logo
Ontario councillor facing criminal charge speaks at meeting, advocates denied deputation

Ontario councillor facing criminal charge speaks at meeting, advocates denied deputation

Global News2 days ago
Advocates attending the meeting of an Ontario municipality shouted their frustrations Tuesday evening, as a councillor facing a criminal charge was allowed to speak on the very topic they had been banned from discussing.
Members of the Women of Ontario Say No advocacy group sat in the Niagara Falls council chamber, alongside supporters of Coun. Mike Strange, where Mayor Jim Diodati struggled to maintain decorum from both sides.
The meeting followed dramatic events in June, where the advocacy group was denied the chance to speak about issues of municipal conduct because the city said it could impact an ongoing legal matter.
After they were told they could not speak, the group attended a June 17 meeting with signs, and its members were arrested. They were later released without charge.
Their frustration bubbled over at Tuesday's meeting, as Coun. Strange, who was charged with domestic assault in May, was allowed to stand during the council meeting and talk about municipal accountability legislation — and the allegation against him.
Story continues below advertisement
The charge against Strange has not been proven in court.
'Every individual is presumed innocent until proven guilty,' Strange said during Tuesday's meeting.
'This is not just a legal technicality; it is a fundamental protection of fairness and justice in our society. To remove an elected official based on an unproven and unfounded allegation would set a dangerous precedent and undermines the very democratic principles that we rely on.'
His speech was punctuated with expressions of frustration from the advocates and met with applause from his supporters. The councillor had previously asked his friends and supporters to attend the meeting and applauded his speech.
Get breaking National news
For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
It has been roughly six weeks since the Women of Ontario Say No first asked to present to Niagara Falls council about municipal reform. Their intention, they say, was to seek support for amendments to provincial law, including having councillors put on paid leave if they are criminally charged.
Emily McIntosh, the founder of the group, said it was 'shocking' that Strange was allowed to speak on the very topic her group had been denied a delegation on.
'It really undermines the credibility of council to allow double rules,' she said.
'Frankly, it felt terrible to be on the other side of that, where we were denied the opportunity to speak because it may relate to ongoing legal proceedings — even though that wasn't the case, it was very general in nature — and then a councillor could get up, not only speak to that but then also speak to his own personal support that he received.'
Story continues below advertisement
McIntosh said it was 'extremely unprofessional' that council allowed Strange to speak at all on the topic. 'This is exactly why the public is losing trust in publicly-elected officials,' she said.
Another councillor did suggest Strange should not address the ongoing legal matter during the meeting, but the city's CAO said he believed Strange could talk on the topic because he could waive his own privilege rights.
Mayor Diodati, who makes calls on who can speak as the chair of the council meeting, told Strange he should avoid referencing his own situation. He did not intervene when Strange discussed the charge.
McIntosh said she spoke to a member of the local group who turned out to support Strange. She said they agreed to add supporting the Women of Ontario Say No's municipal reform plans to the agenda at their next meeting.
'So, I will give credit where credit is due,' she said. 'It is very fascinating to me that that core group is willing to provide space to discuss and engage and we couldn't see the same from the Niagara Falls council.'
The Women of Ontario Say No has also retained a lawyer, who wrote to the city and local police after the arrests in June. They are considering a legal challenge to force Niagara Falls to allow them to make their presentation and for a public apology.
Story continues below advertisement
At Tuesday's meeting, Coun. Lori Lococo said her colleagues and the city had not treated the group fairly.
'It was stated that they could not have a delegation; there was no opportunity for something to be put on the agenda,' she said.
'I'm all about fairness — they weren't treated fairly to provide what they needed. I understand what you're saying, maybe in the lawyer's correspondence, they were given that option, but they were not given that option from day one.'
During the meeting, Strange tabled a motion to ask staff to research proposed municipal conduct legislation. He said the advocacy group could speak on the day the staff report is finished, at which point — they say — it will be too late.
The legislation that the Women of Ontario Say No wanted to discuss at Niagara Falls council is currently being debated by a legislative committee, as the Ford government decides if it needs to make changes.
Ontario NDP MPP Jeff Burch said Niagara Falls council was in danger of distracting and taking away from a discussion on how to improve the law.
'It's really detracting from what is supposed to be a bill that makes the municipal arena safer for women, so more people feel comfortable putting their name in the ring to become councillors and work for municipalities,' he said.
Story continues below advertisement
'It's about making things safer for women and all of these actions designed to silence the voices of women who are trying to make things safer for women is something I find very troubling.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

B.C. restaurateur raises concerns with province's Racist Incident Helpline
B.C. restaurateur raises concerns with province's Racist Incident Helpline

Global News

time5 hours ago

  • Global News

B.C. restaurateur raises concerns with province's Racist Incident Helpline

A Victoria businessman is raising concerns after his conversation with the province's Racist Incident Helpline. Solomon Siegel was at Victoria's Pride Parade last week and says he saw a booth selling a shirt with the word 'intifada' on it. The Arabic word means a rebellion or uprising. He described the shirt as having pictures of children on it with a Palestinian flag and an anti-zionist phrase. When Siegel, the owner of the well-known Victoria restaurant Pagliacci's, got home, he said he called the newly established hotline but said he became angry with what he heard from the person on the other end of the phone. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy 'Immediately, the person said intifada means struggle and there is a genocide going on, and I said, 'Excuse me, you understand the history of these words,'' Siegel told Global News. Story continues below advertisement 1:23 B.C. legislation introduced to address systemic racism The Racist Incident Helpline is funded by the provincial government but administered by the United Way. The parliamentary secretary for racism in B.C. said she called Siegel and apologized. 'It is not for the hotline to judge, they are there to provide supports,' Jessie Sunner said. 'It (is) something that should have happened and didn't.' The booth with the t-shirt was run by an independent vendor. 'We have generally accepted we allow these marginal groups to define their racism and on an anti racism hotline, as a Jewish person, I was not afforded that,' Siegel said. Sunner said the province is now ensuring the United Way will be adding additional staff training following this incident.

‘Who really is in charge of the waterways?': B.C. boy's death prompts call for change
‘Who really is in charge of the waterways?': B.C. boy's death prompts call for change

Global News

time5 hours ago

  • Global News

‘Who really is in charge of the waterways?': B.C. boy's death prompts call for change

The family of a 10-year-old boy who was struck and killed by a speedboat while being towed on an inner tube in Burrard Inlet off Cates Park in North Vancouver on June 7 said their lives are forever changed. 'It will never be easy,' mom Shelley Klassen told Global News. Dad Jason Hall said his son's death is something that no one can prepare for. 'It's the unthinkable,' he said. Another child was critically injured in the crash. Now, the Tsleil-Waututh First Nation is pitching to be part of a water guardianship program to help increase enforcement on the water. Hall said they are on board '100 per cent.' Story continues below advertisement 'Being a coastal metropolis, maybe we should pay attention to this,' he said. 'People are getting more vessels, people are getting bigger vessels… we need to make some changes.' Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Deanna George, a councillor with the Tsleil-Waututh First Nation, said there is a lot of marine traffic on the waterways and following Hall's death, they want more of a presence. 'Reminding (boaters), educating them, basically putting a Tsleil-Waututh Nation face in our territory,' she told Global News. 'Get people to think logically or be more mindful of other people who are using these waters.' 1:57 Tragic speedboat crash that killed boy sparks calls for more enforcement off Cates Park George said the nation had already been in talks with other levels of government but Hall's death has highlighted a need for more collaboration and presence among different groups. Story continues below advertisement Speed and alcohol are believed to be factors in the fatal accident, North Vancouver RCMP said. The driver of the boat is expected in court in August. 'Guardians are an extension of First Nations self-determination, serving as their Nation's 'boots on the ground' and providing cultural expertise and stewardship, monitoring, public safety, education and knowledge exchange,' according to the provincial government. Klassen said that this accident is 'not for nothing.' 'We as a family don't want any other family to go through what we've just gone through and what we will continue to go through.' Klasses added that it is clear there is not enough authority on the water to monitor the boaters. 'We don't know who really is in charge of the waterways?' she said. 'And an organization, like the Tsleil-Waututh First Nation, if they would like to come forth and start a program that is a presence on the water… we welcome the First Nations people in that area to come and do some amazing work.'

Residents take City of Calgary to court over rezoning of former Viscount Bennett site
Residents take City of Calgary to court over rezoning of former Viscount Bennett site

Global News

time6 hours ago

  • Global News

Residents take City of Calgary to court over rezoning of former Viscount Bennett site

A group of residents in the southwest communities of Richmond and Knob Hill are taking the City of Calgary to court over a council decision to change the zoning of the former Viscount Bennett school site to make way for a high-density development. On April 8, city council voted 9-5 in favour of rezoning the former school site along Crowchild Trail between 26 Avenue and 33 Avenue S.W. Now, a group called Neighbours for Richmond and Knob Hill hope to challenge that decision, seeking a judicial review. 'The basis is that council failed to comply with steps and procedures as outlined as part of the Municipal Government Act,' said Lucia Rossini-Lake, one of the members of Neighbours for Richmond and Knob Hill. The group claims city council made its decision, following a public hearing, without recent traffic data or studies on area infrastructure. Story continues below advertisement 'We know there's going to be development, it just has to be reasonable,' said Storm Purdy, another member of the group. 'If you're going to plunk something down, you want to make sure that the pipes work and make sure that the traffic flows before you actually build anything.' The proposed development's impact on traffic has been a significant concern for those living in the area throughout the process. Stephanie Howard, who has lived in Richmond since 1996, noted she often has to warn other drivers to slow down through the neighbourhood. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy 'I think the traffic will increase exponentially, which is really unfortunate,' she told Global News. 'I don't think the streets have the capacity for that.' 2:05 Activists protest outside Calgary courts hoping to stop fluoridization of drinking water Council's approval of the rezoning for the site came with several conditions including infrastructure upgrades, improvements to three intersections in the area, and more than $1 million to build a new bus rapid transit stop along Crowchild Trail. Story continues below advertisement While taking questions after the decision in April, Ward 8 Coun. Courtney Walcott said people's habits 'take time to shift.' 'People have to see the bus, they have to know that it's accessible, they have to know that it's safe and know the timelines,' he said at the time. 'That stuff will come.' Minto Communities purchased the property from the Calgary Board of Education in 2023. The development proposal includes eight buildings, mostly between four and six storeys tall, as well as a trio of 16-storey towers along Crowchild Trail that could accommodate up to 1,509 units. However, planning documents show the building heights were scaled back from a maximum of 30 storeys in the original proposal, and the amount of anticipated units dropped from 2,503 to just 1,231 units in the updated plan. A development permit application for one of the buildings on the southeast corner of the site is currently under review, according to the City of Calgary's development map According to Purdy, residents would prefer if the development remained within the guidelines in the Local Area Plan of 400 units per hectare. 'The scaled back version is obviously a scaled back version, but it's still too big,' Purdy said. 'It's not appropriate for this community.' Story continues below advertisement Both the City of Calgary and Minto Communities declined a request for comment from Global News as the matter is before the courts. An initial court date to hear the residents' application has been set for July 23.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store