The Starmiversary is here - where did it all go so wrong?
Six weeks later, Sir Keir Starmer pulled up in his car to No 10 on July 5. As he stepped out, the sun came out.
The metaphor was clear. In contrast to the bleak, miserable end to the Tories' time in charge, here was a new leader promising brighter days ahead.
During his first speech, he told the nation: 'If you voted for Labour yesterday, we will carry the responsibility of your trust, as we rebuild our country.
'But whether you voted Labour or not, in fact – especially if you did not, I say to you, directly, my government will serve you.'
Looking back at that day a year on, it might not be too hard to argue that optimistic idea about Starmer bringing a warm glow to the country was quite a pathetic fallacy.
Craig Munro breaks down Westminster chaos into easy to follow insight, walking you through what the latest policies mean to you. Sent every Wednesday. Sign up here.
Labour's polling numbers have collapsed since that day, and the party is now consistently stuck several points behind Reform. The PM himself is doing only marginally better, with a net favourability rating of -34 according to YouGov.
On Tuesday, the government suffered its biggest ever rebellion despite gutting its flagship welfare bill. The following day, the Chancellor wept openly during PMQs.
By Thursday evening, one of Starmer's MPs, Zarah Sultana, announced she was leaving the Labour party and would 'co-lead the founding of a new party' with the ex-Labour leader, Jeremy Corbyn. He said discussions were 'ongoing' after the announcement.
Outlining her reasons for leaving the party, Sultana accused the Labour Government of failing to improve people's lives, and claimed it 'wants to make disabled people suffer' in reference to ministers' proposals to reform welfare – a claim that was rejected by Home Secretary Yvette Cooper.
So where did it all go so wrong?
It's impossible to pick a particular moment where the trouble started. But if we were going to have a shot regardless, polls wouldn't be a bad place to start looking.
They seem to suggest Starmer's approval rating falls off a bit of a cliff around the end of July 2024 – barely three weeks after he started his new job.
What was happening politically around the end of July? Well, one big thing happened on July 29: that was the day Rachel Reeves stood up in Parliament and declared a massive cut to the winter fuel payment.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
In hindsight, it's a little baffling. Starmer's government was still defining itself to voters, trying to project an image about who they were and what they represented.
There's an argument that the Chancellor was aiming to get the tough but necessary decisions out of the way as early as possible, so they would have faded to the back of voters' minds by the next general election.
But clearly, first impressions matter. Despite the recent backtrack, in which the payment was returned to everyone receiving a pension who has an income below a £35,000 threshold, this might have been the moment many voters made up their mind about the PM and his ministers.
And of course, the Winter Fuel Payment was not the only announcement in this vein. There was inheritance tax on farms, and the retention of the two-child benefit cap.
All these 'tough decisions' circled around something else mentioned for the first time in that July 29 speech: the '£22 billion black hole' in the public finances that Reeves said she had found left over by the Conservatives.
Many of Labour's woes in government can be traced back to this figure. According to the Parliamentary transcript Hansard, the phrase '£22 billion black hole' has been used in the House of Commons no fewer than 287 times since last July, largely in the context of justifying unpopular choices.
Plenty of political goodwill has been spent on filling it but, as might be expected from a black hole, everything else has been sucked into it too.
Several of the government's policies enjoy broad public support – charging VAT on private school fees to fund state education; closer alignment with the European Union; and expanding free school meals, for example. More Trending
But it's the tricky decisions that the government says it must make to get the country on a firmer fiscal footing that really stick with people.
As a result, a year after the party's landslide victory, the Labour government has found itself defined more by the things it didn't want to have to do, than the things it did want to do.
This week, the sun was blazing again ahead of the first Starmiversary. But the Prime Minister may well have spent those days wondering how much longer it'll be until the clouds clear for him.
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
MORE: What we know about Zarah Sultana's new party 'with Jeremy Corbyn' after she quits Labour
MORE: From tears to cheers, readers discuss Rachel Reeves and tax rises
MORE: Rachel Reeves crying exposes a grim double standard
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Rhyl Journal
9 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Any breakaway party should be called ‘Farage assistance group'
Lord Kinnock told Sky News's Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips that any 'splintering' would 'only be of assistance to the enemies of Labour'. Speaking on Friday, Jeremy Corbyn said that 'discussions are ongoing' about the shape of a prospective new political party, after Zarah Sultana said she was quitting Labour to 'co-lead the founding' of a new outfit with the ex-party leader. Ms Sultana, who lost the Labour whip in the Commons last year, said the project would also include other independent MPs and campaigners. Lord Kinnock, who led Labour between 1983 and 1992, told Sky: 'I understand they're having a bit of difficulty over thinking of a name. 'In a comradely way, I'd suggest one. It would be the 'Farage assistance group'.' He said that a 'division' in the 'anti-right-wing vote can only assist the parties of the right, the Conservatives, especially now under Mrs Badenoch and under Farage, the Reform party'. 'So the splintering… offered by a new party of the left… can only be of assistance to the enemies of Labour, of the working-class – the people who have no means of sustaining themselves other than the sale of their labour by hand and by brain – and can only be of benefit to the egos of those who are running such a party,' he said. It comes as Labour are trailing Nigel Farage's Reform UK in the polls. On Friday, the Home Secretary appeared to shrug off Ms Sultana's announcement of a new party, and on Sunday, the Education Secretary said that 'some of those involved' had 'checked out' of the Labour Party some time ago. 'Now it's for them to forge their way forward,' she said. 'But what will determine the next election is whether people really see in their lives, in their families, in their communities, the difference a Labour Government has brought.'
Leader Live
10 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Ministers ‘pushed ahead too fast' on welfare reform, says Phillipson
Bridget Phillipson also said that future spending decisions had been made 'harder', when asked about the prospect of the two-child benefit cap being scrapped. Ms Phillipson told the BBC's Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg programme that she was 'not going to pretend that it hasn't been a tough or a challenging week' after ministers were forced to scrap their plans for the personal independence payment (Pip) in the face of a backbench revolt. 'I'd be the first to acknowledge that, both in the pace and the nature of what we set out, we didn't get it right, but we do need to reform the system we've got,' she said. Asked about the Prime Minister's authority, the Education Secretary said: 'What the Prime Minister has said, and what I also believe, is that what we set out, we pushed ahead too fast, we didn't listen enough to people, including, I would say, including to lots of people who had concerns about the nature of that change.' Ministers have warned MPs that there will be financial consequences to the decision not to reform Pip as planned. Labour backbenchers have also been pushing for the Government to scrap the two-child benefit cap. When asked if there was now less chance of the cap being scrapped given the costs that come with Tuesday's decision, Ms Phillipson told the BBC that ministers were 'looking at every lever and we'll continue to look at every lever to lift children out of poverty'. Pushed on whether the likelihood of the cap going was now slimmer, Ms Phillipson said: 'The decisions that have been taken in the last week do make decisions, future decisions harder. 'But all of that said, we will look at this collectively in terms of all of the ways that we can lift children out of poverty.' Meanwhile, shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride had written to the budget watchdog asking whether a new updated fiscal forecast was in the works after Labour's U-turns on welfare and winter fuel. I've written to the @OBR_UK seeking urgent clarity on the multi-billion pound hole created by Labour's unfunded spending commitments. When governments lose control of the finances and transparency is sidelined, confidence in our economy is put at risk. Parliament and the public… — Mel Stride (@MelJStride) July 6, 2025 In his letter to the Office for Budget Responsibility, Sir Mel said: 'The public, Parliament and markets deserve clarity and transparency about the impact of recent events on the nation's finances and the Government's fiscal strategy.' The Conservatives will try to change the Government's welfare Bill to tighten up access to Pip and universal credit by laying a series of amendments this week. Tory leader Kemi Badenoch will also pledge that the Tories are 'now the only party committed to serious welfare reform' in a speech expected on Thursday.
Leader Live
11 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Labour policies ‘obscured' by rows over welfare and winter fuel
Lord Kinnock – who led the party from 1983 to 1992 – told Sky News that a 'cloud hangs over the accomplishments of the Government', as Sir Keir Starmer marked a year in office this weekend. He said that the party have 'a series of really commendable and absolutely essential policies' and also suggested a wealth tax as a change that could 'commend' them to the general public. The week of Sir Keir's first anniversary in Number 10 saw the Prime Minister scrap a raft of the Government's proposed welfare reforms in the face of a backbench revolt. Asked what has gone wrong in Government, Lord Kinnock told the Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips programme: 'What's gone wrong is really the lack of a narrative, a story of the objectives of the Government and where they're working towards it and how they're working towards it. 'They are working towards it with a series of really commendable and absolutely essential policies. 'They are barely noticed because they're obscured by all the song and dance and noise, drums banging and cymbals clashing of the winter fuel payment… the welfare programme, the two-child benefit cap, the cuts in development aid, all those negative things that really are heartily disliked across the Labour movement and more widely, much more widely.' He said that a 'cloud hangs over the accomplishments of the Government, which are substantial and will become greater, and people are not getting the message'. Lord Kinnock said there are things the party could do that 'would commend themselves to the great majority of the general public' and that these included 'asset taxes'. 'By going for an imposition of 2% on asset values above £10 million, say, which is a very big fortune, the Government would be in a position to collect £10 billion or £11 billion,' he said. Shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride said he thought a wealth tax would be 'the worst thing to do' and opposed the idea of 'piling further taxes on the wealth creators'. He also told the same Sky News programme that it had been a 'year of utter underperformance' from Labour. 'Whether you look at illegal boats, migrants coming across the Channel, that's now at record levels, far from smashing the gangs, they're smashing all the records as to the numbers coming into our country. If you look at the chaotic U-turns that we've just had in the last few weeks,' he added. Analysis by the PA news agency found that Labour has seen a double-digit drop in support in the opinion polls since last year's general election. According to figures collated this week, the party has averaged 24% in polls in the past month, down 10 points from 34% in the weeks following the 2024 election. It is common for political parties to experience a slide in the polls after taking power – it has happened to every UK government bar one in the past 40 years – but a drop of this size is unusual. The last time it was in double digits was 1992/93, when the Tory administration led by former prime minister John Major saw its poll numbers fall 12 points, from an average of 43% in the weeks after the April 1992 election to 31% a year later.
