Latest news with #AbdulRehman
India.com
16 hours ago
- Politics
- India.com
Faith or Fanaticism: Is Religious Conversion A Command By Allah? Analysis
In a controversial case that has sparked national debate, an investigation by ZEE News has revealed that members of an alleged religious conversion racket in Delhi believe they are acting on divine command. Abdul Rehman, identified as a key figure in this network, has been accused of orchestrating the mass conversion of Hindus to Islam. In a startling video, Rehman's wife and daughter, both seen in burqas, openly claim on camera that converting people to Islam is a command from Allah. Their calm and confident manner during the interview raised concerns among viewers and experts alike, suggesting a deep-rooted ideological influence. The women, showing neither hesitation nor remorse, stated that their actions were in line with religious duty. Rehman and his family, much like the earlier exposed figure Chhangur, allegedly turned religious conversion into a full-time operation based out of Delhi. In today's DNA, ZEE News questioned whether such acts are truly endorsed by Islamic scripture. To explore this, the news channel consulted Islamic scholars and examined Quranic teachings on the matter. The scholars unanimously stated that Islam strictly prohibits forced or manipulative conversions. According to their interpretation, the Quran does not support coercion in matters of faith under any circumstances. #DNAWithRahulSinha | दिल्ली से यूपी..धर्मांतरण पर बड़ा खुलासा, ब्रेनवॉश कैसे किया जाता है..LIVE देखिए क्या धर्मांतरण..अल्लाह का हुक्म है?#DNA #ReligionConversion @RahulSinhaTV — Zee News (@ZeeNews) July 22, 2025 A key verse cited was Surah Yunus, Ayah 99, which clearly states: 'If your Lord had willed, all the people on earth would have believed. Will you then compel people to become believers?' Scholars explained that this verse conveys a powerful message of religious freedom and coexistence, rejecting any form of force or deceit in conversion practices. Further, scholars pointed out that pressuring or luring individuals into changing their faith through fear, greed, or misinformation is both a sin in Islam and a crime under Indian law. They emphasized that such actions distort the essence of Islamic teachings and do not reflect the principles of the Prophet Muhammad, who preached tolerance and respect for all faiths. In light of this, religious scholars condemned the actions of Abdul Rehman and others accused of similar offenses, calling them dangerous extremists who exploit religion for personal or political agendas. They warned that such misinterpretations of the Quran not only mislead people but also harm the social fabric of the country. Through this investigation and conversations with Islamic scholars, it becomes evident that the Quran does not endorse forced religious conversion. Instead, the practice promoted by figures like Abdul Rehman stems from personal fanaticism and deliberate misreading of sacred texts, which must be addressed both spiritually and legally.
BBC News
a day ago
- Health
- BBC News
Bradford: Grieving son's 'healing walks' aim to help others
When Mukhtar Rehman lost his father during the height of the Covid-19 pandemic, nothing could have prepared him for what followed. The Bradford-based hair stylist and community worker held his father, Abdul Rehman, in his arms as he passed away - a moment that would haunt him."I had PTSD - I didn't know how to process that emotion of loss," he a long battle to cope with his own grief, during which he ultimately found peace and healing in nature, he's now hoping to do the same for other men in similar situations by launching a Yorkshire Dales walking group. His father's death was followed by a year of "silence and suppressed grief", he the only son in his family, he says he automatically took on the role of "protector" for his mother and five sisters."It kind of fell on me, that responsibility," Mukhtar, 38, recalls."I couldn't express myself emotionally, I felt like I had to support others."It was autopilot - it only really sank in afterwards." "After the burial I couldn't eat, couldn't sleep, I had continuous memories of him passing," he says."I still carried on and I blocked it out for a year."Mukhtar's experience echo a wider issue he later recognised in his community."Men from ethnic minority backgrounds are less likely to access formal mental health services," Mukhtar, from Heaton, explains."Yet many men are impacted by grief, loss, and cultural stigma around expressing emotion."Research recently published in the British Journal of General Practice found that South Asian men in the UK are more likely to experience mental health issues but are less likely to access talking therapies. Many men navigate grief, anxiety, and distress alone, the study concluded, underlining the need for culturally sensitive, community-led approaches. He says two rounds of therapy "gave me the tools and the mechanisms to be able to manage myself a lot better", with the outdoors also playing a key role."When I'm surrounded by nature, it almost heals me in a way I can't explain," he also found purpose in his community work - a passion he says was passed down from his Sunday he is leading a walking group in Malham, with his group activities funded by a bursary from the Yorkshire Dales Community Champion scheme. The walk will include mindfulness sessions and moments of quiet reflection, along with creating a space where men can "open up".Mukhtar hopes the project will provide a way to honour his father, help others heal, and remind people that grief doesn't have to be faced alone."The whole idea is to get men talking to other men, getting out into the countryside," he says."It's not about fixing grief - it's about facing it together." If you have been affected by any of the issues raised in this story, information and support can be found at the BBC's Action Line. Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
Business Recorder
a day ago
- Business
- Business Recorder
Pakistan's parched future: bonds to bridge the water funding chasm
As the monsoons arrive, once again, Pakistan is facing a water crisis, shifting from drought-like scenarios to the threat of a flood. The seasonal threat is no longer creeping but ferocious. As seasonal relief in monsoon showers may seem to provide, the bitter truth remains the same: our water security is falling, drop after drop, each passing year. Where once favoured with powerful rivers and glacial flows, present-day Pakistan is a water-scarce nation. Water availability on a head-per-capita basis has crashed down to 800–1,017 cubic meters from 5,260 in 1951. By 2035, we could dip below 500–660 cubic meters, a threshold of pure scarcity, while UNDP predicts extreme scarcity below 500 cubic meters in 2025. This is no future prospect; it is present in the dried-out canals in Punjab, Sindh's saline groundwater, drop in water tables in Balochistan, and failing supply lines in main cities like Karachi and Lahore. But behind the green disaster is the less spoken but no less lethal, twin disaster: the disparity between what we need to pay for water security and what we pay. The cost of inaction Pakistan's water economy is bleeding. Analyst estimates and official sources put inefficiencies, climate-related disasters, and old infrastructure at Rs3-4 trillion every year, about 3–4 percent of GDP. The losses occur due to floods, droughts, inefficient irrigation, and crumbling infrastructure. Agriculture, which accounts for more than 90 percent of usable water, loses on conveyance estimated at between 40–60 percent, endangering both productivity and rural livelihoods. Consider, for example, a rural Punjabi smallholder, Abdul Rehman. During the lean season, his wheat crop shriveled for lack of water as irrigation canals dried up, prompting him to sell livestock to make ends meet. Just as in lower Sindh, Ghulam Mustafa encountered an almost identical ordeal in May-June this year; he was waiting for water to begin kharif planting amidst water scarcity. The Indus reduced significantly by the time it flowed to his distributary because of downstream restrains added to existing upstream problems, slowing down and dwindling the stream. By the time water flowed back, as well, it was in vain, the sowing period was gone and his debts increased. Such incidents are not unique. Along the coasts in Sindh, advancing seawater engulfs arable lands as flows of freshwater fail to trickle down to the delta, making previously fertile patches near Thatta and Sujawal desolate areas. Across central and southern Punjab, numerous Rabi growers watched their wheat crop drought for insufficient final irrigations in February just months before harvesting, owing to paucity of water. Across cities such as Karachi, Lahore, Multan, and Quetta, damaged water infrastructure compelled families to rely on costly and sometimes hazardous tanker supplies. The World Bank warned that unabated disruptions would shave an estimated 6 percent of the GDP until mid-decade, long-term estimates could be 10 percent until 2050, or even 18-20 percent because of broader climate damage. The flood damage in 2022 alone was estimated at Rs3.2 trillion, sweeping away homes, crops, and livelihoods. Yet investment hasn't caught up. Why the gap persists The 2018 National Water Policy (NWP) had set a humble target: 10 percent of the Public Sector Development Programme (PSDP) should be for water in 2019, increasing to 20 percent in 2030. We still aren't achieving even the baseline. Present federal PSDP allocations are around 9.5 percent, national water expenditures, across federal and provincial governments, are a mere Rs380–400 billion in FY2025–26, less than 0.3 percent of GDP. Although mega-projects such as Mohmand Dam (Rs35.7 billion) and Diamer-Bhasha (Rs25 billion) are separately funded, the aggregate amount remains inadequate. Provincial budgets are no different. Punjab allocated Rs38 billion for irrigation, Sindh Rs31 billion, KP Rs25.1 billion, and Balochistan Rs32 billion (inclusive of foreign-aided schemes). The figures are humble for a sector for which provinces are the sole operator for canal operations, water distribution, and urban supply. Much of the gap lies in the larger fiscal constraint in Pakistan: debt servicing accounts for more than 20 percent of the federal budget. With IMF austerity, restricted fiscal space, and increasing rivalry from defense, subsidies, and social protection, long-gestation infrastructure initiatives end up on the casualty list. The federal PSDP for water for the next financial year is down by more than 25 percent to Rs185 billion in FY2024–25. Dams receive Rs63.3 billion, canals Rs39.3 billion—the figures 10–15 percent below previous years in real terms. This reduction threatens to trap us in a vicious cycle of postponed upkeep and exposure. Enter: Pakistan Water Bonds In this dismal fiscal context, one idea offers a way out: Water Bonds. These are structured financial instruments that raise dedicated capital for water-related infrastructure and services, independent of the donor cycle or the vagaries of annual PSDP allocations. They are not untested. In 2021, WAPDA raised USD500 million through a Green Eurobond, oversubscribed six times. More recently, the Parwaaz Green Action Bond raised Rs1 billion with a strong AA–rating, while the federal government's Green Sukuk in May 2025 brought in Rs32 billion, testifying to strong investor appetite. Pakistan's Islamic finance market, which is estimated to hold Rs7 trillion in deposits (close to 20 percent of the banking network), is waiting for innovation. The Water Bonds, in the name of green sukuks, can exploit this resource pool and provide 10–12 percent yields while conforming to ethical investment paradigms. They can be traded on home exchanges and can appeal to pension funds, insurance, and even microfinance institutions. The diaspora dividend Arguably, the most promising and emotionally resonant source of capital lies in the Pakistani diaspora. Remittances totaled USD35 billion in FY2025, and the Roshan Digital Account (RDA) mobilized over USD10 billion in just a few years. Overseas Pakistanis have shown that they are willing to invest if credible, transparent, and purpose-driven instruments exist. Green Diaspora Water Sukuk issued in dollars, pounds, or euros would potentially raise USD250–500 million if only 2–3 percent of RDA investors buy in. Such bonds could fund filtration plants, desalination facilities, rainwater harvesting, and pipeline improvements in the very towns where their loved ones live. Picture a Pakistani doctor in the United States funding a desalination plant back in his hometown in Sindh—it would not only provide him 6–8 percent returns but ensure that future generations also drink clean water. With sovereign backing, ESG reporting, and zakat-associated functionalities, such bonds could blend moral responsibility with financial sense. These diaspora flows could unlock matching contributions from development institutions such as the World Bank, the Islamic Development Bank, or the IFC, much like ADB's recentUSD500 million commitment for water resilience. Making it work: a phased roadmap But it won't happen without a phased, strategic roadmap. A Rs100 billion pilot bond in 2025 would aim for low-hanging fruit: wastewater treatment (national efficiency <1 percent) and flood irrigation and unlined channels (up to 60 percent loss of applied water). In 2026–27, scaling could be Rs 560 billion for storage, urban networks, and flood control. By 2030, an additional Rs400–580 billion could be spent on precision agriculture, desalination, and AI-based metering. These initiatives would need to be aligned with the existing water-sector project in the PSDP, worth Rs424 billion but stalled because not adequately funded. Transparency, not just tranches Naturally, finance alone is not a panacea. Diaspora and private investors need reassurance. Transparency must be ingrained through blockchain-powered audit trails, third-party audits, and exchange listing on the Pakistan Stock Exchange. Volumetric water pricing against cross-subsidies, sovereign guarantees, and municipal-level credit enhancements will be imperative. The Council of Common Interests must be empowered to offer interprovincial oversight and break political impasses. Although Pakistan's credit rating is a concern, Fitch's upgrade in the near term and IMF criteria hold promise. The OECD's Asia Capital Markets Report 2025 points to unprecedented growth in sustainable bonds but cites challenges in new markets such as Pakistan, such as regulatory barriers and investor awareness, underlining the imperative for sound frameworks. A bond for our future Our water shortage is reality. But so is our capacity for innovation. We have capital. We have policy frameworks. What we lack is urgency and vision. Water Bonds provide something beyond dollars. They provide a trustworthy, long-term financing tool to pay for the singular most important determinant of our survival: water. Let's not wait for the next flood, the next drought to teach us lessons we know all too well. The moment to act is today. Let's construct our water future, bond for bond, drop for drop. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Indian Express
a day ago
- Indian Express
‘Conversion racket': After Saturday's raids, Agra police arrest ‘conversion kingpin' from Delhi
AS PART of an ongoing probe into an illegal religious conversion racket busted two days ago with the arrest of 10 people from six states, the Agra police on Monday arrested a 60-year-old Delhi resident, who they said is a prime accused in the case and had himself converted from Hinduism to Christianity and later to Islam in the 1990s. Police said the accused, Abdul Rehman, was allegedly leading the illegal religious conversion racket with the help of three co-accused who are now on the run. He was arrested from his residence in Delhi on the basis of information provided by the accused who were arrested two days ago and are currently in police custody. 'Abdul Rehman is a close associate of Kaleem Siddiqui, who is serving a life sentence in a case related to illegal religious conversions. Hailing from Firozabad, Rehman converted to Islam after first embracing Christianity,' said Agra Police Commissioner Deepak Kumar. He added that Rehman, whose original name was Mahendra Pal, had moved to Delhi in the 1990s, where he underwent religious conversion. Rehman was one of four persons managing Kaleem Siddiqui's illegal religious conversion racket following Siddiqui's conviction, said Kumar. Police are conducting raids to locate the remaining three accused. Police said the racket members used to refer to Rehman as 'Rehman Chacha' or 'Rehman Uncle.' Police said that during the investigation, it was revealed that Abdul Rehman also used to provide logistical support to members of the illegal religious conversion racket. During a raid at his residence in Delhi, police claimed to have found a girl from Rohtak, Haryana. Upon contacting their Haryana counterparts, it was confirmed that a missing person report had been filed for her there, said the commissioner. Police also claimed to have recovered documents from the house written by convict Kaleem Siddiqui, in which Abdul Rehman's name was mentioned. On Saturday, Agra Police arrested 10 people from six different states, claiming to have exposed another nationwide network allegedly involved in illegal conversion activities. Police said the network was uncovered while investigating the alleged kidnapping of two sisters, aged 33 and 18, from Agra in March this year. As the investigation moved forward, evidence pointed to a group working across several states. Police said the accused were allegedly involved in targeting young girls, especially minors, across different states by using deceptive methods, including love jihad, to convert them to another religion. They are also suspected of promoting radical ideas and receiving money from Canada and other foreign countries. According to police, the group used religious jihad and foreign funding for conversions and spreading radical beliefs, in a manner similar to how ISIS operates. A police officer added that the initial investigation suggests the group may have links to organisations like PFI, SDPI, and some extremist groups in Pakistan.
New York Times
4 days ago
- Sport
- New York Times
Fantasy Premier League: Analysing the major rule changes to the game for the 2025-26 season
It's Fantasy Premier League, but perhaps not as you know it. On Friday, the makers of everyone's favourite Premier League companion game announced two pretty major changes to the rules for the 2025-26 season, which will almost certainly affect strategies across the board. The first is that outfield players can now be rewarded with two FPL points for 'defensive contributions'. Advertisement Defenders who reach a combined total of 10 clearances, blocks, interceptions and tackles (known as CBIT) in a single match will score two points, as will midfielders and forwards who reach 12 CBIT points – but in addition, they can also rack these up via 'ball recoveries'. The second major change is that FPL users will now have access to two super-powered sets of chips: the Wildcard, Free Hit, Triple Captain and Bench Boost. The initial four chips must be used before the Gameweek 19 deadline on December 30, 2025, and cannot be carried over into the second half of the season. Here, our FPL experts Holly Shand and Abdul Rehman explore how these rule changes may impact the game and how you can take advantage of the new status quo. Holly: Doubling the number of chips for the season has definitely caught my eye and left me feeling excited about the season ahead. As an engaged manager, in the past I have often felt restricted by having to save chips for the second half of the season, where we typically see more blanks and double gameweeks — these have traditionally been the best time to use these chips 'on paper'. This time around, we will have an opportunity to use the our chips in the first half of the season, with the freedom to go on instinct and gut feeling, and without being punished in the second half of the campaign. Since the introduction of the chips in 2015-16, they have been the most exciting part of the game, with the power to make or break your season, and so to have those opportunities doubled provides plenty of hope. I think it will also encourage a greater variety of strategies and team differences, which is only a good thing in my eyes. Abdul: The double set of chips for sure. I am all for any changes that make the game more fun but at the same time, don't change the core scoring in the game. Having more chips means we don't need to wait until the second half of the season to use them around doubles and blanks. We can have a bit of fun using them in single weeks and chase upside. It also means more varied strategies which is a great thing. Advertisement Of course, we were free to use the chips in the first half of the season before but you would have to get quite lucky to outscore those managers using it around double and blank gameweeks. I think this will also keep more FPL managers engaged for longer, which is probably why they have introduced the change. Holly: We often see players new to the game using chips in the opening gameweeks of the season without realising their worth later in the campaign, and then being punished for this lack of knowledge. These changes will allow them to remain on an even keel with more experienced managers in the long term, instead of dropping off. As a content creator in FPL, a strong start is definitely helpful and so I'm absolutely open to using the chips early, too. Bench Boost has plenty of constraints on your team and could be something best played in Gameweek 1 or shortly after your first Wildcard. I'll personally be waiting to gather information on the worst defences in the league before committing to using a Triple Captain chip in the first half of the season, but it will likely be used on one of the big premium players like Erling Haaland or Mohamed Salah. Free Hit can be used as a 'get out of jail free card' if injuries or suspensions leave your team in bad shape, or alternatively could be used to attack a gameweek with alternative picks when you have lots of players facing each other in your main squad. Abdul: I don't think it will change much for the second half of the season as it will still be optimal to use them around blanks and doubles — but it will mean planning more meticulously in the first half of the season now. A Bench Boost in Gameweek 1 becomes much more viable as you can set your team up for an early wildcard afterwards and get that chip 'out of the way'. You are effectively wildcarding in Gameweek 1, so it's not a bad time to play it at all now that we have another available to us. Advertisement Triple Captain and Free Hit can be used on a whim for as and when your team needs, and there will be less need for long-term strategy as we are not planning for doubles and blanks. The Free Hit might come in really handy actually, with so many teams competing in Europe and with the extra games. Having two sets of chips might even encourage FPL managers to be a bit more maverick with their first ones. Chasing differentials and unconventional times to use the chip is a lot easier when you know you have another set to use in the second half of the season. Holly: The removal of the Assistant Manager chip is another major positive for me, as the introduction of this chip in the 2024-25 season felt flawed on a number of levels. For starters, it felt far too complicated for casual managers to understand and the one-chip-per-gameweek rule will have caught many out. In addition, the chip had too much power in the game, with massive swings of 50-plus points if activated to perfection, which could cause a huge swing in overall rank and mini leagues come the end of the season. It was also frustrating to spend half the season looking at a 'Mystery Chip' with no idea of what it was or what it would do, and how that could impact strategy later in the season and so avoiding that eventuality is another positive in my book. Abdul: I enjoyed the Assistant Manager chip from a selfish point of view, simply because I gained around 45 points from it. But from a game-state perspective, I think it was the right decision to remove it from the game as it was too powerful. I also feel it was maybe a bit too complicated for the average manager to take advantage of it. It really advantaged the hardcore managers who were able to research the best time to use it. Advertisement There should be a nice balance of luck and skill in FPL, and at the moment, I think they have it right, even with the two sets of chips. The Assistant Manager chip tipped it too much into the luck category due to how the scoring was structured. You could literally come away with zero points while others were getting near 50. Holly: The introduction of defensive contribution points brings FPL in line with other popular fantasy games that we've seen from alternative providers, and those from major international tournaments. I'm not surprised of its inclusion given that it's been something well discussed in the FPL community for many years. I'm a little sceptical of the form in which it's been introduced, with a variety of actions all being pooled together in one metric known as clearances, blocks, interceptions and tackles (CBIT) for defenders, and then ball recoveries also for attacking players — it might have been neater to have those actions counting individually. It will change the way FPL managers watch games and scout players, and there will almost certainly be some frustrations along the way of exactly which actions are credited towards the tally of 10 or 12 respectively to activate the two point bonus. Brand new for the 2025/26 season 🤩 Introducing defensive contribution points 🛡️#FPL — Fantasy Premier League (@OfficialFPL) July 18, 2025 Abdul: I am not a big fan of the points for defensive contributions. There is only an extra two points on offer per game and player, so it's not overpowered and won't cause a huge shift in the viable player pool. However, the reason I love FPL is due to its simplicity and this change is leading towards taking that out of the game. I am not totally against it though, and I'm willing to see how it goes this season. Also, there is already at least one controversy per gameweek as to what counts as an assist according to the game's rules, which can cause frustrating changes to points scored. Advertisement It feels like this is going to cause similar issues in terms of what constitutes as a block, clearance, tackle etc. It's fun watching your FPL players and cheering them to score or assist. I am not sure I want to be sitting there counting how many tackles or interceptions they have made. Holly: Without the context of player prices, it's hard to categorically say how the new defensive contribution points will impact team construction. If player prices stay widely similar to the past, then I don't think it will have a big impact in terms of team construction, but it will give certain players more utility. Traditionally, we've always targeted attacking full-backs in FPL but centre-backs will now carry more appeal. We've also tried to avoid defenders from newly promoted teams or against tough opposition, but both of these situations invite pressure on defences which could allow centre-backs to rack up CBIT actions more frequently. We may also choose a fifth midfielder differently, with holding midfield players also rewarded in this system. Abdul: I think it will impact our defence a lot more than the attack. The likes of James Tarkowski and other similar cheaper centre-backs will become more popular. Choosing players who play 90 minutes will be even more important now, with full-backs getting subbed off much more often than centre-backs. They also generally make more blocks, interceptions and tackles, although there definitely will be some full-backs who will breach the threshold regularly but that will become more apparent once the season kicks off. For the attack, I reckon it only really makes a difference to our fifth or possibly fourth midfielder. We are still going to pick the likes of Mohamed Salah, Cole Palmer and Bukayo Saka etc. However, when it comes to the cheaper mids at £5.0m and below, defensive contributions will become a lot more important. Advertisement Holly: My thoughts immediately went to attack-minded forwards and midfielders who press for their team and get involved in defensive actions too, with Manchester United's Bruno Fernandes immediately on my radar. I think he could be set for a deeper role this season, especially with the expected arrival of Bryan Mbeumo in the summer transfer window to follow that of Matheus Cunha. I'll also be keeping a close eye on the prices of Arsenal's Declan Rice and Chelsea's Enzo Fernandez, who are no strangers to attacking returns and have some set-piece involvement, while also providing plenty of defensive contributions. Backing assets who play 90 minutes regularly could be an important consideration. When it comes to defenders, centre-backs from defences who typically don't have plenty of possession fit the bill — we know that Everton's Tarkowski was the top performer in this metric last season. There may also be merit to picking central defenders from those sides who keep consistent clean sheets, like Liverpool's Virgil van Dijk and Arsenal's Gabriel. Abdul: The official FPL X page put out a graphic showing the defenders and midfielders who would have picked up the most points from the defensive contributions last season. Tarkowski, Jan Bednarek and Dean Huijsen (all centre-backs) led the way, so the Everton man is definitely on my radar. David Moyes' team are a solid defensive side and will pick up a fair few clean sheets. Tarkowski is nailed to start, plays 90 minutes and has a bit of goal threat too. James Tarkowski tops the charts 📊 No defender would have picked up as many defensive contribution points as the Everton defender if they were available in FPL last season 🔵#FPL — Fantasy Premier League (@OfficialFPL) July 18, 2025 Moses Caicedo would have picked up the most defensive contribution points among midfielders, followed by Elliot Andersen and Joao Gomes. Moises Caicedo would have picked up the most defensive contribution points among midfielders last season 👊 With the new defensive contributions points coming in 2025/26, will any of these players be in your squad? 👀#FPL — Fantasy Premier League (@OfficialFPL) July 18, 2025 Caicedo picked up an extra 42 points, which is quite significant, so his price is something I will be keeping an eye on. Also, defensive midfielders like Rice, Rodri, Bruno Guimaraes and Fernandez might be interesting, too. They all have a fair bit of attacking threat. Manchester United's Fernandes could be the one who benefits the most from this. We all know he's one of the most nailed players in the league and on penalties, but he's also really involved and played deep quite a lot last season. Overall though, a fair bit of research is still needed pre-season to try and find those gems before the pack.
