Latest news with #ArianaTriggs
USA Today
12-07-2025
- Entertainment
- USA Today
McDonald's Snack Wrap is back, and we tried it: Here's our review
An oldie but a goodie is officially back on the McDonald's menu. After months of teasing from McDonald's about the possible return of the Snack Wrap, the highly anticipated (and beloved) menu item was made available for purchase on July 10, after nearly a decade away. Snack Wraps, which come in either the "Spicy" or "Ranch" flavor, costs $2.99 a la carte but can be made into a combo meal consisting of two Snack Wraps, a medium fry and a drink of choice. And we, just like the rest of the U.S., were eager to try it. So, we did. A handful of USA TODAY reporters and video producers who tried the McDonald's Snack Wrap either again or for the first time, offered their thoughts and genuine reactions to the entrée on camera. Here's our review, including review and reactions from others who were equally as ecstatic about the Snack Wrap's return. McDonald's Snack Wraps are back. Are they healthy? Our review: McDonald's Snack Wrap is just OK The group who taste-tested McDonald's Snack Wrap have spoken, and the truth of the matter is that many people thought the entrée is just OK. But it did receive a stamp of approval from video producers Ariana Triggs and Christina Cardona. Julie Gomez, a trending reporter, was not as easily impressed, saying that she was disappointed by the lack of sauce, since the majority of the sauce that came in her Snack Wrap was located on the bottom, instead of being evenly spread throughout. "There's no difference to me," Gomez says. "That doesn't have any sauce. It's just chicken." Senior reporter Mike Snider, who ordered a 'Spicy' Snack Wrap, said it was 'pretty spicy' and better than he thought it would be. USA TODAY reviews McDonald's, Popeyes and Taco Bell snack wraps USA TODAY senior reporter Mike Snider taste tested each chicken snack wraps from McDonald's, Popeyes and Taco Bell. "It's pretty solid," Gabe Hauari, another trending reporter, told the camera. "The chicken is nice. The cheese and lettuce add a little bit of flavor and texture as well." Trending reporter Melina Khan, on the other hand, said that her Snack Wrap was "definitely tasty." "(It's) Definitely an easy thing to grab as a quick bite to eat if you're on the go or something like that," Khan said. Internet reacts to the return of the McDonald's Snack Wrap July 10 will forevermore be known as the day the Snack Wrap returned to McDonald's. (At least that's what everybody's been saying.) Most everyone who is talking about Snack Wraps on social media is itching to try it or are posting pictures once they've gotten it. A small minority were a little miffed that Honey Mustard was not among the Snack Wrap flavors released. The netizens have spoken and here's what they're saying about McDonald's "new" Snack Wrap:
Yahoo
11-07-2025
- Entertainment
- Yahoo
McDonald's Snack Wrap is back, and we tried it: Here's our review
An oldie but a goodie is officially back on the McDonald's menu. After months of teasing from McDonald's about the possible return of the Snack Wrap, the highly anticipated (and beloved) menu item was made available for purchase on July 10, after nearly a decade away. Snack Wraps, which come in either the "Spicy" or "Ranch" flavor, costs $2.99 a la carte but can be made into a combo meal consisting of two Snack Wraps, a medium fry and a drink of choice. And we, just like the rest of the U.S., were eager to try it. So, we did. A handful of USA TODAY reporters and video producers who tried the McDonald's Snack Wrap either again or for the first time, offered their thoughts and genuine reactions to the entrée on camera. Here's our review, including review and reactions from others who were equally as ecstatic about the Snack Wrap's return. The group who taste-tested McDonald's Snack Wrap have spoken, and the truth of the matter is that many people thought the entrée is just OK. But it did receive a stamp of approval from video producers Ariana Triggs and Christina Cardona. Julie Gomez, a trending reporter, was not as easily impressed, saying that she was disappointed by the lack of sauce, since the majority of the sauce that came in her Snack Wrap was located on the bottom, instead of being evenly spread throughout. "There's no difference to me," Gomez says. "That doesn't have any sauce. It's just chicken." Senior reporter Mike Snider, who ordered a "Spicy" Snack Wrap, said it was "pretty spicy" and ultimately better than he thought it would be. "It's pretty solid," Gabe Hauari, another trending reporter, told the camera. "The chicken is nice. The cheese and lettuce add a little bit of flavor and texture as well." Trending reporter Melina Khan, on the other hand, said that her Snack Wrap was "definitely tasty." "(It's) Definitely an easy thing to grab as a quick bite to eat if you're on the go or something like that," Khan said. McDonald's Snack Wraps are back. Are they healthy? July 10 will forevermore be known as the day the Snack Wrap returned to McDonald's. (At least that's what everybody's been saying.) Most everyone who is talking about Snack Wraps on social media is itching to try it or are posting pictures once they've gotten it. A small minority were a little miffed that Honey Mustard was not among the Snack Wrap flavors released. The netizens have spoken and here's what they're saying about McDonald's "new" Snack Wrap: Contributing: Gabe Hauari, USA TODAY This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: We tried McDonald's Snack Wraps. Here's our review.
USA Today
10-07-2025
- Entertainment
- USA Today
McDonald's Snack Wrap is back, and we tried it: Here's our review
An oldie but a goodie is officially back on the McDonald's menu. After months of teasing from McDonald's about the possible return of the Snack Wrap, the highly anticipated (and beloved) menu item was made available for purchase on July 10, after nearly a decade away. Snack Wraps, which come in either the "Spicy" or "Ranch" flavor, costs $2.99 a la carte but can be made into a combo meal consisting of two Snack Wraps, a medium fry and a drink of choice. And we, just like the rest of the U.S., were eager to try it. So, we did. A handful of USA TODAY reporters and video producers who tried the McDonald's Snack Wrap either again or for the first time, offered their thoughts and genuine reactions to the entrée on camera. Here's our review, including review and reactions from others who were equally as ecstatic about the Snack Wrap's return. Our review: McDonald's Snack Wrap is just OK The group who taste-tested McDonald's Snack Wrap have spoken, and the truth of the matter is that many people thought the entrée is just OK. But it did receive a stamp of approval from video producers Ariana Triggs and Christina Cardona. Julie Gomez, a trending reporter, was not as easily impressed, saying that she was disappointed by the lack of sauce, since the majority of the sauce that came in her Snack Wrap was located on the bottom, instead of being evenly spread throughout. "There's no difference to me," Gomez says. "That doesn't have any sauce. It's just chicken." Senior reporter Mike Snider, who ordered a "Spicy" Snack Wrap, said it was "pretty spicy" and ultimately better than he thought it would be. "It's pretty solid," Gabe Hauari, another trending reporter, told the camera. "The chicken is nice. The cheese and lettuce add a little bit of flavor and texture as well." Trending reporter Melina Khan, on the other hand, said that her Snack Wrap was "definitely tasty." "(It's) Definitely an easy thing to grab as a quick bite to eat if you're on the go or something like that," Khan said. McDonald's Snack Wraps are back. Are they healthy? Internet reacts to the return of the McDonald's Snack Wrap July 10 will forevermore be known as the day the Snack Wrap returned to McDonald's. (At least that's what everybody's been saying.) Most everyone who is talking about Snack Wraps on social media is itching to try it or are posting pictures once they've gotten it. A small minority were a little miffed that Honey Mustard was not among the Snack Wrap flavors released. The netizens have spoken and here's what they're saying about McDonald's "new" Snack Wrap: Contributing: Gabe Hauari, USA TODAY
USA Today
02-05-2025
- USA Today
Booze at altitude: The messy truth about drinking on planes
Booze at altitude: The messy truth about drinking on planes Show Caption Hide Caption Shoes off, reclined seats tops pet peeves when traveling by plane Among the top pet peeves among Americans traveling on planes are passengers reclining their seats, according to a survey by The Vacationer website. Ariana Triggs, USA TODAY A passenger's excessive alcohol consumption on a flight raises questions about the responsibility of airlines to limit service. While some support drink limits on flights, the issue is complex due to alcohol's revenue contribution and passenger/airport bar sales. Although a federal law exists against serving intoxicated passengers, enforcement seems inconsistent. Jodi Smith lost count of the number of rum and Cokes her seatmate ordered on a recent flight from Boston to Los Angeles. Was it five? Or six? "He was a nervous flier," Smith remembered. "Old enough to order alcohol, but too young to make good decisions." After the third drink, the passenger started slurring his words, so Smith made eye contact with the flight attendant who had been mixing the Cuba Libres. She gave her the look of, "Can you do something about this?" "She just shrugged," Smith said. Check out Elliott Confidential, the newsletter the travel industry doesn't want you to read. Each issue is filled with breaking news, deep insights, and exclusive strategies for becoming a better traveler. But don't tell anyone! The flight didn't end well. For the sake of our family audience, let's just say it involved a lot of noise, agony and the discharge of bodily fluids. Smith, an etiquette expert, still has one question about the incident. "In most states, bartenders are legally obligated not to overserve," she said. "Why doesn't this also apply to those serving drinks in the air?" Are you the world's worst hotel guest? Here's how to tell (and redeem yourself) Everyone's talking about alcohol on planes She's not the only one asking. Ryanair CEO Michael O'Leary recently blamed most of the air rage incidents in Europe on overconsumption and suggested a two-drink limit at airport bars. Since then, there have been a string of embarrassing incidents involving alcohol on planes, including inebriated passengers, crewmembers, and even pilots. So as this summer rolls around, it's not so much a question of whether drink limits are a good idea – it's more an issue of what limits make sense. A new survey by Global Rescue found that some travelers support limits on alcohol. About 1 in 5 passengers say airlines shouldn't serve more than one drink every 30 minutes, while 17% favored a limit of one an hour. A majority say serving alcohol should be left to the discretion of the crewmember or bartender. Dan Richards, Global Rescue's CEO, said there was one takeaway, no matter how travelers voted. "While travelers should always be responsible for their consumption, airports and airlines also have a duty to ensure the safety of all passengers," he told me. The problem is surprisingly complicated Imposing a drink limit sounds like an easy solution. While we're at it, maybe there should even be a federal law that would limit alcohol consumption on domestic flights. But this issue is surprisingly complex. For starters, alcohol is by far the biggest source of onboard revenue, so cutting off passengers would make a dent in the airline industry's profits. (During the pandemic, some airlines stopped serving alcohol amid an epidemic of in-flight violence, but they quickly resumed beverage service in an effort to reclaim lost revenue.) It's common knowledge that limiting alcohol can improve the quality of the flight. Recent research by the University of Texas found that consuming alcohol was a "significant contributor" to passenger misconduct. And German researchers also discovered that drinking on planes can harm your health. But the problem is, neither passengers nor airlines want limits. There's yet another layer of complexity. Many passengers board their flights already intoxicated because they've been hanging out at the airport bar. And those watering holes in the terminal selling overpriced cocktails would, of course, go out of business without nervous fliers who order a few drinks before their flights. So you can't just limit or ban drinking on a plane. You have to apply sensible rules to airports as well. And if you were cheering for a new drink limit rule, consider this: there already is a federal law that limits alcohol consumption on planes. It forbids airlines from serving anyone who appears to be intoxicated or who has a deadly or dangerous weapon accessible to him, among other things. So why did Smith's seatmate get so many rum and cokes? Perhaps the flight attendant had to make her sales quota. Should you drink on a plane? The decision about whether to drink or not on a plane is a personal one. Here are a few things to consider: Don't forget – you're on a plane. I know, it sounds obvious, but most people don't think about the effects of being in a pressurized cabin. "Unfortunately, sometimes the effects of alcohol don't show until the plane is in the air or the passenger has their next drink," said Beth Blair, a former flight attendant. She remembers serving a passenger a Bloody Mary – only one! – and the next thing she knew, he was knocking on the door of the flight deck, demanding to speak to the captain. "The FAA and FBI met our flight," she recalls. "There were severe consequences." I know, it sounds obvious, but most people don't think about the effects of being in a pressurized cabin. "Unfortunately, sometimes the effects of alcohol don't show until the plane is in the air or the passenger has their next drink," said Beth Blair, a former flight attendant. She remembers serving a passenger a Bloody Mary – only one! – and the next thing she knew, he was knocking on the door of the flight deck, demanding to speak to the captain. "The FAA and FBI met our flight," she recalls. "There were severe consequences." If you drink, do it in moderation. That's the consensus of the behavioral experts I talked to for this story. "If we get the little bottle of wine or beer in economy class with our meal, that should be enough," said etiquette expert Adeodata Czink. "No more alcohol than that. This way we would have our wine and there would be much less intoxication." That's the consensus of the behavioral experts I talked to for this story. "If we get the little bottle of wine or beer in economy class with our meal, that should be enough," said etiquette expert Adeodata Czink. "No more alcohol than that. This way we would have our wine and there would be much less intoxication." You're really better off avoiding alcohol on flights. That's especially true if you take any prescription medications. "The vast majority of medical emergencies our team have been asked to intervene in with other passengers have involved alcohol," said Bob Bacheler, managing director of Flying Angels, a medical transportation service. "It's usually a combination of alcohol and sedatives. I can't stress how dangerous the combination of sedatives, alcohol and decreased cabin pressure is." Ultimately, the choice is yours, of course. But ask yourself: Do you want to end up getting hauled off the plane in handcuffs, like the guy on Blair's flight? Maybe you can wait until you land to have that drink. So, how do you fix this problem? I've been writing about problem passengers since the 90s, and in almost all cases, alcohol is involved. Airlines have had plenty of warnings, from the drunken passenger who defecated on a meal cart to the epidemic of air rage during the pandemic. Take away the alcohol, and you remove some of the fuel that powers these outbursts of antisocial behavior. I've also seen the destruction alcohol can wreak on the ground. I've watched relationships get ripped apart, and I've lost friends to alcohol. And by "lose," I mean they are dead. It affected me so profoundly that I stopped drinking a decade ago. The debate over alcohol consumption on flights is more nuanced than it might initially seem. While limiting or banning alcohol could improve passenger behavior and reduce incidents of air rage, it's not a decision airlines can make lightly. After all, alcohol sales contribute significantly to their bottom line, and many passengers look forward to that glass of wine or cocktail during their flight. But the consequences of excessive drinking onboard – from unruly behavior to safety risks – can far outweigh the temporary pleasure of a drink. Abstaining from alcohol while in the air is a simple and responsible choice. After all, a few hours without a drink isn't too much to ask. And for airlines, perhaps it's time to prioritize passengers over profit and consider following the lead of carriers in the Middle East who have adopted a dry policy altogether. Maybe the real question isn't whether alcohol should be limited on flights, but whether the convenience of a drink is worth the potential risks it brings to the flight experience. As for Jodi Smith's seatmate, the rum-and-coke binge wasn't just a bad decision – it was a reminder that when alcohol is involved, it's not just the passengers who are at risk, but everyone onboard. So, the next time you're flying, ask yourself: Is it really worth it? Christopher Elliott is an author, consumer advocate, and journalist. He founded Elliott Advocacy, a nonprofit organization that helps solve consumer problems. He publishes Elliott Confidential, a travel newsletter, and the Elliott Report, a news site about customer service. If you need help with a consumer problem, you can reach him here or email him at chris@
USA Today
28-02-2025
- Entertainment
- USA Today
Patriarchy Hannah built a following as the perfect trad wife. Was it all a lie?
Patriarchy Hannah built a following as the perfect trad wife. Was it all a lie? Show Caption Hide Caption 'Trad wives' are becoming more popular for young women. What to know. The 'trad wives,' or a traditional wife lifestyle gained popularity on social media. Now more young women are exploring the alternative lifestyle. Ariana Triggs and Claire Hardwick, USA TODAY She has 14 children. She dotes on her husband, Tony, who works in construction. She frequently discusses the importance of wives "submitting" to their husbands − and built a significant following online in doing so. To many, she's the quintessential "trad wife." Or is she? On X, the trad-wife influencer known as "Patriarchy Hannah" has come under scrutiny, after internet sleuths alleged the idealized, "traditional-wife" persona she presents online is a lie. The controversy has sent shockwaves through the trad-wife corner of the internet, where many looked to Patriarchy Hannah for advice on matters of family, marriage and faith. In response, the Patriarchy Hannah account posted a since-deleted apology on X, according to screenshots circulating online and a report from NBC News. The person behind the account could not immediately be reached for comment, and the account on X has also been deleted. 'I just want to say that I am sorry for the lies I told and the hurt I caused," read the apology. "I never intended for this account to become as big as it did, and once things started snowballing, I enjoyed the relationships I'd built and didn't know how to put an end to it." Regardless of who Patriarchy Hannah actually is, experts say the debacle serves as an important reminder to approach what you see online with skepticism, particularly when it comes from an influencer touting a lifestyle that's unrealistic or unattainable for many. 'Provider women': Are they the opposite of 'trad wives'? They're getting attention on TikTok. "Anytime that people feel swindled or conned, there's going to be a visceral response to it," psychotherapist Stephanie Sarkis says. "We as humans generally trust in someone as who they say they are. So, when we find out that's not true, it brings up a lot of questions about human nature and also people feeling taken advantage of." Why we need to be more skeptical On the internet, the term "trad wives," short for "traditional wives," refers to a subgroup of women who choose to live as homemakers. Trad wives are typically conservative, usually Christians and post about things like cooking, cleaning and subservience to their husbands. Some emulate a wardrobe and aesthetic akin to women from the 1950s. The Patriarchy Hannah account purported to be run by one of these women. It amassed over 25,000 followers on X, making it a significant presence in the online trad-wife community. On Feb. 14, X user Ryan Duff posted a lengthy thread of alleged inconsistencies in Patriarchy Hannah's personal story. The thread went viral with over 3 million views. Then came the apology. 'The bottom line is that I am not who I presented (myself) to be," the since-deleted Patriarchy Hannah post read. "I'm not going to be giving my reasons for why I started because I am not looking for sympathy here. It was wrong, and I humbly hope that you all can find it in your hearts to forgive me in the future." What is a 'trad wife'? These controversial women are drawing attention – and opinions Followers expressed a range of emotions, including shock, outrage and sadness. "I'm not sure who the sadder people are in the Patriarchy Hannah debacle…" one user wrote. "The girl for perpetuating the fraud… or the people who wanted it to be real so bad they believed it." Others have found the whole thing entertaining, like user Hilary Crowder: "Listen two things can be true: (1)The 'Patriarchy Hannah' situation is horrible, sad, and shows the depth of deception humans are capable of AND (2) I need another hit of this story because Netflix hasn't produced anything as compelling as this dumpster fire in years." If Patriarchy Hannah did fabricate her life story, she's not the only influencer to do so. Annabelle 'Belle' Gibson, for instance, became an Instagram star while proclaiming she had an elixir that managed her terminal cancer. In reality, it was a con she implemented to launch a wellness empire that included a cookbook and an app. Netflix recently turned Gibson's grift into a six-episode limited series called 'Apple Cider Vinegar.' 'Trad wives' controversy continues: TikTok star Nara Smith reacts to 'hateful' criticism Catfishing happens often and to varying degrees, thanks to the anonymity afforded by the internet. Stories of catfishing captivate us because they hit on a core human fear: that of being deceived, Sarkis says. "It really calls into question our ideas of trustworthiness and how quickly someone can feel attached to someone that is having a shared experience," she says. This also goes for people who don't agree with Patriarchy Hannah or trad wives, but who still engaged with her posts. "If you didn't agree with the account, if you were still viewing it, you were still having some type of connection." What the Patriarchy Hannah controversy says about trad wives To some, the Patriarchy Hannah situation speaks to deeper issues within the trad wife movement. Critics of trad wives often accuse them of promoting a lifestyle that's unattainable. As journalist and author Jo Piazza previously told USA TODAY, the purported '50s sitcom life was just that: a television ideal, not a real one. "It's a false nostalgia for a time that didn't exist for the majority of the population, and for a time that was incredibly demeaning, condescending and difficult for women," Piazza previously said of trad wives. More: Could trad wives, influencers have sparked the red wave among female voters? Trad wives tend to draw a lot of attention in general because their content hits on topics that are already polarizing: gender dynamics, relationship structures and politics. The controversial nature of trad wives adds to the intrigue around Patriarchy Hannah. "If you have a topic that's very polarizing, you're going to get the people that identify with it and the people that are against it," she says. "Anything that's polarizing draws attention from a large swath of people." Contributing: Erin Jensen, Ariana Triggs, Claire Hardwick and David Oliver
