Latest news with #Bowser
Axios
2 days ago
- Politics
- Axios
D.C. progressives want their own Zohran Mamdani vs. Mayor Bowser
Democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani's shock win in the New York City mayoral primary has locals buzzing: Could it happen in D.C.? Why it matters: I declared D.C.'s progressive era over earlier this year, but Mamdani's get-it-done brand of politics and hip campaign messaging is opening a new conversation on the left. The big picture: As Mayor Muriel Bowser considers a fourth-term bid for 2026, lefties are studying Mamdani's playbook. "The real question is: Does DC have the kind of charismatic, inspiring, fearless progressive leader that is willing to take on Mayor Bowser full throttle and run the kind of modern campaign Mamdani did?" wondered Scott Goldstein, a D.C. activist, in an X post. What I'm hearing: The most talked-about name in the last 24 hours has been Janeese Lewis George, the council member who represents uptown neighborhoods like Brightwood and the Georgia Avenue corridor. A democratic socialist, she beat a Bowser acolyte in 2020 for the Ward 4 seat. Whether she wants the job is another question, but she could make a play for a Mamdani-inspired run. At-large Council member Robert White has said he's " interested" in a Bowser rematch. White skews left — he won his seat with progressive backing and sounds skeptical about taxpayer dollars for RFK Stadium. But he's also recently voted the other way, like on Initiative 82. Beyond them, the field gets way more speculative. What about former Council member Elissa Silverman, whose 2022 loss left a progressive power vacuum on the council? "I don't have plans to do that," she told me, and ditto when I asked if she would happen to run for D.C. Council. A wildcard: A candidate no one's talking about right now. See: A national political figure or a lesser-known politico like Erin Palmer, an advisory neighborhood commissioner who got more votes than expected in her loss to Council Chairman Phil Mendelson in 2022. Asked about Bowser's future, the mayor's former campaign chairman, Bill Lightfoot, told me: "The mayor is focused on building the RFK site, reducing violence, improving our schools and passing a balanced budget."
Washington Post
2 days ago
- Business
- Washington Post
Where each D.C. Council member stands on the Commanders RFK stadium deal
Before the Washington Commanders can build a $3.7 billion stadium development at the decaying RFK Stadium site, the deal has to go through the D.C. Council. In the weeks since Mayor Muriel E. Bowser (D) unveiled the terms of the deal with the Commanders — including over $1 billion in taxpayer funds for the development — lawmakers have largely signaled that they plan to approve the stadium development. But not before making their mark on it. Lawmakers are exploring changes to the terms Bowser reached with the Commanders ranging from rethinking parking garages, seeking a strong project labor agreement to ensure well-paying union jobs for District residents and capturing more revenue for D.C. generated at the stadium. Bowser and the Commanders wanted the council to approve the deal by July 15, the deadline laid out in the terms they negotiated — but lawmakers have said that's not realistic and are planning to take more time. Bowser has turned up the pressure on lawmakers, worrying that D.C. could lose out on the opportunity with the Commanders if the council does not move more quickly. But for a multi-decade, multi-billion-dollar development, lawmakers insist that they need to do more due diligence. On Tuesday, D.C. Council Chairman Phil Mendelson (D) introduced a stand-alone RFK Stadium bill identical to Bowser's proposal, which he said would allow the council to 'complete its due diligence' and hold a public hearing. The council is also awaiting a financial analysis on the impact of various tax abatements offered to the Commanders as part of the deal, which it expects by mid-July. Mendelson said that he would plan to hold a vote on the proposed deal 'as soon as possible' after a public hearing, which his staff said would be held July 29 for the public and on July 30 for the team and government officials. 'No one should infer from the introduction of this bill that funding in the Mayor's proposed budget for the Washington Commanders Football Team is in jeopardy,' Mendelson wrote in a statement accompanying the bill, noting that capital funds for the stadium remain in the budget expected to be approved in July. All but one council member have either committed to supporting the stadium development with public investment or are contemplating specific changes to the terms that would get them to a yes vote. Here are the conditions, requests or concerns that lawmakers are raising before they vote on the deal. Some council members count themselves among the more enthusiastic supporters of the stadium — but even lawmakers who say they will vote yes have additional requests. Kenyan R. McDuffie (I-At Large) McDuffie said he wants firmer guarantees that the project will bring well-paying union jobs to D.C. residents, along with skilled apprenticeships and contracts for local women-owned and minority-owned businesses. He also wants a 'strong, sustainable, enforceable community benefits agreement,' he said, as well as efforts to make sure that D.C.'s youth can 'see themselves reflected' in both the development and the local sports economy Bowser is trying to build. Anita Bonds (D-At Large) Bonds says she wants the Commanders to pay for a portion of the $89 million SportsPlex that Bowser has proposed for the site; the facility, to be run by D.C.'s Department of Parks and Recreation, could contain youth sports amenities like an Olympic-size indoor pool and indoor track, the mayor has said. Brooke Pinto (D-Ward 2) Pinto said she wants the deal to include guaranteed job opportunities for people returning from jail or prison, a grass field and digital signage to leave room for women's soccer games at the new stadium and a commitment to honoring the late Robert F. Kennedy Sr. She also said she opposes Bowser's plan to fund the stadium by extending a tax on businesses that was supposed to expire once the Nationals Park bonds were paid off — but has not so far been able to identify an appropriate alternate funding stream. Wendell Felder (D-Ward 7) Felder, who represents residents nearest the stadium, said in a written statement to The Washington Post that 'I fully support the RFK stadium deal,' calling it a 'once-in-a-generation opportunity' that the council should not delay a vote. He said he is working hard to 'ensure the deal delivers more than a stadium.' 'Whether it's quality jobs with livable wages, youth programming, or access to small business and workforce opportunities — Ward 7 must see real, tangible benefits.' To strengthen the deal, he said he wants to see a firmer timeline for when housing will be constructed at the RFK site, along with set-aside opportunities for business owners who live in Ward 7. He also said he supports a project labor agreement and is open to discussing the details with his colleagues. Some council members count themselves among the more enthusiastic supporters of the stadium — but even lawmakers who say they will vote yes have additional requests. Kenyan R. McDuffie (I-At Large) McDuffie said he wants firmer guarantees that the project will bring well-paying union jobs to D.C. residents, along with skilled apprenticeships and contracts for local women-owned and minority-owned businesses. He also wants a 'strong, sustainable, enforceable community benefits agreement,' he said, as well as efforts to make sure that D.C.'s youth can 'see themselves reflected' in both the development and the local sports economy Bowser is trying to build. Anita Bonds (D-At Large) Bonds says she wants the Commanders to pay for a portion of the $89 million SportsPlex that Bowser has proposed for the site; the facility, to be run by D.C.'s Department of Parks and Recreation, could contain youth sports amenities like an Olympic-size indoor pool and indoor track, the mayor has said. Brooke Pinto (D-Ward 2) Pinto said she wants the deal to include guaranteed job opportunities for people returning from jail or prison, a grass field and digital signage to leave room for women's soccer games at the new stadium and a commitment to honoring the late Robert F. Kennedy Sr. She also said she opposes Bowser's plan to fund the stadium by extending a tax on businesses that was supposed to expire once the Nationals Park bonds were paid off — but has not so far been able to identify an appropriate alternate funding stream. Wendell Felder (D-Ward 7) Felder, who represents residents nearest the stadium, said in a written statement to The Washington Post that 'I fully support the RFK stadium deal,' calling it a 'once-in-a-generation opportunity' that the council should not delay a vote. He said he is working hard to 'ensure the deal delivers more than a stadium.' 'Whether it's quality jobs with livable wages, youth programming, or access to small business and workforce opportunities — Ward 7 must see real, tangible benefits.' To strengthen the deal, he said he wants to see a firmer timeline for when housing will be constructed at the RFK site, along with set-aside opportunities for business owners who live in Ward 7. He also said he supports a project labor agreement and is open to discussing the details with his colleagues. Council Chairman Phil Mendelson (D) Mendelson earlier this month gave his clearest signal yet that the council would likely approve the deal, saying in a statement that the body would 'move forward quickly to analyze the Mayor's terms, improve the deal where possible for taxpayers, and approve a new football stadium.' He has been less clear about his personal position. Historically opposed to taxpayer funds for a football stadium, Mendelson said at a news conference earlier this month that he was not yet prepared to put the deal up for a vote. 'It would not be fair to the taxpayers,' he said. Mendelson is awaiting an analysis of the deal the council commissioned, and he said in an interview that he needs more time to analyze the revenue projections the mayor has touted and suggest improvements that could save taxpayers money. Matthew Frumin (D-Ward 3) Frumin said he needs more information before staking a position, preferring to wait for the results of the council-commissioned analysis. In the meantime, he said he wants to explore some adjustments, including changes to the placement of parking garages, which for now would both be adjacent to the Kingman Park neighborhood. 'Is there something more creative we can do to better use the space?' he said in an interview, wondering if more options for belowground parking could allow the space on top to be put to good use. Frumin also said he wants to explore the idea of green-energy requirements on construction, and whether there could be more accountability attached to the affordable-housing requirements to ensure the housing is delivered on time. He is also among the seven council members who sent a letter to Commanders ownership demanding a project labor agreement that guarantees union jobs not only for the stadium but also for the new restaurants and hotels. Janeese Lewis George (D-Ward 4) Lewis George said while she can get behind funding basic infrastructure work, she does not support a $1 billion-plus price tag for taxpayers and wants the topline contribution to come down. She said she'll also be looking for firmer details about the affordable-housing plan and how it will be funded, and signed the same letter seeking strong union protections on the other elements of the development project. Council Chairman Phil Mendelson (D) Mendelson earlier this month gave his clearest signal yet that the council would likely approve the deal, saying in a statement that the body would 'move forward quickly to analyze the Mayor's terms, improve the deal where possible for taxpayers, and approve a new football stadium.' He has been less clear about his personal position. Historically opposed to taxpayer funds for a football stadium, Mendelson said at a news conference earlier this month that he was not yet prepared to put the deal up for a vote. 'It would not be fair to the taxpayers,' he said. Mendelson is awaiting an analysis of the deal the council commissioned, and he said in an interview that he needs more time to analyze the revenue projections the mayor has touted and suggest improvements that could save taxpayers money. Matthew Frumin (D-Ward 3) Frumin said he needs more information before staking a position, preferring to wait for the results of the council-commissioned analysis. In the meantime, he said he wants to explore some adjustments, including changes to the placement of parking garages, which for now would both be adjacent to the Kingman Park neighborhood. 'Is there something more creative we can do to better use the space?' he said in an interview, wondering if more options for belowground parking could allow the space on top to be put to good use. Frumin also said he wants to explore the idea of green-energy requirements on construction, and whether there could be more accountability attached to the affordable-housing requirements to ensure the housing is delivered on time. He is also among the seven council members who sent a letter to Commanders ownership demanding a project labor agreement that guarantees union jobs not only for the stadium but also for the new restaurants and hotels. Janeese Lewis George (D-Ward 4) Lewis George said while she can get behind funding basic infrastructure work, she does not support a $1 billion-plus price tag for taxpayers and wants the topline contribution to come down. She said she'll also be looking for firmer details about the affordable-housing plan and how it will be funded, and signed the same letter seeking strong union protections on the other elements of the development project. Numerous lawmakers have framed the mayor's proposed terms as a bad deal for taxpayers that needs improvement, whether seeking less taxpayer investment or greater revenue from the development. They each are also signatories of the project labor agreement letter. Robert C. White Jr. (D-At Large) White was skeptical that the full costs to taxpayers were reflected in the $1 billion topline figure, pointing out that other potential public costs such as in affordable-housing production or debt repayment are not included. While questioning top city officials during a hearing last week, he said it's not a good deal when so much revenue from sources such as ticket sales, merchandise and parking would go to the team or be reinvested back into the stadium instead of into D.C. coffers to invest in other services and programs. 'I don't want to give people the impression that somehow we'll be able to pay for teachers with this money,' he said. Jenny Reed, director of the D.C. Office of Budget and Performance Management, said while it is true that about $1.4 billion over 30 years is expected to go into a special RFK fund for stadium maintenance and related costs, she said $974 million is expected to go into the general fund from other revenue sources, such as hotel stays and income tax on employees working at different venues around the stadium. White said among his conditions to get to a yes vote would be more advantageous revenue-sharing agreement for the city, and that the Commanders move their business headquarters to D.C., which would benefit the city through taxes. Christina Henderson (I-At Large) Henderson said she does not support the mayor's agreement with the Commanders that the team would only have to pay $1 a year to lease the stadium and other commercial parcels from the District, unlike at other sports venues like Nationals Park or Capital One Arena. She also said the parking arrangements need to be rethought, both where and how they are built and who gets the revenue generated by them. She wondered if the garages could be spread out to 'lessen the blow' and traffic for nearby residents. Right now, the team, which would operate the parking garages, would get all the revenue from the parking garages, while the District would invest over $350 million in constructing them. 'Why would I not get any parking revenue from the parking garages that I'm paying for?' Henderson said. Zachary Parker (D-Ward 5) Parker has made several requests that he said are essential to win his support. Parker wants to see the team set up a dedicated education fund for Wards 5, 7 and 8 and a commitment that existing revenue-generating events at RFK will continue. He is also calling on the mayor to make good on a tentative agreement she had struck with Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) when the RFK bill was moving through the Senate to invest District dollars in National Park Service land in the city equivalent to the value of the stadium land. 'On principle we shouldn't have to invest in NPS land, but since the agreement was made and there is such disrepair to NPS land properties across the District, it is an opportunity to advance in some areas, like in Fort Totten Park,' Parker said. Charles Allen (D-Ward 6) A longtime stadium foe, Allen said he was pushing for eight to 10 changes that could get him in the yes camp. For starters, 'There's no scenario where they can't pay rent. That's ridiculous.' He also opposed 8,000 parking spots, wanting to see instead more like 2,000 spots and the bulk of the parking garage money instead going to expand Metro capacity, such as a new station at Oklahoma Avenue NE and Benning Road. Like Frumin, Allen also wants more accountability associated with the affordable-housing requirements and a firm timeline for completion. Allen also bristled at various sales tax exemptions within the stadium, such as for personal seat licenses. 'Why? The team doesn't get any of that sales tax revenue — it's just us giving up our own sales tax revenue,' he said. Numerous lawmakers have framed the mayor's proposed terms as a bad deal for taxpayers that needs improvement, whether seeking less taxpayer investment or greater revenue from the development. They each are also signatories of the project labor agreement letter. Robert C. White Jr. (D-At Large) White was skeptical that the full costs to taxpayers were reflected in the $1 billion topline figure, pointing out that other potential public costs such as in affordable-housing production or debt repayment are not included. While questioning top city officials during a hearing last week, he said it's not a good deal when so much revenue from sources such as ticket sales, merchandise and parking would go to the team or be reinvested back into the stadium instead of into D.C. coffers to invest in other services and programs. 'I don't want to give people the impression that somehow we'll be able to pay for teachers with this money,' he said. Jenny Reed, director of the D.C. Office of Budget and Performance Management, said while it is true that about $1.4 billion over 30 years is expected to go into a special RFK fund for stadium maintenance and related costs, she said $974 million is expected to go into the general fund from other revenue sources, such as hotel stays and income tax on employees working at different venues around the stadium. White said among his conditions to get to a yes vote would be more advantageous revenue-sharing agreement for the city, and that the Commanders move their business headquarters to D.C., which would benefit the city through taxes. Christina Henderson (I-At Large) Henderson said she does not support the mayor's agreement with the Commanders that the team would only have to pay $1 a year to lease the stadium and other commercial parcels from the District, unlike at other sports venues like Nationals Park or Capital One Arena. She also said the parking arrangements need to be rethought, both where and how they are built and who gets the revenue generated by them. She wondered if the garages could be spread out to 'lessen the blow' and traffic for nearby residents. Right now, the team, which would operate the parking garages, would get all the revenue from the parking garages, while the District would invest over $350 million in constructing them. 'Why would I not get any parking revenue from the parking garages that I'm paying for?' Henderson said. Zachary Parker (D-Ward 5) Parker has made several requests that he said are essential to win his support. Parker wants to see the team set up a dedicated education fund for Wards 5, 7 and 8 and a commitment that existing revenue-generating events at RFK will continue. He is also calling on the mayor to make good on a tentative agreement she had struck with Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) when the RFK bill was moving through the Senate to invest District dollars in National Park Service land in the city equivalent to the value of the stadium land. 'On principle we shouldn't have to invest in NPS land, but since the agreement was made and there is such disrepair to NPS land properties across the District, it is an opportunity to advance in some areas, like in Fort Totten Park,' Parker said. Charles Allen (D-Ward 6) A longtime stadium foe, Allen said he was pushing for eight to 10 changes that could get him in the yes camp. For starters, 'There's no scenario where they can't pay rent. That's ridiculous.' He also opposed 8,000 parking spots, wanting to see instead more like 2,000 spots and the bulk of the parking garage money instead going to expand Metro capacity, such as a new station at Oklahoma Avenue NE and Benning Road. Like Frumin, Allen also wants more accountability associated with the affordable-housing requirements and a firm timeline for completion. Allen also bristled at various sales tax exemptions within the stadium, such as for personal seat licenses. 'Why? The team doesn't get any of that sales tax revenue — it's just us giving up our own sales tax revenue,' he said. Brianne K. Nadeau (D-Ward 1) Nadeau said she firmly opposes a stadium. 'If we don't spend any local dollars, I would consider it,' she said. 'I'm not sure we need to vote on it.' Brianne K. Nadeau (D-Ward 1) Nadeau said she firmly opposes a stadium. 'If we don't spend any local dollars, I would consider it,' she said. 'I'm not sure we need to vote on it.'
Time of India
3 days ago
- Entertainment
- Time of India
IShowSpeed and Kai Cenat Go Live Today for Nonstop Super Mario Bros Marathon, When, How to Watch, and More
Image via: YouTube Two of the largest independent stars, IShowSpeed and Kai Cenat, are joining forces for an epic challenge beginning today, a 24/7 Super Mario Bros speed run marathon. The aim? To complete every single game in the Super Mario Bros franchise in one nonstop session, no rest until the last Bowser is bested. The Marathon Challenge: When and How to Watch The marathon starts June 25th at 4 PM EST, and will likely have the stream running for several days, up to four days at most, according to iShowSpeed. Fans can catch all the action live on their favorite streaming services as the duo explores Nintendo's legendary series, from the original 8-bit classic to today's exciting new entries. Unlike regular game streams, this marathon is all-or-nothing. IShowSpeed and Kai Cenat have both vowed not to call it quits until every game is defeated. That means it's going to be an extreme endurance test and high-octane entertainment for audiences as the streamers battle through each course, boss battle and secret warp zone the Mushroom Kingdom has in store! A Collaboration Beyond Gaming This isn't the first time IShowSpeed and Kai Cenat have collaborated. The dynamic duo have recently co-hosted a new show, The Kai 'N Speed Show on Rumble, cranking out three episodes a month. Their on-screen and off-screen chemistry has had fans buzzing, and with the announcement of an upcoming collaborative music video titled Dogs, merging art with their one-of-a-kind vibes, fans were clued in that something special was in the works. Behind their anti-establishment, fun and frequently chaotic streaming personas, has bubbled recently a discord on one of these live streams including the now discredited rumor of a shooting involving Kai Cenat, which trended for a short time on social media. The two hastily put those rumors to rest, proving that their partnership is as strong as ever and their attention is turned fully to this new marathon-length event. What Fans Are Saying Even the announcement of the nonstop Super Mario Bros marathon has produced a storm of positive thought and discontent hesitance from fans. Comments such as 'They seriously picked violence against their sanity, the old Mario games not fun' are representative of the wider community's acknowledgment and appreciation of the arduous challenge they're taking on. Some audience members question if the pair is even capable of beating notoriously challenging games like Super Mario 64, commenting things like 'They can't beat Mario 64, it's the hardest Mario game, they are cooked!' What to Expect Next With the stakes so high, the marathon will feature a mix of serious smashmouth gameplay, comedic commentary, and audience participation. Whether you've played Mario since the days of sliding down flagpoles or you're just a casual Mario-watching internet viewer interested in all the malarkey, this event promises a one-of-a-kind look at what it takes to master one of gaming's most iconic and beloved franchises live and in real-time. not ending until we beat Super Mario Bros🍄 ft. Kai Cenat So save the date and get ready for an unforgettable adventure to the Mushroom Kingdom — the marathon kicks off today, and it won't stop until the last flagpole is cleared. Can IShowSpeed and Kai Cenat beat the odds and do the unthinkable? So don't forget to listen in and learn! Game On Season 1 continues with Mirabai Chanu's inspiring story. Watch Episode 2 here.
Metro
4 days ago
- Entertainment
- Metro
The best Mario Kart World character is not who you'd expect
One character is now deemed the best racer in Mario Kart World, thanks to hidden stats Nintendo doesn't want you to see. Despite what some people try to pretend, Mario Kart is far more reliant on skill than getting lucky with the items. And that remains the case in Mario Kart World, even with the player count bumped up to 24 per race. That being said, Mario Kart is the perfect casual game, that anyone of any age or skill level can pick up and have a good time with. But that's not stopped some players from getting into the nitty gritty to try and figure out the best way to win races. You'd think that would only require getting better at the game, but a significant number of players have come to the conclusion that the best way to win is by using a specific character. The character in question? Not Mario, not Bowser, not the fan favourite cow, but Spike – one of the random enemies you can unlock through the Kamek item. As spotted and translated by Automaton, Spike has become a popular pick amongst Japanese players for his stats; something most casual players will likely ignore when it comes to choosing a racer. Sign up to the GameCentral newsletter for a unique take on the week in gaming, alongside the latest reviews and more. Delivered to your inbox every Saturday morning. 他の方も仰っているようにノリで楽しんでるのはそうなのですが、実際にガボンは強キャラではありますその画像のステータスの他に隠しステータスが存在しているのですが、ガボンは通常のアスファルトの道に対しての補正が他のキャラより高く設定されているので、それが人気の秘訣でもあります — りんごもちぃ (@ringo_moti12) June 23, 2025 Although the game doesn't draw attention to it, characters in Mario Kart World are divided across different weight classes, which has an effect on your vehicle's stats. Since Spike is a lightweight class, this gives him high acceleration and better handling than heavier characters, at the cost of being much easier to shove around. As it turns out, though, characters have another hidden stat that the game never mentions: terrain bonuses. We don't know how players figured this out, but characters can essentially drive faster depending on the terrain they're on. In Spike's case, he gains a boost in speed when driving on smooth roads, compared to rougher terrain and water. Although heavier characters like Bowser gain even more of a boost benefit from terrain, according to data by CrypticJacknife, they don't recover from being hit by items as quickly and have worse handling. More Trending These are areas Spike excels at and his weaknesses can be offset by pairing him with the right vehicle, since all of those have their own stats as well. It's too soon to tell if this info will spread far enough to fill the online lobbies up with nothing but Spike players, but this is both a strange insight into the more competitive side of Mario Kart and proof that Nintendo puts a lot more thought into balancing Mario Kart than you may think. Nintendo could afford to be forthcoming about how Mario Kart World works in general, though. Hiding weight classes and terrain bonuses is one thing, but it makes little effort to explain driving techniques like charge jumping to new players, hiding them away in an options menu that's easy to miss. Email gamecentral@ leave a comment below, follow us on Twitter. To submit Inbox letters and Reader's Features more easily, without the need to send an email, just use our Submit Stuff page here. For more stories like this, check our Gaming page. MORE: All 30 Mario Kart World racetracks ranked from worst to best MORE: Mario Kart World's soundtrack is fantastic – here are the best songs MORE: Nintendo explains why Zelda and Splatoon racers aren't in Mario Kart World
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Business
- Yahoo
The Stacks Phase One Reaches Final Completion in Buzzard Point
Clark Construction, Akridge, and National Real Estate Development ('National Development') have reached final construction completion of Phase One of The Stacks, a 1.1-million-square-foot mixed-use development in Capitol Riverfront's Buzzard Point neighborhood. The Stacks Phase One, Ribbon Cutting Washington, DC, June 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- WASHINGTON, DC - Clark Construction, Akridge, and National Real Estate Development ('National Development') have reached final construction completion of Phase One of The Stacks, a 1.1-million-square-foot mixed-use development in Capitol Riverfront's Buzzard Point neighborhood. This milestone marks a major step forward in the neighborhood's development, with the delivery of the three residential mixed-use towers and public spaces. Clark, Akridge, and National Development gathered together on June 18, 2025, for a ceremonial ribbon-cutting alongside Washington, DC's Mayor Bowser and local officials to celebrate the new development. Phase One of The Stacks includes The Byron, a 14-story, 384-unit apartment building; Everly, a 14-story, 413-unit apartment building; and Colette, a 13-story, 319-unit building. The development provides a combined 1,100 rental apartment units, 40,000 square feet of retail, 300,000 square feet of below-grade parking, plus a 22,000-square-foot park. A key part of the development is the pedestrian-only path running through the heart of the project that guides people from the nearby Audi Stadium to the Anacostia waterfront. Dubbed 'The Corso,' the path curves gently through the length of The Stacks. 'The delivery of this asset would not be possible without the strong partnership between Clark, Akridge, National Development, and the talented design and trade partners on this project,' said Molly Raglani, manager, Clark DC. 'With the addition of 41 combined stories of residential space and a major public park, this project brings significant energy and a real sense of place to the Buzzard Point neighborhood.' Launch Workplaces, an 11,000-square-foot coworking and flexible office space opening mid-2025, and FLEX, a 10,000-square-foot community gym concept by Balance Gym and FLEX—Buzzard Point, are the newest tenants at The Stacks, adding to the new community's live-work-play lifestyle. At final build-out, The Stacks will consist of two million square feet of mixed-use space, including over 2,000 residential units, 80,000 square feet of retail and restaurant space, and a 15,000-square-foot park along V Street. Jointly owned by Akridge, Bridge Investment Group (Bridge), Blue Coast Capital (BCC), and institutional funds managed by National Real Estate Advisors (National), with Phase One construction financing by Bank OZK. Residential leasing is managed by Greystar. ABOUT CLARK CONSTRUCTION GROUP Clark Construction Group is one of the largest building and infrastructure companies in the United States. Our portfolio spans every major building market, from public to private, corporate to cultural, education to entertainment, and the infrastructure connecting it all – power, transit, water, and roadways. Since 1906, we've been delighting and delivering value to our clients and project partners, providing diverse opportunities for our team, and strengthening the communities where we live. With offices strategically located across the country, we pride ourselves on being a local builder with national reach. To learn more, visit ### Attachment The Stacks Phase One, Ribbon Cutting CONTACT: Shanna Wilson Clark Construction Group 917-674-3096 in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
