logo
#

Latest news with #Cayman

VC legal dispute threatens biotech startups
VC legal dispute threatens biotech startups

Axios

time16 hours ago

  • Business
  • Axios

VC legal dispute threatens biotech startups

Apple Tree Partners has invested billions of dollars to launch and grow biotech companies, but now a legal dispute threatens to shut many of them down. The big picture: Apple Tree has an unusual structure for a venture capital firm, according to court documents filed in Delaware and the Cayman Islands. Since 2012 it's been almost entirely funded by one man, a Russian oligarch named Dmitry Rybolovlev. If that name sounds familiar, it's probably because you remember his unsuccessful art fraud allegations against auction house Sotheby's. Rybolovlev made more than $2.4 billion of commitments to Apple Tree, but not via a blind pool. Instead, Apple Tree would propose "budgets" for new portfolio companies for approval by Rybolovlev or a representative of his family office. Zoom in: This concentrated capital arrangement was risky for Apple Tree portfolio companies, particularly given that Apple Tree sought to be their only investor via tranched financings. The protection was a "global default" provision. Were Rybolovlev to refuse a valid capital call, the fund could confiscate up to 50% of his interests. Behind the scenes: According to a lawsuit filed by Apple Tree, this arrangement worked fine until shortly after Russia's invasion of Ukraine. After that, Apple Tree claims that Rybolovlev got stingy. By September 2022, his family office allegedly said it only would approve "austerity" budgets going forward. There were some legal wranglings in the Caymans, which got resolved. Fast forward: Last month, Apple Tree issued over $100 million in capital calls — $87 million of which is earmarked for up to 10 portfolio companies. This is according to a Cayman's complaint by Rybolovlev because much of Apple Tree's filing in Delaware is redacted. He claims that he is not legally obligated to pay because, in part, the companies haven't met certain milestones. Moreover, he accuses Apple Tree of "serious mismanagement and a lack of probity." Apple Tree calls the situation "an emergency," saying that several of its portfolio companies "face imminent collapse." In fact, a source tells Axios that one of them has already signaled its plans to shutter. Look ahead: The firm is asking the court for specific performance (i.e., require that Rybolovlev meet his capital call), and argues that Rybolovlev actually wants them to struggle and sell to him on the cheap.

New Self-Employment Tax Risks For U.S. Investors In Global Funds
New Self-Employment Tax Risks For U.S. Investors In Global Funds

Forbes

time18-06-2025

  • Business
  • Forbes

New Self-Employment Tax Risks For U.S. Investors In Global Funds

A new Tax Court ruling is a warning for U.S. limited partners in global funds, imposing new ... More self-employment (SECA) tax risks. U.S. limited partners in foreign funds like Cayman or Luxembourg partnerships must ensure passive roles to avoid costly SECA tax liabilities. The U.S. Tax Court decided Soroban Capital Partners LP v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo 2025-52) in May 2025 leaving financial, tax and legal advisors concerned. The court upended assumptions about the self-employment tax exemption for limited partners in hedge funds, and by analogy to venture capital, and private equity partnerships both in the U.S. and abroad. U.S. citizens and green card holders who are limited partners in hedge funds or similar businesses, including those in foreign countries, should understand the effects of this decision. The case signals a shift away from a state or local law definition of a 'limited partner' toward a more comprehensive evaluation of the partner's actual role to determine if the 'limited partner' exclusion from Self-Employment Contributions Act taxes should apply. The Soroban court applied a 'functional analysis test' to determine whether limited partners' distributive share of partnership income is subject to SECA taxes. The decision has far-reaching SECA implications for how limited partners will structure their roles and manage their tax obligations. This article explores the Soroban ruling, what it means for U.S. limited partners, especially for those working with hedge funds or other businesses abroad that use a limited partnership structure. First, it is helpful to understand generally why funds often use a limited partnership vehicle. A limited partnership for U.S. purposes is comprised of both general and limited partners. General partners manage the fund and have unlimited liability. Limited partners contribute capital, and their liability is limited to their investment. The limited partnership structure is tax transparent for U.S. tax purposes, meaning it provides pass-through taxation of income, credits and deductions to its partners. The partnership entity itself is not subject to U.S. income tax, and the partners report their distributive shares on their individual U.S. tax returns. The structure also provides significant flexibility in governance. For all these reasons, the limited partnership is often ideal for private funds. Self-employment income is taxed at a rate of 15.3% (12.4% for Social Security and 2.9% for Medicare). A SECA exclusion exists under Internal Revenue Code Section 1402(a)(13) for a limited partner's distributive share of partnership income. The Tax Court rejected the notion that state law classifications of limited partners should be determinative for purposes of this exclusion. Instead, it applied a functional analysis test to Soroban's limited partners and concluded that these partners were 'limited in name only.' As such, the limited partners' distributive share did not qualify for the SECA exclusion. The court carefully examined the activities of the limited partners and found they were heavily involved in generating the partnership's income by overseeing day-to-day management, working full-time for the business, and that marketing material listed them as essential to the success of the partnership. In addition, the capital contributions made by the limited partners were viewed as insignificant when compared to the fees Soroban charged. This comparison suggested that the limited partner's distributive share was not a passive return on investment but rather compensation for active participation. The label 'limited partner' alone, is not enough to guarantee the SECA exclusion. Instead, the functional analysis test requires a thorough analysis of the facts and a careful examination of the partner's role in the enterprise. The factors include how integral the partner is in generating revenue, the degree of participation in the business, whether the partner is working full-time in the business, whether marketing materials indicate the partner plays a key role and whether the partner's capital investments truly reflect a passive investment. For U.S. limited partners, particularly those in hedge funds or other investment vehicles, the Soroban holding invites the IRS and courts to closely scrutinize the actual activities of limited partners to determine SECA liability. While the Soroban case focused on a U.S. hedge fund, its principles can apply to any partnership structure in which U.S. citizens or green card holders are limited partners. The holding can apply to a vast range of industries operating globally where U.S. partners are contributing expertise and management. Private equity firms, venture capital funds, and other businesses often use a limited partnership structure. A limited partner in an overseas real estate partnership or tech startup fund could face scrutiny if the role involves active management or income generation. Only truly passive investors are meant to benefit from the SECA exclusion and while local law will be important in the analysis, the IRS will be looking beyond any local law label of 'limited partner' to scrutinize eligibility. Various jurisdictions have limited partnership structures closely resembling the U.S. model. The most popular jurisdictions having limited liability for limited partners as well as generally having flow-through tax treatment include the Cayman Islands, British Virgin Islands, Luxembourg, Hong Kong and Ireland. While these jurisdictions appeal to global funds because of their tax and regulatory regimes which parallel the U.S. in important respects, limited partners should be ready to consider a heightened compliance burden given the holding in Soroban. Adding to the additional possible tax burden, the U.S. limited partner abroad will be unhappy to learn that self-employment income subject to SECA tax is not reduced by the foreign earned income exclusion. U.S. limited partners should reassess their involvement in the partnership to make sure they qualify as passive investors entitled to the SECA exclusion. This may mean a significant reduction of day-to-day management responsibilities or restructuring their roles to emphasize capital investment over active participation. For U.S. limited partners in foreign funds, the statute of limitations for SECA tax assessments is generally three years from the due date or actual filing date of the income tax return, whichever is later. However, the statute of limitations for tax matters can be extended several years and even indefinitely, depending on the facts. Crucially, if a U.S. partner fails to file a required foreign information return, such as Form 8938 (Statement of Specified Foreign Financial Assets) or Form 8865 (Return of U.S. Persons With Respect to Certain Foreign Partnerships), the statute of limitations does not start for the entire tax return. This gives the IRS the ability to assess SECA tax at any time in the future. U.S. limited partners should be proactive and planning for a possible IRS challenge to a claimed exclusion from SECA. U.S. limited partners should first consult an experienced tax advisor to assess their involvement in the fund and optimize tax outcomes. Next, meticulously document management roles, time commitments, and public representation to ensure compliance with IRS scrutiny and minimize the risk of tax exposure. Partnership agreements should be examined. If feasible, partnership agreements may need to be amended to clarify the role of limited partners as passive investors, emphasizing capital contributions over operational involvement. Limited partners who blur the line between passive investment and active management could find a surprising increase in their U.S. tax liability with their distributive shares subject to SECA taxes. The Soroban case may be appealed, and staying informed on this topic is critical. Investors should be looking out for any future IRS guidance or legislation that might refine the functional analysis test. I help with tax matters around the globe. Reach me at vljeker@ Visit my US tax blog

ZTO Express (Cayman)'s (NYSE:ZTO) Returns On Capital Are Heading Higher
ZTO Express (Cayman)'s (NYSE:ZTO) Returns On Capital Are Heading Higher

Yahoo

time15-06-2025

  • Business
  • Yahoo

ZTO Express (Cayman)'s (NYSE:ZTO) Returns On Capital Are Heading Higher

What are the early trends we should look for to identify a stock that could multiply in value over the long term? One common approach is to try and find a company with returns on capital employed (ROCE) that are increasing, in conjunction with a growing amount of capital employed. If you see this, it typically means it's a company with a great business model and plenty of profitable reinvestment opportunities. Speaking of which, we noticed some great changes in ZTO Express (Cayman)'s (NYSE:ZTO) returns on capital, so let's have a look. AI is about to change healthcare. These 20 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10bn in marketcap - there is still time to get in early. For those that aren't sure what ROCE is, it measures the amount of pre-tax profits a company can generate from the capital employed in its business. The formula for this calculation on ZTO Express (Cayman) is: Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities) 0.19 = CN¥12b ÷ (CN¥93b - CN¥29b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to March 2025). Therefore, ZTO Express (Cayman) has an ROCE of 19%. On its own, that's a standard return, however it's much better than the 13% generated by the Logistics industry. See our latest analysis for ZTO Express (Cayman) In the above chart we have measured ZTO Express (Cayman)'s prior ROCE against its prior performance, but the future is arguably more important. If you're interested, you can view the analysts predictions in our free analyst report for ZTO Express (Cayman) . Investors would be pleased with what's happening at ZTO Express (Cayman). The numbers show that in the last five years, the returns generated on capital employed have grown considerably to 19%. The company is effectively making more money per dollar of capital used, and it's worth noting that the amount of capital has increased too, by 67%. This can indicate that there's plenty of opportunities to invest capital internally and at ever higher rates, a combination that's common among multi-baggers. For the record though, there was a noticeable increase in the company's current liabilities over the period, so we would attribute some of the ROCE growth to that. Essentially the business now has suppliers or short-term creditors funding about 31% of its operations, which isn't ideal. Keep an eye out for future increases because when the ratio of current liabilities to total assets gets particularly high, this can introduce some new risks for the business. All in all, it's terrific to see that ZTO Express (Cayman) is reaping the rewards from prior investments and is growing its capital base. Given the stock has declined 50% in the last five years, this could be a good investment if the valuation and other metrics are also appealing. So researching this company further and determining whether or not these trends will continue seems justified. On the other side of ROCE, we have to consider valuation. That's why we have a that is definitely worth checking out. For those who like to invest in solid companies, check out this free list of companies with solid balance sheets and high returns on equity. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Sign in to access your portfolio

9 cars set to be axed in 2025 including two really recognisable vehicles
9 cars set to be axed in 2025 including two really recognisable vehicles

Daily Mirror

time09-06-2025

  • Automotive
  • Daily Mirror

9 cars set to be axed in 2025 including two really recognisable vehicles

As manufacturers respond to new regulations, electrification and changing consumer demand, motorists after these models must act swiftly, otherwise they'll be gone for good A number of the UK's much-loved motorcar models will be axed by the end of the year, marking a huge shift in the automotive landscape. While the UK accelerates its transition over to electric vehicles, certain models are being retired to better align with evolving consumer tastes and make way for newer technology. For years, drivers of electric, zero, or low-emission cars were offered huge cash benefits, such as vehicle tax discounts and exemptions from the 'Expensive Car Road Tax'. ‌ While many of these incentives have been cut, which you can learn more about here, Brits are still being encouraged to go for cleaner vehicles. As manufacturers prepare for stricter emissions regulations, here are nine cars confirmed to be discontinued by the end of 2025 — if they haven't been canned already — including some of the most recognisable and iconic brands on the road. ‌ 1. Lexus LS After 35 years on sale, the ultra-luxury Lexus LS saloon is being discontinued in the UK due to poor sales. Once hailed as a game-changer when it launched in 1990, the LS helped establish Lexus as a serious competitor to European and American luxury brands. The final generation, the LS 500, launched in 2017 and was updated in 2020. Despite a starting price of over £100,000, only 39 hybrid V6 models have been sold since 2020, with just three last year, leading to its demise in the UK market. 2. Mazda2 Mazda confirmed in February 2025 that the Mazda2 supermini, which has been on sale in its most current iteration for a decade — the earliest version was launched in the UK in 2003 — is no longer available to order. Known for its fun driving experience, the petrol and mild-hybrid versions have been replaced by the Mazda2 Hybrid, essentially a rebadged Toyota Yaris. Mazda cited a shift towards electrification and consumer demand for hybrids as reasons for the change, aiming for all their cars to have some form of electrification by 2030. A Mazda spokesperson told Autocar: "As we move towards increased electrification of our cars, the Mazda 2 Hybrid meets consumer demand in the B-segment and is a step in our journey to ensure all our cars have some form of electrification by 2030." ‌ 3. Mazda MX-30 Mazda's first and only electric car, the MX-30, is also being discontinued after just four years. Launched in 2021 as an EV or plug-in hybrid, it struggled due to its limited range of just 124 miles and cramped cabin space. The smaller battery was chosen to reduce weight and emissions but caused range anxiety among drivers. While the fully electric MX-30 is being axed, the plug-in hybrid version remains available in the UK. 4. & 5. Porsche Boxster & Cayman ‌ Porsche announced that production of the petrol-powered 718 Boxster and Cayman will end in October 2025. These iconic sports cars have no confirmed electric replacements yet, but an electric successor is expected eventually. Sales in Europe ceased in summer 2024 due to new EU cybersecurity rules, though the UK market continues unaffected post-Brexit. Porsche's head of production confirmed the global end of petrol 718 models by October 2025. 6. Nissan GT-R The Nissan GT-R R35, first unveiled in 2007, has been unavailable in the UK for some time. Production ended in Japan in early 2025, marking the loss of its final market. It was discontinued in the UK and Europe in 2022, and in the USA and Canada in 2024. Nissan's financial difficulties could delay or derail plans for a fully electric GT-R successor, making this a significant moment for fans of the iconic "Godzilla" sports car. ‌ 7. & 8. Audi A1 & Q2 Audi shocked the market by announcing the end of production for the popular A1 hatchback and Q2 crossover in 2026. Both are among Audi's cheapest and best-selling models, but neither is sold in the US or China. Audi plans no direct successor for the A1, instead focusing on a new entry-level electric vehicle to serve as an alternative to the A3 and Q3, reflecting the brand's shift toward electrification. Audi CEO Gernot Döllner told Autocar that the manufacturer 'will end production of the A1 and Q2' in 2026, and that there 'definitely will be no successor for the A1'. He added: "We will also see the car that will enter production next year in Ingolstadt [where Audi is based], which will be our entry BEV in the A-segment". ‌ 9. Ford Focus ST After 23 years, the Ford Focus ST is being taken off sale in the UK, with production ending in November 2025. The ST could still be ordered as recently as April, but has now disappeared from dealer price lists. Ford said in a statement: "There are no new factory orders available for the Focus ST at the moment, but there are around 170 built and unsold currently available within the UK dealer network. This includes 30 of the special ST Edition variant in Azura Blue." The retirement of these nine models signals a much larger shift in the motoring world. As manufacturers respond to new regulations, electrification, and changing consumer demand, fans still after these models need to act fast, otherwise they'll be gone forever.

Caymanian Queen Jada Ramoon Ready to Fly the Cayman Islands Flag at Miss World Final
Caymanian Queen Jada Ramoon Ready to Fly the Cayman Islands Flag at Miss World Final

Yahoo

time30-05-2025

  • Entertainment
  • Yahoo

Caymanian Queen Jada Ramoon Ready to Fly the Cayman Islands Flag at Miss World Final

Miss World Cayman Islands, Jada Ramoon, competes in the 72nd Miss World pageant tomorrow (31st May) in Telangana, India. George Town, Cayman Islands, May 30, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Jada Ramoon, Miss World Cayman Islands, is preparing to take centre stage tomorrow, Saturday 31st May, as she competes in the 72nd Miss World pageant in Telangana, India. The pageant's red carpet will commence at 7 a.m. Cayman time, with the main event beginning at 8 a.m, which can be seen on TVJ, channel 30 on Logic TV. Representing the Cayman Islands with grace and determination, Jada has taken part in a series of preliminary challenges over recent weeks, including Talent, Head-to-Head, Sports, Multimedia and Beauty with a Purpose. She secured placements in both the Talent and Head-to-Head competitions—a remarkable achievement on the world stage. Reflecting on her journey thus far, Jada shared: "I'm feeling a mixture of nerves and excitement as Saturday draws near. I'm hopeful that I can continue to make history for Cayman. I'm truly grateful for how things have unfolded so far; it's been a humbling and incredible experience. I'm proud to be here, representing the place I love and proudly call home." Beyond the competition, Jada has embraced the opportunity to learn about the vibrant culture of Telangana, bond with her fellow contestants, and share the values and heritage of the Cayman Islands with a global audience. Homecoming: The Cayman Islands public is warmly invited to welcome Jada upon her return. She is scheduled to arrive at Owen Roberts International Airport on Monday, 2nd June at 4:30 p.m. To learn more about Jada's journey and the Miss World competition, please refer to our previous release or follow the official Miss World Cayman Islands channels. About Storytellers: Storytellers is a Cayman Islands based digital PR and news company specialising in strategic communications, media relations, and digital content creation. The company works with global businesses, organisations, and public figures to amplify their stories and connect with audiences across North America, the Caribbean, UAE, Canada, China, and beyond. Media Contact: Publicity Partner Storytellers Qamar Zaman T: 1-345-327-7206 Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store