Latest news with #Baytown
Sustainability Times
4 days ago
- Business
- Sustainability Times
'This Isn't Investment, It's Invasion': Locals Revolt as Dubai Takes 1 Billion ft³ of U.S. Land to Pump the ‘New Oil'
IN A NUTSHELL 🌍 Adnoc and ExxonMobil have partnered in the Baytown Project to revolutionize low-carbon energy production. and have partnered in the to revolutionize low-carbon energy production. ⚡ The project aims to create the world's largest low-emission hydrogen plant, producing up to 1 billion cubic feet of blue hydrogen daily. daily. 💼 Despite its promise, the project's success depends on political support and government subsidies for blue hydrogen in the U.S. in the U.S. 🔋 If successful, the Baytown Project will contribute to solving the global energy crisis and offer significant local economic benefits. As the world grapples with an unprecedented energy crisis, a groundbreaking partnership has emerged between the Abu Dhabi state oil company, Adnoc, and the American giant ExxonMobil. This billion-dollar collaboration aims to revolutionize the energy landscape by focusing on low-carbon solutions. The partnership's potential impact extends beyond the energy sector, influencing global geopolitics as countries seek alternatives to traditional oil. With a strong commitment to innovation and environmental sustainability, this venture could redefine the future of energy and reshape international alliances in the process. The Baytown Project: A New Era of Energy Production The visionary joint venture between Adnoc and ExxonMobil is known as the Baytown Project. This ambitious initiative aims to establish what could be the largest low-emission hydrogen plant in the world. The project is designed to produce up to 1 billion cubic feet per day of blue hydrogen, a form of hydrogen derived from natural gas with integrated CO₂ capture. This process is critical as it significantly reduces carbon emissions compared to traditional hydrogen production methods. The production of blue hydrogen involves extracting hydrogen not as a liquid but through a refined, technologically advanced process. This clean energy source is poised to power refineries in Europe and energy plants in Japan and Korea. A key goal of the Baytown Project is to capture up to 98% of carbon emissions during production, paving the way for the annual generation of 1 million tons of low-carbon ammonia. This development is significant because ammonia is emerging as a crucial component in the global energy transition. Challenges and Risks: The Political Landscape The Baytown Project, though promising, faces political and economic uncertainties. The United Arab Emirates has invested heavily, securing a 35% stake in the project, centered in the heart of Texas. However, the project's future hinges on the availability of government subsidies for blue hydrogen production in the United States. Despite the absence of clear tax incentives, Adnoc has committed to the project, demonstrating strong confidence in its potential. ExxonMobil, on the other hand, has expressed concerns, even threatening to withdraw by early 2024 if blue hydrogen remains ineligible for tax credits under preliminary US Treasury guidelines. The evolving political climate, particularly after upcoming American elections, could alter this scenario. The project's success depends on navigating these complex political dynamics to secure essential support and funding. Implications for the Global Energy Crisis Despite uncertainties, the Baytown Project represents a pivotal moment in addressing the global energy crisis. Beyond a commercial alliance, the agreement marks a significant step in the internationalization of transitional energies. Adnoc's commitment to achieving zero emissions by 2045 underscores the strategic value of this partnership for the United States. Meanwhile, ExxonMobil solidifies its position as a leader in carbon capture technologies and the development of cleaner, sustainable fuels. The project also promises substantial local benefits, including job creation, economic development, and community support in Texas. If successful, operations are set to begin in 2029, potentially positioning this partnership as the most influential in the world. It could even surpass recent high-profile alliances, such as the one between China and Russia, touted as the most significant of the century. Looking Ahead: A Transformative Partnership The collaboration between Adnoc and ExxonMobil signifies not just a business venture but a transformative step towards sustainable energy solutions. With the potential to redefine low-carbon energy production, this project could lead the way in transitioning to cleaner fuel sources. However, its success will depend on political support, technological advancements, and global cooperation. As the world watches the unfolding of this ambitious initiative, one must ask: Will the Baytown Project become a beacon of innovation and collaboration, leading the charge in solving our energy challenges, or will it succumb to the political and economic hurdles that often accompany such groundbreaking endeavors? This article is based on verified sources and supported by editorial technologies. Did you like it? 4.7/5 (23)
Associated Press
12-07-2025
- General
- Associated Press
Faith Family Church Gears Up for Biggest Serve Day of the Year: Joining Thousands of Churches Worldwide in a Wave of Compassion
Baytown, TX July 12, 2025 --( )-- Faith Family Church is excited to announce its biggest Serve Day of the year, taking place this Saturday, July 12. This day is a massive collaboration of compassion, uniting over 2,500 churches worldwide in a powerful movement to spread God's love through practical acts of service. At pop-up Dream Centers across Baytown, Crosby and the surrounding areas, 700+ Volunteer Serve Team members will be providing free hair cuts, groceries, school supplies and clothing to resource pre-registered families. In addition, these families will celebrate with bouncy houses and snow cones for families. They'll take their Summer Blast experience on wheels to multiple locations to create a dynamic, fun, Bible-based day of fun for elementary kids through their mobile Dream Center. While the kids are having a great time learning about God, parents will enjoy refreshments and receive valuable resources in a relaxed small group setting. Plus, every child will go home with free school supplies at the end of the day. The Faith Family Church Serve Team, in partnership with the Baytown Homeless Shelter, will reach out to individuals in need in our community by providing a meal, clean clothes, access to showers, haircuts and hygiene bags. They will cook and serve breakfast for the current residents living at the Baytown Homeless Shelter. They will also deep clean their kitchen and stock up their pantry with needed essentials. In addition to these pop-up Dream Centers, the Serve Team will be sharing God's kindness through dozens of other projects including mulching community parks, painting local buildings, assisting with food distribution, constructing wheelchair ramps, cleaning up animal shelters, visiting local nursing homes, picking up trash, mowing lawns and so much more. 'This Serve Day is the perfect opportunity for us to show the love and kindness of God to our community,' said Pastor Josh, Lead Pastor of Faith Family Church. 'We serve our neighbors every second Saturday of each month and this is our biggest Serve Day of the year. We're grateful that we get to make a difference in the name of Jesus right here in our neighborhoods.' To view a full list of projects, please visit For more information about Serve Day or to arrange interviews, please contact Kim Granillo at 281-837-5626 or [email protected]. Faith Family Church exists to lead people into a growing relationship with Jesus Christ. Contact: Kim Granillo Communications Director Faith Family Church 281-837-5626 [email protected] Contact Information: Faith Family Church Kim Granillo 281-837-5626 Contact via Email Read the full story here: Faith Family Church Gears Up for Biggest Serve Day of the Year: Joining Thousands of Churches Worldwide in a Wave of Compassion Press Release Distributed by
CTV News
30-06-2025
- Business
- CTV News
U.S. Supreme Court rejects Exxon's appeal of US$14.25 million air pollution penalty
The U.S. Supreme Court turned away Exxon Mobil Corp's bid to overturn a $14.25 million civil penalty that a judge imposed in a long-running lawsuit over air pollution at its Baytown, Texas, crude oil refinery on Monday. Exxon had asked the justices to take up the case after a lower court in December upheld the largest penalty ever assessed in a citizen-initiated lawsuit enforcing protections against air pollution under the landmark Clean Air Act environmental law. The lawsuit, filed in 2010 by the Environment Texas Citizen Lobby and the Sierra Club, focused on Exxon's operation in Baytown of the largest petroleum and petrochemical complex in the United States. The plaintiffs said that the facility routinely exceeded limits under the Clean Air Act on emissions of harmful air pollutants, affecting the daily lives and health of people who live and work nearby by emitting toxic, carcinogenic and ozone-forming chemicals. Houston-based U.S. District Judge David Hittner in 2017 issued a $19.95 million penalty to Exxon, finding it was responsible for the pollution from the Baytown complex between 2005 and 2013. The New Orleans-based fifth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals later threw out the penalty and ordered Hittner to reassess it, resulting in the judge in 2021 issuing a new $14.25 million penalty, which the appellate court ultimately upheld. On appeal to the Supreme Court, Exxon argued that the plaintiffs lacked legal standing to pursue the case and that the fifth Circuit, like some other federal appeals courts, had adopted a novel standard to assess standing that the justices should reject. Exxon said that under the fifth Circuit's standard, plaintiffs in environmental cases seeking penalties for Clean Air Act violations may establish standing simply by showing that the injuries they suffered are the kinds that a defendant's conduct could have caused, rather than likely caused. Exxon urged the Supreme Court to use the case as means to overturn its 2000 ruling in the case called Friends of the Earth v. Laidlaw Environmental Services Act, which held that citizens may have standing to seek penalties under the Clean Air Act even though any penalties are paid not to them but to the U.S. Treasury. The Supreme Court has a six to three conservative majority, and its ideological makeup has shifted to the right since that case was decided in a seven to two ruling. The only currently sitting justice to participate in that case, conservative Justice Clarence Thomas, joined a dissenting opinion by the late Justice Antonin Scalia, who wrote that the case was decided on 'preposterous' grounds. (Reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston; Editing by Will Dunham)
Reuters
30-06-2025
- Business
- Reuters
US Supreme Court rejects Exxon's appeal of $14.25 million air pollution penalty
June 30 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court turned away on Monday Exxon Mobil Corp's (XOM.N), opens new tab bid to overturn a $14.25 million civil penalty that a judge imposed in a long-running lawsuit over air pollution at its Baytown, Texas, crude oil refinery. Exxon had asked the justices to take up the case after a lower court in December upheld the largest penalty ever assessed in a citizen-initiated lawsuit enforcing protections against air pollution under the landmark Clean Air Act environmental law. The lawsuit, filed in 2010 by the Environment Texas Citizen Lobby and the Sierra Club, focused on Exxon's operation in Baytown of the largest petroleum and petrochemical complex in the United States. The plaintiffs said that the facility routinely exceeded limits under the Clean Air Act on emissions of harmful air pollutants, affecting the daily lives and health of people who live and work nearby by emitting toxic, carcinogenic and ozone-forming chemicals. Houston-based U.S. District Judge David Hittner in 2017 issued a $19.95 million penalty to Exxon, finding it was responsible for the pollution from the Baytown complex between 2005 and 2013. The New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals later threw out the penalty and ordered Hittner to reassess it, resulting in the judge in 2021 issuing a new $14.25 million penalty, which the appellate court ultimately upheld. On appeal to the Supreme Court, Exxon argued that the plaintiffs lacked legal standing to pursue the case and that the 5th Circuit, like some other federal appeals courts, had adopted a novel standard to assess standing that the justices should reject. Exxon said that under the 5th Circuit's standard, plaintiffs in environmental cases seeking penalties for Clean Air Act violations may establish standing simply by showing that the injuries they suffered are the kinds that a defendant's conduct could have caused, rather than likely caused. Exxon urged the Supreme Court to use the case as means to overturn its 2000 ruling in the case called Friends of the Earth v. Laidlaw Environmental Services Act, which held that citizens may have standing to seek penalties under the Clean Air Act even though any penalties are paid not to them but to the U.S. Treasury. The Supreme Court has a 6-3 conservative majority, and its ideological makeup has shifted to the right since that case was decided in a 7-2 ruling. The only currently sitting justice to participate in that case, conservative Justice Clarence Thomas, joined a dissenting opinion by the late Justice Antonin Scalia, who wrote that the case was decided on "preposterous" grounds.
Yahoo
30-06-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
US Supreme Court rejects Exxon's appeal of $14.25 million air pollution penalty
By Nate Raymond (Reuters) -The U.S. Supreme Court turned away on Monday Exxon Mobil Corp's bid to overturn a $14.25 million civil penalty that a judge imposed in a long-running lawsuit over air pollution at its Baytown, Texas, crude oil refinery. Exxon had asked the justices to take up the case after a lower court in December upheld the largest penalty ever assessed in a citizen-initiated lawsuit enforcing protections against air pollution under the landmark Clean Air Act environmental law. The lawsuit, filed in 2010 by the Environment Texas Citizen Lobby and the Sierra Club, focused on Exxon's operation in Baytown of the largest petroleum and petrochemical complex in the United States. The plaintiffs said that the facility routinely exceeded limits under the Clean Air Act on emissions of harmful air pollutants, affecting the daily lives and health of people who live and work nearby by emitting toxic, carcinogenic and ozone-forming chemicals. Houston-based U.S. District Judge David Hittner in 2017 issued a $19.95 million penalty to Exxon, finding it was responsible for the pollution from the Baytown complex between 2005 and 2013. The New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals later threw out the penalty and ordered Hittner to reassess it, resulting in the judge in 2021 issuing a new $14.25 million penalty, which the appellate court ultimately upheld. On appeal to the Supreme Court, Exxon argued that the plaintiffs lacked legal standing to pursue the case and that the 5th Circuit, like some other federal appeals courts, had adopted a novel standard to assess standing that the justices should reject. Exxon said that under the 5th Circuit's standard, plaintiffs in environmental cases seeking penalties for Clean Air Act violations may establish standing simply by showing that the injuries they suffered are the kinds that a defendant's conduct could have caused, rather than likely caused. Exxon urged the Supreme Court to use the case as means to overturn its 2000 ruling in the case called Friends of the Earth v. Laidlaw Environmental Services Act, which held that citizens may have standing to seek penalties under the Clean Air Act even though any penalties are paid not to them but to the U.S. Treasury. The Supreme Court has a 6-3 conservative majority, and its ideological makeup has shifted to the right since that case was decided in a 7-2 ruling. The only currently sitting justice to participate in that case, conservative Justice Clarence Thomas, joined a dissenting opinion by the late Justice Antonin Scalia, who wrote that the case was decided on "preposterous" grounds. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
