
The boredom we grew up with — and why it mattered
The other day, my 17-year-old niece looked my wife dead in the eye and said, 'You grew up bored.'
It wasn't an insult. It was said with the clinical certainty of someone who's watched two TikToks on attention spans and half a YouTube explainer on dopamine loops. But I saw my wife turn a few shades of crimson, like someone just accused her of growing up without WiFi. Which, of course, she did.
I, being the supportive husband I am, guffawed.
Because let's call it what it is—we were bored. Spectacularly so. Long summers without AC. Doordarshan reruns. The excruciating 30-minute wait for Windows 95 to boot up. The thrill of finishing a library book and waiting a whole week to borrow another. And oddly, we turned out okay.
But we now live in an age where boredom is treated like a bug in the human operating system—something to be fixed, optimized, swiped away.
We are a generation that remembers waiting. For the dial-up to connect. For the train to arrive. For the film to develop. Today's world, however, spins on the axis of immediacy. There's an app for everything—sometimes two. Waiting is for chumps. And effort? That's for people who didn't buy the premium plan.
Homework? Ask ChatGPT. Content? Let the algorithm decide. Love? Swipe till the dopamine hits. Hunger? Ten-minute delivery and not a single utensil dirtied. What was once activity is now choreography—perfected to the beat of thumb taps and real-time notifications.
We've converted every task into a verb, and every verb into a transaction. But somewhere in this efficiency opera, we forgot: verbs were meant to carry weight. To do something. To feel the doing.
Now, we don't really act. We tap. Then wait.
And in that silence between intention and gratification, something quietly unravels.
What we've gained in speed, we've lost in soul. Instant delivery, instant validation, instant everything. It's convenient, yes. But it's also cheap. The high fades, the craving lingers. It's like eating candy when what we needed was a meal.
The pleasure is immediate. The emptiness? That comes later.
Because true satisfaction doesn't come preloaded. It takes work. It comes from burning your fingers trying to learn the guitar, from screwing up a dish and then getting it right, from talking to someone without the crutch of emojis and WiFi. The kind of effort that doesn't guarantee success—but guarantees you'll feel something.
And that's what we're losing—the ability to feel.
We're raising a generation fluent in multitasking but foreign to focus. They can FaceTime from anywhere but dread phone calls. They can get everything faster, yet feel slower inside. Peace isn't elusive—it's just never been modelled.
We've made them so reliant on their devices that, frankly, if you wanted to kill Gen Z, you wouldn't need a weapon. Just turn off their phones and watch them dissolve into existential dust.
This isn't nostalgia for a better time. It's an SOS from one that remembers what effort felt like.
So maybe the answer isn't more innovation. Maybe it's intentional friction. The kind that slows you down just enough to notice. That makes you pause long enough to care.
Because in the race to make life easier, we risk forgetting how to live it.
Let's not just build faster tools. Let's build fuller lives.
Before boredom becomes the last thing that made us human.
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer
Views expressed above are the author's own.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Trump to unveil investments to power AI boom
Academy Empower your mind, elevate your skills US president Donald Trump heads to Pennsylvania on Tuesday to announce energy and infrastructure deals intended to meet big tech's soaring demand for electricity needed to fuel the AI will make the announcement at the inaugural Pennsylvania Energy and Innovation Summit at Carnegie Mellon tech world has fully embraced generative AI as the next wave of technology, but fears are growing that its massive electricity needs cannot be met by current infrastructure, particularly in the United AI requires enormous computing power, mainly to run the energy-hungry processors from Nvidia, the California-based company that has become the world's most valuable company by market expect that by 2028, tech companies will need as much as five gigawatts of power for AI -- enough electricity to power roughly five million to an official who spoke to Bloomberg, Trump's announcement will total $70 billion in executives from BlackRock, Palantir, Anthropic, Exxon and Chevron are slated to participate, the official funding will cover new data centers, power generation, grid infrastructure, AI training, and apprenticeship programs. Google said it is committing $25 billion to build AI-ready data centers in Pennsylvania and surrounding regions."We support President Trump's clear and urgent direction that our nation invest in AI... so that America can continue to lead in AI," said Ruth Porat, Google's president and chief investment officer, who attended the search engine giant also announced a partnership with Brookfield Asset Management to to modernize two hydropower facilities in Pennsylvania, representing 670 MW of capacity on the regional David McCormick, from Pennsylvania, said the investments "are of enormous consequence to Pennsylvania, but they are also crucial to the future of the nation."His comments reflect the growing sentiment in Washington that the United States must not lose ground to China in the race to develop AI."If the United States does not lead this revolution on our own terms, we will hand control of our infrastructure, our data, our leadership, and our way of life to Communist China," McCormick wrote in a Fox News launched the "Stargate" project in January, aimed at investing up to $500 billion in US AI infrastructure -- primarily in response to growing competition with tech investor SoftBank, ChatGPT-maker OpenAI, and Oracle are investing $100 billion in the initial has also reversed many policies adopted by the previous Biden administration that imposed checks on developing powerful AI algorithms and limits on exports of advanced technology to certain allied is expected to outline his own blueprint for AI advancement later this month.


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Nvidia's Jensen Huang rips MIT study claiming AI makes people dumb, says 'As a CEO, I spend most...'
Dismissing a recent MIT study that suggests Artificial Intelligence (AI) diminishes cognitive abilities, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang has an astonishing claim saying that AI has actually improved his thinking skills. Huang, whose net worth soared $1 billion as the chipmaker joined the $4 trillion club, admitted he uses AI every day so that it could teach him something new. In an interview to CNN, the Nvidia CEO said he used AI "literally everyday" and believes his "cognitive skills are actually advancing." "I haven't looked at their research yet, but I have to admit, I'm using AI literally every single day," Huang stated during the interview. "I think my cognitive skills are actually advancing, and the reason for that is because I am not asking it to do the thinking for me." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Dream Kitchen Within Reach? See How HomeLane Get Quote Undo Jensen Huang said AI assists him in solving problems that he would not have been able to. He asks the AI tool, 'Are you sure this is the best answer you can provide?' and asserts that AI is making him smarter. ALSO READ: Emmy Nominations 2025: 'Severance,' 'The White Lotus' and 'Adolescence' to bag big scores? Full list revealed Live Events A new study from researchers at MIT's Media study, which analyzed 54 subjects writing SAT essays using ChatGPT, Google Search, or no tools showed concerning results. Researchers used an EEG to record the writers' brain activity across 32 regions, and found that of the three groups, ChatGPT users had the lowest brain engagement and 'consistently underperformed at neural, linguistic, and behavioral levels. Over the course of several months, ChatGPT users got lazier with each subsequent essay, often resorting to copy-and-paste by the end of the study. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang on MIT study Challenging the study's methodology and questioning how participants are using AI tools, he said, "I am not exactly sure what people are using it for that would cause you to now not have to think," he told CNN's "Fareed Zakaria GPS" that aired Sunday. "But if you have the thing in order, for example, the idea of prompting an AI, the idea of asking questions... you're spending most of your time today asking me questions in order to ask good questions. It's a highly cognitive skill." ALSO READ: National Hurricane Center has a warning for Florida, Texas as Gulf tropical development chances are increasing He added, 'You know this is no different than getting three opinions. Three doctors' opinions. I do the same thing. I ask the same question to multiple AIs. And I ask them to compare each other's notes and then, you know, give me the best of all the answers.' This methodology, according to Huang, actually strengthens analytical abilities rather than weakening them. "So I think that process of critiquing and critiquing the answers of your critical thinking enhances cognitive skills," he explained, offering direct advice to the MIT study participants: "Apply critical thinking." 'I'm not exactly sure what people are using it for that would cause you to not have to think, but you have to think. When I'm interacting with AI, it's a questioning system. You're asking it questions. In order to formulate good questions, you have to be thinking. You have to be analytical. You have to be reasoning yourself,' Huang further said. 'I think that process of critiquing, criticising, the answers, you know, critical thinking enhances cognitive skills. And so to all the people who were taking those tests, I would advise that they apply critical thinking,' he concluded. ALSO READ: Cory Mills apartment scandal: Why is the Florida Congressman losing his swanky Washington home? Stressing that AI should be used as a learning tool rather than a replacement for thinking, the Nvidia CEO said, "I'm asking it to teach me many things that I don't know or help me solve problems otherwise I wouldn't be able to solve reasonably or research." Huang further that effective AI interaction requires sophisticated cognitive skills, particularly in formulating quality questions. "As a CEO, I spend most of my time asking questions, and 90% of my instructions are actually, you know, conflated with questions," Huang explained. "When I'm interacting with AI, it's a questioning system. You're asking a question, so I think that in order to formulate good questions, you have to be thinking, have to be analytical, reasoning yourself."


The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
Two senior citizens from Hyderabad lose ₹58.8 lakh after clicking social media ads
In separate incidents of cyber fraud, two senior citizens in Hyderabad have been duped of over ₹58.8 lakh after falling prey to a deceptive online schemes, one through an Instagram-based trading platform, and the other via a misleading YouTube advertisement promising a high-value coin sale. In the first case, a 60-year-old resident of Jubilee Hills lost over ₹57.4 lakh after being misled by a fraudulent investment platform called 'FX Road'. The victim came across the platform through an Instagram advertisement, which led him to engage with individuals posing as 'trading experts'. After convincing him to register and sign documents digitally, they guided him to invest via credit card payments and bank transfers, claiming the funds were being used to trade in crude oil, precious metals, company stocks like Tesla, and cryptocurrencies. To build trust, the platform initially displayed fake profits. Later, the scammers pressured the victim to deposit more funds to maintain 'margin levels' as the market became volatile. This led him to borrow ₹7–8 lakh from Navi, a financial services platform, and pledge his ICICI Prudential Savings Suraksha policy to raise an additional ₹17.5 lakh. He was further asked to deposit a further ₹25–32 lakh. Realising he had been deceived, the victim reported the matter to the national cybercrime helpline (1930). Investigations later revealed that the fraudsters had impersonated representatives of a reputed brokerage firm, Trade Bulls, and used forged documents to run a well-orchestrated scam. In a second incident, a 68-year-old resident of Dar-ul-shifa lost over ₹1.46 lakh after responding to a YouTube advertisement falsely claiming that a ₹20 coin could be sold for ₹50 lakh. Tempted by the offer, the victim called the number provided and was contacted by a man who identified himself as 'Raj Gyani.' Claiming to be a collector, the fraudster initially requested ₹1,500 to 'create a file' for the transaction, then continued to extract money under various pretexts including documentation and clearance charges. Trusting the process, the victim transferred multiple payments totalling ₹1,46,100. When the fraudster demanded an additional ₹1 lakh, the victim realised he had been conned and subsequently reported the fraud to the cybercrime helpline. Investigation is underway.