Latest news with #CMFPhone
Geeky Gadgets
03-07-2025
- Geeky Gadgets
Summer 2025: Top Budget Smartphones Revealed
The summer of 2025 offers a diverse range of budget smartphones that combine affordability with impressive features. Whether you prioritize display quality, battery life, gaming performance, or camera capabilities, there's a device tailored to meet your needs. The video below from Tech Spurt explores the top budget-friendly smartphones available this season, helping you make an informed decision based on your preferences. Watch this video on YouTube. Nothing Phone 3A: Stylish and Versatile The Nothing Phone 3A stands out as a stylish and functional option, priced at just over £300. Its OLED display delivers vibrant and sharp visuals, making it ideal for media consumption. The telephoto camera ensures decent photography performance, while the Nothing OS introduces the Essential Space feature, which enhances multitasking for productivity-focused users. A unique feature of this phone is its flashing back panel, which doubles as a notification system, adding a distinctive and practical flair. With solid gaming performance, the Nothing Phone 3A is a versatile choice for users seeking a balance of design, functionality, and performance. CMF Phone 2 Pro: Durable and Customizable For those who prioritize durability, the CMF Phone 2 Pro is a compelling choice. This rugged smartphone combines a customizable design with reliable performance, all at a lower price than the Nothing Phone 3A. It features an AMOLED display, a basic telephoto camera, and dependable battery life. While it may not excel in heavy gaming, its sturdy construction makes it an excellent option for users who need a tough yet stylish device. The CMF Phone 2 Pro is particularly suited for individuals who value resilience without compromising on essential features. Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G: Affordable Premium Features The Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G offers premium features at an affordable price of under £300. Its 6.7-inch AMOLED display supports Dolby Vision and HDR10+, delivering an immersive viewing experience for streaming and gaming. The phone also features water resistance and decent battery life, making it a reliable companion for everyday use. While it handles moderate gaming effectively, its camera performance can be inconsistent, especially in low-light conditions. This device is an excellent choice for users seeking advanced display technology and solid overall performance without exceeding their budget. Xiaomi Poco F7: Built for Gamers The Xiaomi Poco F7 is a powerhouse designed for gaming enthusiasts. It features a 6.8-inch AMOLED display, a Snapdragon 8S Gen 4 chipset, and a massive 6,500 mAh battery with fast charging capabilities. These specifications ensure smooth gameplay and extended usage. Additionally, the phone includes IP68 water resistance, enhancing its durability for everyday use. However, extended gaming sessions may cause the device to heat up, which could affect comfort for heavy users. For those who prioritize gaming performance above all else, the Xiaomi Poco F7 is a top contender. Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro: Unique Design with Reliable Performance The Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro appeals to users who value both aesthetics and functionality. It's Iron Man-themed special edition offers a distinctive design that stands out from the crowd. The phone is equipped with an AMOLED display, a Dimensity 8400 Ultra chipset, and IP68 water resistance, ensuring reliable performance and durability. The 6,000 mAh battery provides ample power for daily tasks, making it a practical choice for users who want a blend of style and performance. OnePlus Nord C4 Lite 5G: Balanced and Practical The OnePlus Nord C4 Lite 5G delivers a well-rounded experience for everyday use. Its OLED display, stereo speakers, and headphone jack make it an excellent choice for media consumption. The 5,100 mAh battery supports 80W fast charging, ensuring minimal downtime and convenience for users on the go. While its Snapdragon 695 chipset limits gaming capabilities, the phone excels in handling routine tasks and casual use. This device is ideal for users seeking a practical and balanced smartphone for daily activities. Motorola Moto G56 5G: Dependable and Durable The Motorola Moto G56 5G is a reliable option for users who prioritize durability and dependability. It features an LCD display, IP68 water resistance, and stereo speakers, making sure a robust and enjoyable user experience. The phone's Dimensity 7060 chipset may restrict gaming performance, but its dependable battery life makes it a trustworthy choice for general use. This device is particularly suited for individuals who need a rugged smartphone that can withstand everyday challenges. Motorola Moto G35: Simplicity and Longevity The Motorola Moto G35 focuses on delivering essential features with a clean and straightforward Android experience. Its excellent battery life ensures long-lasting performance, making it a reliable option for users who value simplicity over advanced features. While its performance and camera capabilities are basic, the Moto G35 is an ideal choice for those who prioritize longevity and ease of use. Motorola Moto G05: Affordable Secondary Option For users on a tight budget, the Motorola Moto G05 is an excellent secondary phone or a suitable choice for children. It offers basic functionality at an extremely affordable price, making it ideal for users with minimal requirements or as a backup device. This phone is perfect for those who need a simple and cost-effective solution. HMD Fusion: Sustainable and Repairable The HMD Fusion stands out for its emphasis on sustainability. Its repairable and expandable design makes it an environmentally friendly choice for buyers who prioritize longevity. Running on stock Android, it provides a user-friendly interface and dependable battery life. However, its low-resolution screen and limited performance may not satisfy users seeking advanced features. The HMD Fusion is a great option for environmentally conscious individuals who value sustainability and practicality. Unlock more potential in Best budget smartphones by reading the previous articles we have written. Source & Image Credit: Tech Spurt Filed Under: Android News, Mobile Phone News, Top News Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
News18
04-06-2025
- Business
- News18
Nothing Phone 3 Launch Date In July 2025 Confirmed: Price, Features And More We Expect
Nothing Phone 3 launch date has been announced and we can safely say that in less than one month's time the new flagship phone will be unveiled. The brand has been teasing small details about the upcoming device that will be fighting in the flagship table this year. Nothing has already launched the 3a series and the CMF Phone models in 2025 but the big premium launch has been awaited since 2024 and now we don't have to wait long. Nothing Phone 3 launch date is official and now we know when the new model will be coming out Nothing Phone 3 Launch Date In July, Timings And More
India Today
21-05-2025
- India Today
Nothing Phone (3) gets a launch schedule: Key specs, features and possible India price
After months of anticipation and several mid-range launches, Nothing has finally announced the official launch timeline for its next flagship — the Nothing Phone (3). The flagship from the company is launching in India in July 2025. The device will mark Nothing's return to the premium smartphone segment, almost two years after the launch of the Nothing Phone (2), which was launched on July 11, the exact launch date hasn't been disclosed yet, the announcement confirms what Nothing CEO Carl Pei teased during a recent AMA session on social media. He hinted that the flagship would arrive in Q3 of 2025 and even mentioned a possible price range. At present, Nothing has not revealed much about the specifications or what to expect. However, it is likely to follow its usual approach of gradually revealing features in the lead-up to the launch, something that has helped it maintain buzz in the to expect from the Nothing Phone (3)Although Nothing has kept most official details under wraps, Carl Pei has confirmed that the Phone (3) will bring major upgrades in performance, improved materials, and significant software enhancements compared to its predecessor. On the design front, the phone is expected to retain Nothing's signature transparent rear panel. However, we may see enhancements in the Glyph lighting system, offering users more customisation options and new interactive features with the Phone (3). There are also reports about a new Dot Matrix Glyph on the back which may display more advanced visual cues for notifications and real-time is also focusing heavily on AI, and the Nothing Phone (3) is expected to be the first flagship from the brand to integrate AI-driven features deeply into its user experience. Pei has previously discussed the role of AI in creating more personalised and intuitive smartphone year's budget Phone (3a) series and even the sub-brand CMF Phone (2) Pro include AI features like the TrueLens Engine 3 (an AI-powered camera system) and the Essential Key. So, we can expect Nothing to bring in these AI experiences with its true flagship and some more. The Phone (3) might also include features like context-aware UI suggestions, smarter voice commands, camera enhancements, and machine learning-powered battery Phone (3) chipset and performance upgradesUnder the hood, the Phone (3) is expected to be powered by a flagship chipset from Qualcomm Snapdragon. While the exact model hasn't been confirmed, rumours suggest it could be either the Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 or the Snapdragon 8 Gen 4. Given that the new flagship is arriving almost two years after its predecessor, the chipset upgrade is likely to represent a significant leap from the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 that powered the Phone (2), promising improved multitasking, gaming performance, and energy Phone (3) rumours: Display and batteryadvertisementOn the front, leaks suggest that the Phone (3) could sport a 6.77-inch 1.5K LTPO AMOLED display with a 120Hz adaptive refresh rate and peak brightness of up to 3,000 nits. The phone is also expected to house a 5,000mAh battery, with support for 50W wired and 20W wireless charging. There is no confirmation yet on whether a charger will be bundled in the box, although Nothing might include it for its Indian Phone (3) to get a powerful camera setup?This year, the budget phones from Nothing received serious camera hardware upgrades. So, for the flagship, we're expecting nothing but the best from the brand. According to leaks, the Phone (3) might feature a triple rear camera setup, including a high-resolution main sensor, an ultra-wide lens, and, for the first time, a periscope-style telephoto camera—a first for any Nothing device. On the front, the phone may offer either a 32-megapixel or a 50-megapixel Sony Phone (3) expected pricing in IndiaCarl Pei has hinted that the Phone (3) could be priced around EUR 800 globally, which roughly translates to Rs 90,500. However, Nothing is likely to adopt a more competitive pricing strategy in India, as it has done in the past. The Phone (2) launched at Rs 44,999, and while a sharp price jump is expected for the Phone (3), it's unlikely to be speculation suggests the device could be priced between Rs 55,000 and Rs 65,000 for the base variant. This price tag would put Phone 3 in direct competition with other flagships like the Pixel 9a, iPhone 16e, and the OnePlus 13.
Deccan Herald
14-05-2025
- Business
- Deccan Herald
Carl Pei reveals Phone 3's price range, Nothing's first true flagship coming soon
On the sidelines of Google's The Android Show, Nothing Inc. co-founder Carl Pei revealed that the upcoming Phone 2 successor will be a true flagship also gave a hint that Phone 3 will be priced around £800. Based on the Foreign exchange rates at the time of writing this article, it will approximately cost around $1,066 or Rs 91,066. If the latter, like the current crop of Nothing phones are assembled in India, the cost is likely to be less, probably anywhere between Rs 65,000 and Rs 75,000 it will be quite expensive compared to the Phone 2 (review). It came with three variants with a price ranging between Rs 45,000 and Rs 55, updates iconic 'G' favicon after a is an indication that Nothing Inc., which is just three years old in the industry, is ready to take on the established players such as Apple, Samsung, Google and OnePlus in the premium 2022, it started with mid-range prices starting at 31,999. Later launched lowered Phone (a) series and sub-brand CMF Phone series with prices ranging between Rs 15,000 and Rs 26, India, Nothing Inc. is the fastest-growing phone brand. Last year, as per Counterpoint Research report, the company recorded 577 per cent quarter (Q1, 2025), the London-based company clocked an amazing 156 per cent year-on-year growth in to Nothing's CMF Phone and Phone (a) series, Nothing Inc. led the growth for five consecutive quarters, a feat no other mobile brand has achieved in the past decade in India, reported International Data Corporation. Recently, Nothing launched two new handsets-- Phone (3a) and Phone (3a) Pro. They too are incredible upgrades over the Phone (3a) review: Bang for the with the Phone 3, Nothing will offer a new premium Android phone, alternative to Samsung's Galaxy S, OnePlus and Google Pixel Pei confirmed that Nothing Phone 3 will come with high-quality materials, big performance upgrades and a better software Chrome gets new AI feature to block online fraudsters on Android phones."Nothing OS is our vision for how AI should work, not just bolted on but built in. A system that learns from you and works with you -- less of a menu, more like a teammate. We're building the tech company we wish existed, one that creates with its community and brings joy and originality back to the category,' said Phone 3 is expected to launch by the end of June or early Phone (3a) Pro review: Feature-rich phone with cool the latest news on new launches, gadget reviews, apps, cybersecurity, and more on personal technology only on DH Tech.
Android Authority
10-05-2025
- Android Authority
Can you tell if a photo is from a $1,300 flagship or a $280 budget phone?
C. Scott Brown / Android Authority With every passing year, the cameras on a smartphone become almost as important as the smartphone itself. People know that pretty much any phone can do the 'phone' things they need, but not just any device can be the best camera phone on the market. As such, in the vast majority of cases, the reason you're paying a certain price for a phone is heavily influenced by the camera hardware you'll find there. But really, how far does this go? Is a phone that costs $1,300 really so much better than one that costs less than $300? Is there a $1,000+ difference between the photos you'll get on one versus the other? I decided to test to find out. I've pitted two very different phones sold at very different price points against one another to see how you really feel about the flagship vs budget phone camera debate. Flagship vs budget phone camera: Phones and methodology C. Scott Brown / Android Authority For this test, I used a Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra with a list price of $1,299 and a CMF Phone 2 Pro with a list price of $279. The Galaxy S25 Ultra is one of the best camera phones you can currently buy. It has a massive camera system, including a 200MP primary sensor, two telephotos (a 10MP 3x optical and a 50MP 5x optical), and a 50MP ultrawide. It also has a high-end 12MP selfie camera. Meanwhile, the CMF Phone 2 Pro has a much weaker hardware system. Its 50MP primary camera is smaller and lower resolution than the Galaxy S25 Ultra's. Likewise, its tiny 8MP ultrawide camera can't compare on paper, and its 16MP selfie camera is undoubtedly a cheaper bit of hardware than the one on Samsung's flagship. Notably, though, the CMF Phone 2 Pro has a 50MP telephoto lens (2x optical), which is rarely seen on a phone this inexpensive. For this test, I used out-of-the-box settings, no tripods, and didn't do any re-shoots. These are as close to real-life examples as I could get! For the tests below, I tried to make each shot match the other as closely as possible. I used out-of-the-box settings and focused on the standard features between both devices. For example, I didn't do a macro shot test because the CMF Phone 2 Pro's software does not support this feature. I also didn't do much setup. I held the phones in my hand (no tripods) and captured each photo with minimal tweaking. I didn't do any reshoots, either — the first photo from each setup is the one I went with. I feel this best reflects real-world usage. In each section, the two photos are unlabeled and in a different order. As you scroll through, pick which photo in each pair you think did the better job. When you get to the end of the article, I'll tell you which phone produced each photo, and you can see which phone you really prefer. One final note: all the photos here are compressed for site loading speed. If you want to see them in an uncompressed state, check out this Drive folder. Just don't use that to cheat! 1x in daylight Camera 1 Camera 2 This is the most basic shot imaginable. The sun was behind me, and I just took a quick snap of the park using the primary lens. Note how different these are in terms of exposure. The Camera 2 shot also has much more pronounced grass coloring, and shadows are much less distinct. This is especially apparent in the park bench behind the tree at the lower left. The gazebo (lower right) also has a weird blue tinge in the Camera 2 shot that isn't apparent in real life, nor in the Camera 1 photo. 1x texture closeup Camera 1 Camera 2 This isn't a macro shot, but it gives an idea of how each camera captures smaller details. Camera 2 did a much better job of stabilizing the image, reducing the blur you see around the lettering in the Camera 1 image. However, the Camera 2 image has some weird artifacts around the wood grain, which are not apparent in the Camera 1 image. Portrait mode Camera 1 Camera 2 This session produced the most significant difference between the two cameras. The coloring of Camera 1 looks very washed out, but the artificial bokeh seems pretty realistic. Meanwhile, the Camera 2 image has some nice coloring on the flowers, but the bokeh is flat-out terrible. I almost canned both of these and did a re-shoot, but I decided to stick to my rule and not do that. Standard selfie Camera 1 Camera 2 Ultimately, it's all about the details with this selfie example. Camera 1 shows a lot more skin details than Camera 2. But Camera 1 also pushed the colors of the plants in the background way too much. Still, the bright sunlight on my face was handled much better with Camera 1 than the washed-out, off-coloring produced with Camera 2. Portrait mode selfie Camera 1 Camera 2 Camera 1 did a pretty good job here, especially with the bokeh on the right side of my face. You can see the bokeh having some trouble around my hair in the upper left, but it still looks pretty good. Meanwhile, Camera 2's bokeh just looks like grain in the background, with no blurry softness that you would expect from a shot like this. The area around my hair in the upper left is also bizarre — it looks like it was just cropped out using Photoshop or something. 1x showing color Camera 1 Camera 2 We're starting to see some trends here. The Camera 1 image has some extremely pushed colors from its HDR effect, with shadows basically being non-existent. Look at the difference in shadowing on the slide — it's like the photos were taken at two different times of day (they weren't). The sky does look a lot better in the Camera 1 shot, though, at least in my opinion. 2x in daylight Camera 1 Camera 2 This was a tough call to make because the two phones don't have the same zoom capabilities. The CMF Phone 2 Pro has a 2x optical zoom while the Galaxy S25 Ultra uses digital cropping for 2x shots. I could have pushed the CMF Phone 2 Pro to 3x — which would have had it using a digital crop — and seen the Galaxy S25 Ultra's optical image, but I figured I should give this one to the CMF Phone 2 Pro since it's the budget phone. Anyway, one of these shots is 2x optical and the other is 2x digital — can you tell which is which? 10x in daylight Camera 1 Camera 2 This one is the opposite of the last one, with the Galaxy S25 Ultra having a distinct advantage since it uses a 5x optical zoom lens to create a 10x digital crop, while the CMF Phone 2 Pro creates a 10x digital crop based on a 2x lens. As such, this should be the easiest one to suss out of the whole bunch. HDR example in direct sunlight Camera 1 Camera 2 It's not in the shot, but the sun is directly above the gazebo, shining brightly over the California town of Novato. This would be a difficult shot for any phone camera, because all that sunlight can make it tough for even the best sensor to balance exposure correctly. There are some distinct, obvious differences between these two shots, but it is pretty incredible that the CMF Phone 2 Pro didn't buckle under the pressure. Which one do you think looks best? 0.6x in daylight Camera 1 Camera 2 The most glaring difference between these two photos is that one has real-life colors and the other looks like Technicolor-levels of coloring. However, looking at the grass on both sides of the Camera 1 image, you'll also see some blurry artifacts there. The tree half in the frame on the left side is particularly poor in the Camera 1 shot, too. Which one of these comes from the $1,300 camera? Night mode Camera 1 Camera 2 Like the Portrait mode example, one of the cameras flat-out failed this test. This room was pretty dark — not blackout dark, but light was scarce. My attempt to get Camera 1 to focus on anything was impossible, but Camera 2 also faced focus issues. I think both photos are poor, but one is obviously better than the other — but which phone made them? Flagship vs budget phone camera: The answers Ryan Haines / Android Authority OK, I hope you have your scorecard ready, because you're about to spoil the answers for yourself if you don't. Here are the cameras that shot each of the photos above: 1x in daylight: Camera 1 is Galaxy S25 Ultra; Camera 2 is Phone 2 Pro Camera 1 is Galaxy S25 Ultra; Camera 2 is Phone 2 Pro 1x texture closeup: Camera 1 is Phone 2 Pro; Camera 2 is Galaxy S25 Ultra Camera 1 is Phone 2 Pro; Camera 2 is Galaxy S25 Ultra Portrait mode: Camera 1 is Phone 2 Pro; Camera 2 is Galaxy S25 Ultra Camera 1 is Phone 2 Pro; Camera 2 is Galaxy S25 Ultra Standard selfie: Camera 1 is Galaxy S25 Ultra; Camera 2 is Phone 2 Pro Camera 1 is Galaxy S25 Ultra; Camera 2 is Phone 2 Pro Portrait mode selfie: Camera 1 is Galaxy S25 Ultra; Camera 2 is Phone 2 Pro Camera 1 is Galaxy S25 Ultra; Camera 2 is Phone 2 Pro 1x showing color: Camera 1 is Phone 2 Pro; Camera 2 is Galaxy S25 Ultra Camera 1 is Phone 2 Pro; Camera 2 is Galaxy S25 Ultra 2x in daylight: Camera 1 is Galaxy S25 Ultra; Camera 2 is Phone 2 Pro Camera 1 is Galaxy S25 Ultra; Camera 2 is Phone 2 Pro 10x in daylight: Camera 1 is Phone 2 Pro; Camera 2 is Galaxy S25 Ultra Camera 1 is Phone 2 Pro; Camera 2 is Galaxy S25 Ultra HDR example in direct sunlight: Camera 1 is Phone 2 Pro; Camera 2 is Galaxy S25 Ultra Camera 1 is Phone 2 Pro; Camera 2 is Galaxy S25 Ultra 0.6x in daylight: Camera 1 is Galaxy S25 Ultra; Camera 2 is Phone 2 Pro Camera 1 is Galaxy S25 Ultra; Camera 2 is Phone 2 Pro Night mode: Camera 1 is Phone 2 Pro; Camera 2 is Galaxy S25 Ultra If you sum up all the best photos — and by 'best,' I mean the ones that are objectively superior in quality, coloring, focus, etc. — the Galaxy S25 Ultra is the clear winner on my scorecard. However, that wasn't the case 100% of the time. The Galaxy S25 Ultra's portrait mode fail was especially egregious. Yes, I could have stood there and re-focused the shot and tried to improve it, but the fact that I had to do that with a $1,300 phone and not a $280 phone is pretty ridiculous. Galaxy S25 Ultra vs CMF Phone 2 Pro: Who won? 1 votes Galaxy S25 Ultra won it all 100 % CMF Phone 2 Pro won it all 0 % Both phones did pretty good 0 % Both phones are bad 0 % What's also remarkable to me is that the CMF Phone 2 Pro clearly can't match the Galaxy S25 Ultra, but it still holds its own reasonably well. Yes, it failed the night mode shot dismally, and I wouldn't use the ultrawide camera for anything ever, but everything else was more than fine. Just look at the HDR example shot. Yes, the Galaxy S25 Ultra's photo is better, but is it $1,000 better? I don't think so. In other words, the Galaxy S25 Ultra wins, but the CMF Phone 2 Pro proves that you don't need to spend over $1,000 to get a camera that can deliver adequate results, at least in good lighting. What do you think? Were you surprised by the outcome of any of these examples? Let me know your thoughts in the comments, and be sure to choose something in the poll above!
