Keir Starmer keeping open mind on BBC licence fee axe
Addressing this, Culture Select Committee chair Dame Caroline challenged the Labour leader on the "regressive tax".
According to The Sun, when asked about the future of the licence fee yesterday, Keir Starmer said: 'We're going through the review and it'll obviously come to its conclusion, and we keep an open mind on what we need to do with the licence fee.
Keir Starmer said he was 'open-minded' about the future of the TV licence (Image: PA/Stefan Rousseau) "But we are working closely with the BBC.'
The TV licence is a fee paid by households that watch, record or stream any television transmissions at the same time they are being broadcast.
The fee was introduced in 1946, when TV broadcasting resumed in the aftermath of the Second World War.
This licence was originally issued by the General Post Office, which was the regulator of public communications in the UK at that time.
According to the TV Licensing website, the price of the fee changed last April, seeing the cost of a colour licence rise to £174.50 a year.
The annual cost of the much rarer black and white TV licence is just £58.50.
Those who are blind or severely sight-impaired can apply for a 50% concession on this, meaning the colour licence costs £87.25.
There are also a number of other concessions and arrangements available for people living in certain types of residential care and for over-75s receiving Pension Credit.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
23 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Monmouthshire County Council 'key decisions' not published
Monmouthshire County Council agreed a change to its constitution in April that 'key decisions' made by council officers be published on the authority's website. The intention is doing so would allow councillors outside of the Labour-led cabinet to call them in for review if necessary. But Conservative member for Shirenewton, Cllr Louise Brown, questioned if that has happened. She told the full council's July meeting: 'I haven't seen any key decisions published. There must be some?'. She asked how the council will ensure the decisions are published and Labour cabinet member Councillor Angela Sandles said the decisions have to be published on the council website within two days of them being taken and they can't be implemented for five days to allow them to be called in. But the Magor East and Undy councillor said she didn't know the answer as to why seemingly no decisions have been published and said she would get back to Cllr Brown. Cllr Sandles, also in response to Cllr Brown, confirmed the council is working to 'improve' its forward planner. There has been repeated criticism over some decisions not being included on the planner and Cllr Sandles said the intention is to mark which have already been listed to go before a scrutiny committee so councillors and committee chairs can also see which others they may want to discuss.
Daily Mirror
24 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Urgent warning for thousands of drivers with cars made between these years
The car tax warning has been issued to drivers and road users who own a vehicle between a certain period of time. Here's what you need to know about the tax increase Motorists with vehicles manufactured between 2001 and 2017 have been issued with an urgent warning. A car tax alert has been sent out to drivers and road users following changes to Vehicle Excise Duty (VED) under the Labour government. Older motors, including contemporary classics registered between 1 March 2001 and 31 March 2017, remain subject to the emissions-based system, with those producing under 100g/km still exempt from charges, whilst everyone else faces a £10 hike from 2024 rates Car insurance firm Hagerty noted: "That means owners of older cars emitting more than 255g/km of CO2 will pay £735 a year for the privilege of driving on Britain's beautifully-maintained road network. Ahem." "Cars registered before 1 March 2001, that were still younger than 40 years old on 1 January 2025, are charged based on engine capacity. That's £210 a year for those under 1,549cc and £345 for anything above." It explained: "The Government considers any car older than those to be a "historic vehicle" and is therefore exempt from paying road tax, or, indeed, being required to have an annual MOT test." Vehicles registered afterwards operate under a separate framework, reports Birmingham Live. During their inaugural registration year, owners must pay a "showroom tax" calculated on the motor's CO2 output. John Cassidy, managing director of sales at Close Brothers Motor Finance, suggests certain purchasers are already deterred by insufficient battery charging networks for electric vehicles. "Applying VED to EVs provides one less incentive for buyers to make the switch," he says. Lorna Macpherson, a motor finance expert at Ocean Finance, which offers car loans, suggests that while the changes to the tax regime do make cleaner cars cheaper to run, drivers may be unable to switch due to the escalating cost of motoring. "For petrol and diesel cars, an increase in VED means higher running costs for owners, making newer, more efficient cars even more attractive," she says. "But with rising interest rates on car finance and the general cost of living crisis, many will hold on to their current vehicles for longer rather than upgrading." This has become concerning since the DVLA raised VED rates on April 1 for owners of petrol, diesel and electric vehicles, which led to significant price increases for some drivers. Motorists can quickly find out the engine size (cc), power (kW) and CO2 (g/km) of their vehicle using free online sites such as WeBuyAnyCar's number plate checker.
BBC News
24 minutes ago
- BBC News
Public frustrated by asylum seeker housing, says minister Jonathan Reynolds
Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds has said the government shares the public's "huge frustration" at the pressure the asylum system puts on housing to the BBC, he acknowledged concern about the Home Office competing with local councils to find temporary homes for asylum seekers and homeless people respectively. He said the solution lay in building more homes, processing asylum applications faster, removing those with no right to be in the UK and cutting small boat crossings. Earlier this week, the Conservatives criticised Sir Keir Starmer for claiming there was "lots of housing in many local authorities" to provide temporary accommodation for homeless families. The Conservative's new shadow housing secretary Sir James Cleverly said the remarks had "amplified" the frustrations of people who were trying to get on the housing past week has seen ongoing demonstrations outside a hotel in Epping being used to house asylum seekers. The prime minister made the remark when appearing at the Liaison Committee, a group of senior MPs. Labour MP Dame Meg Hillier, who chairs the Treasury Committee, asked the prime minister where the government was going to house homeless people, given that the price of temporary accommodation had been driven up by the need to house asylum replied: "Oh, there is lots of housing and many local authorities that can be used, and we're identifying where it can be used."Pressed for specific examples, Sir Keir said he would write to the about the comments on the Today programme, Reynolds said the prime minister "was talking about, in lengthy way, we need to put more in place to solve the housing crisis. "We're doing that and there are several options that can be considered for British families in temporary accommodation." Speaking to the same programme, chair of the Housing Committee Florence Eshalomi said councils were "at breaking point when it comes to housing supply".She said her committee had been told that between 2023- 2024, local councils had spent a total of £2.3bn on temporary accommodation and that the numbers in temporary accommodation had risen by 11% in the past year. Asked about the Sir Keir's comments, she said she would "welcome seeing the detail the prime minister was alluding to". She said it "cannot be right" that the Home Office and local authorities were having to compete for the same accommodation and that there needed to be better "co-operation" between government departments. She also said more social housing - housing that can be rented at affordable levels - needed to be built in order to ease the pressures. Figures released earlier this year found that a record 123,000 families were living in temporary housing in accommodation refers to accommodation which is organised by the local authority but is not a permanent home. It can include hotels, hostels or caravans. It is provided to those who are homeless, while they wait for longer term housing. Priority is given to those at risk of abuse from a partner or relative, pregnant women, people with dependent children or those who are homeless because of a fire or flood. Separately, the government is required by law to provide accommodation to destitute asylum seekers, while their application is being processed. In general asylum seekers are not allowed to work and earn money until their claim has been completed, although there are some exceptions. Since 2020, there has been an increased in using hotels to provide this accommodation. As of March 2025, there were 32,345 people in asylum hotels, up from 29,585 at the end of June 2024, but lower than the total in December. The Home Office's annual accounts show a third less was spent on hotels to house asylum seekers between April 2024 and March 2025, falling from £3bn to £2.1bn. A senior Home Office source told the BBC one of the main factors behind the saving was moving some asylum seekers from hotels into other types of cheaper said the department had prioritised moving families and children into regular housing so they were not living in hotels for long periods of government has said it wants to end the use of hotels to house asylum seekers altogether and Reynold told the BBC the number of hotels being used had fallen from a peak of 400 to 200. However, he added: "The solution is not about putting people into different forms of accommodation"It's about having a system where if people shouldn't be in the UK they have to leave the UK."That is government policy... it is about having a system that processes the claims at the pace they should be processed and doesn't leave people in limbo."
