Latest news with #AdrienBrody
Indian Express
a day ago
- Entertainment
- Indian Express
What to watch on OTT: The Brutalist, Squid Game Season 3 and more
What to watch on OTT: Oscar-winner The Brutalist, powered by Adrien Brody; and the new season of Squid Game, here's you latest watch list for the weekend. Squid Game S3 Netflix A failed rebellion, the death of a friend, and a secret betrayal — Squid Game Season 3 picks up in the aftermath of Season 2's bloody cliffhanger, reveals Netflix. Although Gi-hun (Lee Jung-jae) is at his lowest point yet, the Squid Game stops for no one. So Gi-hun will be forced to make some important choices in the face of overwhelming despair as he and the surviving players are thrust into deadlier games that test everyone's resolve. With each round, their choices lead to increasingly grave consequences. Meanwhile, In-ho resumes his role as Front Man (Lee Byung-hun) to welcome the mysterious VIPs, and his brother Jun-ho continues his search for the elusive island, unaware there's a traitor in their midst. The series will be released on June 27. The Brutalist JioHotstar Directed by Brady Corbet, the film features Adrien Brody, who won the Academy Award for Best Actor in a Leading Role for his performance in it, as a talented architect who flees postwar Europe. The visionary architect comes to America to rebuild his life, his career, and his marriage. On his own in a strange new country, he settles in Pennsylvania, where a wealthy and prominent industrialist recognises his talent. In America, he meets his match in a power-hungry industrialist played by Guy Pearce. Available to stream from June 28. Panchayat S4 Prime Video S4 In this series set in the fictional village of Phulera, the turf war between Manju Devi and Kranti Devi intensifies as the panchayat election draws closer. With rally songs, lofty pledges, and lots of fanfare, the village turns into a buzzing battleground. As both camps race to outshine and out-scheme the other, Phulera transforms into a carnival of chaos. The showdown is marked by humour as the stakes heighten. The series brings back the cast of Jitendra Kumar, Neena Gupta, Raghubir Yadav, Faisal Malik, Chandan Roy, Sanvikaa, Durgesh Kumar, Sunita Rajwar, and Pankaj Jha. Produced by The Viral Fever, Panchayat Season 4 is created by Deepak Kumar Mishra and Chandan Kumar. Raid 2 Netflix With Raid 2, Ajay Devgn returns as the unflinching IRS officer Amay Patnaik. Directed by Raj Kumar Gupta, Raid 2 carries forward the story of Patnaik, who is on a fresh mission, in a new fictional city set in Rajasthan, and a powerful face-off that tests the limits of justice. The film's cast features Riteish Deshmukh, Vaani Kapoor, Rajat Kapoor and Saurabh Shukla. Viraatapalem: PC Meena Reporting Zee5 Set in the 1980s, in the remote and fear-stricken village of Viraatapalem, a chilling curse silences celebrations, every bride dies mysteriously on her wedding day. No marriage has taken place for over a decade. The village is frozen in fear; its population reduced to only the very young and the very old. When a bold police constable (Abhignya Vuthaluru) is posted to the town, she refuses to accept the curse as truth. Teaming up with a reformed convict, she begins to pull at the threads of a mystery the village would rather keep buried. The series will be released on June 27. The Monkey Prime Video After discovering their father's old toy Monkey in the attic, twin brothers Hal and Bill are haunted by a series of chilling deaths. Hoping to escape its curse, they discard the Monkey and go their separate ways. But when the deaths begin again; the brothers reunite to confront the sinister toy and end its reign of terror once and for all. Based on Stephen King's 1980 short story, the film directed by Osgood Perkins stars Theo James in a dual role.
CBC
4 days ago
- Entertainment
- CBC
Celebrity art shows: are they good?
There are two celebrity art shows on right now that are getting a lot of buzz — but not necessarily for all the right reasons. Robbie Williams and Adrien Brody have both received bad reviews for their respective art shows. Today on Commotion, host Elamin Abdelmahmoud speaks with art critics Annie Armstrong and Eddy Frankel about the reaction to, and the quality of, Adrien Brody's show in New York City and Robbie Williams's show in London. WATCH | Today's episode on YouTube: Panel produced by Amelia Eqbal.
Time of India
18-06-2025
- Entertainment
- Time of India
The Brutalist OTT Release Date: When and where to watch Adrien Brody's Oscar-winning epic period film in India
The Brutalist OTT Release Date: When you dive into The Brutalist, you're stepping into a sweeping post-war saga that feels personal and epic at once. It follows László Tóth (Adrien Brody), a Jewish-Hungarian architect and Holocaust survivor, who arrives in the U.S. in the late 1940s with his wife Erzsébet (Felicity Jones) and niece Zsófia (the haunting Raffey Cassidy). They're broken, carrying both trauma and hope. In Pennsylvania, László catches the eye of industrialist Harrison Lee Van Buren (Guy Pearce), who sees more than concrete and steel; he sees potential, but also potential compromise. László finds success designing grand structures, but each success carries a new burden: balancing personal integrity with commercial demand, remembering the past while trying to build a future. Good news: from June 28, 2025, The Brutalist is streaming on JioHotstar in India. It had been on rental-only platforms like Prime Video, AppleTV and Zee5, but now anyone can stream it freely if they've got JioHotstar. Cast, crew and the creative force behind it all Adrien Brody delivers an Oscar-winning turn as László. Felicity Jones brings softness and strength as Erzsébet, while Guy Pearce gives off that elegant, slightly cold edge you expect from a tycoon. Joe Alwyn, Stacy Martin, Emma Laird, Alessandro Nivola, and Isaach de Bankolé round out a powerhouse supporting cast. The Brutalist is directed and co‑written by Brady Corbet, with writing help from Mona Fastvold, and carried by Lol Crawley's cinematic eye and Daniel Blumberg's unforgettable score. More about The Brutalist Premiered at Venice in September 2024, winning the Silver Lion, then played Toronto and New York festivals. It hit U.S. theatres late last year, came to India in Feb 2025, and by March had scooped Oscars for Best Actor (Brody), Best Cinematography, and Best Original Score at the 97th Academy Awards. Golden Globes, Baftas, critics' awards and AFI top‑10 lists followed.
Telegraph
17-06-2025
- Entertainment
- Telegraph
Why do celebrities think they can paint? Here's our pick of the worst
The double Oscar -winning actor Adrien Brody is rightly celebrated for his on-screen talents, even if there is some truth to the grumblings that he only really excels when he plays Holocaust victims. Yet before, during and after winning his second Oscar, for the magnificent drama The Brutalist, he seems to have been on a personal mission to behave in as obnoxious a fashion as possible. At the Oscars, for example, he caused much revulsion by throwing a piece of used chewing gum at his partner Georgina Chapman so she could hold it while he made his rambling, arrogant acceptance speech But Brody isn't just an actor; he is also an artist, or at least would like to be regarded as such. He is currently displaying a solo show, entitled Made in America, at New York's prestigious Eden Gallery that has been afforded all the accoutrements that a major art-world figure would merit. A lengthy profile piece in the New York Times, fawning news items about his selling one of his artworks, of Marilyn Monroe, for $425,000 at the amfAR gala in Cannes and an elevated degree of respect because of his existing fame. Part of this art, we learn, once again involves chewing gum. Visitors to Made in America are invited to take a piece of gum from a pre-packaged pile, chew it, and then stick it onto a canvas that is festooned with the word 'Violence.' A sign on the wall declares 'Leave your mark—messy, visceral, and anonymous'. This is one way of looking at it. Another way is to suggest that, in a contemporary art world that seems to have gone stark raving mad – Maurizio Cattelan's Comedian, in which a banana duct-taped to a wall sold for $6.2 million last year at Sotheby's, was quite literally bananas – the cachet brought in by an A-list celebrity makes apparently dreadful artworks seem both respectable and newsworthy. Brody's exhibition poses as a deconstruction of much-loved pop icons such as the Simpsons and Mickey Mouse, appearing to homage such New York legends as Jean-Michel Basquiat and Andy Warhol. Unfortunately, Made in America has been panned in the American and international art press on the grounds that Brody isn't a talented artist, despite his beliefs otherwise. 'Why do great actors have so much trouble when they venture into visual art?' asked Artnet critic Annie Armstrong, who attended the opening. 'Can you name one who has been able to bridge the gap?' She concluded: 'It feels uncanny to see an artist who is so successful in one medium be so flat-footed in another.' Still, it did not help that Brody approached this with maximum pomposity. At Cannes, while presenting his Monroe canvas, he indignantly shushed the audience during a lengthy introductory speech. 'I've painted and drawn most of my whole life,' he declared. 'Painting precedes acting for me.' In another interview in 2016 with the Huffington Post, he remarked: 'Maybe I am vain, to a certain extent, but the purpose of doing this is far from vanity.' Most would disagree with his summation. Still, in the actor's defence, he is far from the only celebrity who has dabbled in the world of art to disastrous or embarrassing effect. Everyone from the late Val Kilmer to Jim Carrey has, at one time or another, decided that they were capable of producing artworks of lasting impact and effect, enabled by a crowd of sycophants and excitable fans. Almost inevitably, the result has been the same; well-known figures have produced mediocre art – at best – that looks like something that a middling GCSE student might come up with as coursework. Whether it's Carrey's truly shameful pictures of 'Jesus Electric' and Melania Trump, Kilmer's self-aggrandising portrait of Jim Morrison (a homage to the man he played, to far greater effect, in Oliver Stone's biopic The Doors) or Sylvester Stallone's Rocky-inspired The Arena, the consistent impression that virtually anyone would have when seeing these 'artworks' is a profound wish that their creators don't give up the day job. Actors who paint tend to take what they do so very seriously, and most actors who do see themselves as artists tend to be exactly the kind of characters you would expect – Johnny Depp, Viggo Mortensen, Marlon Brando, etc. Sir Anthony Hopkins, however, is a refreshing exception to this rule. He may be one of the finest thespians that Britain has ever produced, but his bizarre, vaguely psychedelic paintings – George, for instance, depicts a vast purple elephant – seem like an elaborate joke. Which it probably is. 'Painting is something I really enjoy, like playing the piano,' Hopkins has said. 'I have a lot of fun with it. I just paint for the sheer enjoyment of it.' This sense of fun is sorely lacking from the more po-faced practitioners. Sharon Stone's abstract, sub-Rothko works, entitled things like It's My Garden, Asshole, appear to exist less to sell for the $40,000 that she charges for some of her canvases, and more for feminist empowerment. As she put it, 'It's my job to open a window for other women and hold it open further.' Likewise, if you look at the monochrome splodges that the actress Lucy Liu appears to specialise in, you will have been missing the point of how from the 'painterly, fleshy nudes to delicate depictions of the human spine in resin or embroidery, Lucy Liu's art lays bare themes of intimacy, belonging and memory.' It makes the relatively accessible and pleasant-looking work of Tony Curtis – which was ridiculed during the actor's lifetime – all the more bearable, although even here, Curtis was not immune to delusions of pseudery. 'When I paint, I don't paint shapes, I paint colours,' he once said. Yet is the desire to create art limited to actors. Musicians have also dabbled in the field, to mixed effect. Rolling Stone Ronnie Wood's paintings of him and his Rolling Stones bandmates have an appealing energy to them (let's ignore his 'nude studies', which have a different kind of energy) and there are many people who rate Bob Dylan's paintings and sculpture, which he was demonstrating as far back as the cover of 1970's Self Portrait album. Others have fared less well. David Bowie and Paul McCartney may be the two greatest post-war British musicians, but neither of them managed to persuade the art world that their own work was of any special significance, whether it was Bowie's alternately haunting and embarrassing Francis Bacon-esque studies or Macca's dreadful daubs. The late Brian Sewell had it about right when he said of the latter that they were 'a self-indulgent impertinence so far from art that the art critic has no suitable words for them – they are, indeed, beneath criticism.' Still, works on canvas are one kind of dreadfulness, but when celebrities veer into performance art, matters worsen inexorably. There are those who believe that Shia LaBeouf is an overlooked genius, others – especially post-Megalopolis – that he is simply a mediocre actor who is addicted to attention-seeking. Such actions as turning up at the premiere of Nymphomaniac in 2014 with a paper bag on his head saying 'I am not famous any more' and watching all his films in reverse order for the #ALLMYMOVIES project may have been original, but they also felt like the showily demonstrative actions of a bored has-been star. And let's not even get onto James Franco, whose smug, self-congratulatory blurring of boundaries between reality and fiction came crashing down in 2021 when he admitted allegations of sexual coercion with students at his acting school. Few miss Franco's once-ubiquitous, forever-irritating presence in public life, during which art was just one of the means he used to torment us. He once commented that he had been painting longer than he had been acting, which sounded like a threat of some kind. At least Robbie Williams, whose current solo show Radical Honesty ('expanding his visual language of sarcasm, self-deprecation, and playful irreverence), refuses to take this stuff seriously. Which is just as well, given that one critic described it as 'an Instagram self-help quote attacking your brain and eyes….incredibly bad art: so earnest, so superficial, it's barely even funny.' There have been a few more successful celebrities involved in the world of art, including Edward G Robinson, a Hollywood tough guy star from the Thirties and Forties and the legendary horror star Vincent Price, although both of these men were more notable as enthusiastic and prodigious collectors than for their own painting. This willingness to step back and let other, more talented artists take the limelight reflected well on them. Today, the Brodys and Carreys and McCartneys produce their terrible, vainglorious work and expect someone impressed by their fame to pay vast sums of money for them. The real tragedy is that, so far, they haven't been disappointed. Brody's exhibition may have been called Made in America, but this worship of celebrity excess is, alas, a global phenomenon, and it shows no signs of dissipating any time soon. Perhaps the solution is to send in the hardy protesters of Just Stop Oil, armed with paint and knives, and see what happens then. If it resulted in a few irreparably damaged works of celebrity hubris, I doubt that too many people would be truly devastated. The five worst celebrity artworks 1. Jim Carrey, Jesus Electric, 2017 The actor Jim Carrey recently claimed to have found God and Christianity, and stated that 'The energy that surrounds Jesus is electric. I don't know if Jesus is real, I don't know if he lived, I don't know what he means. But the paintings of Jesus are really my desire to convey Christ-consciousness.' This would be fine, if the Bruce Almighty star's representation of his idol's electric energy wasn't so embarrassingly redolent of the kind of paintings that you see for sale on a dodgy-looking stall in Camden Market. Such is Carrey's clout that he even made a short documentary about the painting's creation, called I Needed Colour; perhaps it should have been called I Needed A Better Agent, given how mired he is in Super Mario Bros films these days. 2. Adrien Brody, Hooked, 2016 Brody's most recent pictures and installations have been soundly and deservedly ridiculed, but some of his earlier work might be even worse – which, I suppose, is a back-handed way of saying he might be getting better. One Warhol-inspired display of fish in four different colours was embarrassing itself on his own terms, but worsened by Brody claiming, straight-faced, that 'If we look closely, we are the fish. We are the ones 'hooked' as we consume with abandon…the fragility and beauty and uniqueness of fish is much like our own spirit and spiritual state.' It makes Eric Cantona's discussion of fish and trawlers look like the last word in profundity. 3. Shia LaBeouf, #IAMSORRY, 2014 Describing Shia LaBeouf's performance artworks as 'good' or 'bad' is not really fair; 'embarrassing' and 'shameful' would be closer to the mark. Yet when he embarked on a five-day stint in a Los Angeles gallery of wearing his 'I am not famous any more' bag on his head, inviting members of the public to interact with him, one participant went rather too far. As LaBeouf later recalled, 'One woman who came with her boyfriend, who was outside the door when this happened, whipped my legs for 10 minutes and then stripped my clothing and proceeded to rape me.' After LaBeouf's girlfriend learnt of this, 'she came in [and] asked for an explanation, and I couldn't speak, so we both sat with this unexplained trauma silently. It was painful.' LaBeouf never pressed any criminal charges, suggesting that this piece of suffering for his art was simply part of the job. 4. Paul McCartney, Unfinished Symphony, 1993 Paul McCartney has always chafed against the idea that he was the 'safe' or somehow predictable Beatle in comparison to John Lennon, frequently bigging up his avant-garde and experimental credentials. Musically, this might well be true, but when it comes to his art, it can be found wanting. This painting, which might kindly be described as his attempt to capture on canvas what A Day in the Life's crescendo did musically, will seem to most as an ugly, Pollock-lite splurge of horrible colours all jumbled together. McCartney remarked of it that 'It is very spontaneous, I don't think there was a lot of thinking about that. But, you know, my composition generally is spontaneous. Some people I talk to will ask, 'Do you do sketches beforehand?' And I will say, 'No, it is alla prima.' You know, I just love to play around with the paint and let the paint show me the way, and I sense they are not as impressed if they think I did it spontaneously.' Perhaps a little less spontaneity may have been welcome here. 5. James Franco, Army Pants, 2011 It now seems incredible to think that James Franco – last seen popping up in French-language blockbusters as the villain – was once one of the hottest actors in Hollywood, an Oscar-nominated star who could (apparently) do no wrong. How else to explain the indulgence that he was offered when it came to producing such ugly, cluttered artworks as the frankly horrible Army Pants. It sold for just over $8000 when it was last offered for auction in 2023; a mere fraction of the work of other celebrity artists, and an indication of how steeply his reputation has fallen.
Epoch Times
10-06-2025
- Entertainment
- Epoch Times
AI Trained on Copyrighted Material Without Permission Poses ‘Direct Threat' to Film Industry, Says BFI
Artificial intelligence trained on copyrighted material without permission 'poses a direct threat to the economic foundations of the UK screen sector,' a report by the British Film Institute (BFI) says. Authors Other issues raised include concerns about the future of the workforce, as well as the need for new skills training for sector employees to be able to adapt to and operate in an AI-enhanced screen industry. The report on the use of AI in the film, TV, visual special effects, and video game industries published on Monday says the source of training data for generative AI models includes scripts from more that 130,000 films and television shows, as well as databases of pirated books and content uploaded to YouTube. The analysis was carried out in partnership with CoSTAR, the UK's creative research and development network which is led by Goldsmiths, Loughborough, and Edinburgh universities. Professor Jonny Freeman, director of CoSTAR Foresight Lab, said that the landscape of AI is complex, with both disadvantages and advantages for its inclusion in the screen sector. Related Stories 2/25/2025 5/22/2025 Freeman said, 'The report acknowledges that while AI offers powerful tools to enhance creativity, efficiency and competitiveness across every stage of the production workflow – from script development and pre-production planning, through on-set production, to post-production and distribution – it also raises urgent questions around skills, workforce adaptation, ethics, and sector sustainability.' AI Used in Industry One of the BFI's recommendations is for the UK to establish AI training licences, enabling deals between intellectual property (IP) rightsholders and AI developers. 'The UK is well-positioned to lead in this space, thanks to its 'gold standard' copyright regime, a vibrant creative technology ecosystem, and a coalition of creative organisations advocating for fair licensing practices.' the report says. AI is already been used for dubbing and visual effects in film and televisions, notably in the post-production of 'The Brutalist,' starring Adrien Brody, which Adrien Brody attending the special screening of The Brutalist, at Picturehouse Central Cinema, London, on Jan. 15, 2025. Ian West/PA Wire The report also recommends the screen sector build skills complementary to AI, making the workforce resilient to technological changes. 'AI automation may, in time, lower demand for certain digital content creation skills. It may also create new opportunities for roles that require human oversight, creative direction, and technical fluency in AI systems,' it said. Rishi Coupland, the BFI's director of research and innovation, said the report 'comes at a critical time and shows how generative AI presents an inflection point for the sector and, as a sector, we need to act quickly on a number of key strategic fronts.' 'While it offers significant opportunities for the screen sector such as speeding up production workflows, democratising content creation and empowering new voices, it could also erode traditional business models, displace skilled workers, and undermine public trust in screen content,' he said. Artists Call for IP Protections The report was published as the government attempts to pass the Data (Use and Access) Bill, which would allow tech companies to train their AI on copyrighted material unless the creator explicitly opts out. The House of Lords has been demanding an amendment be added to ensure artists are offered copyright protection. High-profile artists are also calling for better protections for their creative output. In February, Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy arrives in Downing Street, London, England, on Oct. 30, 2024. Lucy North/PA Wire Last week, Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy sought to reassure the creative sector that artists would not be harmed by future legislation and AI. Addressing the Media & Telecoms 2025 and Beyond Conference on June 3, she 'I will never stop working for creatives to deliver solutions, transparency and the empowerment that you need in the digital age. We are a Labour government, and the principle of people must be paid for their work is foundational, and you have our word that if it doesn't work for the creative industries, it will not work for us,' Nandy said.
