logo
OpenAI Unveils A.I. Technology for ‘Natural Conversation'

OpenAI Unveils A.I. Technology for ‘Natural Conversation'

New York Times27-02-2025
When OpenAI started giving private demonstrations of its new GPT-4 technology in late 2022, its skills shocked even the most experienced A.I. researchers. It could answer questions, write poetry and generate computer code in ways that seemed far ahead of its time.
More than two years later, OpenAI has released its successor: GPT-4.5. The new technology signifies the end of an era. OpenAI said GPT-4.5 would be the last version of its chatbot system that did not do 'chain-of-thought reasoning.'
After this release, OpenAI's technology may, like a human, spend a significant amount of time thinking about a question before answering, rather than providing an instant response.
GPT-4.5, which can be used to power the most expensive version of ChatGPT, is unlikely to generate as much excitement at GPT-4, in large part because A.I. research has shifted in new directions. Still, the company said the technology would 'feel more natural' than its previous chatbot technologies.
'What sets the model apart is its ability to engage in warm, intuitive, naturally flowing conversations, and we think it has a stronger understanding of what users mean when they ask for something,' said Mia Glaese, vice president of research at OpenAI.
In the fall, the company introduced technology called OpenAI o1, which was designed to reason through tasks involving math, coding and science. The new technology was part of a wider effort to build A.I. that can reason through complex tasks. Companies like Google, Meta and DeepSeek, a Chinese start-up, are developing similar technologies.
The goal is to build systems that can carefully and logically solve a problem through a series of discrete steps, each one building on the last, similar to how humans reason. These technologies could be particularly useful to computer programmers who use A.I. systems to write code.
These reasoning systems are based on technologies like GPT-4.5, which are called large language models, or L.L.M.s.
L.L.M.s learn their skills by analyzing enormous amounts of text culled from across the internet, including Wikipedia articles, books and chat logs. By pinpointing patterns in all that text, they learned to generate text on their own.
To build reasoning systems, companies put L.L.M.s through an additional process called reinforcement learning. Through this process — which can extend over weeks or months — a system can learn behavior through extensive trial and error.
By working through various math problems, for instance, it can learn which methods lead to the right answer and which do not. If it repeats this process with a large number of problems, it can identify patterns.
OpenAI and others believe this is the future of A.I. development. But in some ways, they have been forced in this direction because they have run out of the internet data needed to train systems like GPT-4.5.
Some reasoning systems outperforms ordinary L.L.M.s on certain standardized tests. But standardized tests are not always a good judge of how technologies will perform in real-world situations.
Experts point out that the new reasoning system cannot necessarily reason like a human. And like other chatbot technologies, they can still get things wrong and make stuff up — a phenomenon called hallucination.
OpenAI said that, beginning Thursday, GPT-4.5 would be available to anyone who was subscribed to ChatGPT Pro, a $200-a-month service that provides access to all of the company's latest tools.
(The New York Times sued OpenAI and its partner, Microsoft, in December for copyright infringement of news content related to A.I. systems.)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Veteran Tesla analyst drops 4-word call
Veteran Tesla analyst drops 4-word call

Miami Herald

time31 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Veteran Tesla analyst drops 4-word call

Tesla (TSLA) stockholders have been through the ringer this year Pulverized by falling sales, political sideshows, and the competition chomping away at its lead, Elon Musk's EV behemoth hasn't given Tesla bulls much to cheer about lately. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter However, a key update suggests things could potentially turn around. With Wall Street's patience wearing thin, even the slightest hint of stability could propel the EV giant ahead and help it regain its 2025 has been mostly a bruising cautionary tale. Related: Veteran analyst drops jaw-dropping Tesla stock target Perhaps the biggest headline this year for the EV pioneer has been its long-hyped robotaxi push. Following years of teasing and bold predictions from Musk, Tesla finally launched a pilot fleet in Austin in late June. In that, we saw a handful of Model Ys zipping around a tight geofenced zone, at just $4.20 a ride under the watchful eyes of safety monitors. Early footage reinvigorated the die-hard Tesla fans. However, it didn't take long for things to go the other way. Clips of wrong-way turns, sudden stops, and near misses with pedestrians spread like wildfire, landing the trials on the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's radar. Suddenly, Tesla's camera-only approach looked a lot more risky than revolutionary. Moreover, the topsy-turvy rollout came as Tesla's European sales slid. In the Nordics, registrations plummeted over 60% in June. In Sweden, things were even worse, plunging 64%. Across the broader EU, deliveries tanked over 40% in May as aggressive Chinese competitors like BYD kept winning price wars. Also, you can forget the Musk factor. The CEO's outspoken political takes have done him hardly any favors this year. His public fallout with former ally President Donald Trump has become a nightmare for Tesla stockholders, with Trump threatening to yank the federal subsidies that have kept Tesla afloat for the better part of its history. More Tech Stock News: Google's quiet AI win spells trouble for AmazonApple could make big change to Siri, delight fansVeteran analyst issues big Broadcom call, shakes up AI stock race For perspective, Tesla has pulled in a whopping $10 billion in regulatory-credit sales or more since 2019 alone, amounting to a third of its net income over that period. According to Deepwater Asset Management analyst Gene Munster, Tesla stock may have just turned a corner. Related: Veteran Tesla bull drops surprising 3-word verdict on robotaxi ride He believes the company's latest second-quarter delivery numbers point to a bottom for the struggling EV powerhouse. Speaking on Bloomberg Television, Munster summed up the relief many investors felt: "We're at the bottom here." He said that Tesla's Q2 deliveries came in roughly 4% higher than market expectations, landing close to 384,000 vehicles. Though that's still down about 13% compared to last year, it wasn't the nightmare some had been bracing for. The stock jumped nearly 5% on Wednesday as traders bet the worst might be behind Tesla, though it later gave back those gains. Additionally, analysts at Goldman Sachs expected just 365,000 deliveries, which meant the actual figure cleared a very low bar, potentially leading to a much-needed bounce for the stock. Nevertheless, the Q2 total was still down year-over-year, but was up 14% from Q1, suggesting a possible stabilization heading into the back half of this year. Tesla's best-selling Model 3 and Model Y made up the lion's share of the numbers, accounting for nearly 374,000 of the cars delivered. Other models added close to 10,000 more. Still, Tesla's road ahead remains bumpy. Competition from cheaper Chinese EVs continues to clip away at its market share, while CEO Musk's divisive political moves continue to spark protests and backlash in key markets. For now, though, Munster's call that "we're at the bottom" is exactly what Tesla bulls wanted to hear. Related: Veteran analyst drops shocking Tesla target The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

Should we stop Asteroid 2024 YR4 from hitting the moon?
Should we stop Asteroid 2024 YR4 from hitting the moon?

The Hill

time2 hours ago

  • The Hill

Should we stop Asteroid 2024 YR4 from hitting the moon?

Asteroid 2024 YR4 has popped up on the news again, offering both peril and opportunities, A few months ago, NASA noted that 2024 YR4 had a 3.1 percent chance of hitting the Earth in 2032. Since the rock is 50 to 90 meters in diameter, if it were to hit the Earth, it would cause an explosion equivalent to a nuclear bomb with the accompanying devastation. Subsequently, NASA dialed down the threat 2024 YR4 posed to the Earth and everyone breathed a sigh of relief. Now, the Earth approaching asteroid has a new target. A small chance exists that it will hit the moon in 2032. The prospect presents new dangers, though not as great as the destruction of a city. According to ZME Science, new data from the James Webb Space Telescope, 2024 YR4 has a 4.3 percent chance of hitting the moon on December 22, 2032. 'If 2024 YR4 hits, it will create a blast equivalent to 6.5 million tons of TNT. The resulting crater would stretch about a kilometer across — bigger than almost any the Moon has seen in the last 5,000 years.' Depending on whether the asteroid hits the near side of the moon —a 50-50 chance assuming it hits it at all — about 10 percent of the debris, about 100 million kilograms, ranging in size from flecks of dust to a small pebbles, could be captured by the Earth's gravity and reach the atmosphere in perhaps three to five days. Little if any debris kicked up by a lunar impact would threaten the Earth's surface. At most, it would cause a spectacular meteor shower unlike anything in our lifetimes. Both scientists and casual sky watchers will be intrigued at this once in several millennia event. The effects on space assets are another matter, however. Satellites, ranging from relatively small Comsats to commercial space stations expected to be in operation by the 2030s, will be subjected to tiny objects traveling at tens of thousands of meters per second. SpaceX's Starlink constellation will be at particular risk. 'This debris won't likely destroy spacecraft and satellites, but it adds wear and tear,' writes ZME. 'In rare cases, a lucky — or unlucky — piece of rock could disable a satellite or trigger a cascade of debris collisions.' Both NASA and Chinese astronauts may be living and working on the moon at the time 2024 YR4 hits and will be in jeopardy due to falling debris or other hazards. The Lunar Gateway, if it exists in seven years, could also be subject to impacts. What, if anything, can be done about it? The option exists of doing nothing. After all, a four percent chance of the asteroid hitting the moon means a 96 percent chance of it not hitting the moon. However, if the powers that be were to decide to divert 2024 YR4 so that it doesn't hit the moon, the technical task should be relatively easy. NASA has already tested asteroid deflection with its DART mission, which diverted an asteroid named Dimorphos with a kinetic impactor. The economic and political problems facing the diversion of 2024 YR4 are another matter. NASA is currently in turmoil due to proposed draconian budget cuts and a lack of a permanent administrator. The Space Force, which is being lavished with money compared to NASA, might be assigned the task. Indeed, an asteroid diversion mission could be good practice for space operations by America's newest military branch. The other alternative is to perform a redirection mission to 2024 YR4 privately. One of the things that Jared Isaacman, the billionaire entrepreneur whose nomination to be NASA administrator President Trump abruptly withdrew, is contemplating is private science missions. An asteroid redirect mission might fit into that model. One can see SpaceX's Elon Musk financing such a mission. Musk has deep pockets and an incentive to divert 2024 YR4 if it threatens his Starlink constellation. Asteroid diversion might become a good business for private launch companies such as SpaceX. If a really big space rock threatens the Earth, the nations of the world might be willing to pay a lot of money to ward it off. Someone like Elon Musk or Jeff Bezos, founder of SpaceX competitor Blue Origin, might literally save the world for a profit. If such an asteroid is rich in useful natural resources, its diversion to a safe, stable orbit around the Earth would be even more profitable. Access to such a source of minerals could spark a space-based industrial revolution. Save the world and get fabulously wealthy doing so. Someone really should make a movie out of that scenario, before it becomes true life. Mark Whittington, who writes frequently about space policy, has published a political study of space exploration titled 'Why is It So Hard to Go Back to the Moon?' as well as 'The Moon, Mars and Beyond,' and, most recently, 'Why is America Going Back to the Moon?' He blogs at Curmudgeons Corner.

Pixel 10 Pro's new display tackles eye strain, but it's not the leap I wanted
Pixel 10 Pro's new display tackles eye strain, but it's not the leap I wanted

Android Authority

time2 hours ago

  • Android Authority

Pixel 10 Pro's new display tackles eye strain, but it's not the leap I wanted

Robert Triggs / Android Authority Google Pixel 10 rumors are coming thick and fast these days as we close in on the launch date in just a few months. Last week, we learned the upcoming phone's Pro models will likely ship with a 480Hz PWM display — a first for the Pixel series. High PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation) rates aren't new to smartphone displays; we've already seen phones boasting thousands of Hz. The Xiaomi 15 Ultra offers a 1,920Hz PWM rate, the OnePlus 13 clocks in at 2,160Hz, and the HONOR Magic 7 Pro tops out at a whopping 4,320Hz PWM. Even the budget-friendly Nothing Phone 3a manages 2,160Hz PWM. Is high display PWM important when buying a phone? 0 votes Yes, I want high PWM. NaN % No, it doesn't matter. NaN % It matters, but it's not the deciding factor. NaN % Not sure, I'd never thought about it. NaN % The Pixel 10 Pro and Pro XL won't match these heavyweights, but a bump to 480Hz will at least put them on par with the brand's closest rivals in the US, Apple and Samsung. In that sense, it's a significant move — but what does all this PWM stuff even mean, and should you actually care? What does PWM have to do with displays? C. Scott Brown / Android Authority If you know a bit about displays, you've likely come across Hz and refresh rate, which measures how many times per second (in Hz) the screen updates. 120Hz looks smoother than 60Hz, for example. PWM is also measured in Hz, but it's unrelated to how quickly your content refreshes. Instead, the PWM rate controls the brightness of the thousands of individual LEDs lighting up your fancy OLED display. Going back to some basic electronics: applying 0 V turns an LED off, while applying the maximum allowed voltage makes it shine at full brightness. There are two ways to achieve a brightness that isn't zero or full. The most intuitive is to scale the voltage somewhere between off and max. However, this isn't always practical for mobile displays, due to the LEDs' temperamental on-threshold voltage, the wasted power from maintaining an intermediate DC level, and the complexity of managing precise voltages across millions of sub-pixels. This isn't a problem for older LCD-type displays, where direct current dimming can easily control the entire backlight in one go. Kamila Wojciechowska / Android Authority Instead, displays control LED brightness using rapid on–off pulses. Each LED toggles hundreds or thousands of times per second, so quickly that your eye perceives a steady brightness rather than flicker. This is achieved efficiently with a clock driver embedded in the display controller, and it's far more power-friendly since little energy is wasted — crucial for mobile devices. The end result is equivalent from a brightness perspective, as the average output of these on–off pulses matches what a constant dimmed level would produce. If you're curious, recording slow-motion video on your phone camera can often reveal PWM flicker, appearing as rolling bands across the screen. That said, several phones now use a hybrid approach to dimming. For example, the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE and Xiaomi 14T Pro offer 'DC dimming' at high brightness levels well above the on-threshold, then switch back to PWM at lower brightness settings. Here, DC dimming really means dropping the drive current in one shot rather than true per-pixel scaling. Display PWM rates tell you how fast the OLED lights flicker on and off. OK, so now this begs the question: why do different smartphones have different PWM rates? Well, each display panel comes paired with its own driver IC. Higher‑end panels often include driver chips capable of much higher PWM frequencies right out of the factory, but even high-end panels don't always race to the biggest possible numbers. Even with the same display driver chip, manufacturers can tweak their PWM clock settings in firmware to hit specific targets — trading off PWM rate against overall power draw (including switching losses vs peak brightness), regulator overhead, BOM cost, and sometimes the precision of contrast and gamma control. Very high PWM frequencies, for example, can reduce the number of available brightness steps, slightly affecting smooth gradients and tonal transitions. These trade-offs are balanced differently depending on each brand's priorities for battery life, display quality, and eye comfort. Why do PWM refresh rates matter? Robert Triggs / Android Authority Here's the catch: what if your eyes or brain can actually detect that flicker from a low PWM rate? Well, this is very much a real issue, often called PWM sensitivity. It affects everyone differently — some people not at all, others might eventually feel eye fatigue, and the unlucky can end up with migraines or nausea. If you're susceptible, PWM sensitivity is most often noticed when viewing a device in a dark environment at low display brightness. That's because at lower brightness levels, PWM dimming runs at a low duty cycle: the LEDs spend most of their time turned off, only pulsing on for brief moments to emit just enough light. Combined with a dimly lit room, these short bursts might not register as visible flicker, but the nerves in your eyes — and ultimately your brain — can still pick up on them. PWM flicker can cause eye fatigue, headaches, and even nausea in some people. There's no exact science on the ideal PWM frequency, partly because there are so many variables when it comes to individual sensitivity, environment, and how any modulation is implemented. For many people, 480Hz doesn't cause any noticeable issues, and phones have been getting away with 240Hz without triggering a wave of returns. However, a growing body of research suggests that these comparatively low values can still trigger unwanted physiological responses in a sizable portion of the population. As such, opting for a 1,000Hz or 2,000Hz display generally pushes you further away from potential harm, and these phones are obviously the better choice for anyone who has experienced fatigue or worse from their devices. But do sufferers continue to benefit from ever-higher values like 4,000Hz? That's less certain, as there's bound to be a law of diminishing returns. Even so, bigger numbers are generally 'safer' from an eye health perspective, and there are no real downsides from the standpoint of display quality. PWM speed is important, but it's not the only thing to considder. As with most things, there are additional nuances at play. PWM display waveforms don't have to be sharp on–off pulses; advanced driver ICs can shape the modulation to ease eye strain. Gradual ramping up and down (like a sawtooth or triangle wave) is an effective alternative that aims to reduce PWM's adverse effects without simply cranking up the frequency. Likewise, most smartphones use multi-phase PWM, ensuring the entire display isn't off at the same time to help average out the luminance your eyes detect. Then there are the aforementioned DC-dimming firmware tricks that let brands advertise 'flicker-free' or 'low-flicker' modes for enhanced eye comfort, even though they still rely on PWM at low brightness. Of course, the best solution is probably to have a bit of everything. Just keep in mind it's not always a clear-cut case of bigger numbers being better — though it certainly doesn't hurt to have a higher PWM display in your next phone. Whether the Pixel 10 Pro's new display does enough here is still very much up for debate. Pixel takes yet another half measure Paul Jones / Android Authority PWM rate certainly isn't the be-all and end-all of what makes a great display, but for some consumers, it's a hugely important buying factor. While eye-fatigue features are staple technologies across the industry, some major manufacturers still fall short when it comes to tackling the specific discomfort caused by low-frequency PWM at dim brightness levels. Historically, Google's Pixel series has made no meaningful strides to address these concerns. Thankfully, the Pixel 10 Pro and Pro XL look set to offer a slight reprieve with their jump to 480Hz — a welcome improvement that finally starts to close the gap. Still, it's hard to ignore that this advance only brings Google in line with what's already become a baseline elsewhere, and remains far from the highest standards now possible. The Pixel 10's 480Hz upgrade would be welcome, but is still behind the curve. Perhaps more frustrating is that this upgraded display is expected to be exclusive to the Pro-tier models, meaning anyone eyeing the standard Pixel 10 — or a future Pixel 10a — will be left waiting yet again. For many, this won't be a dealbreaker. But for those sensitive to display flicker or simply hoping to minimize long-term eye strain, Google's cautious step forward may feel like too little, too late. In the end, it's a positive move, but one that highlights how much more could still be done. Here's hoping it won't take another generation or two before these improvements become standard across the entire Pixel lineup.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store