to doors, and families quarantined.
Australians too, were affected. Polio became a notifiable disease in Tasmania and other states by 1922. Despite these measures, polio incidents continued to rise until 1938, when in Australia the number of cases peaked at 39 per 100,000.
Polio, sometimes called infantile paralysis, is a devastating disease that causes muscle fatigue and spasms in the limbs, often accompanied by severe pain.
When Elizabeth Kenny first encountered the disease, the accepted practice was to immobilise the patient.
With splints and plaster body casts to prevent muscle tightening, many paralysed patients lay for months at a time.
Unfortunately this would often atrophy both affected and healthy muscles.
The Australian Elizabeth Kenny (1880 -1952) became something of a maverick by developing what was then considered a radical treatment.
In 1913 Kenny opened a small hospital in Queensland, where her method was reportedly used with success.
To ease pain, she lay strips of hot moist cloth over the person's affected areas. And rather than immobilising her patients, she had them do exercises such as bending and flexing joints.
Several times a day, they'd move them through a limited range of motion.
In doing so, she went directly against the orthodoxy, but her methods are now thought to be a forerunner of modern physiotherapy.
However Elizabeth Kenny remains a tricky subject. In some ways, she resembles today's self-appointed heroes who reveal their groundbreaking treatment that busts open the orthodoxy. Kenny appears to have been a skilled self-promoter. She became famous in the United States and her story even featured in a 1946 Hollywood movie.
But some saw her as a tireless propagandist who manipulated, or even falsified, her results.
She claimed to have achieved an astounding 80 per cent recovery rate, but this was based on observation and intuition rather than any scientific study.
MORE ASK FUZZY:
Her approach was based on a fundamental misconception that the problem was a muscular one that could be corrected through "muscle re-education".
As some researchers thought at the time and has subsequently been proven, polio paralysis is actually a neurological condition.
As someone with direct experience of RSI (Repetitive Strain Injury) and Frozen Shoulder (adhesive capsulitis), I cannot imagine a worse treatment than to stop a person exercising.
Treatment today is more nuanced. As with the Kenny method, it includes hot moist packs and physical therapy. However, institutions such as the Mayo Clinic also include appropriate bed rest and even "splints or other devices to encourage good position of the spine and limbs".
The Fuzzy Logic Science Show is at 11am Sundays on 2xx 98.3FM.
Send your questions to AskFuzzy@Zoho.com; Podcast: FuzzyLogicOn2xx.Podbean.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
43 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Protein: Behind the supplement we can't get enough of
Although protein is important for overall health, much of its popularity stems from the macronutrient's association with two things: building muscle and weight management. Protein is key to maintaining muscle and supporting bone growth. Credit: Getty 'Dietary protein is involved in appetite regulation. It helps us feel fuller for longer,' says Associate Professor Nick Fuller, from the University of Sydney. However, while it can play a role in curbing hunger, Fuller says that increasing your protein intake over the recommended daily intake (RDI) is not always the answer; in fact, it can have the opposite effect. Loading 'The body can't store protein, so once its needs are met, protein will be used for energy or stored as fat,' he says. When it comes to muscle mass, again, protein is only one piece of the puzzle. 'Eating protein is the queen, exercise is the king, together they make the kingdom,' says Evangeline Mantzioris, program director of the nutrition and food sciences degree at the University of South Australia. 'In other words, you won't get muscle mass just by eating protein or eating lots of it, you need to do resistance training as well.' How much protein we need from our diet varies throughout the lifespan. Some individuals, such as children and teenagers experiencing growth spurts, have higher protein needs. Additionally, peri- and post-menopausal women and older adults require more protein to prevent muscle loss. However, the recommended daily intake for adults ranges from 0.75 for women to 0.84g/kg for men of body weight, which is around 46-64 grams of protein each day. Most of us get sufficient protein from our diets without the need for supplementary products like powders. Credit: iStock That's equivalent to about 180 grams of cooked chicken per day, for an average healthy adult, including those looking to manage their weight or build lean muscle. While many people are focused on adding protein to their diet by consuming commercial products, '99 per cent of healthy Australians are actually meeting their protein needs without them', says Mantzioris. 'Even if people think they aren't getting a healthy amount of protein, they probably are through their main meals,' she says. Do we really need commercially processed protein-supplemented foods and beverages? According to the experts, the simple answer is no. 'Protein has become this cult-like fixation,' Fuller says. 'One minute it's no carbs, then no sugar, keto and now it's high protein, it's just another dieting fad that we don't need.' Another issue with consuming highly processed protein-rich products is that, aside from protein, they don't offer any other dietary benefits or include ingredients that aren't good for us. Loading 'In some cases, 'high protein' products, such as bars and cereals, are marketed in a way to make them appear healthy, when in fact they may contain high quantities of sugar, sodium, or saturated fat, and would be classified as a 'discretionary' food,' Rebuli says. 'Look past the marketing on the package and check the nutrition information panel and ingredient list, or look for the health star rating.' But perhaps worst of all, is that the extra protein is often 'taking up the serving of another food type, which contains nutrients and vitamins that you do need, which can mean some people aren't getting their recommended serving of those,' adds Mantzioris. It's all about balance and going back to basics. 'We did not evolve on supplements, we evolved on whole foods like dairy, meat and fish,' says Mantzioris. Other foods naturally high in protein include eggs and plant foods like legumes, beans, nuts, seeds, and soy products. 'These remain the best source of protein for most people', she says. Make the most of your health, relationships, fitness and nutrition with our Live Well newsletter. Get it in your inbox every Monday.
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
Do you want protein with that? Behind the supplement we can't get enough of
Why are we so protein-obsessed? Although protein is important for overall health, much of its popularity stems from the macronutrient's association with two things: building muscle and weight management. 'Dietary protein is involved in appetite regulation. It helps us feel fuller for longer,' says Associate Professor Nick Fuller, from the University of Sydney. However, while it can play a role in curbing hunger, Fuller says that increasing your protein intake over the recommended daily intake (RDI) is not always the answer; in fact, it can have the opposite effect. Loading 'The body can't store protein, so once its needs are met, protein will be used for energy or stored as fat,' he says. When it comes to muscle mass, again, protein is only one piece of the puzzle. 'Eating protein is the queen, exercise is the king, together they make the kingdom,' says Evangeline Mantzioris, program director of the nutrition and food sciences degree at the University of South Australia. 'In other words, you won't get muscle mass just by eating protein or eating lots of it, you need to do resistance training as well.' How much protein do we actually need? How much protein we need from our diet varies throughout the lifespan. Some individuals, such as children and teenagers experiencing growth spurts, have higher protein needs. Additionally, peri- and post-menopausal women and older adults require more protein to prevent muscle loss. However, the recommended daily intake for adults ranges from 0.75 for women to 0.84g/kg for men of body weight, which is around 46-64 grams of protein each day. That's equivalent to about 180 grams of cooked chicken per day, for an average healthy adult, including those looking to manage their weight or build lean muscle. While many people are focused on adding protein to their diet by consuming commercial products, '99 per cent of healthy Australians are actually meeting their protein needs without them', says Mantzioris. 'Even if people think they aren't getting a healthy amount of protein, they probably are through their main meals,' she says. Do we really need commercially processed protein-supplemented foods and beverages? According to the experts, the simple answer is no. 'Protein has become this cult-like fixation,' Fuller says. 'One minute it's no carbs, then no sugar, keto and now it's high protein, it's just another dieting fad that we don't need.' Another issue with consuming highly processed protein-rich products is that, aside from protein, they don't offer any other dietary benefits or include ingredients that aren't good for us. Loading 'In some cases, 'high protein' products, such as bars and cereals, are marketed in a way to make them appear healthy, when in fact they may contain high quantities of sugar, sodium, or saturated fat, and would be classified as a 'discretionary' food,' Rebuli says. 'Look past the marketing on the package and check the nutrition information panel and ingredient list, or look for the health star rating.' But perhaps worst of all, is that the extra protein is often 'taking up the serving of another food type, which contains nutrients and vitamins that you do need, which can mean some people aren't getting their recommended serving of those,' adds Mantzioris.
Sydney Morning Herald
9 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
‘One-size-fits-all approach doesn't work': Plan to save the NDIS billions
Billions of dollars in disability payments could be funnelled to struggling children through daycare programs under a plan to ease the financial strain of the nation's insurance scheme while ushering in a new era of early intervention. Taxpayers would save $12.1 billion over the next decade if 10 per cent of National Disability Insurance Scheme payments were set aside for people not currently on the scheme – including children needing temporary support – and the current model of individual support plans was reserved for Australians with life-long disabilities, a report says. It can take years of waiting and one-on-one specialist appointments to gain support under current NDIS procedures. Removing some of that red tape and allowing children with autism and developmental difficulties – and their parents – to receive support directly at childcare and primary schools would be more effective and cheaper, according to the Grattan Institute report. This new era of the disability scheme, known as 'foundational supports', could be funded using the existing NDIS envelope, the think tank's report says, and should be brought in over the next five years if the new-look system is to pile the least amount of pressure on federal and state budgets. Governments could save an additional $34 billion over 10 years by not needing to find extra money for the new disability system. Foundational supports were meant to roll out on Tuesday under the original deadline set by previous NDIS minister Bill Shorten. However, that start date has been pushed back to at least December as the states and federal government negotiate details. Grattan Institute disability program director Samuel Bennett said the NDIS had transformed the lives of tens of thousands of people but had grown 'too big, too fast'. 'Something needs to be done,' Bennett said. 'Time has shown a one-size-fits-all approach doesn't work. What children and families really need is evidence-based early intervention – preferably available where the child already lives, learns and plays – rather than navigating this bureaucratic nightmare that is today's NDIS.'
