logo
Bluetooth pairing sucks on most Google TV devices, but Google wants to change that

Bluetooth pairing sucks on most Google TV devices, but Google wants to change that

Damien Wilde / Android Authority
TL;DR Google's Fast Pair, meant to simplify Bluetooth pairing, is still not widely available on Google TV devices a year after its initial rollout.
Despite a prior announcement suggesting a broad release, the feature is currently only supported on four devices, including the Chromecast models.
Device makers must choose to enable Fast Pair on their TVs, and Google says it's working with partners to bring the feature to more devices.
Pairing a new Bluetooth accessory with your phone can feel slow and clunky, but imagine doing it on a TV using just a remote. You have to put your Bluetooth device in pairing mode, open your TV's settings menu, navigate to the Bluetooth page, scan for nearby devices, select your accessory, and finally confirm the pairing request. To make this process less of a hassle, Google brought its Fast Pair service to TVs in 2024. Unfortunately, a year later, Fast Pair is still not widely available on Google TV devices, leaving most users stuck with the old tedious pairing process.
Fast Pair simplifies the process of connecting Bluetooth devices like speakers, earbuds, headphones, and controllers to your phone, tablet, or laptop. When a Fast Pair-enabled accessory enters pairing mode, a pop-up appears on nearby compatible devices. This pop-up lets you connect the accessory with a single tap, saving you from having to dig through Bluetooth settings.
Google first introduced Fast Pair for Android phones and tablets back in 2017. In January 2022, the company announced plans to expand the feature to Chromebooks in the 'coming weeks' and to Google TV and Android TV OS devices in the 'coming months.'
However, these timelines proved to be optimistic. Fast Pair didn't actually begin rolling out to Chrome OS until March 2023, over a year later. The wait for Google TV was even longer, with the feature finally making its first appearance in February 2024 — a full two years after the initial announcement.
To add to the confusion, the official 'Made by Google' account posted on X in March 2024 that Fast Pair was rolling out to all Google TV devices running Android 12 or newer. As we later discovered, however, this wasn't actually the case.
A few weeks ago, I spotted a feature flag named com.google.android.feature.FAST_PAIRING — a flag I believed is exclusive to devices with Fast Pair support. When I searched the Google Play Console for devices declaring this feature, only four appeared: the two Chromecast with Google TV models (HD and 4K), the Google TV Streamer, and the Onn 4K Plus.
Mishaal Rahman / Android Authority
Given Google's prior statement, I was puzzled by the fact that only four devices were listed, so to confirm my findings, I reached out to Google. A company spokesperson verified this list is accurate, adding that any OEM can choose to enable Fast Pair and that Google is actively working with partners to bring the feature to more devices.
It's unclear why OEMs must specifically add support for Fast Pair on Google TV, especially since it's part of Google Play Services and was rolled out widely on mobile and Chrome OS without needing device-specific support. Perhaps it has something to do with the quirky nature of the Bluetooth protocol. Whatever the case, it's encouraging that Google is working to expand this capability.
Got a tip? Talk to us! Email our staff at
Email our staff at news@androidauthority.com . You can stay anonymous or get credit for the info, it's your choice.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

C3 AI (AI) Loses 10.8% as CEO Steps Down
C3 AI (AI) Loses 10.8% as CEO Steps Down

Yahoo

time4 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

C3 AI (AI) Loses 10.8% as CEO Steps Down

We recently published . Inc. (NYSE:AI) is one of the worst-performing stocks on Thursday. C3 AI snapped a two-day rally on Thursday, losing 10.84 percent to close at $26 apiece as investors repositioned portfolios following its chief executive's announcement that he was stepping down from his post. In a statement, Inc. (NYSE:AI) said that CEO Thomas Siebel has tendered his resignation due to health reasons, effective upon a successor assuming his post. 'After being diagnosed with an autoimmune disease in early 2025, I have experienced significant visual impairment,' he said. 'For C3 AI to reach its full potential—which I believe is spectacular—the board and I have initiated a search for a new CEO who can take the company to the next level of growth and success. I will remain fully engaged as Chief Executive Officer of until such time as the board appoints my successor, after which I will continue in the role of Executive Chairman, focusing on strategy, product innovation, strategic partner and customer relationships,' he noted. Meanwhile, an analyst from Wedbush said that the chief's resignation presented an opportunity for other firms to acquire Inc. (NYSE:AI). Wedbush gave Inc. (NYSE:AI) an 'outperform' rating and a price target of $35 apiece. While we acknowledge the potential of AI as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the .

TechnipFMC (FTI) Extends Winning Streak on Impressive Earnings, Growth Outlook
TechnipFMC (FTI) Extends Winning Streak on Impressive Earnings, Growth Outlook

Yahoo

time4 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

TechnipFMC (FTI) Extends Winning Streak on Impressive Earnings, Growth Outlook

We recently published . TechnipFMC plc (NYSE:FTI) is one of the best-performing stocks on Thursday. TechnipFMC extended its winning streak to a third consecutive day on Thursday, jumping 11.76 percent to close at $37.54 apiece as investors cheered its impressive earnings performance and growth outlook for the rest of the year. In a statement, TechnipFMC plc (NYSE:FTI) said it was able to grow its net income by 44.5 percent to $269.5 million in the second quarter of the year from $186.5 million in the same period last year. Revenues also rose by 9 percent to $2.5 billion from $2.3 billion year-on-year. Commenting on the performance, TechnipFMC plc (NYSE:FTI) Chairman and CEO Doug Pferdehirt underscored the company's $2.6 billion of Subsea inbound in the quarter, representing a diverse set of awards. Source:unsplash 'The uniqueness and diversity of our order book give us continued confidence that we will reach our three-year goal of $30 billion of Subsea inbound by the end of this year,' he noted. While we acknowledge the potential of FTI as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the . Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

What Does It Cost To Charge a Tesla Monthly Compared To Gas for a BMW 3 Series?
What Does It Cost To Charge a Tesla Monthly Compared To Gas for a BMW 3 Series?

Yahoo

time4 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

What Does It Cost To Charge a Tesla Monthly Compared To Gas for a BMW 3 Series?

Electric vehicles promise a lot, including lower emissions, less maintenance and high-end tech. But for everyday drivers, the real question is simpler: How much does it actually cost to run one? Not the sticker price or tax incentives. The monthly cost to keep it moving. Consider the Tesla Model 3 and the gas-powered BMW 3 Series, two well-known sedans with similar performance. One charges up, the other fills up. And when you break down the costs, the gap between them gets surprisingly wide. Check Out: Read Next: Charging a Tesla The Tesla Model 3 rear-wheel drive (RWD) has an EPA-estimated range of 272 miles and a usable battery capacity of 57.5 kilowatt hours (kWh), according to Green Cars Compare. This translates to an efficiency of about 4.61 miles per kWh under ideal conditions. Assuming an average monthly driving distance of 1,200 miles, the Tesla would use roughly 260 kWh of electricity each month. At the current U.S. average residential electricity rate of 17.45 cents per kWh, according to Choose Energy, monthly charging costs come to about $45.37. Using Tesla Superchargers or other public fast chargers, which typically cost between 40 and 60 cents per kWh, will raise the monthly cost accordingly if relied upon frequently. Discover More: How Long Does Charging Take? Charging time depends on how and where it's done, according to the Department of Transportation. Level 1 (120V outlet): Two to five miles of range per hour. A full charge could take 40 to 50 hours — only useful for very light driving. Level 2 (240V home charger): 10 to 20 miles per hour. Fully recharges in about 4 to 10 hours. Tesla Supercharger: A charge to 80% typically takes 20 minutes to an hour, and adds 180 to 240 miles. Fuel Cost for a BMW 3 Series A 2025 BMW 330i averages around 31 miles per gallon combined, according to Edmunds. Driving 1,200 miles per month means buying about 38.7 gallons of gas. At $3.16 per gallon, the national average as of July 2025, that works out to $122.41 per month. Charging a Tesla Model 3 RWD at home costs about $45 per month, while fueling a BMW 3 Series averages around $122 per month. That's $77 in monthly savings, or $924 annually, just on energy expenses if you choose the Tesla over the BMW. Cost Per Mile Tesla: Uses about 0.22 kWh per mile, with a cost of $0.1745 per kWh. This comes out to roughly 3.8 cents per mile. BMW 3 Series: With gas prices around $3.16 per gallon and an average fuel economy of 31 miles per gallon, the cost comes to about 10 cents per mile. Other Cost Considerations Electric vehicles like the Tesla avoid many routine maintenance expenses common to gas cars, such as no oil changes, no spark plugs and no emissions tests. Regenerative braking also extends brake life, reducing replacement frequency. BMW owners typically face higher maintenance and repair costs, especially as the vehicle ages, along with fluctuating fuel prices that can spike unexpectedly. In contrast, electricity prices tend to be more stable and predictable. More From GOBankingRates How Much Money Is Needed To Be Considered Middle Class in Your State? This article originally appeared on What Does It Cost To Charge a Tesla Monthly Compared To Gas for a BMW 3 Series? Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store