'Glasgow is the only true metropolis north of Manchester'
In short, making Metropolitan Glasgow more real.
The transformational impact of the City Deal is there for all to see - from the new bridges spanning the Clyde and M8, the Barclays Campus, the reborn Sighthill, or the ongoing Avenues project.
And the mature partnerships across the eight councils, businesses, academia, and civil society that have helped deliver that change are also forging an entirely new economy, one with science and technology at its core and which has restored Glasgow's international reputation for ingenuity and innovation.
What's been achieved across the city region in a short space of time, and throughout some difficult years, has been remarkable.
Our track record for delivery has now been recognised by successive UK governments.
Our inclusion alongside Greater Manchester and the West Midlands in new approaches to boost growth, such as the £100 million Innovation Accelerator programme and strategic partnerships with the UK Wealth Fund, is testament to our position as one of the most productive city regions in these islands.
But right now, we've reached a fork in the road.
The route we go on can either take us to the next level, with massive benefits for communities and residents.
Or it could see us start to fall behind our peers south of the border.
City Regions like Greater Manchester and the West Midlands are our counterparts in many respects.
But what we don't yet share with them is the empowerment and resource that comes with the new Devolution Deals being planned for English city regions.
The Glasgow City Region should have parity with what's on offer elsewhere.
The eight Glasgow City Region leaders have now made a joint approach to both governments, setting out exactly how we can build on our successes.
We're united in believing that we can go much faster and further in delivering transformational benefits for our communities and our economy.
That's why we've asked the government to put pace and purpose behind empowering our City Region.
That means access to similar powers and the same single funding pots which our comparators south of the border enjoy.
Right now, on many key economic indicators, we're outperforming the likes of Greater Manchester, West Midlands, West Yorkshire, or Merseyside.
But the reality is that if we don't secure the equal status that we're asking for, then Metropolitan Glasgow risks falling behind.
And if that happens, then Scotland falls behind.
I know that the Scottish Government is exploring how it can enter into the kind of partnership with the City Region and the UK Government that can work for us all.
The UK Government's Spending Review is on the immediate horizon, providing a critical opportunity to turn our readiness into action.
I hope that in the coming days they can give us a clear indication that we're all heading in the same direction.
I was delighted to see the recent reports that the numbers of shoppers and revellers in Glasgow city centre has been on the rise, by as much as 10 per cent on some streets.
The latest data is also showing that people are spending a little more, with sales outstripping comparator cities.
With businesses, and indeed households, having been feeling the strain over recent years, that's to be welcomed.
These are just some of the hugely encouraging signs that our plans to put our city centre on a road to recovery are bearing fruit.
With the George Square redevelopment underway, more Avenues taking shape, and development activity on the up, the evidence is mounting that we're turning a corner.
Over the coming weeks and months, the council and our partners will be doing much more to get the good news out there about what's happening with the city centre.
This hasn't always been easy.
But with transformation taking shape and confidence on the up, it's in everyone's interests that we pull together and build on the growing positivity about our city centre.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
2 days ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on Starmer and Macron's channel crossings deal: safe routes hold the key to future progress
To use a football analogy that he might appreciate, the first year of Sir Keir Starmer's premiership has been a game of two halves. Domestically, grievous strategic mistakes have been made. On the foreign stage, however, an approach that Sir Keir likes to style as 'quiet, serious diplomacy' has yielded some tangible results. For the most part, this week's state visit by Emmanuel Macron further showcased the benefits of leaving behind the blowhard politics of the post-Brexit years. Sir Keir and the French president used the occasion to pledge greater cooperation on security and strengthened their joint commitment to safeguarding Ukraine's future as a sovereign independent state. But the biggest take-away from Mr Macron's trip launched the prime minister straight back into toxic domestic terrain. The announcement of a 'one in, one out' migrant returns deal with France represents the government's most high-profile attempt to halt the Channel crossings, which led last year to a record 86 deaths at sea. In the spirit of a renewed 'entente amicale', Mr Macron has agreed to the automatic return of a small proportion of migrants reaching Britain on small boats. In exchange, the UK will offer safe routes from France for an equivalent number of asylum seekers. The prime minister hopes this agreement can work sufficiently well to be scaled up, acting as a deterrent to those currently willing to risk their lives to reach our shores. The stakes, both ethically and politically, cannot be overstated. Sir Keir is absolutely right to suggest that Labour must combat the performative outrage of Nigel Farage and Reform – to which he has at times lamentably pandered – with a more humane, 'social democratic' response to the Channel crossings. As the Guardian's reporting has this week underlined, the desperate situation of refugees on the French coast shames political authorities on both sides of the Channel. But whether this week's deal constitutes such a response is much less clear. Most obviously, it is difficult to see how a pilot scheme targeting only a very small proportion of arrivals can ever offer 'proof of concept' of deterrence. Many migrants using irregular routes, having already risked so much, will surely choose to take their chances as before. The selection procedure for those to be sent back to France is also murky, and returns decisions will almost certainly be subject to legal challenge. Implementation of the plan will ultimately depend on the verdict of the European Commission as to its legality. Italy, Spain and Greece have already made their objections known. Delay and confusion would only lead to more gruesome headlines for Labour. In one respect though, Sir Keir was justified in describing the scheme as 'groundbreaking'. For years, Conservative governments have attempted to stop Channel crossings through devising unjust and unworkable deterrence measures such as the Rwanda scheme. The only result has been a rising toll of human misery. By agreeing for the first time to expand safe routes to Britain for asylum seekers – albeit on a tiny scale – the prime minister offered a glimpse of a different, more compassionate solution. Going further, in cooperation with countries of origin and European partners, would be the most effective way to undermine the business models of people-smugglers, especially if combined with meaningful levels of aid to the world's poorest countries. Labour should be focusing more on how it lets refugees in, and less on how it can find new ways to kick them out. Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.
The Guardian
2 days ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on Starmer and Macron's channel crossings deal: safe routes hold the key to future progress
To use a football analogy that he might appreciate, the first year of Sir Keir Starmer's premiership has been a game of two halves. Domestically, grievous strategic mistakes have been made. On the foreign stage, however, an approach that Sir Keir likes to style as 'quiet, serious diplomacy' has yielded some tangible results. For the most part, this week's state visit by Emmanuel Macron further showcased the benefits of leaving behind the blowhard politics of the post-Brexit years. Sir Keir and the French president used the occasion to pledge greater cooperation on security and strengthened their joint commitment to safeguarding Ukraine's future as a sovereign independent state. But the biggest take-away from Mr Macron's trip launched the prime minister straight back into toxic domestic terrain. The announcement of a 'one in, one out' migrant returns deal with France represents the government's most high-profile attempt to halt the Channel crossings, which led last year to a record 86 deaths at sea. In the spirit of a renewed 'entente amicale', Mr Macron has agreed to the automatic return of a small proportion of migrants reaching Britain on small boats. In exchange, the UK will offer safe routes from France for an equivalent number of asylum seekers. The prime minister hopes this agreement can work sufficiently well to be scaled up, acting as a deterrent to those currently willing to risk their lives to reach our shores. The stakes, both ethically and politically, cannot be overstated. Sir Keir is absolutely right to suggest that Labour must combat the performative outrage of Nigel Farage and Reform – to which he has at times lamentably pandered – with a more humane, 'social democratic' response to the Channel crossings. As the Guardian's reporting has this week underlined, the desperate situation of refugees on the French coast shames political authorities on both sides of the Channel. But whether this week's deal constitutes such a response is much less clear. Most obviously, it is difficult to see how a pilot scheme targeting only a very small proportion of arrivals can ever offer 'proof of concept' of deterrence. Many migrants using irregular routes, having already risked so much, will surely choose to take their chances as before. The selection procedure for those to be sent back to France is also murky, and returns decisions will almost certainly be subject to legal challenge. Implementation of the plan will ultimately depend on the verdict of the European Commission as to its legality. Italy, Spain and Greece have already made their objections known. Delay and confusion would only lead to more gruesome headlines for Labour. In one respect though, Sir Keir was justified in describing the scheme as 'groundbreaking'. For years, Conservative governments have attempted to stop Channel crossings through devising unjust and unworkable deterrence measures such as the Rwanda scheme. The only result has been a rising toll of human misery. By agreeing for the first time to expand safe routes to Britain for asylum seekers – albeit on a tiny scale – the prime minister offered a glimpse of a different, more compassionate solution. Going further, in cooperation with countries of origin and European partners, would be the most effective way to undermine the business models of people-smugglers, especially if combined with meaningful levels of aid to the world's poorest countries. Labour should be focusing more on how it lets refugees in, and less on how it can find new ways to kick them out. Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.
The National
2 days ago
- The National
Palestine Action ban protests to take place this weekend
The protests, which have mostly been coordinated by campaign group Defend Our Juries, are planned in London, Manchester, Cardiff and Derry on Saturday afternoon. It comes after a proscription order on the direct action group Palestine Action came into effect last weekend, designating it as a terror organisation. READ MORE: UK minister pictured grinning with Israeli politician who backs starving Gazans The order makes membership of, or support for, the direct action group a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. Defend Our Juries had organised a protest in London on July 5 – the day the ban came into effect – which saw 29 people arrested in connection with terror offences. The group said a number of other demonstrations had taken place since the ban then, claiming that more than 100 people had been arrested under the proscription order as a result. Protesters are expected to gather in London and Cardiff at 1pm, while the protest in Manchester is set to start at 2.30pm, and in 3pm in Derry. The London, Cardiff and Manchester protests were organised by Defend Our Juries. At these demonstrations, protesters are expected to hold signs which read: "I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action." The protest in Derry has been independently organised. READ MORE: Pro-Palestine protest planned against UK Government's spy flights over Gaza A spokesperson for Defend Our Juries said: 'Are these people holding up signs serious criminals committing terror crimes, who should be locked up for 14 years? "Or are they ordinary, decent people, exercising their democratic rights and taking a stand against corruption, injustice and genocide? "Make up your own mind." The group will also send a letter to the Home Secretary on Saturday, which is expected to accuse the Labour Government of doing more to "fuel support for Palestine Action and to raise its profile" than many of the protesters. In the letter, the group will set out that they "will not be deterred from opposing genocide, nor from defending those who refuse to be bystanders".
