logo
#

Latest news with #21stcentury

The best XI of the 21st century according to Artificial Intelligence
The best XI of the 21st century according to Artificial Intelligence

Yahoo

time6 days ago

  • Sport
  • Yahoo

The best XI of the 21st century according to Artificial Intelligence

The best XI of the 21st century according to Artificial Intelligence In current times, it seems that everything is under the control of Artificial Intelligence. That is why OneFootball didn't want to miss the opportunity to ask the now-famous AI for its ideal XI of the 21st century so far. Advertisement A total of 25 years in which we have seen two of the players considered the greatest in history, like Messi and Cristiano. Besides the Argentine and the Portuguese, which other footballers form, according to the AI, the best team of the last quarter-century? This article was translated into English by Artificial Intelligence. You can read the original version in 🇪🇸 here. 📸 PIERRE VERDY

Making Lists
Making Lists

New York Times

time05-07-2025

  • Entertainment
  • New York Times

Making Lists

What did you rank as your top movies of the 21st century? Did you include 'La La Land,' which landed at No. 16 on our list of readers' picks, despite not appearing at all on the list by actors and directors? I struggled to determine how I would rank a movie as one of 'the best.' Was it one that left me astonished when I saw it? One that stayed with me long after watching? Or should I choose films that somehow felt important in the history of cinema? And what does 'important' mean anyway? In 2000, I loved 'High Fidelity' and 'Best in Show' — but of course I hadn't seen 'Moonlight' or 'The Royal Tenenbaums' or 'Tár' yet. What did it mean if my list diverged wildly from The Times's lists? From those of my friends? I found myself inanely worrying that my picks weren't serious enough, that they didn't adequately convey my tastes or aesthetic. What is the purpose of a list ranking 'the best' of something, anyway? Is it to establish a canon, a definitive record, etched in stone? Is it to inspire questions and conversations and arguments about what makes something good? The very fact that we are stopping to consider the movies we love and debating their relative merits, interrogating what our picks say about us and the culture, is glorious. If we bemoan how the majesty of moviegoing has been diminished and replaced by slack-jawed streaming of algorithm-designed 'content,' then a project that lifts us out of the endless scroll and helps us remember why we love movies in the first place is a welcome tonic. I love the way a big list forces me to question and define my tastes, to consider what I like and don't and why, to sharpen my critical takes against those of others. But the best part of engaging with the films of the 21st century is how the list prompted a cascade of memories of the past 25 years. I remember the exact theater in which I saw 'Y Tu Mamá También' in 2002, the friends I was with, where we ate afterward. That restaurant is definitely not there anymore. I remember seeing 'Melancholia' in 2011, talking about it over drinks in a weird bar in Midtown. What was my drink order in those days? The objective quality of a film is fun to debate, but it's a lovely sort of ecstasy to think back over one's quarter-century of movie-watching experiences, to use those movies to populate a memory palace. The film is just the catalyst for a million other reminiscences. Making a list of the movies you loved over the past 25 years is a way of organizing those years, a kind of post-factum diary. If you were to riff on each of your top 10 movies, what long-forgotten details from your history might be dislodged? You might remember how 'The Hurt Locker' floored you in 2009, but you might also remember the rainy day on which you saw it, your raincoat — what happened to that raincoat? — the car you drove to the theater, the job you had then or the person you were dating. We're forever cramming our brains with more information. Take these 10 movies and use them to sift through some of the accumulated sediment, to make order out of the chaos. If I can rouse myself from reverie, I'll commit myself this weekend to some of the 11 movies on the main list that I haven't seen and want to. (How is it possible that I've never seen 'Spirited Away'?) Or maybe not — 'F1' and 'Sorry, Baby' are in theaters, and it might be more satisfying to get a jump on 2050's list. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Is this the best movie of the 21st century? 500 Hollywood power players think so.
Is this the best movie of the 21st century? 500 Hollywood power players think so.

Yahoo

time29-06-2025

  • Entertainment
  • Yahoo

Is this the best movie of the 21st century? 500 Hollywood power players think so.

The people have spoken, and the best movie released since Jan. 1, 2000, has been determined. And by people, we mean the 500 or so actors, directors, writers and other Hollywood power players The New York Times surveyed for its 100 best movies of the 21st century ranking, which came out with its top 20 on June 27. The likes of Pamela Anderson, Nicholas Sparks, Stephen King, Simu Liu, Sofia Coppola, Danielle Brooks, Brian Cox, Ava DuVernay, Molly Ringwald, Rachel Zegler and Mel Brooks had their say — and yes, you can even see each of their top 10 picks, Letterboxd style. Oscar-winning director Coppola apparently took a shining to the 2004 Pixar classic (and fellow Oscar winner) "The Incredibles," while Julianne Moore admitted she's not above a raunchy comedy like "Superbad" and "The 40-Year-Old Virgin." And Sparks isn't only watching soppy romances; he's also enjoying dramas like "Inception" and "Gladiator." Undeserved Oscar winners – and the ones that should have won None other than Bong Joon Ho's "Parasite," which in 2020 became the first ever non-English film to earn the best picture Oscar, ranked as the No. 1 highest-voted film in the NYT's survey. And no wonder, because it earned an eye-boggling 99% "fresh" rating from nearly 500 film reviews on Rotten Tomatoes. In 2019, USA TODAY's film critic Brian Truitt was close to giving the social commentary thriller full marks (he ended up giving three and a half of four stars). The Korean film "is expertly paced with its reveals, never falls apart (even when it descends into bloody chaos) and also features outstanding acting performances," he noted in his review. In case anyone was wondering, director Bong did not include any of his own films (which includes the recent "Mickey 17" as well as 2017's "Okja" and 2013's "Snowpiercer) in his top nine ranking. New on streaming: From 'Minecraft' to 'KPop Demon Hunters,' what to watch right now The top 20 highest-voted films were as follows: 20. "The Wolf of Wall Street," 2013 19: "Zodiac," 2007 18: "Y tu mamá también," 2002 17: "Brokeback Mountain," 2005 16: "Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon," 2000 15: "City of God," 2003 14: "Inglourious Basterds," 2009 13: "Children of Men," 2006 12: "The Zone of Interest," 2023 11: "Mad Max: Fury Road," 2015 10: "The Social Network," 2010 9: "Spirited Away," 2002 8: "Get Out," 2017 7: "Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind," 2004 6: "No Country for Old Men," 2007 5: "Moonlight," 2016 4: "In the Mood for Love," 2001 3: "There Will Be Blood," 2007 2: "Mulholland Drive," 2001 1: "Parasite," 2019 This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: 'Parasite' voted best film of the century by Hollywood power players

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store