Arkansas coalition submits proposed ballot initiative to overturn legislative changes to referendum law
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. – A coalition of Arkansas community organizations announced Monday from the state capitol an effort to halt changes to the state's referendum process.
A spokesperson said the group was submitting a ballot initiative to overturn legislation passed in the most recent session to increase restrictions on the referendum process. The spokesperson continued that if the initiative passes, it will make direct democracy an amendment to the state constitution.
Arkansas League of Women Voters files federal suit, calls changes to voter referendum process 'Unconstitutional'
The spokesperson said the law passed during the 95th General Assembly makes it nearly impossible for 'regular people' to have a say in issues. In contrast, legislators said election integrity was at stake.
One issue is a law passed requiring ballot initiatives to be at an eighth-grade reading level or lower. The attorney general's office recently rejected a similar ballot submission by the Arkansas League of Women Voters because it was above the reading level requirement.
Lawmakers seek to rein in citizen ballot initiatives with new requirements for petitions
Other changes made during the recent session increase the requirements for signature gathering and canvasser requirements.
The Protect AR Rigths coalition includes Arkansas Advocates for Children & Families, Arkansas Appleseed Legal Justice Center, Arkansas Citizens First Congress, Arkansas Public Policy Panel, For AR People, The Arkansas Education Association and NAACP Arkansas State Conference.
Recent successful ballot initiatives in Arkansas were those allowing lottery proceeds to be used for vocational school scholarships and an amendment repealing the Pope County casino license. In the past, a 2018 initiative increased the state's minimum wage, and a 2016 initiative established an Arkansas medical marijuana program.
ACLU representing two groups hoping to join Arkansas ballot bill lawsuit
Other ballot initiatives to increase access to marijuana failed in 2022 and 2024.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
2 days ago
- Politico
Newsom fears backdoor ban on AI rules
AROUND THE NATION Republicans in Congress rejected a push by some of their colleagues to temporarily ban states from regulating artificial intelligence in President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act — citing their confidence in state lawmakers and the importance of keeping the tech giants in check. But now some in California are worried Trump revealed a backdoor ban this week with his release of an AI Action Plan that says he'll deny federal funding for AI to states with rules that might hinder the funding's 'effectiveness.' Trump's comments afterwards suggested he would interpret that mandate broadly. 'You can't have one state holding you up,' he said at a Washington event. 'We need one common sense federal standard that supersedes all states, supersedes everybody.' Trump's attitude caught the attention of California's Democratic governor, Gavin Newsom, our colleagues in the Golden State reported. California has moved more quickly than other states to regulate AI. Newsom signed a bill last year that bars health insurers in the state from using AI to deny claims. 'Having failed to get his group of sycophants to approve an AI moratorium in his 'Big Beautiful Betrayal,' Trump now tries to force it on states,' Newsom spokesperson Tara Gallegos said in a statement. 'Trump might not care but the Governor will not let him endanger our most vulnerable citizens.' The backstory: The version of Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act that the House passed in May would have barred states from regulating AI for 10 years. Commerce Chair Ted Cruz (R-Texas) proposed similar language when the Senate took up the measure, but Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) tanked it, arguing that states needed 'to protect their citizens from the abuses of AI.' She said she feared the moratorium would give tech firms licence to 'exploit kids, creators, and conservatives.' MORNING MONEY: CAPITAL RISK — POLITICO's flagship financial newsletter has a new Friday edition built for the economic era we're living in: one shaped by political volatility, disruption and a wave of policy decisions with sector-wide consequences. Each week, Morning Money: Capital Risk brings sharp reporting and analysis on how political risk is moving markets and how investors are adapting. Want to know how health care regulation, tariffs, or court rulings could ripple through the economy? Start here. WELCOME TO FUTURE PULSE This is where we explore the ideas and innovators shaping health care. A new study by Harvard researchers says that a baby's sex might not be random but connected to the mother's age, genes and older siblings' sexes. Share any thoughts, news, tips and feedback with Carmen Paun at cpaun@ Ruth Reader at rreader@ or Erin Schumaker at eschumaker@ Want to share a tip securely? Message us on Signal: CarmenP.82, RuthReader.02 or ErinSchumaker.01. WORLD VIEW The EU has joined the U.S. in scrutinizing citizens' exposure to fluoride, our colleagues across the pond report. This week, the European Food Safety Agency, an arm of the EU, updated safe fluoride intake levels, setting new limits but finding overall that the EU's drinking water doesn't pose health risks. In the U.S., Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. wants to stop adding the cavity-fighting mineral to drinking water, as many water systems here do on the recommendation of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Dentists say Kennedy is making a big mistake. Compare and contrast: Nearly three-quarters of Americans drink fluoridated water, but few EU countries fluoridate — in fact, only Ireland and parts of the U.K. and Spain do — and the concentration of fluoride found in drinking water in European countries is usually less than 0.3 milligrams per liter. The CDC recommends a level of 0.7 mg per liter to prevent tooth decay. Kennedy, who says Americans can get all the fluoride they need from toothpaste and mouthwash, cites research finding higher levels of fluoride linked to lower IQ scores as justification for rolling back the agency's guidance. The EU officials said those studies had prompted their review. They set 'tolerable upper intake levels' from all sources, including drinking water, of 1 mg per day for infants, 1.6 mg per day for children ages 1-3 years, 2 mg per day for children 4-8 years and 3.3 mg per day for anyone over 8 years old.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Anger in Aussie tourist region after council ban rejected: 'So wrong'
An Australian council's unanimous decision to ban a controversial industry has been rejected by a state government, leaving local legislators 'disappointed'. Shire of Yarra Ranges councillors voted to be excluded from the commercial kangaroo harvesting program due to concerns about the impact of ongoing shooting on the region's tourism, but it was told it did not have the power to make the request. Located less than an hour from central Melbourne, the Yarra Ranges encompasses suburbs, farms and the world-famous Yarra Valley wine region, which attracts 3 to 5 million visitors annually. Many international tourists bus out to its rolling hills to see wild kangaroos, and some residents delight in watching mobs of the animals over the fence in paddocks and parks. But kangaroos don't understand fencelines, and a friendly "skippy" that's chilling in a family's backyard could hop over to a neighbouring farm and face danger. Under the Kangaroo Harvesting Program (KHP), introduced by the Labor state government in 2019, it could then be shot and processed into pet food, or even sold for human consumption. The program has resulted in conflict in the region. In 2021, Yahoo News spoke to a teary dog walker who discovered that her local kangaroo mob had been shot and butchered, with body parts left strewn across the paddocks of Chirnside Park. Councillor worries about kangaroo harvest's impact on tourism Council's official request to be excluded from the Gippsland Harvesting Zone of the KHP was made in May, following a vote in April, and it was rejected in July. Council responded with a strongly worded letter, telling the Allan government the decision would 'cause distress and concern among members of our community'. Councillor Tim Heenan seconded the motion for the Yarra Ranges to be excluded from the KHP. Speaking with Yahoo this week, he said he had concerns about entire families of kangaroos being depleted, and accused the government of being 'bloody-minded' in its response. 'I just can't understand why the state government thinks it's a good thing. We're a tourist area. We have people who come up here for nature, and shooting kangaroos here is so wrong,' he said. Protest planned against government kangaroo decision Chirnside Ward Councillor and Acting Mayor, Richard Higgins, told Yahoo councillors had tried to 'advocate for the community' and now that the request had been rejected, there was little they could do. He said if kangaroo advocates continued to garner the support of other councils around Victoria, the state government could change its mind. Angry Yarra Ranges residents have planned a protest on August 2 to urge the state government to reconsider its decision. Protest organiser and Yarra Ranges resident Alyssa Wormald accused Victoria Environment Minister Steve Dimopoulos of 'thumbing his nose at the community'. 'Council took their due diligence seriously and conducted a great deal of research and consultation before they agreed unanimously in April 2025 that we need commercial kangaroo shooters out of our communities,' she said. Claim kangaroos causing 'significant harm' to environment Dimopoulos did not respond to questions from Yahoo News about the decision, but his office shared a statement from a state government spokesperson maintaining the program was 'humane and sustainable', and that changes to harvest zones were not decisions that could be made by councils. "Victoria takes a conservative approach when setting kangaroo control levels to no more than 10 per cent of the population each year, to ensure harvesting does not compromise the sustainability of kangaroo populations," it said. "Changes to harvest zones, including the adjustment of the exclusion zone boundary are not made at the request of local councils, but by consideration of local kangaroo population levels." The spokesperson continued, saying kangaroos can have 'significant impacts on Victoria's environment' and that 'sometimes it is necessary to control their population'. Yahoo asked Dimopoulos's office where specifically in the Yarra Ranges kangaroo populations were causing 'significant impacts' on the environment, but it did not respond. Separate from the KHP, farmers who are concerned about kangaroos damaging property can apply to shoot or disperse them under an Authority to Control Wildlife (ATCW). This is not something councillors voted against. They have challenged the KHP, which allows licensed 'harvesters' to enter properties at the request of landholders and potentially shoot all the kangaroos in a paddock so they can be processed for meat and skins. What did the councillors have to say? A number of councillors have expressed frustration that attempts to advocate for their constituents were unsuccessful. Some, like Heenan, have a fundamental objection to kangaroo harvesting, and despite assurances from the government about sustainability, he has concerns about its impact on local populations. 'As a kid, I always understood that we had tonnes of wildlife — emus, koalas, kangaroos — but the times are changing,' he said, before noting that once stable koala populations in NSW and Queensland plummeted following the Black Summer bushfires. Yahoo News reached out to all councillors from the shire about the state government's decision to reject their request, except for Yarra Ranges Mayor Jim Child as he recused himself from the April vote. Councillor Jeff Marriott said he was disappointed by the state government's determination, adding, 'We made our decision and we'd hoped that would have been paid attention to.' Councillor Len Cox, who raised the motion in April, said in an email he had 'a strong opinion on this matter', but was unable to be reached for further comment. Councillors Mitch Mazzarella and Peter Mcilwain referred all questions to the acting mayor. Councillor Gareth Ward was unable to be immediately contacted. Councillor Fiona McAllister gave a strong indication she would not speak with Yahoo about the Australia's weird and wonderful environment? 🐊🦘😳 Get our new newsletter showcasing the week's best stories.
Boston Globe
4 days ago
- Boston Globe
Targeting Obama, Trump's retribution campaign takes another turn
Displaying a willingness to weaponize the federal government in ways that were as novel as they were audacious, he took on a wide variety of individuals and institutions — from law firms and universities to journalists and federal bureaucrats — that he felt had crossed him, failed to fall in line or embodied ideological values that he rejected. Advertisement But on Tuesday, Trump reverted to earlier form, resurfacing — in a remarkably unfiltered and aggressive rant — his grievances against Obama, prominent figures in past administrations and others he associated with what he considers a long campaign of persecution dating back to the 2016 election. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Seeking to change the topic at a time when he is under bipartisan political pressure over his unwillingness to do more to release investigative files into Jeffrey Epstein, he said the time had come for his opponents to face criminal charges. President Trump on DNI report on 2016 Russian interference claims: "The leader of the gang was President Obama. Barack Hussein Obama, have you heard of him?...He's guilty. It's not a question. You know, I like to say let's give it time. It's there. He's guilty. This was treason." — CSPAN (@cspan) 'I let her off the hook, and I'm very happy I did, but it's time to start after what they did to me,' Trump said of Hillary Clinton, adding: 'Whether it's right or wrong, it's time to go after people. Obama's been caught directly.' Advertisement 'He's guilty,' he added. 'This was treason. This was every word you can think of.' But if his enemies list was familiar, his capacity to pursue retribution appears to be expanding. Repeatedly in his first term, Trump accused his perceived enemies of treason and tried to push the FBI and Justice Department to indict them. He told his chief of staff that he wanted to 'get the IRS' on those who crossed him. Many of them were investigated, and two of them were the subjects of highly unusual and invasive audits, but none of them were ever charged. The difference now is that Trump, much more so than during his first term, is surrounded by aides and Cabinet members who often appear willing to follow through on his angriest and most authoritarian impulses. The Justice Department, whose top ranks are populated by loyalists, including two of his own lawyers, has shown a willingness to carry out Trump's personal agenda. The department has dismissed prosecutors involved not just in the criminal cases brought against him two years ago by a special counsel but also those who pursued Jan. 6 rioters. The department also dropped a prosecution against New York City's mayor after he agreed to help Trump on immigration issues. And the administration also targeted first-term officials who became public critics of Trump, like Miles Taylor and Chris Krebs. But now the efforts to target top officials from previous administrations appears to be gaining momentum. The intelligence community under Trump is engaged in a campaign seeking to show that Obama and his aides wrongly sought to tie Trump to Russian efforts to influence the 2016 election in Trump's favor -- and that some of Obama's officials and perhaps Obama himself should be held criminally liable. Advertisement John Ratcliffe, the CIA director, conducted a review that was deeply critical of the Obama administration and former CIA director John Brennan. Ratcliffe wrote on social media that the review had shown that the process was corrupt and then he made a criminal referral to the FBI. Trump's director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, issued another report last week including documents that she asserted showed that there was a 'treasonous conspiracy' in 2016 by the Obama administration to harm Trump. On Wednesday, Gabbard released more material: a 2017 House Intelligence Committee report that took issue with elements of the Obama administration's assessment. Those House findings were at odds with a bipartisan series of Senate reports that later affirmed the work of the CIA and the other intelligence agencies. The Trump administration reports have so far provided little or no evidence of wrongdoing by Obama or his aides, but Sunday, Trump posted a fake video of Obama being apprehended by FBI agents in the Oval Office. It is not yet clear whether even a compliant Justice Department will be willing to open criminal investigations into Obama or other prominent Democrats and Trump critics, or be able to find grounds to do so. Even if prosecutors lodged charges, prosecutions could be difficult. Obama, like Trump, presumably enjoys immunity from prosecution for any official acts while in office, based on the Supreme Court's landmark presidential immunity ruling last year. But Trump often seems intent on using the federal government to subject his foes to the same kinds of scrutiny he has undergone. Advertisement Infuriated by what he has sought to characterize as 'witch hunt' investigations and legal proceedings against him that started with the investigation into the 2016 election and morphed into the obstruction-of-justice investigation into him, he has levied crippling executive orders against law firms that had even fleeting connections to those episodes. That process has pressured many of the firms into committing nearly $1 billion in pro bono legal work to causes he favors. Casting universities as breeding grounds for antisemitism and a brand of woke liberalism that he feels has opposed and denigrated him at every turn, his administration made an example of Harvard, using a whole-of-government approach to demand major changes. He pelted Harvard with major cuts to its research funding, tried to take visas away from its international students and launched a series of invasive and onerous investigations into the school. Harvard is now negotiating a settlement with the White House, but the administration kept up the pressure by informing the school of a new investigation Wednesday. He took an ax to what he saw as pockets of 'deep state' resistance inside his own government. He has sought to cow news organizations, barring The Associated Press from the White House press pool, extracting big financial settlements from the owners of ABC and CBS in disputes over their coverage, and filing suit against The Wall Street Journal for its reporting on his ties to Epstein. But, as his own supporters acknowledge, none of that is as important as putting one of his perceived enemies behind bars. 'If you tell the base of people, who support you, of deep state treasonous crimes, election interference, blackmail, and rich powerful elite evil cabals, then you must take down every enemy of The People,' Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., posted Sunday. 'If not. The base will turn and there's no going back. Dangling bits of red meat no longer satisfies. They want the whole steak dinner and will accept nothing else.' Advertisement This article originally appeared in .
