
Pentagon pause on arms shipments to Ukraine part of a global review of pressures on stockpiles
The Trump administration's decision comes as Ukraine is facing intensified attacks by Russia against its civilians, and withholding that assistance could reduce Kyiv 's ability to counter deadly incoming ballistic missile attacks.
Officials said the decision was prompted by concerns that U.S. stockpiles were getting too low.
Here's a look at what the U.S. has provided Ukraine to date and why it's concerned about pressure on its own arsenal:
What weapons has the U.S. provided to Ukraine to date?
Since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, the U.S. has provided more than $67 billion in weapons and security assistance to Kyiv.
That ranges from more than 500 million bullets and grenades to 31 Abrams tanks, more than 3 million 155mm artillery rounds and more than 5,000 Humvees. It's also provided scores of critical drones and drone defense systems.
But Ukraine's constant need has been for air defense — from taking out Russian aircraft in the early days of the conflict to having to defend itself against long-range missiles now.
In response, the U.S. has provided Patriot air defense batteries, National Advanced Surface-to-Air Missile Systems and HAWK air defense systems — and still more is sought.
But those demands are butting up against demands for similar air defenses in the Middle East and the reality that the U.S. military does not have enough munitions on hand to sustain a high rate of deliveries, while providing troops with equipment to train on and build up a stockpile for a potential future conflict. That's especially true if it's put in a position where the U.S. has to defend Taiwan against China.
How will the new weapons pause affect Ukraine?
This is the second time the Trump administration has paused weapons shipments to Ukraine, but for different reasons.
After an explosive Oval Office meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in March, President Donald Trump paused weapons that were funded under the Biden administration and still flowing into Ukraine. That pause was short-lived after Republican lawmakers pressed for Ukraine aid to resume.
The new pause affects high-demand munitions the U.S. has sent to Ukraine, including Patriot missiles, the AIM-7 Sparrow air-to-air missile and shorter-range Stinger missiles.
Ukraine has relied on the AIM-7 Sparrow to counter incoming missiles and shorter-range Stinger missiles to knock down Russian aircraft or counter drone attacks. The Patriot missiles are used against Russia's frequent ballistic missile attacks.
The pause could have deadly consequences for Ukraine, said Brad Bowman, senior director of the Center on Military and Political Power at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies.
'If we deprive Kyiv of PAC-3 (Patriot) interceptors it means more Russian missiles getting through and more dead Ukrainians,' Bowman said.
Rather than cutting off Ukraine, Bowman said the administration needs to look at 'whether we are taking all the steps we can to procure the max quantity that industry can produce.'
Does the U.S. face stress on its weapons stockpile?
The Trump administration's pause is part of a global review by the Pentagon on what munitions it is providing and where it is sending them, and the impact on its own stockpiles.
'We can't give weapons to everybody all around the world,' Pentagon chief spokesman Sean Parnell said in a briefing Wednesday. 'We have to look out for Americans and defending our homeland and our troops around the world.'
Adm. Samuel Paparo, head of U.S. Indo-Pacific Command, has previously warned that the conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East were putting pressure on his stockpile levels.
As Iran launched a retaliatory ballistic missile attack last month, troops defended Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar with scores of Patriot air defense missiles — a high-demand munition the U.S. only has in limited supply.
The Navy also has defended ships in the Red Sea by striking Houthi weapons and launch sites in Yemen with Tomahawk missiles. In one day in January 2024, it fired more Tomahawks than the Navy had purchased the prior year, said Mackenzie Eaglen, a senior defense fellow at the American Enterprise Institute.
'Everybody's worried — and the thing is, they have a reason to be worried,' Eaglen said. 'Air defense is a key capability of the most concern.'
Is the U.S. producing enough weapons?
A $60 billion Ukraine aid bill passed by Congress last year contained billions for U.S. weapons manufacturers to expand their production capacity.
Despite the billions spent on defense contracts each year, the number of weapons in the U.S. can quickly dwindle — particularly for some of the complex air defense munitions — if a major conflict breaks out. That's because of the time it takes to build each missile.
For example, despite an influx of investment since Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022, the rate of production for Patriot missiles — one of the military's most important air defenses for its bases overseas — has increased to just 48 per month. That is compared to 21 per month prior to the invasion.
While the total number of Patriot munitions the U.S. has is unknown, the number of entire Patriot missile defense systems is in such limited supply that providing one to a new location often means taking it from somewhere else. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has said he needs the systems to help defend his country's electrical grid and cities from the thousands of missile and drone attacks it faces daily.
And defending a large overseas base like Al Udeid can also require firing scores of the missiles, which cost $4 million a piece. For other munitions that have been critical to Ukraine's defenses — like the High Mobility Artillery Rocket System, or HIMARS — production has increased from just 5 per month pre-invasion to 8 per month now, according to a Defense Department fact sheet.
Elbridge Colby, Defense Department undersecretary for policy, said Pentagon officials have aimed to provide Trump 'with robust options to continue military aid to Ukraine' but also are 'rigorously examining' that approach while 'preserving U.S. forces' readiness for administration defense priorities.'
___
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Arsenal have one final hurdle in Viktor Gyokeres deal after Benjamin Sesko issues
Arsenal are in talks with Sporting over a move for Viktor Gyokeres, with a deal set to be concluded once a payment structure is agreed. Mikel Arteta wanted a striker in before pre-season properly started, which is one reason for the sudden advancement. Arsenal's football leadership had been involved in constructive discussion over whether to proceed on Gyokeres or RB Leipzig 's Benjamin Sesko, with Aston Villa's Ollie Watkins a fallback, and it is understood that the difficulty of doing a deal for Sesko has ultimately swayed the decision. The prospective signing is the first sign of new sporting director Andrea Berta's influence, as his preference was for Gyokeres. While the club's staff generally rated both the Swedish forward and Sesko equally, there were a number of considerations like age profile –Gyokeres is 27 and Sesko 21 – as well as readiness to immediately fit in, and the context they've been scoring goals in. Arsenal had still been at least €10m away from Leipzig's valuation on Sesko, with the German club wanting €40m of the release clause up front, and around €40m split over fewer instalments. A further issue is that Arsenal hadn't agreed a final package with Sesko's camp for the player's terms, with the impasse lasting right up to last week with Berta specifically feeling Leipzig's demand was too high a figure. It is understood that Arsenal got increasingly frustrated with the pace of negotiations and with Sesko's camp, which has been a key factor in the evolution of their striker pursuit. Arsenal have since been working more in other directions, due to Arteta's will for the situation to not drag on. There had been no such complications with Gyokeres, who has made it clear for months he only wants to join Arsenal. Personal terms are agreed and only final details now need to be settled with Sporting, for a deal that could come to around £60m. Once a forward is confirmed, Arsenal are still expected to move on to potentially two further players. They have been in talks with Chelsea over Noni Madueke, with The Independent having previously reported that the Stamford Bridge hierarchy want £50m. Arsenal retain a strong interest in Real Madrid's Rodrygo and, especially, Crystal Palace's Eberechi Eze, but there has been no concrete movement on either yet. Arsenal are likely to have to sell before bringing in one of the two, with the primary budget having been allocated for a forward and Real Sociedad's Martin Zubimendi. The signing of the Basque midfielder was finally confirmed on Sunday.


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Porky Britain loses its appetite for Greggs sausage rolls
Asked last year if she thought Britain was approaching 'peak Greggs', Roisin Currie laughed off the suggestion. The bakery chain's chief executive said this point was 'a long way off' as she announced plans to open dozens of new stores across the country following a surge in sales. Today, the prospect of Greggs' over-saturation is less of a laughing matter. After years of extraordinary growth, questions are being asked about whether the chain can maintain its upwards trajectory. Shares in the company plunged by more than 15pc this week after it warned June's scorching heatwave had dampened demand for its hot pastries and sausage rolls, and would lead to lower profits this year. In March, the company posted its slowest sales growth since the pandemic, warning it faces a tougher time in 2025. Investors' faith has been faltering all year, causing a slump of almost 40pc in its share price since January. Though it still offers a cheap meal, the chain has been forced to raise the cost of many of its best-sellers as the burden of paying for labour, ingredients and energy soared. Jonathan Pritchard, of investment bank Peel Hunt, believes these price rises are putting some shoppers off. Other challenges are on the horizon. Labour plans to force takeaway chains to cut customers' calories in an effort to tackle the nation's expanding waistlines. At the same time, Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, has vowed to make appetite-suppressing weight-loss jabs easier to get on the NHS. 'We've had unseasonal weather or overly seasonal weather many times over the last 10 years, and they've sailed through that without too many problems. I do think it nods to something slightly more fundamental,' says Pritchard of last week's warning. Recipe for success Founded in 1951 in Newcastle, Greggs was largely a regional business until retail veteran Roger Whiteside took over in 2013 and led a march of expansion across the country. By ditching the traditional bakery side of the business, improving the coffee, revamping the shops and focusing on takeaway food, Whiteside – a former M&S executive – grew the chain to more than £1bn in revenues by 2018. He is widely credited with turning the once-hesitant British middle classes on to the wonders of the Greggs sausage roll. The invention of the £1 vegan version in 2019 sealed Greggs' newfound dominance on the high street, turning the chain into a viral sensation and winning over millions of younger fans. In 2022, Whiteside stepped down, passing the torch to Currie, a well-respected executive who previously led its people, retail and property operations. Greggs' winning streak continued during the first few years of her tenure. While the cost of living crisis hit more expensive brands, it helped the low-price bakery chain as demand soared for cheaper food. By the end of 2024, the chain's revenues had topped £2bn. Today it runs 2,649 shops – more than both McDonald's and Starbucks – and Currie has said she believes there is scope to reach as many as 3,500 in the long term. Obesity crackdown Yet the recent sales slowdown raises questions about whether this ambition is misplaced. Greggs was approached for comment. Some observers are also sceptical of Greggs efforts to try to conquer dinner time. In recent months the chain has been pitching its pizzas as a cost-efficient alternative to Domino's, while simultaneously increasing its focus on chicken dishes to compete with the likes of KFC. 'In the evenings there is absolutely tons of opposition, and it's difficult,' Pritchard says. 'They've tried to come with a value proposition, but you're up against Domino's, and you're up against people that have got enormous marketing budgets and consumer loyalty.' Simon Stenning, a hospitality industry expert and founder of Future Foodservice, believes Greggs is still good value and can give rivals a run for their money on price. 'If you're on your way to work, why wouldn't you buy a bacon roll and a coffee for £2.50, or whatever it is? I think in a world of comparisons where prices are known, they can get away with an extra 5p, 10p or 20p,' he says. He is more worried, however, that increasingly interventionist legislation could hamstring the bakery and other hospitality firms at a time when costs are high and growth is imperative. The Government is planning an ambitious clampdown on food companies that could see chains such as Greggs compelled to reduce diners' calorie intake. 'There's going to be taxation, legislation, nudging, nanny-state intervention to try to reduce our fast food consumption out of home,' Stenning says. 'That's going to be a slowing down.' Then there is the question of GLP-1 weight-loss drugs, which are rapidly growing in popularity in the UK. An estimated 1.5m people now take them. Currie has called them 'something on the horizon we are watching closely and understanding and learning about'. Greggs has made efforts to combat the perception that it is unhealthy and, under Currie, has been launching healthier options such as salads and lower-calorie bakes. But the reality is that GLP-1 drugs work by suppressing appetites, meaning people on them will be eating less. Currie insists that recent troubles are simply bumps in the road. But after a decade of dominance, the hard yards are ahead as Labour pushes Britons to ditch the sausage rolls.


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Roger Waters faces prosecution for Palestine Action support
Roger Waters, the former Pink Floyd songwriter, is facing calls to be prosecuted after he declared his support for the banned terrorist organisation Palestine Action. The 81-year-old released a video on X in which he described the group as a 'great organisation' and praised the Bob Vylan rapper who led a chant of 'death, death to the IDF' at the Glastonbury festival. He posted the video just hours after the Government outlawed Palestine Action, meaning support or membership of the group is now a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. Posting to his 673,000 followers after the ban came into place, Waters said: 'I support Palestine Action. It's a great organisation. They are non-violent, they are absolutely non-terrorist in any way.' Following the release of the video, the Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA) would seek to bring a private prosecution if he was not charged. 'I support Palestine Action' In a video that has been viewed almost 400,000 times, Waters said: 'This is independence day, July 5 2025. I declare my independence from the Government of the UK who has just designated Palestine Action a proscribed terrorist organisation. 'For the record 5th of July. I support Palestine Action. It's a great organisation. They are non-violent, they are absolutely non-terrorist in any way. 'They are a non-violent protest organisation protesting the presence in the UK of Elbit systems, who are an Israeli arms manufacturing organisation. 'I support Palestine Action and I always will because that is the right thing to do… we will not be rolled over by this appalling Labour government in the United Kingdom. 'Palestine Action is not a terrorist organisation so they are lying and they have put their lies into the law of the land. 'Independence. We must support our brothers and sisters in Palestine and support them no matter what so good on you [Bob] Vylan and the rest of you who are standing up to be counted, I love you.' He also displayed a handwritten note that read: 'Roger Waters supports Palestine Action 5 July 2025. Parliament has been corrupted by agents of a genocidal foreign power. Stand up and be counted. It's now.' Responding to the posting of the video, a spokesman for the CAA said they were now preparing to bring a private prosecution. The spokesman said: 'Last night, former Pink Floyd frontman Roger Waters published a video across multiple social media platforms in which he declared his support of proscribed terrorist organisation Palestine Action. 'Section 12 of the Terrorism Act 2000 states that 'A person commits an offence if the person expresses an opinion or belief that is supportive of a proscribed organisation, and in doing so is reckless as to whether a person to whom the expression is directed will be encouraged to support a proscribed organisation. 'Section 17 of the Terrorism Act 2006 makes that criminal offence apply worldwide, stating that 'If a person does anything outside the United Kingdom, and his action, if done in a part of the United Kingdom, would constitute an offence falling within [section 12 of the Terrorism Act 2000], he shall be guilty in that part of the United Kingdom of the offence.' 'Campaign Against Antisemitism is preparing a criminal prosecution, which would require the consent of the director of public prosecutions, Stephen Parkinson.' Activists arrested It comes after 29 people, including an 83-year-old retired priest, were arrested outside Parliament for expressing support for the newly banned group. Several dozen activists held up signs or wore t-shirts that read: 'I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action.' The Government banned Palestine Action after the group claimed responsibility for an attack on two voyager aircraft at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire. Four people have since appeared in court accused of causing £7 million worth of damage to the aircraft.