Latest news with #AIgrowth
Telegraph
2 days ago
- Business
- Telegraph
French tycoon to cash in on Labour's data centre blitz
A French tycoon is plotting to cash in on the Labour-backed boom in data centres after snapping up planning rights for a landmark development in Cambridgeshire. Max-Hervé George, who runs Swiss-based investment fund SWI Group, has bought a site earmarked for development near Sutton-in-the-Isle with the intention of constructing one of the UK's biggest data centres. Mr George's fund said the new site, which won planning permission three years ago under a different developer, would target a capacity of 330 megawatts (MW) – making it one of the most significant projects in Britain. Mr George's move highlights a new gold rush for data centres after they were classed as critical national infrastructure last September, with Sir Keir Starmer creating 'AI growth zones' so that they can be built more quickly. The Cambridgeshire site aims to cater to a cluster of global technology businesses located in Britain's so-called 'golden triangle' between Cambridge, Oxford and London. It is among a slew of projects lined up across Britain that underpin the Prime Minister's strategy for economic growth. Under the plan, SWI Group has acquired the existing rights and planning permission from another business to develop the land. It plans to invest around £3bn to bring the site to life although the money is yet to be raised. Mr George, 35, said that his business has been 'unstinting and steadfast' in its efforts to create 'Europe's most valuable data centre groups'. He added: 'When we first got involved with data centres six years ago, we could see the demand for computing was going to grow dramatically, but the explosion in the growth of AI has taken even us by surprise.' The Sutton project will be the group's fifth data centre to operate under its AiOnX brand, adding to its sites in Ireland, Denmark, Spain and Italy. SWI is looking to invest more than €20bn (£14.6bn) into the centres, to provide a total capacity of 2 gigawatts. Mr George set up SWI Group earlier this year by merging his Icona Capital business with Switzerland's Stoneweg, a fund manager. He told The Telegraph in March that at least half of the fund's €10bn pot could be ultimately invested in British assets, in what could be a major boost for Sir Keir's push to attract overseas capital and bolster economic growth. Mr George said at the time that he was 'intensively looking to invest in data centres', as well as warehousing and logistics properties. Beyond SWI Group, Mr George made his millions through 'golden ticket' life insurance contracts sold by Aviva France. Under those contracts, which he first received at the age of seven from his father, customers were able to trade funds based on the previous week's prices.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Business
- Yahoo
Credo's Revenue Soars, Attracts Big Money Inflows
CRDO focuses on connectivity solutions for data infrastructure, including integrated circuits, active cabling, and SerDes chiplets. The company is well positioned for AI-based growth, having recently diversified its revenue base with three hyperscalers, each contributing over 10% to overall revenue. Financially, CRDO's fourth-quarter fiscal 2025 report showed $170 million of quarterly revenue, which is a 180% year-over-year increase. Fiscal year 2025 revenue was $437 million, which is a 126% jump over the prior year. Also, CRDO's fiscal year 2026 revenue guidance exceeds $800 million, representing 85% annual growth. No wonder CRDO shares are up 41% so far this year – and they could rise more. MoneyFlows data shows how Big Money investors are again betting heavily on the stock. Institutional volumes reveal plenty. In the last year, CRDO has enjoyed strong investor demand, which we believe to be institutional support. Each green bar signals unusually large volumes in CRDO shares. They reflect our proprietary inflow signal, pushing the stock higher: Plenty of technology names are under accumulation right now. But there's a powerful fundamental story happening with Credo. Institutional support and a healthy fundamental backdrop make this company worth investigating. As you can see, CRDO has had strong sales growth: 1-year sales growth rate (+126.3%) 3-year sales growth rate (+68%) Source: FactSet Also, EPS is estimated to ramp higher this year by +26.2%. Now it makes sense why the stock has been generating Big Money interest. CRDO has a track record of strong financial performance. Marrying great fundamentals with MoneyFlows software has found some big winning stocks over the long term. Credo has been a top-rated stock at MoneyFlows. That means the stock has unusual buy pressure and growing fundamentals. We have a ranking process that showcases stocks like this on a weekly basis. It just made the rare Outlier 20 for the first time ever, and there could be more ahead. The blue bar below shows when CRDO was a top pick…Big Money is buying in: Tracking unusual volumes reveals the power of money flows. This is a trait that most outlier stocks exhibit…the best of the best. Big Money demand drives stocks upward. The CRDO action isn't new at all. Big Money buying in the shares is signaling to take notice. Given the historical gains in share price and strong fundamentals, this stock could be worth a spot in a diversified portfolio. Disclosure: the author holds no position in CRDO at the time of publication. If you are a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA) or are a serious investor, take your investing to the next level and follow our free weekly MoneyFlows insights. This article was originally posted on FX Empire Earnings and Inflows Push Heico Shares Up 34% Visa Shares Up 2,655% Since Big Money Bought In Fragile Middle East Truce Heightens Geo-political, Macroeconomic Risks, Including for Europe Core & Main Flashes Bullish Outlier Signals Vistra's Nuclear AI Option, Renewables Draw Inflows Outlier Inflows Boosting Carpenter Technology Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
17-06-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
OpenAI is under 'unprecedented pressure to grow,' says its new recruiting head
OpenAI's new head of recruiting said the company is under "unprecedented pressure to grow." "The world is looking to us to learn how to grow and how to work together in an AGI era," he said. The AI talent war is raging at startups and Big Tech players alike. OpenAI is under "unprecedented pressure to grow" as it races to scale in the era of artificial general intelligence, said Joaquin Quiñonero Candela, the tech giant's newly appointed head of recruiting. "If we were a rocket (wait, we're one), we'd be at MaxQ — maximum dynamic pressure," he wrote in a LinkedIn post on Tuesday announcing his new role. "Recruiting has never been more important." Candela joined OpenAI in 2024 as head of preparedness, where he worked on building safer AI systems. He holds a Ph.D. in machine learning and has spent decades in the field, including more than nine years at Facebook, where he led the company's machine learning group and later its responsible AI efforts. His new position comes at a time when OpenAI — and the broader AI sector — is rethinking what hiring looks like in a world shaped by the very technologies it's building. The company has grown almost tenfold over the past two and a half years, Candela said. "The world is looking to us to learn how to grow and how to work together in an AGI era," he added. "How should we use AGI for recruiting? Whom should we hire in a post-AGI world?" The company lists 330 open jobs, from a sales gig in Korea to postings for lawyers in San Francisco. OpenAI did not respond to a request for comment from Business Insider. Candela's comments come as OpenAI tries to stay ahead in the AI talent war. In May, OpenAI announced it was buying an AI hardware startup from Jony Ive, Apple's former design chief, for nearly $6.5 billion. Ive's startup, IO, is set to work with OpenAI's research, engineering, and product teams. Sam Altman also said in the same month that he had hired Fidji Simo, Instacart's chair and CEO, as his new CEO of applications. "I cannot imagine a better new team member to help us scale the next 10x (or 100x, let's see)," Altman wrote in a post on X. The hiring builds on last June's appointments of Sarah Friar, the former CEO of Nextdoor, as chief financial officer, and Kevin Weil, a former Meta and Twitter exec, as chief product officer. OpenAI is not alone in chasing top AI talent. Just last week, Meta announced a nearly $15 billion investment in data company Scale AI — and brought over its CEO Alexandr Wang to join the tech giant's AI push. Meta now owns a 49% stake in the company, which also counts OpenAI as a major customer. Read the original article on Business Insider Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
CNET
05-06-2025
- Business
- CNET
How a Proposed Moratorium on State AI Rules Could Affect You
Congress would slam the brakes on any state rules and laws around artificial intelligence under language in the big federal spending bill now before the US Senate. Proponents say such a move would help the industry grow and compete with AI developers in China, while critics say it would limit the power of anyone but the federal government to put guardrails around a technology that is quickly becoming a major part of our lives. The proposal says no state or political subdivision "may enforce any law or regulation regulating artificial intelligence models, artificial intelligence systems or automated decision systems" for 10 years. In May, the House of Representatives narrowly voted to approve the full budget bill, which also includes the extension of the 2017 federal tax cuts and cuts to services like Medicaid and SNAP. AI developers and some lawmakers have said federal action is necessary to keep states from creating a patchwork of different rules and regulations across the US that could slow the technology's growth. The rapid growth in generative AI since OpenAI's ChatGPT exploded on the scene in late 2022 has led companies to fit the technology in as many spaces as possible. The economic implications are significant, as the US and China race to see which country's tech will predominate, but generative AI poses privacy, transparency and other risks for consumers that lawmakers have sought to temper. "We need, as an industry and as a country, one clear federal standard, whatever it may be," Alexandr Wang, founder and CEO of the data company Scale AI, told lawmakers during an April hearing. "But we need one, we need clarity as to one federal standard and have preemption to prevent this outcome where you have 50 different standards." Not all AI companies are backing a moratorium, however. In a New York Times op-ed, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei called it "far too blunt an instrument," saying the federal government should create transparency standards for AI companies instead. "Having this national transparency standard would help not only the public but also Congress understand how the technology is developing, so that lawmakers can decide whether further government action is needed." Efforts to limit the ability of states to regulate artificial intelligence could mean fewer consumer protections around a technology that is increasingly seeping into every aspect of American life. "There have been a lot of discussions at the state level, and I would think that it's important for us to approach this problem at multiple levels," said Anjana Susarla, a professor at Michigan State University who studies AI. "We could approach it at the national level. We can approach it at the state level too. I think we need both." Several states have already started regulating AI The proposed language would bar states from enforcing any regulation, including those already on the books. The exceptions are rules and laws that make things easier for AI development and those that apply the same standards to non-AI models and systems that do similar things. These kinds of regulations are already starting to pop up. The biggest focus is not in the US, but in Europe, where the European Union has already implemented standards for AI. But states are starting to get in on the action. Colorado passed a set of consumer protections last year, set to go into effect in 2026. California adopted more than a dozen AI-related laws last year. Other states have laws and regulations that often deal with specific issues such as deepfakes or require AI developers to publish information about their training data. At the local level, some regulations also address potential employment discrimination if AI systems are used in hiring. "States are all over the map when it comes to what they want to regulate in AI," said Arsen Kourinian, a partner at the law firm Mayer Brown. So far in 2025, state lawmakers have introduced at least 550 proposals around AI, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. In the House committee hearing last month, Rep. Jay Obernolte, a Republican from California, signaled a desire to get ahead of more state-level regulation. "We have a limited amount of legislative runway to be able to get that problem solved before the states get too far ahead," he said. While some states have laws on the books, not all of them have gone into effect or seen any enforcement. That limits the potential short-term impact of a moratorium, said Cobun Zweifel-Keegan, managing director in Washington for the International Association of Privacy Professionals. "There isn't really any enforcement yet." A moratorium would likely deter state legislators and policymakers from developing and proposing new regulations, Zweifel-Keegan said. "The federal government would become the primary and potentially sole regulator around AI systems," he said. What a moratorium on state AI regulation means AI developers have asked for any guardrails placed on their work to be consistent and streamlined. During a Senate Commerce Committee hearing last week, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman told Sen. Ted Cruz, a Republican from Texas, that an EU-style regulatory system "would be disastrous" for the industry. Altman suggested instead that the industry develop its own standards. Asked by Sen. Brian Schatz, a Democrat from Hawaii, if industry self-regulation is enough at the moment, Altman said he thought some guardrails would be good, but "It's easy for it to go too far. As I have learned more about how the world works, I am more afraid that it could go too far and have really bad consequences." (Disclosure: Ziff Davis, parent company of CNET, in April filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, alleging it infringed Ziff Davis copyrights in training and operating its AI systems.) Concerns from companies, both the developers that create AI systems and the "deployers" who use them in interactions with consumers, often stem from fears that states will mandate significant work such as impact assessments or transparency notices before a product is released, Kourinian said. Consumer advocates have said more regulations are needed, and hampering the ability of states could hurt the privacy and safety of users. "AI is being used widely to make decisions about people's lives without transparency, accountability or recourse -- it's also facilitating chilling fraud, impersonation and surveillance," Ben Winters, director of AI and privacy at the Consumer Federation of America, said in a statement. "A 10-year pause would lead to more discrimination, more deception and less control -- simply put, it's siding with tech companies over the people they impact." A moratorium on specific state rules and laws could result in more consumer protection issues being dealt with in court or by state attorneys general, Kourinian said. Existing laws around unfair and deceptive practices that are not specific to AI would still apply. "Time will tell how judges will interpret those issues," he said. Susarla said the pervasiveness of AI across industries means states might be able to regulate issues like privacy and transparency more broadly, without focusing on the technology. But a moratorium on AI regulation could lead to such policies being tied up in lawsuits. "It has to be some kind of balance between 'we don't want to stop innovation,' but on the other hand, we also need to recognize that there can be real consequences," she said. Much policy around the governance of AI systems does happen because of those so-called technology-agnostic rules and laws, Zweifel-Keegan said. "It's worth also remembering that there are a lot of existing laws and there is a potential to make new laws that don't trigger the moratorium but do apply to AI systems as long as they apply to other systems," he said. A proposed 10-year moratorium on state AI laws is now in the hands of the Senate, where the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee has already held hearings on artificial intelligence. Nathan Howard/Bloomberg via Getty Images The AI debate moves to the Senate With the bill now in the hands of the US Senate -- and with more people becoming aware of the proposal -- debate over the moratorium has picked up. Senators of both parties, including Republican Sens. Josh Hawley and Marsha Blackburn, have voiced their concerns. In the Senate, the measure could be stripped out of the budget because of the so-called Byrd Rule, which prohibits anything that is not a budgetary issue from being included in a reconciliation bill. Whatever bill the Senate approves will then also have to be accepted by the House, where it passed by the narrowest of margins. Even some House members who voted for the bill have said they don't like the moratorium, namely Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, a key ally of President Trump. The Georgia Republican posted on X this week that she is "adamantly OPPOSED" to the moratorium and that she would not vote for the bill with the moratorium included. At the state level, a letter signed by 40 state attorneys general -- of both parties -- called for Congress to reject the moratorium and instead create that broader regulatory system. "This bill does not propose any regulatory scheme to replace or supplement the laws enacted or currently under consideration by the states, leaving Americans entirely unprotected from the potential harms of AI," they wrote.
Globe and Mail
20-05-2025
- Business
- Globe and Mail
This Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stock Looks Poised for a Rebound
It's been a long journey for SoundHound AI (NASDAQ: SOUN). Founded in 2005, the company has worked for decades to assemble a voice AI platform that enables customized conversational experiences. It's powered by more than 200 patents, and major businesses including Honda and Oracle have already signed on as customers. This year, analysts expect sales to grow by nearly 90% and in 2026, another 25% sales growth is expected. And yet somehow, SoundHound stock is down 50% in value since the year began. This stock is primed for a rebound, but there are a few risks you should be aware of before jumping in. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue » SoundHound has an impressive AI business The past five years have brought heavy revenue growth for SoundHound. Sales over that time period have risen by more than 370%. Looking ahead, analysts forecast more heavy growth in the year to come -- expectations that have risen wildly over the past half year. What's driving all this growth? Demand for its voice AI suite, which helps companies incorporate AI into verticals like customer support, personal assistants, and product ordering. For example, SoundHound's work with Honda is to help Honda drivers engage with its vehicles more, like chatting with the car or truck about maintenance needs. The company's work with White Castle, for comparison, deals with drive-thru order windows, helping customers order faster, more accurately, and with less cost to the company. SOUN Revenue (TTM) data by YCharts Basically anywhere you might speak to a person or machine, SoundHound has a solution. That creates a balanced mix of end markets for the company, everything from automotive, restaurants, and financial services to healthcare and insurance sectors' customers. The AI voice market is expected to reach nearly $50 billion in value by 2034, with annual growth averaging roughly 35%. With trailing annual sales of just $102 million, it's clear that SoundHound has a lot of room for potential growth. Shares are down 50% this year not because end market growth has lagged or because sales growth is expected to be low. Rather, shares dipped hard simply because they were already valued at nosebleed levels. Before the decline, SOUN stock traded at an astounding 100 times sales. Now, shares trade at just 37 times sales. That's still expensive, but perhaps reasonable for such a small company targeting such a large opportunity. But there are a few important risks to consider before buying in. Don't invest in SoundHound before understanding these risks SoundHound is a tiny competitor. That creates huge upside potential, but it also creates risks. Most of the company's competitors are significantly larger -- think Big Tech firms with deep pockets. Long term, it's not clear whether the company can actually compete with these well-financed businesses, especially considering its research and development budget over the past 12 months totaled just $80 million. But it's not just competition. Investors will likely need to wait years for the company's hefty valuation premium to be justified. That should be no problem for long-term investors. With annual sales growth rates of 80% or more, even a 37 times sales valuation can become a steal, but that will take time. SoundHound stock looks ready to rebound after the correction. But it's a long-term rebound that investors should be targeting, not a short-term spike. High-premium growth stocks like this can be very volatile, and investors should be ready for that even if they do commit to a holding period of several years or more. Should you invest $1,000 in SoundHound AI right now? Before you buy stock in SoundHound AI, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and SoundHound AI wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $642,582!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $829,879!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is975% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to172%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of May 19, 2025
