Maga influencer and de facto national security adviser Laura Loomer holds outsized sway on Trump
And not just any war: they are applauding Donald Trump's high-risk decision to bomb Iran's nuclear facilities, a move that was considered a war too far even by the Bush administration.
Maga's quick flip-flop has made it clear that Maga was never really anti-war. Maga is about xenophobia, not isolationism, and its support for Trump's decision to bomb a Muslim country fits in with its support for his draconian campaign against immigrants.
But above all, Maga is about fealty to Trump.
That formula certainly helps explain why Laura Loomer, who has emerged as the most prominent Maga America First influencer in the early days of Trump's second term, has given her full support to his Iran strike.
In early April, Loomer, a 32-year-old pro-Trump online influencer widely seen as a rightwing conspiracy theorist, met with Trump and gave him a list of names of people on the staff of the national security council that she believed were not loyal enough to Trump or at least had professional backgrounds that she considered suspect. Trump fired six staffers. Later, national security adviser Mike Waltz, whom Loomer had criticized for his role in the Signalgate chat leak scandal, was ousted as well.
Loomer doesn't have a job in the government, but she has still emerged as one of Trump's most important and most polarizing foreign policy advisers in the early days of his second administration. She has had direct access to Trump and has used it to push for ideological purges inside the administration, instilling fear and anger among national security professionals.
In fact, when it comes to the national security side of the Trump administration, Loomer has been something akin to a one-woman Doge. Now the big question is how long her influence with Trump will last, or whether she will soon go out the same way as Elon Musk.
Loomer's power in the Trump administration is ill-defined. Her many critics say she has just been taking credit for moves that Trump was already planning. But Trump himself has said he takes her seriously, so it may be more accurate to describe her as Trump's de facto national security adviser.
Press reports recently suggested that Loomer's status in the White House was waning because she had overreached, much like Musk. She has left a trail of bitter Trump aides, while there have also been reports that Trump himself has grown weary of her. But, as if to disprove the reports that she was getting frozen out, Loomer had a private meeting with JD Vance in early June.
In a revealing interview on journalist Tara Palmeri's podcast in late April, Loomer said that her White House access came directly from Trump himself, and that she maintained her relationship with the president even as his aides tried to keep her out. 'Donald Trump is my biggest ally in the White House,' she said.
'I don't have delusions of grandeur, but I certainly do believe that a lot of the information I have given him has protected him and has prevented disasters from happening,' she added. 'I believe that the information that I provide is valuable. And I believe that it has proven itself to be an asset to President Trump and his apparatus. I don't know why some of the people that work for him don't want that information around him. But I'm not going to let that stop me. I'm going to keep on uncovering information and finding ways to get it to President Trump – and informing President Trump about individuals within his inner circle that are working against his agenda.'
Loomer added that 'it all comes down to vetting at the end of the day'.
Loomer's close ties to Trump first became big news during the 2024 presidential campaign, when she traveled with the Republican candidate on his campaign plane despite repeated efforts by Trump aides to keep her away. The aides were particularly upset that Loomer traveled with Trump on September 11, since she had earlier gained online infamy after posting a video claiming that the 9/11 attack on the World Trade Center was an 'inside job'. To be sure, fears by his aides that Trump was associating with a conspiracy theorist ignored the fact that he relishes in spreading conspiracy theories far and wide. During the 2024 campaign, Trump promoted a conspiracy theory that Haitian immigrants were eating pets in Springfield, Ohio; that xenophobic lie became the hallmark of Trump's fall campaign.
Sign up to This Week in Trumpland
A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration
after newsletter promotion
Once Trump returned to office, Loomer began to flex her newfound power, and even professional ties to top Trump administration officials weren't enough to protect staffers from being fired after Loomer gave her list of names to Trump. Among those fired at the NSC was Brian Walsh, who had worked on the staff of the Senate intelligence committee for Marco Rubio, now serving as both secretary of state and national security adviser, when Rubio was in the Senate.
The most stunning purge attributed to Loomer came in April when Trump fired Gen Timothy Haugh, the director of the National Security Agency, along with his top deputy, after they had found their way on to Loomer's list as well. The fact that Loomer could trigger the firing of a senior military officer in charge of the nation's largest intelligence agency finally led to a bipartisan outcry in Washington. A group of Senate Democrats wrote to Trump saying that the firings were 'inexplicable', while Mitch McConnell, a Kentucky Republican senator who is now a leading Trump critic, lamented that experienced military leaders were being ousted while 'amateur isolationists' are in senior policy positions. The moves even troubled Mike Rounds, a South Dakota Republican senator and Trump loyalist who is the chair of the cybersecurity subcommittee of the Senate armed services committee. Rounds made a point of praising Haugh during a subcommittee hearing soon after his firing and noted that 'men and women capable of leading the National Security Agency … are in short supply. We do not have enough of these types of leaders, and a loss of any one of them without strong justification is disappointing.'
But like Musk, Loomer has been so red-hot in the early days of Trump's second term that her fall seems almost inevitable, especially after she began to call out White House actions she didn't like.
In May, for example, she publicly criticized Trump's decision to accept a luxury jet from Qatar.
When news of the gift was first reported, Loomer posted a statement saying: 'This is really going to be such a stain on the admin if this is true.' She added: 'I say that as someone who would take a bullet for Trump. I'm so disappointed.' She later backtracked and became more supportive. But later she was critical of Trump's decision to withdraw the nomination of billionaire Jared Isaacman to be the head of Nasa, whose nomination she had supported. 'There is reason to believe that Isaacman may be facing retaliation because of his friendship with @elonmusk,' Loomer posted as the news first broke. Days later, Isaacman suggested that he also believes that his nomination was withdrawn because of his ties to Musk.
Loomer has been careful to try to limit her criticism to Trump's aides, and not to Trump himself. But it is an open question how long that distinction will make a difference for Loomer. During the Palmeri podcast, Loomer said that she is 'not going to be a sycophant and sit there and pretend that every little thing is great'. She added that 'there's a lot of incompetence in the White House. There's a lot of people in positions they shouldn't be in and they embarrass the president on a daily basis.'
That is the backdrop for Loomer's strong support for Trump's decision to attack Iran. Perhaps concerned that her earlier criticism was damaging her ties to Trump world, Loomer has been profuse with her praise of Trump's Iran attack, while also defending her America First credentials. In one post, she asked 'How is it not AMERICA FIRST to congratulate those who just made sure Islamists who chant 'DEATH TO AMERICA' … never have an opportunity to have a nuke?' She has even gone on the offensive against other rightwing influencers, including Tucker Carlson, who have dared criticize the Iran strike. 'I am screenshotting everyone's posts and I'm going to deliver them in a package to President Trump so he sees who is truly with him and who isn't,' Loomer posted. 'And I think by now everyone knows I mean it when I say I'm going to deliver something to Trump.'
For Maga influencers, staying on Trump's good side seems to matter more than issues of war and peace.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
29 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Why a top Cabinet secretary was glaringly missing during Trump's marathon meeting with his closest advisers
One of the most prominent and publicly-recognized members of President Donald Trump 's Cabinet was missing from Tuesday's meeting at the White House. Health and Human Service Secretary Robert F. Kennedy was glaring absent from the table at the president's marathon sit down in the Cabinet Room. Kennedy was on international travel, a spokesperson said. 'Due to long-planned international travel, the Secretary couldn't attend today's Cabinet meeting. However, he remains in constant contact with HHS leadership and today took decisive action by declaring a public health emergency for the State of Texas,' an HHS spokesperson told Daily Mail. No additional details were given. Trump held the sixth Cabinet meeting of his administration. Other prominent secretaries - including Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Attorney General Pam Bondi and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth - were present to chat with the president about the work of his administration. Kennedy is one of the most notorious and controversial cabinet members. His controversial views on vaccines has led to some accusing him of spreading misinformation on the issue. In fact several leading medical groups are suing Kennedy over changes to federal COVID-19 vaccine recommendations. The suit - which includes the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American College of Physicians and the American Public Health Association - was filed in federal court and asks for a reversal of Kennedy's decision to remove pregnant women and healthy children from the COVID-19 vaccine schedule. Kennedy has pushed a Make America Healthy Again agenda - a play off Trump's campaign slogan of Make America Great Again. But even that plan came under fire when the news outlet NOTUS reported that seven of the more than 500 studies cited in the HHS report - which decried America's food supply, pesticides and prescription drugs - did not appear to have ever been published. The administration shrugged it off as 'formatting issues.' President Trump has been supportive of his health secretary. Kennedy is also moving to ban dyes in food and fluoride in water. The son of the late Attorney General Robert Kennedy made his own presidential bid as a Democrat before dropping out of the contest and endorsing Trump.
The Independent
31 minutes ago
- The Independent
Judge orders mental evaluation for Venezuelan man convicted of killing Laken Riley
A judge has ordered a mental evaluation of the Venezuelan man convicted of killing Georgia nursing student Laken Riley. A judge in November found Jose Ibarra guilty of murder and other crimes in Riley's February 2024 killing and sentenced him to life in prison without the possibility of parole. Ibarra is seeking a new trial, and his lawyers asked the judge to order a mental evaluation as part of that process. Clarke County Superior Court Judge H. Patrick Haggard's order for a mental evaluation was sent to the state Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities Tuesday, according to a letter filed with the court. Riley's killing became part of the national debate about immigration during last year's presidential campaign. Ibarra had entered the U.S. illegally in 2022 and was allowed to stay while he pursued his immigration case, federal immigration authorities said after his arrest. President Donald Trump in January signed into law the Laken Riley Act, which requires the detention of unauthorized immigrants accused of theft and violent crimes. Prosecutors said Ibarra encountered Riley while she was running on the University of Georgia campus on Feb. 22 and killed her during a struggle. Riley, 22, was a student at Augusta University College of Nursing, which also has a campus in Athens, about 70 miles (115 kilometers) east of Atlanta. In a court filing last month, Ibarra's post-conviction attorneys, James Luttrell and David Douds, said they believe Ibarra suffers from 'congenital deficiency' that could make him 'incapable of preparing a defense and standing trial." Ibarra 'lacks the mental capacity" to understand the proceedings, and his attorney wrote that he believes that was the case at the time of the killing and at the time of trial. Ibarra, 27, had waived his right to a jury trial, meaning it was up to Athens-Clarke County Superior Court Judge H. Patrick Haggard alone to hear and decide the case. 'A criminal defendant must personally and intelligently participate in the waiver of the constitutional right to a trial by jury,' Luttrell and Douds wrote, noting that Ibarra's trial attorney did not ask for a competency evaluation. Prosecutor Sheila Ross wrote in a court filing responding to the request that there were 'no challenges or concerns' about Ibarra's competency prior to trial and that 'there is nothing in the trial record that would suggest that Defendant was not competent during his trial.' But she wrote that she does not oppose the request for a competency evaluation. Haggard last week filed an order asking the Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities to evaluate Ibarra with the aid of a Spanish-language interpreter. He asked for findings on whether Ibarra was capable of understanding the pretrial proceedings involving the waiver of his right to a jury trial, as well as the trial itself, and whether he was capable of assisting his attorney to prepare his defense. He also wants to know whether Ibarra understands the post-conviction proceedings and can aid in preparing his defense. Ibarra was convicted on Nov. 20 and his attorneys filed a motion for a new trial on Dec. 2. Under Georgia law, a notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of a conviction becoming final, which is the date of sentencing or the denial of a motion for a new trial, whichever is later. Therefore, the filing of a motion for a new trial effectively extends the deadline to file an appeal.
NBC News
42 minutes ago
- NBC News
With their megabill signed into law, Republicans seek to buck midterm history: From the Politics Desk
Welcome to the online version of From the Politics Desk, an evening newsletter that brings you the NBC News Politics team's latest reporting and analysis from the White House, Capitol Hill and the campaign trail. In today's edition, Steve Kornacki dives into recent midterm history to show what Republicans are up against as they seek to maintain their House majority next year. Plus, Bridget Bowman explores why so many independents are running for statewide office. — Adam Wollner With their megabill signed into law, Republicans seek to buck midterm history As it made its way through Congress, the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" received consistently low marks from the public. This has fed Democratic optimism as the 2026 midterm playing field begins to take shape. Previous unpopular legislative pushes from presidents are being invoked, from Bill Clinton's 1993 tax hike to Barack Obama's health-care overhaul in 2010 to the Donald Trump-led GOP's unsuccessful Obamacare repeal attempt in 2017. All of these efforts preceded dire midterm losses by the party that controlled the White House, an outcome Democrats believe is on the table now. Republicans, meanwhile, face the task of either reversing voters' views of the Trump megabill or shifting the focus away from it and onto other issues where they are better positioned politically. And they must do this with the weight of midterm history stacked against them. This is particularly stark when it comes to the House, where Republicans have just 220 seats. That means that a net loss of just three would cost them their majority next year. And here's how the president's party has fared over the last 15 midterms: Note that in only two cases did the White House party manage to pick up House seats. And both come with a ready explanation. When Clinton's Democrats gained five seats in 1998, it coincided with the GOP's wildly unpopular impeachment effort, which fomented a backlash and drove up the president's approval rating (68% in the exit poll). And the Republicans' gain of eight seats in 2002 came just a year after 9/11, when public support for President George W. Bush remained unusually strong and deep. There were also minimal losses suffered by Republicans in 1986 and 1990, although those can be chalked up in large part to how diminished the House GOP ranks already were heading into those midterms. Simply put, there just weren't that many seats left for Republicans to lose in those years. So, is there anything here Trump's GOP can take solace from now? Ironically, it's the most recent entry on the list. In 2022, Joe Biden's approval rating was barely at 40%, a level that has often correlated with heavy midterm losses. And Biden and his party were also saddled with an unpopular legislative achievement, the Inflation Reduction Act. But despite forecasts of a bloodbath, Democrats lost only a net of nine House seats, coming far closer to retaining their majority than anyone had expected. It's a matter of debate what exactly caused this, but the bottom line is that a sizable number of voters with negative views of Biden and his agenda nonetheless voted for Democratic candidates. Some combination of negative views of Trump, the Republican Party and individual Republican candidates likely played a role. Trump's current approval rating is at 46.4%, according to the RealClearPolitics polling average. That's four points better than Biden's was on Election Day 2022 and also three points above where Trump himself was during his first midterm in 2018, when his party lost 41 House seats. Historically speaking, though, it's still a perilous place for an incumbent to be. While Republicans certainly hope that Trump can maintain and even improve on his current standing, their bigger hope may lie in our latest NBC News Decision Desk poll, which found that 57% of Americans have a negative view of the Democratic Party. If they can push that number even higher, it could offer them their best — and maybe only — chance at defying midterm history. Dan Osborn is the latest independent to launch a statewide run By Bridget Bowman Dan Osborn, a mechanic and Navy veteran, is launching another run for Senate in Nebraska, becoming the latest candidate to run for statewide office who is looking to capitalize on voters' disdain for both parties. 'I want to show people that we can get back to working with a government that's by and for the people and not for the 1% and the corporations,' Osborn said in an interview with NBC News ahead of his launch on Tuesday. Republicans have already signaled they plan to replicate the playbook they used against Osborn last year and paint him as a Democrat masquerading as an independent. Osborn made a surprisingly competitive run against GOP Sen. Deb Fischer last year, losing by 7 points as Trump carried Nebraska by 20 points. But Osborn contends he is a 'lifelong independent,' not having registered to vote with either party and describing himself as fiscally conservative and more socially liberal. He could have a slightly easier time campaigning without a party label than other independent Senate candidates running in deeply Republican states who have clearer, and recent, ties to the Democratic Party. In Mississippi, Ty Pinkins left the Democratic Party to challenge GOP Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith as an independent in 2026. But he has run for office multiple times as a Democrat, including an unsuccessful race last year against GOP Sen. Roger Wicker. In Idaho, former state Rep. Todd Achilles, another Democrat-turned-independent, is running against Republican Senate Jim Risch. And in South Dakota, retired Air Force Lt. Col. Brian Bengs launched an independent bid against GOP Sen. Mike Rounds after losing a 2022 Senate race as a Democrat. This new wave of independent Senate campaigns underscore just how toxic the Democratic brand has become in ruby red states. Bengs, for example, told The New York Times that voters 'ruled out any possibility of supporting me because the letter 'D' was beside my name.' Meanwhile, Detroit Mayor Mike Duggan, a longtime Democrat, is running as a third-party candidate for governor of battleground Michigan. But recent history shows other independent candidates have struggled to overcome the partisan bent of their states or compete against the two major parties. The last time voters sent a new independent candidate to the Senate was in 2012, when Maine's Angus King won his first term, and that was after he had served as the state's governor. King and Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., have easily won re-election since their first campaigns and caucus with Democrats. There are currently no independent governors. Still, these candidates believe they have an opening among voters who have negative views of Republicans and Democrats. As Duggan recently told NBC News, 'Every place I go, the depth of anger at the two parties runs deep.'
