Latest news with #CLATPG
Indian Express
23-06-2025
- Politics
- Indian Express
CLAT PG exam: On plea against ‘exorbitant counselling fee', Delhi HC seeks response from NLU, BCI, UGC
The Delhi High Court on Monday sought response from a consortium of National Law Universities (NLU), the Bar Council of India (BCI) and the University Grants Commission (UGC) on a petition moved by an aspirant challenging the 'exorbitant' counselling fees being charged for the Common Law Admission Test (CLAT) PG exams. 'This is the only examination in the whole country where such a high fee is taken…hundreds are not able to participate,' Advocate Siddharth R Gupta, appearing for the petitioner, Jatin Shrivastava, who scored 474th rank in the CLAT PG exams, told the court. 'I'm praying for interim relief…please let me participate without paying the fees. I've already paid 30,000 refundable fees. I'm being charged 20,000 per round,' Gupta said. 'The process is going on, second counselling is going on. How can I disturb the whole system for one candidate?' asked Justice Rajneesh Kumar Gupta while issuing notice to the consortium. 'For freezing the seat, Rs 20,000 will have to be paid again…I can't fill the form without this payment,' said Advocate Gupta on the petitioner's behalf. When asked by the judge about the next CLAT PG counselling date, Advocate Gupta responded that it was scheduled for July 4. After hearing the response, Justice Gupta posted the matter for hearing on July 2 — two days before the third round of counselling and further directed the consortium to file a reply to the aspirant's plea. An interim order in favour of the aspirant was not passed by Justice Gupta. In the plea moved by Srivastava, examples of the counselling fees for 15 exams were attached. It was also argued in the petition that charging a high fee was discriminatory towards those who didn't have the means to pay. A similar petition has been filed before the Kerala HC against the 'exorbitant fees' charged during counselling. This plea is likely to be heard later in July.
NDTV
12-06-2025
- General
- NDTV
CLAT PG 2025 Revised Result Out; Counselling Process Begins, Check Deadline
CLAT PG 2025 Revised Result: The Consortium of National Law Universities (NLUs) has announced the revised results for the Common Law Admission Test (CLAT) Postgraduate 2025, following a directive from the Delhi High Court issued on June 6. Candidates can now access the updated result and final answer key on the official website - As part of the revision, two questions from the original paper have been withdrawn, reducing the total marks from 120 to 118. The updated scores have been used to prepare a new merit list that will form the basis for admission to LLM programmes across participating NLUs. CLAT PG Counselling: Step-By-Step Guide Qualified candidates must now participate in the counselling process, which is being held online. Here's how to apply: Visit the official website: Click on the 'Login' tab and enter your registered credentials Complete the counselling form by entering all required details Submit a minimum of 15 NLU preferences (can be updated until June 13) Pay the counselling registration fee Submit the form, then download and save the confirmation page Keep a printed copy for future reference Counselling Registration Fee General Category: Rs 30,000 SC, ST, OBC, BC, EWS, PwD Categories: Rs 20,000 Post Seat Allotment Options After the first round of allotment, candidates can choose from the following: Accept: Confirm the allotted seat by paying a non-refundable Rs 20,000 Float: Wait for a preferred NLU in upcoming rounds Exit: Opt out of the counselling process entirely The CLAT PG 2025 exam was conducted on December 1, 2024, at 141 centres across 25 states and four Union Territories. The counselling registration window will remain open until June 13. Candidates are advised to regularly check their CLAT login accounts for updates on seat allotments and further instructions.
Indian Express
11-06-2025
- Business
- Indian Express
CLAT PG 2025 result declared, registration for counselling begins
The Consortium of NLUs on June 10 has announced the Common Law Admission Test Postgraduate (CLAT PG) 2025 results. Candidates can check and download the CLAT PG 2025 scorecard by logging into their account on the CLAT 2025 portal through the Consortium's website at CLAT PG 2025 was conducted on December 1, 2024, at 141 test centres across 25 states and 4 Union Territories in India. Considering the order passed by Delhi High Court on June 6, 2025, the Consortium updated the final answer key and the results have been amended. The CLAT PG final answer key was also released on June 10. Two questions are withdrawn and as a result, CLAT PG 2025 will be out of 118. Eligible candidates will be invited to participate in the admissions counselling process in accordance with the rank list and the admissions matrix provided by each NLU. Candidates must login to their CLAT account on the website of the Consortium of NLUs and validate that they have been invited for counselling during each round. Registrations for the admissions counselling process will open at 1 pm, on June 11, and close at 5 pm on June 13. Candidates will have to provide a minimum of 15 preferences. Candidates can update the preferences any number of times, until the closure of the counselling registration. Candidates from the general category, will have to pay Rs 30,000 for the counselling process and candidates from the ST/ SC/ OBC/ BC/ EWS/ PWD categories will be required to pay Rs 20,000. Each candidate who has been allotted a seat at any NLU may exercise any of the 'freeze', 'float', or 'exit' options in a counselling round. In order to 'freeze' their seat in the first, second and third round of counselling, the candidate must pay the non-refundable confirmation fee of Rs 20,000 within the stipulated time. If the candidate has not been allotted their first preference NLU and chooses to leave 'open' the possibility of getting a higher preference NLU seat they may choose the 'Float' Option. If at any time after completing the registration process, a candidate does not want to participate in the counselling process, they may choose to 'Exit' the admissions counselling process.
News18
10-06-2025
- General
- News18
Judiciary Vs CLAT PG Vs Corporate Law: How To Decide Your Path In Final Year
Last Updated: Choosing between judiciary, CLAT PG, and corporate law is less about the "right" path and more about finding what aligns with your values, mindset, and goals. At a certain point in the final year of law school, the conversations start to sound different. Career discussions shift from what is out there to what is right for me. Some decisions feel straightforward. This one rarely does. Choosing between the judiciary, CLAT PG (Common Law Admission Test for Postgraduate) and corporate law is about choosing a way of thinking, working and living for the years ahead. It is easy to feel the weight of this decision, especially when everyone seems to be moving in different directions with equal conviction. One student may be preparing for judiciary exams with complete focus, while another is lining up internships at law firms. A third may be buried in public law readings, wondering if CLAT PG is the right next step. No one path looks clearly better. And each requires a different mindset, rhythm and sense of direction. Clarity does not always come from certainty. Often, it begins by understanding what each path truly demands, beyond what it promises. The Judiciary: A Career of Discipline And Public Service For those drawn to public service and a disciplined approach, the judiciary offers a career deeply rooted in legal principles and societal impact. Preparing for judicial services means engaging with a vast syllabus that varies by state and includes procedural laws, local statutes, and general knowledge. The exam process is demanding, combining subjective and objective questions followed by interviews that evaluate personality and temperament. Exam calendars can be unpredictable, requiring aspirants to cultivate patience and resilience. Students who begin preparation early around their third or early fourth year gain a significant advantage. They focus on bare acts, landmark judgments, and sharpen their written articulation skills. Preparation is most effective when paired with regular revision and mock tests, which help build both knowledge and the crucial exam temperament. Apart from textbooks, connecting with recent judicial officers and fellow aspirants through webinars or alumni networks provides strategic insights and practical tips that are often state specific. Ultimately, a judicial career offers the unique chance to influence justice at the grassroots level and become a key part of the legal system that shapes society. The CLAT PG examination is often seen as a gateway to an LLM (Masters in Law), but its significance extends much further. It opens doors to diverse legal careers in academia, policy research, think tanks, specialised litigation, and international fellowships. The exam's format changes annually but generally emphasises comprehension of constitutional law, jurisprudence, criminal law, and current legal debates. Success in CLAT PG depends on mastering a few core areas deeply rather than spreading oneself too thin. To prepare effectively, candidates should: Additionally, connecting with current LLM students and attending academic workshops or law review launches enriches preparation and builds valuable networks. Publishing articles in student law journals further strengthens research credentials. Graduates from this path often transition into academia, legal journalism, or human rights litigation, with many pursuing doctoral studies or international opportunities. This route is ideal for those who thrive on intellectual stimulation and specialised legal inquiry. Corporate law offers substantial professional growth for students eager to enter a fast paced, dynamic environment. It demands a strong commercial acumen and the ability to handle contracts, mergers, regulatory compliance, and litigation strategy within law firms or corporate legal teams. Preparing for this path requires intentional internships, especially with Tier 1 and boutique firms aligned with one's interests. Application materials such as CVs and cover letters should be polished with feedback from mentors or alumni to avoid generic approaches. Students aiming for corporate roles benefit from honing key skills including contract drafting, legal research, and effective communication. Staying updated on transactions and regulatory changes through platforms like LiveLaw, IBBI, and SEBI newsletters is crucial for understanding the business context. Networking also plays a pivotal role. Attending career fairs, webinars, and alumni meets opens doors to short term internships and lasting connections. Though corporate law may not traditionally be seen as public interest work, its influence on industry practices, compliance, and economic policy is significant. Furthermore, in-house roles frequently evolve into positions involving arbitration, environmental, social, and governance issues or corporate social responsibility, expanding the scope of impact far beyond routine legal work. Aligning Your Choice With Personal Strengths And Goals Choosing the right legal path requires honest self reflection. Judicial preparation demands steady, long term commitment with rewards that may take time to materialise. Corporate law offers rapid learning and progression but with high intensity and pressure. CLAT PG promises intellectual depth and specialisation, yet needs focused direction. Considering whether you excel in methodical study or thrive under fast-paced challenges, whether your motivation stems from public service, academic exploration, or business outcomes, will clarify which path aligns best with your temperament and goals. Building A Career, Not Just Finding A Job Ultimately, early career choices lay the foundation for lifelong professional habits, networks, and identity. The objective should be to build a meaningful career that reflects your values and strengths rather than seeking quick solutions. Law students who approach this phase with clear purpose, consistent effort, and a willingness to seek guidance position themselves to carve out fulfilling and future ready legal journeys. In law-related careers, thoughtful strategy is what sets the best apart. (The author is Founder and CEO at Maansarovar Law Centre. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views.) About the Author Education and Careers Desk A team of reporters, writers and editors brings you news, analyses and information on college and school admissions, board and competitive exams, career options, topper interviews, job notifications, latest in ...Read More Stay updated with the latest education! Get real-time updates on board exam results 2025, entrance exams such as JEE Mains, Advanced, NEET, and more. Find out top schools, colleges, courses and more. Also Download the News18 App to stay updated! tags : career guide CLAT judiciary law Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: June 10, 2025, 14:55 IST News education-career Judiciary Vs CLAT PG Vs Corporate Law: How To Decide Your Path In Final Year
New Indian Express
07-06-2025
- Politics
- New Indian Express
Award marks on two disputed PG admission question, Delhi HC directs CLAT consortium
NEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court on Friday directed the Consortium of National Law Universities (NLUs) to award marks to candidates for two disputed questions in the Common Law Admission Test (CLAT) 2025 for postgraduate (PG) students. A bench of Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela ruled in favour of the candidates on two out of the three questions that had been challenged before the court. One of the questions under dispute concerned a supposed extract from the Supreme Court's judgment in Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board v A Rajappa and Ors. The court noted that this was not an actual extract from the judgment, but rather material taken from a commentary. 'It is not disputed that the candidates who had appeared in the examination were not previously provided with any list of judgments that they were to be ready with. That apart, it is not disputed that the passage (V) is not an extract from the judgment... it would be unreasonable to expect candidates to look for any answer beyond what is provided in the passage itself. Thus, the answer in option 'B' is incorrect and option 'C' is the correct answer. Resultantly, the Consortium shall accord marks to the candidates accordingly,' the court held. The bench also rejected the Consortium's position on a jurisprudence question regarding the source of the statement: 'Right is an interest which is to be recognised, protected and enforced by law.' The petitioners had also urged the Court to examine the Rs 1,000 fee imposed per objection to the CLAT PG provisional answer key, arguing it was excessive. While acknowledging that the fee appeared high compared to similar national-level exams, the court recognised the Consortium's argument that the charge was intended to deter frivolous objections. 'There has to be a fine balance which needs to be resolved between two sets of genuine grievances,' the court observed.
