TOJOY CEO GE Jun Advocates Enhanced China-Europe Collaboration at Kopaonik Business Forum
Leading a delegation of Chinese entrepreneurs, Mr. Ge emphasized China's commitment to global economic dialogue. He addressed trade dynamics, stating that unilateral measures like tariffs could hinder mutual growth, resulting in a "lose-lose" situation. "Trade is a cornerstone of progress," he remarked. "Openness and innovation, not barriers, drive prosperity."
Marking 50 years of China-EU diplomatic ties, Mr. Ge highlighted China's market potential, citing its 1.4 billion consumers—including 400 million middle-income individuals—and consistent open-market policies. He pointed to a significant investment increase by multinational firms as evidence of China's appeal, alongside its annual output of 7 million engineering graduates, outpacing the combined totals of the U.S., Russia, India, and Iran. He highlighted opportunities in electric vehicles, 5G, green energy, and healthcare, inviting global leaders to come see China's innovations for themselves.
Mr. Ge championed the sharing economy's transformative role, noting that platform-based enterprises can bridge China and Europe by leveraging complementary strengths. He highlighted TOJOY Shared Group's evolution into a big data-driven platform, connecting 5.5 million users to foster entrepreneurial resource sharing. Through its "1+N" model, TOJOY aims to cultivate unicorn enterprises and expand globally, with big data as a key driver.
The Chinese delegation, under Mr. Ge's leadership, actively participated in forum sessions, raising awareness of China's enterprises and markets. Their engagement seeks to bolster China-Europe economic ties and advance multinational projects for shared progress.
Hashtag: #TOJOY
The issuer is solely responsible for the content of this announcement.
TOJOY Shared Smart Enterprise Services
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Etihad
2 hours ago
- Al Etihad
Trade on agenda as Trump lands in Scotland for diplomacy and golf
26 July 2025 01:02 TURNBERRY, United Kingdom (AFP) US President Donald Trump landed in Scotland on Friday for a five-day visit set to mix diplomacy, business and leisure, as a huge UK security operation swung into place amid planned protests near his family-owned golf resorts. The president, whose mother was born in Scotland, will split his time between two seaside golf courses bearing his name, in Turnberry on the southwestern coast and Aberdeen in the Force One, carrying the president and White House staff, touched down at Prestwick Airport near Glasgow shortly before 8:30 pm (1930 GMT). Police officers lined the surrounding streets, and several hundred curious Scots came out hoping for a glimpse of the US leader as he then made his way to Turnberry by has no public events scheduled for Saturday and is expected to play golf at his picturesque resort before meeting EU chief Ursula von der Leyen on Sunday for trade is also due to meet UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer during the said the meeting would be "more of a celebration than a workout," appearing to row back on previous comments that a bilateral trade deal struck in May needed "fine-tuning"."The deal is concluded," he told reporters on the tarmac at the unpredictable American leader appeared unwilling to cede to a UK request for reduced steel and aluminium tariffs. Trump has exempted British exports from blanket 50 per cent tariffs on both metals, but the fate of that carve-out remains unclear.
Zawya
4 hours ago
- Zawya
Ambassador GAO Wenqi Visits Chinese-Invested Enterprises in Rwanda
On July 25, Ambassador GAO Wenqi visited the C&D Products Group. The company executives gave a briefing on the company's production, operations, and development, as well as the working and living conditions of its employees. Ambassador GAO encouraged the company to adhere to safe production and compliant operation, and take good care of its employees, so as to actively fulfill its social responsibilities and set up a good image for Chinese enterprises. He also asked the company to actively take part in and contribute to Rwanda's economic and social development, and promote China-Rwanda relations. Specializing in apparel manufacturing and export, C&D was established in Rwanda in 2019. It has created over 7,000 jobs for local communities. Distributed by APO Group on behalf of Embassy of the People's Republic of China in the Republic of Rwanda.
Gulf Today
4 hours ago
- Gulf Today
The wisdom of ending wind and solar subsidies
Diana Furchtgott-Roth and Ryan Strasser, Tribune News Service The recently passed One Big Beautiful Bill Act signals a major shift in federal energy policy. Among its provisions, the law accelerates the phase-out of tax credits for new wind and solar projects and eliminates long-term subsidies for renewable developers on public land. The law revives a principle that should guide all energy policy: Let the best ideas win on their own merit. Rolling back the subsidies should relieve pressure to use valuable land for solar and wind farms. Consider the direct land use involved in today's energy sector. Wind projects take up approximately 30,000 acres to produce the same amount of electricity as a 2,500-acre coal plant. Solar is also land-intensive, requiring about 5,000 acres for equivalent output. However, when government subsidies reduce the use of public land for renewable energy sources, investors are no longer incentivised to look at the tradeoffs of their land-use footprint. Land is a finite and valuable resource. Using it for energy comes at the expense of other potential uses. When developers receive subsidies, they do not have to account for the value of alternative uses for the land. If an energy source requires more land, it should pay for that land. Communities across the country are voicing concerns, objecting to large-scale wind and solar developments that disrupt local land use, strain water resources, and alter rural landscapes. According to Robert Bryce's Renewable Rejection Database, more than 800 wind and solar projects have been rejected or restricted by local governments in the United States since 2015. One example of the disadvantages of large-scale renewable energy projects is the Spotsylvania Solar Energy Center in Virginia, a solar facility that spans over 6,300 acres, one of the largest solar projects east of the Rockies. Locals raised their concerns over the project's environmental effects, particularly the clearing of 3,500 acres of forested land, which involved the removal of around a million trees. Residents feared toxic substances leaching from panels into groundwater, in addition to the heat generated by the installation of 1.8 million solar panels, manufactured by Chinese companies. Despite the opposition, full operation began in 2021. Virginians' average electricity rates rose from 10 cents per kilowatt hour (kWh) in 2019 to 15 cents/kWh in June 2025. This 50% rise in energy prices over less than 6 years underscores that wind and solar projects generally don't save money and entail serious environmental and community costs of their own. Supporters of climate-change subsidies often argue that a rapid shift to renewable energy is necessary as they believe resource depletion or environmental harm is on the horizon. Even though America still holds centuries' worth of recoverable fossil fuels, this argument is flawed in its understanding of energy production. Coal, oil, and gas are the most efficient and profitable energy sources available. Over the past 20 years, wind and solar have received global subsidies of $9 trillion. The most recent data from the Energy Information Administration show that renewable energy sources received over $15 billion in federal subsidies in 2024, compared to $3 billion for fossil fuels. If renewable energy is truly the cheapest and most competitive option, why do its supporters call for lavish government support? Some argue that without such incentives, renewable energy investment will dry up. However, when the government gives special financial help to one type of energy, it makes it harder to see which energy sources are the best and most affordable. This distorts fair competition. If wind and solar energy are the future of America's energy sector, they should compete without the crutch of federal aid. Subsidizing large-scale land for renewable energy development raises electricity prices and uses public, taxpayer-owned lands. The result is not cleaner and more reliable energy, but misallocated resources. Spain offers a cautionary tale. With over half of its grid supplied by renewables and a national push toward 100% by 2050, the country suffered a 12-hour blackout on April 28. Two solar panels in southwest Spain went down, and the grid had insufficient inertia, or backup, to continue operating. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act represents more than just a shift in federal spending; it reflects a renewed commitment to competitive land use in America's energy sector. By phasing out preferential tax treatment and below-market land deals, the law encourages energy developers to compete on merits and meet America's rising energy demands with an approach rooted in efficiency, reliability, and competition.
