Latest news with #777
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
United Flight Declares Emergency 8 Hours Into Flight, Sends Out International Distress Code
A United Airlines flight from San Fransisco to Rome sent out an international code of distress while flying over the Atlantic UA507 diverted and made an emergency landing in Reykjavík, Iceland No injuries were reported for the 275 passengers and 14 crew membersPassengers and crew on a United Airlines flight from San Francisco to Rome are safe after the plane sent out a distress Airlines flight 507, which was operating a 26-year-old Boeing 777, departed San Francisco International Airport at 5:03 p.m. local time on Saturday, June 21. Eight hours into the trip, halfway across the Atlantic Ocean, the plane descended rapidly to 21,000 feet, per flight monitoring service Aviation Source made two decisions: first, to issue squawk code 7700, an international distress code; second, to divert north to Iceland for an emergency landing.'The 777 is descending through 10,000 feet,' the flight monitoring service reported 10 minutes before landing. 'Based on its descent path and runway in use, the aircraft is aiming for a straight-in approach for Runway 01.' Around 8 a.m. local time on June 22, the flight touched down at Keflavik International Airport near Reykjavík. The plane vacated the runway before getting towed to a remote stand. United Airlines canceled the remainder of the flight to confirms to PEOPLE that none of the flight's 275 passengers or 14 crew members were injured.'United Flight 507 from San Francisco to Rome landed safely at Keflavik Airport on Sunday to address a mechanical issue,' a representative said in a statement. 'We scheduled a new flight to take our customers to Rome on Monday and have provided them with hotel accommodations.' This isn't the first time United has had issues with their flight from San Francisco to Rome. In August 2024, the airline cancelled or diverted the flight three days in a row, according to SFGATE. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. On Aug. 13, 2024, flight 507 to Rome diverted to Sacramento to 'address a mechanical issue,' a United spokesperson told the outlet. One hundred and forty eight passengers exited the aircraft onto the tarmac. The next day, the flight was diverted to Edmonton, Canada, to address a passenger's medical issues. On Aug. 15, the airline canceled one of its flights to address the other flyers still waiting to get to Rome. Read the original article on People
Sydney Morning Herald
6 days ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
New planes were meant to be more comfortable. Here's why it didn't happen
Quick quiz for airline enthusiasts: flying economy class aboard Singapore Airlines, would you rather sit in one of the airline's Boeing 777 aircraft or a Boeing 787? The 787 Dreamliner is newer, its cabin is pressurised to a lower altitude, which means more oxygen in your lungs, the seat back comes with a slightly larger in-flight entertainment screen and both aircraft have the same 3-3-3 seating configuration, but there's one crucial factor that makes the 777 the aircraft I'd prefer to fly on. On Singapore Airlines' 777s, the seat width is 18 inches (45.7cm);* aboard the 787, the tape measure says 17 inches (43.2cm). That's just 2.5 centimetres, less than half the size of a credit card from top to bottom. An inch, if you like. How First World-problematic can you get? But that 2.5cm matters. Seat pitch, which determines the amount of legroom per seat, is the standard measure of comfort in economy class seating, but the width of the seat is just as important. When you're reading a book or eating in a narrow seat you need to squish in your elbows and give yourself T-Rex hands, especially in the middle seat. A narrow seat also gives you less shoulder room, and a shoulder that sticks out into the aisle gets plenty of attention from passing passengers, as well as the meal trolley. It wasn't supposed to be this way Boeing conceived the 787 with eight seats across in its economy cabin, with a seat width of 18.5 inches (47cm), but airlines had other ideas. By squeezing in another seat per row, they could add at least 15 seats per aircraft, and for airlines, that's money in the bank. That meant tighter seating for passengers, but cash trumps comfort when it comes to economy class air travel. One of the very few airlines that flies the Boeing 787-9 and most of its 787-8s with eight economy seats per row in a 2-4-2 configuration is Japan Airlines. Those seats are a comfy 47.8cm wide, and seat pitch is an equally commendable 83.8cm. However, note that one of the three versions of JAL's Boeing 787–8 aircraft has a 3-3-3 configuration, which shrinks the seat width to just 43.2cm. The same thing happened to the 787's wide-body predecessor, the 777. Boeing designed the 777 with nine economy seats per row in mind, with a 3-3-3 configuration, and that was what airlines got when the aircraft entered service in the mid-1990s. After just a few years, the US carriers levered another seat into the mid-section and the trend caught on, especially with the introduction of the 777-300ER. Today it's almost impossible to find any airline operating a Boeing 777 with nine seats across.
The Age
6 days ago
- The Age
New planes were meant to be more comfortable. Here's why it didn't happen
Quick quiz for airline enthusiasts: flying economy class aboard Singapore Airlines, would you rather sit in one of the airline's Boeing 777 aircraft or a Boeing 787? The 787 Dreamliner is newer, its cabin is pressurised to a lower altitude, which means more oxygen in your lungs, the seat back comes with a slightly larger in-flight entertainment screen and both aircraft have the same 3-3-3 seating configuration, but there's one crucial factor that makes the 777 the aircraft I'd prefer to fly on. On Singapore Airlines' 777s, the seat width is 18 inches (45.7cm);* aboard the 787, the tape measure says 17 inches (43.2cm). That's just 2.5 centimetres, less than half the size of a credit card from top to bottom. An inch, if you like. How First World-problematic can you get? But that 2.5cm matters. Seat pitch, which determines the amount of legroom per seat, is the standard measure of comfort in economy class seating, but the width of the seat is just as important. When you're reading a book or eating in a narrow seat you need to squish in your elbows and give yourself T-Rex hands, especially in the middle seat. A narrow seat also gives you less shoulder room, and a shoulder that sticks out into the aisle gets plenty of attention from passing passengers, as well as the meal trolley. It wasn't supposed to be this way Boeing conceived the 787 with eight seats across in its economy cabin, with a seat width of 18.5 inches (47cm), but airlines had other ideas. By squeezing in another seat per row, they could add at least 15 seats per aircraft, and for airlines, that's money in the bank. That meant tighter seating for passengers, but cash trumps comfort when it comes to economy class air travel. One of the very few airlines that flies the Boeing 787-9 and most of its 787-8s with eight economy seats per row in a 2-4-2 configuration is Japan Airlines. Those seats are a comfy 47.8cm wide, and seat pitch is an equally commendable 83.8cm. However, note that one of the three versions of JAL's Boeing 787–8 aircraft has a 3-3-3 configuration, which shrinks the seat width to just 43.2cm. The same thing happened to the 787's wide-body predecessor, the 777. Boeing designed the 777 with nine economy seats per row in mind, with a 3-3-3 configuration, and that was what airlines got when the aircraft entered service in the mid-1990s. After just a few years, the US carriers levered another seat into the mid-section and the trend caught on, especially with the introduction of the 777-300ER. Today it's almost impossible to find any airline operating a Boeing 777 with nine seats across.
San Francisco Chronicle
6 days ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
United flight from San Francisco to Rome makes emergency landing in Iceland
A United Airlines flight from San Francisco to Rome made an emergency landing in Iceland early Sunday after experiencing an onboard incident over the Atlantic Ocean. Flight UA507, a Boeing 777-200ER registered N76010, declared an emergency roughly eight hours into the flight. The aircraft had departed San Francisco International Airport at 5:03 p.m. local time Saturday and was cruising toward Europe when it suddenly descended to 21,000 feet and transmitted a squawk 7700 — an international distress code. The flight was diverted north and landed safely at Keflavik International Airport near Reykjavík around 8 a.m. local time. 'The 777 is descending through 10,000 feet,' a flight monitoring service reported shortly before touchdown. 'Based on its descent path and runway in use, the aircraft is aiming for a straight-in approach for Runway 01.' After landing, the plane vacated the runway and was towed to a remote stand in the airport's East Apron. The remainder of the flight to Rome was canceled. No injuries were reported among passengers or crew. As of Sunday morning, the cause of the emergency had not been disclosed. The aircraft, built in 1999, is more than 26 years old and part of United's legacy fleet of Boeing 777-200s.
Time of India
21-06-2025
- Business
- Time of India
As Routes Shift,Flight Fares Goon Steep Ascent
Air fares from India to several international destinations have risen sharply in the past month, travel companies said, potentially intensifying worries for travellers especially families looking to head out for the summer holidays. Airline operating costs are getting impacted by airspace closures due to the Israel-Iran conflict, forcing longer flight detours, and fuel price volatility, the companies said, adding lower seat capacity on certain routes is also weighing on the ticket prices. Fares could rise further if route diversions and impact on flight frequencies continue, the companies said. Europe is likely to see the sharpest fare hikes, especially for routes to France, Germany and UK, said Jatinder Paul Singh, global CEO of Viacation, a travel solutions provider. 'From India, airfares to Europe have gone up by 20–35% between March and July based on forward bookings data.' Longer Diversions | page 11 Singh also noted short-term fare hikes on flights to some destinations in the Middle East. 'In North Asia, Japan and South Korea have also become significantly more expensive to reach,' he said. A one way, non-stop Air France ticket for Delhi to Paris for July 1 costs about ₹64,000 on a popular travel portal. A one way, non-stop Air India ticket for Mumbai to Japan for the same date costs ₹101, 698 per adult on the same website. Ongoing geopolitical tensions in West Asia have resulted in temporary airspace restrictions, leading to longer flight durations on certain routes by two to four hours, increasing operational costs of airlines, and prompting 15-20% fare hikes on certain routes, said Bharatt Malik, senior VP, flights and hotel business at Yatra Online, an online travel company. Last week, Air India diverted or recalled around 16 flights on transatlantic and European routes as Iran closed its airspace after Israel launched an attack targeting its nuclear and military sites. The Iranian airspace currently remains shut to most international flights. A June 15 advisory by IndiGo, India's largest airline, said due to the airspace curbs, flight routes to and from the Gulf region were experiencing congestion which may cause delays on certain sectors. 'As we continue to operate via alternate paths, extended travel times may be expected,' the airline in a post on X. In an update on Thursday, Air India announced a temporary reduction in services operated by Boeing 787 and 777 aircraft from June 21 till at least July 15. The suspended routes include Delhi-Nairobi, Amritsar-London, Goa-London, while routes with reduced frequency include Delhi-Washington, Delhi-San Francisco, Delhi-Toronto, and Delhi-Tokyo. For some carriers, airfares for Dubai and Abu Dhabi are 10-15% higher from a month ago, while those to Japan and South Korea are 5-10% higher, said Abraham Alapatt, president and group head for marketing, service quality, value added services and innovation at travel company Thomas Cook (India). Industry insiders said the first wave of fare hikes started around late April, when Pakistan closed its airspace to Indian carriers. This affected many flights departing from north Indian cities, with reroutes adding up to three hours on some long-haul journeys. 'Subsequently, in mid-June, airspace closures over Iran, Iraq, and surrounding regions due to escalating conflict in the Middle East compounded the situation,' said Karan Agarwal, director at Cox & Kings. 'The dual impact of these disruptions has led to fare hikes of about 8–12% on Gulf-bound and short-haul international flights, while fares to Europe and North America have risen more sharply, by approximately 30–45% compared to earlier this year. These changes have unfolded gradually over a span of six to eight weeks, and pricing remains dynamic depending on route and carrier capacity,' he added. Increased flight duration, especially on long-haul routes connecting Europe, the Middle East, and the US, not only disrupts schedules but also raises operational costs like fuel, crew time, and landing charges inevitably pushing fares upwards, said Ravi Gosain, president of the Indian Association of Tour Operators (IATO). 'Compounding this is the surge in crude oil prices, which directly impacts aviation turbine fuel (ATF) costs. For international carriers, ATF can constitute up to 30–40% of operating expenses, making fare adjustments almost unavoidable,' he added. While airfares are expected to rise further given the surge in oil prices and longer flying times on account of airspace closures, the demand scenario will also have a role to play, said Ajay Prakash, VP, Federation of Associations in Indian Tourism & Hospitality (FAITH). 'Combine that with the comparatively lower airfares that Air India is currently offering on some routes, we could have a very fluid situation and airfares in the same sector could differ significantly from day to day and flight to flight. But there is definitely pressure on airlines to increase fares to compensate for increased operating costs.'
