Latest news with #AAMI
Courier-Mail
13 hours ago
- Automotive
- Courier-Mail
‘Turn it off': The tech Aussies hate most
Don't miss out on the headlines from On the Road. Followed categories will be added to My News. A new report has found Aussie drivers are increasingly disabling safety systems found in modern cars which are designed to prevent serious crashes. An analysis by insurance company AAMI Insurance found a surprising one in five drivers admitted to turning these safety features off. It comes as new claims data, analysing more than 480,000 claims, from AAMI found nose to tail crashes were the most common, with afternoons being the worst time of day. Drivers are being urged to keep ADAS enabled. Picture: NCA NewsWire / Gaye Gerard MORE: 'Musk on mute' as pet project crashes AAMI Motor Prevention Manager Mary Kennedy, says modern safety systems are designed to protect road users and encourages Aussies to embrace new technologies instead of turning them off. 'In-car safety features aren't just gadgets, they're designed to help protect us and make our roads safer,' Mary said. 'Many of the safety features drivers are turning off, like collision warning and automatic emergency braking, are really effective at preventing these types of crashing, along with many others, including reversing into another vehicle or object such as a trolley or bollard.' Of those Australians who confessed to disabling in-car safety driving features, the overwhelming majority, 69 per cent, cited that they found the systems 'annoying', 'distracting', or 'too sensitive'. Nissan Pathfinder LDW MORE: 'So lost': Huge issue hurting Aus drivers most Additionally, 23 per cent of drivers believed they 'don't need' in-car safety features, while 13 per cent expressed concerns that they just 'don't trust' them. The most commonly dialled-down or turned-off safety features were lane departure warning and lane keeping assist, adaptive cruise control, parking assist, automatic emergency braking, and forward collision warning (see table below). This trend is particularly concerning, given that more than half of Australian drivers (59 per cent) agree that safety features improve road safety and reduce the severity and frequency of accidents. Subaru Infrared Driver Monitoring System detects drowsy drivers and distracted drivers on mobile phones. Picture: Supplied. Blind Spot Monitor warning in a side mirror MORE: Huge change coming to Aussie roads AAMI's claims data further supports this, showing that ADAS-enabled vehicles are less likely to be involved in an accident when compared to vehicles without this technology. When asked readers earlier this year whether modern cars are becoming too annoying and complicated, 94 per cent of the 10,102 voters agreed. Arthur, one commenter, said 'Lane keeping is useless on Aussie regional and rural roads. Your try to stay out of potholes and trucks squeezes you and the car jerks you back into the trenches.' Subaru says its next-generation EyeSight technology will automatically call for help following a crash. Australia has been slower to adopt driver monitoring systems. Picture: Supplied. While another user said 'Modern cars are intrusive and annoying.' Mary Kennedy is strongly urging drivers to keep Advanced Driver Assistance Systems activated in cars that support it and to adapt to the evolving changes in modern cars. 'Drivers should understand and use these safety features to enhance their own awareness, reduce the risk of human error, and avoid getting into an accident in the first place,' Mary said. 'We know through our claims data that Friday continues to be the worst day of the week, and afternoons are the most dangerous time on our roads.' Originally published as 'Turn it off': The tech Aussies hate most
Daily Telegraph
15 hours ago
- Automotive
- Daily Telegraph
‘Turn it off': The tech Aussies hate most
Don't miss out on the headlines from On the Road. Followed categories will be added to My News. A new report has found Aussie drivers are increasingly disabling safety systems found in modern cars which are designed to prevent serious crashes. An analysis by insurance company AAMI Insurance found a surprising one in five drivers admitted to turning these safety features off. It comes as new claims data, analysing more than 480,000 claims, from AAMI found nose to tail crashes were the most common, with afternoons being the worst time of day. Drivers are being urged to keep ADAS enabled. Picture: NCA NewsWire / Gaye Gerard MORE: 'Musk on mute' as pet project crashes AAMI Motor Prevention Manager Mary Kennedy, says modern safety systems are designed to protect road users and encourages Aussies to embrace new technologies instead of turning them off. 'In-car safety features aren't just gadgets, they're designed to help protect us and make our roads safer,' Mary said. 'Many of the safety features drivers are turning off, like collision warning and automatic emergency braking, are really effective at preventing these types of crashing, along with many others, including reversing into another vehicle or object such as a trolley or bollard.' Of those Australians who confessed to disabling in-car safety driving features, the overwhelming majority, 69 per cent, cited that they found the systems 'annoying', 'distracting', or 'too sensitive'. Nissan Pathfinder LDW MORE: 'So lost': Huge issue hurting Aus drivers most Additionally, 23 per cent of drivers believed they 'don't need' in-car safety features, while 13 per cent expressed concerns that they just 'don't trust' them. The most commonly dialled-down or turned-off safety features were lane departure warning and lane keeping assist, adaptive cruise control, parking assist, automatic emergency braking, and forward collision warning (see table below). This trend is particularly concerning, given that more than half of Australian drivers (59 per cent) agree that safety features improve road safety and reduce the severity and frequency of accidents. Subaru Infrared Driver Monitoring System detects drowsy drivers and distracted drivers on mobile phones. Picture: Supplied. Blind Spot Monitor warning in a side mirror MORE: Huge change coming to Aussie roads AAMI's claims data further supports this, showing that ADAS-enabled vehicles are less likely to be involved in an accident when compared to vehicles without this technology. When asked readers earlier this year whether modern cars are becoming too annoying and complicated, 94 per cent of the 10,102 voters agreed. Arthur, one commenter, said 'Lane keeping is useless on Aussie regional and rural roads. Your try to stay out of potholes and trucks squeezes you and the car jerks you back into the trenches.' Subaru says its next-generation EyeSight technology will automatically call for help following a crash. Australia has been slower to adopt driver monitoring systems. Picture: Supplied. While another user said 'Modern cars are intrusive and annoying.' Mary Kennedy is strongly urging drivers to keep Advanced Driver Assistance Systems activated in cars that support it and to adapt to the evolving changes in modern cars. 'Drivers should understand and use these safety features to enhance their own awareness, reduce the risk of human error, and avoid getting into an accident in the first place,' Mary said. 'We know through our claims data that Friday continues to be the worst day of the week, and afternoons are the most dangerous time on our roads.' Originally published as 'Turn it off': The tech Aussies hate most
News.com.au
16 hours ago
- Automotive
- News.com.au
‘Turn it off': The tech Aussies hate most
A new report has found Aussie drivers are increasingly disabling safety systems found in modern cars which are designed to prevent serious crashes. An analysis by insurance company AAMI Insurance found a surprising one in five drivers admitted to turning these safety features off. It comes as new claims data, analysing more than 480,000 claims, from AAMI found nose to tail crashes were the most common, with afternoons being the worst time of day. AAMI Motor Prevention Manager Mary Kennedy, says modern safety systems are designed to protect road users and encourages Aussies to embrace new technologies instead of turning them off. 'In-car safety features aren't just gadgets, they're designed to help protect us and make our roads safer,' Mary said. 'Many of the safety features drivers are turning off, like collision warning and automatic emergency braking, are really effective at preventing these types of crashing, along with many others, including reversing into another vehicle or object such as a trolley or bollard.' Of those Australians who confessed to disabling in-car safety driving features, the overwhelming majority, 69 per cent, cited that they found the systems 'annoying', 'distracting', or 'too sensitive'. Additionally, 23 per cent of drivers believed they 'don't need' in-car safety features, while 13 per cent expressed concerns that they just 'don't trust' them. The most commonly dialled-down or turned-off safety features were lane departure warning and lane keeping assist, adaptive cruise control, parking assist, automatic emergency braking, and forward collision warning (see table below). This trend is particularly concerning, given that more than half of Australian drivers (59 per cent) agree that safety features improve road safety and reduce the severity and frequency of accidents. AAMI's claims data further supports this, showing that ADAS-enabled vehicles are less likely to be involved in an accident when compared to vehicles without this technology. When asked readers earlier this year whether modern cars are becoming too annoying and complicated, 94 per cent of the 10,102 voters agreed. Arthur, one commenter, said 'Lane keeping is useless on Aussie regional and rural roads. Your try to stay out of potholes and trucks squeezes you and the car jerks you back into the trenches.' While another user said 'Modern cars are intrusive and annoying.' Mary Kennedy is strongly urging drivers to keep Advanced Driver Assistance Systems activated in cars that support it and to adapt to the evolving changes in modern cars. 'Drivers should understand and use these safety features to enhance their own awareness, reduce the risk of human error, and avoid getting into an accident in the first place,' Mary said. 'We know through our claims data that Friday continues to be the worst day of the week, and afternoons are the most dangerous time on our roads.'
ABC News
2 days ago
- Automotive
- ABC News
Research shows one in five drivers admit disabling car safety features
An analysis by insurance company AAMI of 480,000 claims over the past year shows 20 per cent of drivers admit they sometimes turn off features in the car that are designed to improve safety. Steve Cratchley, motor insights and operations manager at AAMI, said the most commonly disabled features were lane keeping assist, lane departure warnings, autonomous emergency braking, and autonomous cruise control. Of the 20 per cent who did disable the features, 69 per cent said it was because they found the safety features annoying, distracting, and too sensitive. Twenty-three per cent said they did not think they needed safety assistance features, and 13 per cent said they did not trust them. Lane departure warning and lane keeping assist were the most disliked features. Mr Cratchley said it was in drivers' best interests to keep the features enabled. "They're designed to avoid crashes, so we're really encouraging people who have this technology to learn what they mean, to understand how they work and to actually have them switched on rather than disabled," he told Nadia Mitsopoulos on ABC Radio Perth. Mr Cratchley said switching to a new car with safety features they had not used before was a big adjustment for many drivers. "People like my father, for example. He's been a truck driver, he's driven for 60-odd years, and when he got his last car he immediately called me and said: 'Look, Steve, how do I turn all this off? It's annoying me. It's trying to kill me,'" he said. "But the reality is, he was driving against this technology, against these safety features. "What he found is that, as he learnt what the bells and whistles and the lights and the mirrors and these sort of things were actually advising him, he became a safer driver, and that meant that those around him were also safer and potentially would have fewer accidents." AAMI's crash report also found that nose-to-tail accidents were the most common, something that emergency braking and forward collision warning systems were designed to help prevent. "As some of my peers have found when they've got their first new car in many years, it really is a case of working with the dealer when you pick up that new vehicle and understanding how these features work and then working with them rather than working against them or disabling them," Mr Cratchley said. Text messages from ABC Radio Perth listeners revealed a deep dislike of adaptive safety features in new vehicles. Paul: "I drove a hire car in Scotland with lane departure features, and it was extremely dangerous. I could put up with the annoying flashing warning signs (when there wasn't any danger) but the violent swerving back to where the car thinks I should be, has been close to taking me off the road into fields!" Julie: "I find the sensors absolutely annoying, especially in the country. It dips my lights when it thinks there's enough light — but I don't want them dipped! There's no-one coming. Everyone's eyes are not the same." Mel: "I have had my Kia Carnival slam on the brakes nearly causing me to be rear-ended because it picked up the car in front that was in the left-hand turning lane rather than in front." Glenda: "I have recently bought a hybrid and it's driving me nuts. I have not turned off the safety features just turned my mind off. The beeping is so constant that it's overwhelming." Eva: "I was in a new work car and it came to a sudden stop as I was merging lanes, luckily with no-one behind me. I was unable to get the car to move at all when this happened. I had to wait for what seemed like an eternity before I was able to move forward. Apparently what could've happened is that the car may have detected an old line and so brought me to a dead stop." Others pointed out that passing could be unnerving when the lane keeping feature was enabled. Kat: "We travel on regional roads and turn off the white line guidance. We've had occasions where there's been a dead animal or other debris on the road, even trying to give a cyclist wide berth, and if you try to steer around it the white line assist will push you back into the hazard." Marty: "It's more dangerous to have lane keep assist on. I've nearly driven into other cars and cyclists when the car has steered me into them because of our dodgy road markings." Paul: "Lane departure is a pain. Passing cyclists does my head in." Lane departure assist, which forces a car back between white lines, is disabled if a driver turns on their indicator. But for some motorists, the safety supports in modern cars were very welcome. Pam: "I can't believe people would sacrifice safety and convenience for the occasional beeps. I have a new car with all the safety features, and I love them, and feel a bit safer now that I can rely on the car to be more vigilant than even I am." Cam: "Emergency braking and alerts saved me hitting a cyclist when they went through a red light. It saved his life."
The Advertiser
2 days ago
- Automotive
- The Advertiser
Australian drivers are turning off 'annoying' safety systems, study shows
Australian drivers are ditching safety systems they find "annoying", "distracting" and "too sensitive" – despite knowing they bring real-world benefits – according to a new report from insurance company, AAMI. The company's latest annual Crash Index, which surveyed more than 480,000 AAMI insurance claimants over the past 12 months, revealed almost one in five drivers nationwide admitted to turning off some of their vehicle's advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS). That's despite 59 per cent of them agreeing that ADAS functions improved road safety and reduced the number – and severity – of crashes. "In-car safety features aren't just gadgets, they're designed to help protect us and make our roads safer," said AAMI motor prevention manager Mary Kennedy in a statement. "We should be embracing these features, not turning them off." CarExpert can save you thousands on a new car. Click here to get a great deal. Of those who said they switched off safety systems, the function most often deactivated was lane departure warning/lane keeping, with 45 per cent admitting it was the first ADAS to be deactivated. Adaptive/radar cruise control was the next most turned-off safety aid, with 17 per cent of drivers who had turned off a feature admitting to avoiding its use. The most common reason for turning off the systems was that they were "annoying" or "distracting", with 69 per cent of drivers surveyed saying this led them to deactivating them. In 2023, Euro NCAP said it would work with automakers to minimise ADAS "noise pollution" and the "more annoying features of these technologies". "As much as it is a challenge to insist that manufacturers fit the latest safety technologies, the real challenge lies in convincing consumers of their necessity," Euro NCAP secretary general Michiel van Ratingen said in a statement. "There is a worrying trend of media and social channels encouraging drivers 'to turn them off'." Earlier this year, Chinese brand Leapmotor recalibrated some ADAS functions in the first model it released in Australia, the C10 mid-size electrified SUV, following media and customer criticism that its systems were too sensitive. The C10 has a five-star ANCAP rating and comes with lane-keep assist, emergency lane-keep assist and adaptive cruise control as standard. "Certainly, the feedback from very, very early on about the sensitivity of the ADAS has been one of the things that we continually work on," Leapmotor Australia boss Andy Hoang told Car Expert. Likewise, software in the Mitsubishi Triton dual-cab ute was updated in 2024 to reduce the sensitivity of its driver monitoring system. The AAMI research mirrors similar research conducted overseas, including a 2025 report by British consumer website Which? that showed more than half of drivers surveyed in the UK switched off safety systems. "We're looking at what is the safest, most insurable vehicle, rather than which one gives the least number of false interventions and the best driving comfort," Yousif Al-Ani, principal engineer for Thatcham Research, which assesses risk for insurance companies, told Which?. "Often, we have issues because those are two conflicting goals. In other words, a car that has ADAS set up to intervene sooner is inherently more insurable, but also more annoying to drive." In the UK, lane-keeping systems were the second most turned-off feature behind speed assist, which combines speed sign recognition and adaptive cruise control to adjust vehicle speed to the posted limit – when it works. Alarmingly, 34 per cent of UK drivers and 16 per cent of Australian drivers admitted to turning off automatic emergency braking (AEB). Proven to reduce incidents and injuries, AEB has been mandatory for all new cars sold in Australia since March 2025. A study conducted in the US by the Partnership for Analytics Research in Traffic Safety (PARTS) showed AEB contributed to a 46 per cent reduction in the number of rear-end crashes. It also showed that AEB systems with pedestrian detection reduced collisions with vulnerable road users by nine per cent. An earlier study showed that when AEB is paired with forward collision warning, the likelihood of motorists suffering injury in a collision fell by 53 per cent. MORE: How autonomous is my car? Levels of self-driving explained MORE: These are the safest cars tested by ANCAP in 2024 MORE: Yes, this safety tech has really reduced car crashes Content originally sourced from: Australian drivers are ditching safety systems they find "annoying", "distracting" and "too sensitive" – despite knowing they bring real-world benefits – according to a new report from insurance company, AAMI. The company's latest annual Crash Index, which surveyed more than 480,000 AAMI insurance claimants over the past 12 months, revealed almost one in five drivers nationwide admitted to turning off some of their vehicle's advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS). That's despite 59 per cent of them agreeing that ADAS functions improved road safety and reduced the number – and severity – of crashes. "In-car safety features aren't just gadgets, they're designed to help protect us and make our roads safer," said AAMI motor prevention manager Mary Kennedy in a statement. "We should be embracing these features, not turning them off." CarExpert can save you thousands on a new car. Click here to get a great deal. Of those who said they switched off safety systems, the function most often deactivated was lane departure warning/lane keeping, with 45 per cent admitting it was the first ADAS to be deactivated. Adaptive/radar cruise control was the next most turned-off safety aid, with 17 per cent of drivers who had turned off a feature admitting to avoiding its use. The most common reason for turning off the systems was that they were "annoying" or "distracting", with 69 per cent of drivers surveyed saying this led them to deactivating them. In 2023, Euro NCAP said it would work with automakers to minimise ADAS "noise pollution" and the "more annoying features of these technologies". "As much as it is a challenge to insist that manufacturers fit the latest safety technologies, the real challenge lies in convincing consumers of their necessity," Euro NCAP secretary general Michiel van Ratingen said in a statement. "There is a worrying trend of media and social channels encouraging drivers 'to turn them off'." Earlier this year, Chinese brand Leapmotor recalibrated some ADAS functions in the first model it released in Australia, the C10 mid-size electrified SUV, following media and customer criticism that its systems were too sensitive. The C10 has a five-star ANCAP rating and comes with lane-keep assist, emergency lane-keep assist and adaptive cruise control as standard. "Certainly, the feedback from very, very early on about the sensitivity of the ADAS has been one of the things that we continually work on," Leapmotor Australia boss Andy Hoang told Car Expert. Likewise, software in the Mitsubishi Triton dual-cab ute was updated in 2024 to reduce the sensitivity of its driver monitoring system. The AAMI research mirrors similar research conducted overseas, including a 2025 report by British consumer website Which? that showed more than half of drivers surveyed in the UK switched off safety systems. "We're looking at what is the safest, most insurable vehicle, rather than which one gives the least number of false interventions and the best driving comfort," Yousif Al-Ani, principal engineer for Thatcham Research, which assesses risk for insurance companies, told Which?. "Often, we have issues because those are two conflicting goals. In other words, a car that has ADAS set up to intervene sooner is inherently more insurable, but also more annoying to drive." In the UK, lane-keeping systems were the second most turned-off feature behind speed assist, which combines speed sign recognition and adaptive cruise control to adjust vehicle speed to the posted limit – when it works. Alarmingly, 34 per cent of UK drivers and 16 per cent of Australian drivers admitted to turning off automatic emergency braking (AEB). Proven to reduce incidents and injuries, AEB has been mandatory for all new cars sold in Australia since March 2025. A study conducted in the US by the Partnership for Analytics Research in Traffic Safety (PARTS) showed AEB contributed to a 46 per cent reduction in the number of rear-end crashes. It also showed that AEB systems with pedestrian detection reduced collisions with vulnerable road users by nine per cent. An earlier study showed that when AEB is paired with forward collision warning, the likelihood of motorists suffering injury in a collision fell by 53 per cent. MORE: How autonomous is my car? Levels of self-driving explained MORE: These are the safest cars tested by ANCAP in 2024 MORE: Yes, this safety tech has really reduced car crashes Content originally sourced from: Australian drivers are ditching safety systems they find "annoying", "distracting" and "too sensitive" – despite knowing they bring real-world benefits – according to a new report from insurance company, AAMI. The company's latest annual Crash Index, which surveyed more than 480,000 AAMI insurance claimants over the past 12 months, revealed almost one in five drivers nationwide admitted to turning off some of their vehicle's advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS). That's despite 59 per cent of them agreeing that ADAS functions improved road safety and reduced the number – and severity – of crashes. "In-car safety features aren't just gadgets, they're designed to help protect us and make our roads safer," said AAMI motor prevention manager Mary Kennedy in a statement. "We should be embracing these features, not turning them off." CarExpert can save you thousands on a new car. Click here to get a great deal. Of those who said they switched off safety systems, the function most often deactivated was lane departure warning/lane keeping, with 45 per cent admitting it was the first ADAS to be deactivated. Adaptive/radar cruise control was the next most turned-off safety aid, with 17 per cent of drivers who had turned off a feature admitting to avoiding its use. The most common reason for turning off the systems was that they were "annoying" or "distracting", with 69 per cent of drivers surveyed saying this led them to deactivating them. In 2023, Euro NCAP said it would work with automakers to minimise ADAS "noise pollution" and the "more annoying features of these technologies". "As much as it is a challenge to insist that manufacturers fit the latest safety technologies, the real challenge lies in convincing consumers of their necessity," Euro NCAP secretary general Michiel van Ratingen said in a statement. "There is a worrying trend of media and social channels encouraging drivers 'to turn them off'." Earlier this year, Chinese brand Leapmotor recalibrated some ADAS functions in the first model it released in Australia, the C10 mid-size electrified SUV, following media and customer criticism that its systems were too sensitive. The C10 has a five-star ANCAP rating and comes with lane-keep assist, emergency lane-keep assist and adaptive cruise control as standard. "Certainly, the feedback from very, very early on about the sensitivity of the ADAS has been one of the things that we continually work on," Leapmotor Australia boss Andy Hoang told Car Expert. Likewise, software in the Mitsubishi Triton dual-cab ute was updated in 2024 to reduce the sensitivity of its driver monitoring system. The AAMI research mirrors similar research conducted overseas, including a 2025 report by British consumer website Which? that showed more than half of drivers surveyed in the UK switched off safety systems. "We're looking at what is the safest, most insurable vehicle, rather than which one gives the least number of false interventions and the best driving comfort," Yousif Al-Ani, principal engineer for Thatcham Research, which assesses risk for insurance companies, told Which?. "Often, we have issues because those are two conflicting goals. In other words, a car that has ADAS set up to intervene sooner is inherently more insurable, but also more annoying to drive." In the UK, lane-keeping systems were the second most turned-off feature behind speed assist, which combines speed sign recognition and adaptive cruise control to adjust vehicle speed to the posted limit – when it works. Alarmingly, 34 per cent of UK drivers and 16 per cent of Australian drivers admitted to turning off automatic emergency braking (AEB). Proven to reduce incidents and injuries, AEB has been mandatory for all new cars sold in Australia since March 2025. A study conducted in the US by the Partnership for Analytics Research in Traffic Safety (PARTS) showed AEB contributed to a 46 per cent reduction in the number of rear-end crashes. It also showed that AEB systems with pedestrian detection reduced collisions with vulnerable road users by nine per cent. An earlier study showed that when AEB is paired with forward collision warning, the likelihood of motorists suffering injury in a collision fell by 53 per cent. MORE: How autonomous is my car? Levels of self-driving explained MORE: These are the safest cars tested by ANCAP in 2024 MORE: Yes, this safety tech has really reduced car crashes Content originally sourced from: Australian drivers are ditching safety systems they find "annoying", "distracting" and "too sensitive" – despite knowing they bring real-world benefits – according to a new report from insurance company, AAMI. The company's latest annual Crash Index, which surveyed more than 480,000 AAMI insurance claimants over the past 12 months, revealed almost one in five drivers nationwide admitted to turning off some of their vehicle's advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS). That's despite 59 per cent of them agreeing that ADAS functions improved road safety and reduced the number – and severity – of crashes. "In-car safety features aren't just gadgets, they're designed to help protect us and make our roads safer," said AAMI motor prevention manager Mary Kennedy in a statement. "We should be embracing these features, not turning them off." CarExpert can save you thousands on a new car. Click here to get a great deal. Of those who said they switched off safety systems, the function most often deactivated was lane departure warning/lane keeping, with 45 per cent admitting it was the first ADAS to be deactivated. Adaptive/radar cruise control was the next most turned-off safety aid, with 17 per cent of drivers who had turned off a feature admitting to avoiding its use. The most common reason for turning off the systems was that they were "annoying" or "distracting", with 69 per cent of drivers surveyed saying this led them to deactivating them. In 2023, Euro NCAP said it would work with automakers to minimise ADAS "noise pollution" and the "more annoying features of these technologies". "As much as it is a challenge to insist that manufacturers fit the latest safety technologies, the real challenge lies in convincing consumers of their necessity," Euro NCAP secretary general Michiel van Ratingen said in a statement. "There is a worrying trend of media and social channels encouraging drivers 'to turn them off'." Earlier this year, Chinese brand Leapmotor recalibrated some ADAS functions in the first model it released in Australia, the C10 mid-size electrified SUV, following media and customer criticism that its systems were too sensitive. The C10 has a five-star ANCAP rating and comes with lane-keep assist, emergency lane-keep assist and adaptive cruise control as standard. "Certainly, the feedback from very, very early on about the sensitivity of the ADAS has been one of the things that we continually work on," Leapmotor Australia boss Andy Hoang told Car Expert. Likewise, software in the Mitsubishi Triton dual-cab ute was updated in 2024 to reduce the sensitivity of its driver monitoring system. The AAMI research mirrors similar research conducted overseas, including a 2025 report by British consumer website Which? that showed more than half of drivers surveyed in the UK switched off safety systems. "We're looking at what is the safest, most insurable vehicle, rather than which one gives the least number of false interventions and the best driving comfort," Yousif Al-Ani, principal engineer for Thatcham Research, which assesses risk for insurance companies, told Which?. "Often, we have issues because those are two conflicting goals. In other words, a car that has ADAS set up to intervene sooner is inherently more insurable, but also more annoying to drive." In the UK, lane-keeping systems were the second most turned-off feature behind speed assist, which combines speed sign recognition and adaptive cruise control to adjust vehicle speed to the posted limit – when it works. Alarmingly, 34 per cent of UK drivers and 16 per cent of Australian drivers admitted to turning off automatic emergency braking (AEB). Proven to reduce incidents and injuries, AEB has been mandatory for all new cars sold in Australia since March 2025. A study conducted in the US by the Partnership for Analytics Research in Traffic Safety (PARTS) showed AEB contributed to a 46 per cent reduction in the number of rear-end crashes. It also showed that AEB systems with pedestrian detection reduced collisions with vulnerable road users by nine per cent. An earlier study showed that when AEB is paired with forward collision warning, the likelihood of motorists suffering injury in a collision fell by 53 per cent. MORE: How autonomous is my car? Levels of self-driving explained MORE: These are the safest cars tested by ANCAP in 2024 MORE: Yes, this safety tech has really reduced car crashes Content originally sourced from:
