Latest news with #BuksanBloomingApartment


Time of India
12-06-2025
- Entertainment
- Time of India
Kim Soo Hyun's company seizes property worth 4 billion KRW; Case filed for the HoverLab CEO's assets
As Kim Soo Hyun and the late Kim Sae Ron 's case goes, many other legal actions have been taken against everyone else involved. Recently, it was reported that Kim Soo Hyun was directly involved in the seizure of HoverLab CEO Kim Se Eui 's properties worth 12 billion KRW. The court order was availed by the actor's company, which allegedly seized the properties amid the ongoing defamation case . Kim Soo Hyun seizes YouTuber's properties amid defamation case On June 11, as reported by Newssen, Kim Soo Hyun's legal representative allegedly took hold of two real estate properties that belonged to Kim Se Eui, the CEO of online streaming channel HoverLab. Earlier, Soo Hyun had filed a defamation case against the YouTuber for spreading misinformation and for defaming the actor. His name, however, has not been fully listed in the real estate seizures, as it would require his private records to be made public per legalities. To protect his personal information, his name was not included directly in the real estate seizure. The Seoul Central District Court approved Kim Soo Hyun's agency's request for a damages lawsuit and an asset seizure request. While the request was filed for 11 billion KRW, the properties seized by the company amount to 4 billion KRW. The two apartment complexes, Hanyang 4th Apartment and Buksan Blooming Apartment, are in Apgujeong and Seocho, respectively. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với sàn môi giới tin cậy IC Markets Tìm hiểu thêm Undo Kim Soo Hyun is listed as a creditor for the provisional seizure of the HoverLab CEO's bank account According to court records, Kim Soo Hyun was listed as one of the creditors in the provisional seizure order. HoverLab or Garosero 's bank account that holds corporate sponsorship funds has been seized under the provision order. As per reports from Allkpop, a legal expert and advisor weighed in on the situation and shared his opinion with the public. He stated that 'This means the court found the lawsuit submitted by Kim Soo Hyun's side sufficiently compelling. They substantiated who was responsible for the defamatory actions and detailed the estimated damage to the agency.'


Pink Villa
12-06-2025
- Entertainment
- Pink Villa
Is Kim Soo Hyun personally involved in provisional seizure of Garosero YouTuber's assets amid Kim Sae Ron scandal?
The Kim Soo Hyun-Kim Sae Ron dating scandal had a major development with the actress' side receiving their first major blow. It included the court ordering for seizure of two properties of YouTuber Kim Se Eui of Garosero Research Institute– the one who amplified Kim Sae Ron's family's messages to the world. As per a June 11 report by Newsen, Kim Soo Hyun was directly involved in the provisional seizure of assets. Read to know how. Garosero's Kim Se Eui slapped with seizure of 2 real estate assets Kim Se Eui was the constant supporter of Kim Sae Ron 's bereaved family and all the revelations regarding the two actors' past involvement with each other was made through his YouTube channel. Due to that, a damages lawsuit was filed and asset seizure request was made by Kim Soo Hyun's agency against Kim Se Eui, which resulted favourably for the actor's side. The Seoul Central District Court approved the real estate seizure request of GOLDMEDALIST, worth 11 billion KRW (about 8 million USD). It allowed the agency to claim two of Kim Se Ui's luxury residential properties, with their total worth being 4 billion KRW (about 2.93 million USD). The properties included a Hanyang 4th Apartment in Apgujeong and a Buksan Blooming Apartment in Seocho. Kim Soo Hyun's direct involvement in provisional seizure of Garosero operator Kim Soo Hyun was explicitly named as a creditor in the provisional seizure of Garosero Institute Co., Ltd.'s bank account holding corporate sponsorship funds. This move underscored his hands-on approach in pursuing legal action against the whistle-blower. The reason Kim Soo Hyun's name wasn't included in the real estate seizures, according to LKB & Partners, his legal team, was that registering a claim on real estate would require making his personal details publicly accessible. To maintain his privacy and keep crucial information out of reach of the opposing party, Kim Soo Hyun strategically decided to participate directly only in the bank account seizure, thereby maintaining confidentiality. The issue stemmed from Kim Sae Ron's side accusing Kim Soo Hyun of being involved romantically with the late actress during her underage days. Kim Soo Hyun legally refuted it, filing defamation charges against both the bereaved family and the Garosero operator.