Latest news with #ChineseMilitary
The Guardian
a day ago
- Politics
- The Guardian
Top Chinese general ousted from body that oversees China's military
A top Chinese general has been dismissed from the body that oversees the Chinese military in the latest sign that Xi Jinping's anti-corruption drive has reached the highest echelons of the armed forces. Miao Hua, a senior admiral from the People's Liberation Army (PLA) navy, was the director of the political work department of the central military commission (CMC), making him responsible for ideology and loyalty within the armed forces. The six-person CMC is one of the most powerful institutions in China and is headed by Xi himself. On Friday, a statement from the Chinese government confirmed that Miao had been dismissed. He was suspended last year and placed under investigation for 'serious violations of discipline', a byword for corruption. He was expelled from the National People's Congress, China's parliament, in April. The dismissal makes Miao one of the highest-ranking CMC officials to be purged since the 1960s, and the latest in a rush of senior military figures targeted. He Weidong, a vice-chair of the CMC, is also reported to be under investigation. The CMC is the governing body of the PLA, and oversees China's coastguard. Xi is the chair of the CMC, as well as being the leader of China's ruling Communist party (CCP) and the president. Miao's dismissal reflects the latest ructions in China's armed forces. Beijing is keen to present an image of strength and stability on the world stage. The purges risk disrupting that image, although at a time when global attention is focused on wars in the Middle East and Ukraine, senior personnel changes in China's military may garner less attention. US-China military dialogue, seen as essential for avoiding accidental conflicts, particularly in the Taiwan strait, have been limited under the presidency of Donald Trump, who has also fired several senior military officials. US military representatives travelled to Shanghai for talks in April, but there have been no public signs of high-ranking meetings. The US and Chinese defence ministers sometimes meet at the Shangri-la Dialogue, an annual defence forum which was held in Singapore last month. But this year China only sent a small, lower-ranking delegation. In the past two years, Xi has dismissed two defence ministers, Li Shangfu and Wei Fenghe; two heads of the PLA's rocket force, which is responsible for missiles and the nuclear arsenal, and two senior CMC officials. Senior aerospace and defence business leaders have also been removed from a CCP advisory body. Many of the recent oustings appear to be related to an investigation into corruption in military procurement. Li, who was dismissed as defence minister in 2023 and expelled from the CCP last year, previously led the equipment procurement department. Several of his associates from the military and the equipment procurement department were also purged. Miao is the eighth member of the CMC to be ousted since Xi took power in 2012. The expulsion of CMC members was previously unheard of since the era of Mao Zedong. Xi took power with a promise to root out corruption in China, vowing to come after both the 'tigers and the flies'. Since then, millions of officials have been investigated, and hundreds of thousands reportedly penalised, including high-profile people being expelled or prosecuted. Having now ruled for more than a decade, however, many of the senior figures coming into the crosshairs of anti-corruption campaigns are people, such as Miao and Li, who Xi had personally appointed, raising questions about his ability to vet important appointments. One of the most high-profile of Xi's picks to fall was the former foreign minister Qin Gang. Qin disappeared from public view in June 2023, drawing global attention as one of China's most public-facing officials. Speculation that he was under investigation ran rampant until October when Beijing announced he had been removed from his post. No reason was given.
The Guardian
a day ago
- Politics
- The Guardian
Top Chinese general ousted from body that oversees China's military
A top Chinese general has been purged from the body that overseas the Chinese military in the latest sign that Xi Jinping's anti-corruption drive has reached the highest echelons of the armed forces. Miao Hua, a senior admiral from the People's Liberation Army (PLA) navy, was the director of the political work department of the central military commission (CMC), making him responsible for ideology and loyalty within the armed forces. The six-person CMC is one of the most powerful institutions in China and is headed by Xi, China's leader. On Friday, a statement from the Chinese government confirmed that Miao had been dismissed. He was suspended last year and placed under investigation for 'serious violations of discipline', a byword for corruption. He was expelled from the National People's Congress, China's parliament, in April. The dismissal makes Miao one of the highest ranking CMC officials to be purged since the 1960s, and the latest in a rush of senior military figures targeted. He Weidong, a vice-chair of the CMC, is also reported to be under investigation. The CMC is the governing body of the PLA, and also oversees China's coastguard. Xi is the chair of the CMC, as well as being the leader of China's ruling Communist party (CCP) and the president. Miao's dismissal reflects the latest ructions in China's armed forces. Beijing is keen to present an image of strength and stability on the world stage. The purges risk disrupting that image, although at a time when global attention is focused on wars in the Middle East and Ukraine, senior personnel changes in China's military leadership may garner less attention. US-China military dialogue, seen as essential for avoiding accidental conflicts, particularly in the Taiwan strait, have been limited under the presidency of Donald Trump, who has also fired several senior military officials. US military representatives travelled to Shanghai for talks in April, but there have been no public signs of high-ranking meetings. The US and Chinese defence ministers sometimes meet at the Shangri-la Dialogue, an annual defence forum held in Singapore last month. But this year China only sent a small, lower-ranking delegation. In the past two years, Xi has purged two defence ministers, Li Shangfu and Wei Fenghe, two heads of the PLA's rocket force – responsible for missiles and the nuclear arsenal – and two senior CMC officials. Senior aerospace and defence business leaders have also been removed from a CCP advisory body. Many of the recent purges appear to be related to an investigation into corruption in military procurement. Li, who was ousted as defence minister in 2023 and expelled from the CCP last year, previously led the equipment procurement department. Several of his associates from the military and the equipment procurement department were also purged. Miao is the eighth member of the CMC to be ousted since Xi took power in 2012. The expulsion of CMC members was previously unheard of since the era of Mao Zedong. Xi took power with a promise to root out corruption in China, vowing to come after both the 'tigers and the flies'. Since then, millions of officials have been investigated, and hundreds of thousands reportedly penalised, including high profile expulsions or prosecutions. But having now ruled for more than a decade, many of the senior figures coming into the crosshairs of anti-corruption campaigns are people, like Miao and Li, who Xi had personally appointed, raising questions about his ability to suitably vet important appointments. One of the most high-profile of Xi's picks to fall was former foreign minister Qin Gang. Qin disappeared from public view in June 2023, drawing global attention as one of China's most public-facing officials. Speculation that he was under investigation ran rampant until October when Beijing announced he had been removed from his post. No reason was given.
South China Morning Post
3 days ago
- Politics
- South China Morning Post
US bunker-busting GBU-57 in Iran: experts in China assess combat debut
Chinese military analysts have closely followed Saturday's US strikes on Iranian facilities, and especially the bombs used – the GBU-57, a powerful 'bunker buster' designed to penetrate deeply buried targets. While praising the success of the B-2's long-range delivery and the bunker buster's performance, they also pointed out the limitations in its effectiveness, especially against sites like Fordow that are deep underground. Mainland China is believed to have the world's most extensive underground bunker systems and its own bunker-busting weapons , as well as ambitions to target facilities, including those deep within the mountains of Taiwan. What did the US bomber strike entail and how is the action viewed by Chinese military analysts? And what is China's approach to the development of its own bunker-busting arsenal? Combat debut A total of 14 GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrators (MOPs) were dropped by seven B-2 stealth bombers in the early hours of Sunday local time, striking Iran's heavily fortified Fordow nuclear site as well as facilities at Natanz.
South China Morning Post
5 days ago
- Politics
- South China Morning Post
Is China preparing to unveil its new HQ-29 ballistic missile defence system?
Footage on social media of what appears to be the new Chinese HQ-29 ballistic missile defence system on the move has triggered speculation that it could make its debut at a military parade in Beijing in September. The system has yet to be officially acknowledged but is believed to be more advanced than known Chinese missile shields including the HQ-19 , which has been likened to the US Terminal High Altitude Area Defence (THAAD) system. A video clip posted on Tuesday to Chinese social media shows the six-axle transporter erector launcher – a vehicle used to transport and launch missiles – carrying two large missile canisters, each about 1.5 metres (4.9 feet) in diameter. According to the post, the vehicle was headed towards Beijing and it was suggested that could be in preparation for its first public appearance, at a military parade on September 3 marking the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II. The system seen in the video looks much like the transporter erector launcher spotted on a road in March, which military watchers at the time speculated was the new HQ-29. Screenshots of the clip posted last week have been widely circulated on social media, reigniting discussion about China's multilayered ballistic missile defence shield – of which the HQ-29 is seen as the missing top layer.
Arab News
7 days ago
- Business
- Arab News
Pakistan says sharing battlefield intel with China on India air war last month
ISLAMABAD: Pakistan's Defense Minister Khawaja Asif said this week it was 'very normal' for Islamabad to share battlefield intelligence with close ally China in the aftermath of last month's brief but intense military confrontation with India, though he downplayed suggestions Beijing played a direct operational role or provided decisive satellite support during the aerial fight. The May 7–10 conflict — the heaviest fighting in decades — has drawn significant interest from Western militaries, security observers and diplomats, who see it as a rare opportunity for China to study the performance of Indian pilots, fighter jets, air defense systems and air-to-air missiles in real combat conditions. With Beijing locked in its own longstanding border disputes and strategic rivalry with New Delhi, analysts believe any Pakistani data trove could sharpen China's military readiness. China is already Pakistan's principal supplier of military hardware, providing fighter jets, missiles, submarines and surveillance technology. The two neighbors share a strategic alliance driven in part by their disputes with India, which has fought wars with both nations. Close economic and security ties, anchored by the multi-billion-dollar China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), has further strengthened the relationship. 'It is very normal if we are sharing any information which we have which can threaten us or the Chinese because the Chinese also have problems with India,' Asif told Arab News in an interview this week when questioned if Pakistan was sharing intelligence with Beijing on Indian use of air defenses and launches of cruise and ballistic missiles, as well as command and control information. 'I think it's very natural if we share intelligence which is gathered through satellites or gathered through other means.' In the military confrontation that began on May 7, Indian fighter jets bombed what New Delhi called 'terrorist infrastructure' in Pakistan in response to an April 22 attack in Indian-administered Kashmir that killed 26 people, mostly tourists. Islamabad denied involvement in the Kashmir assault but retaliated to the Indian airstrikes with tit-for-tat military action that involved fighter jets, drones, missiles and artillery. A ceasefire was brokered by the US and announced on May 10. Pakistan said its Chinese jets shot down at least six Indian military planes, including three French-made Rafales, during the four days of clashes. General Anil Chauhan, India's chief of defense staff, has admitted that an unspecified number of its jets were lost. 'MADE IN PAKISTAN' VICTORY The London-based International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) says China now operates at least 115 satellites dedicated to intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance, and 81 for monitoring military electronic and signals data, a network second only to the United States and far ahead of India's capabilities. According to two Islamabad-based Western diplomats involved in the May ceasefire negotiations and one Pakistani security official, all of whom requested anonymity, 44 of these satellites were at Pakistan's disposal during the conflict with India. The Western officials suggest the Chinese satellite and signals intelligence may have assisted Pakistan in monitoring Indian troop and missile movements during the air war, possibly giving Pakistan a real-time edge. The Pakistani defense minister rejected the claims. 'You are underestimating the ability of our armed forces,' Asif said, cautioning against downplaying Pakistan's own capabilities in electronic warfare and precision targeting. Asked directly about the use of Chinese satellite capabilities for any kind of support during the fighting, the defense chief said: 'I don't know and I don't think so … We are very advanced as far as this warfare is concerned … China's help is always, always very valuable … but this fight was Pakistani, the victory is 'Made in Pakistan'.' He also denied that Chinese personnel were able to monitor the fighting in real time or access Pakistan Air Force monitoring systems during the May 7–10 period. 'No, I don't think so they had any access. They were watching the situation very closely, as a neighbor, as a friend,' Asif said. 'But I'll again assert that this war was fought by our boys and girls.' While Asif noted that Pakistan sourced most of its military hardware — including submarines, aircraft and weapons — from China, as well as some from Turkiye, the United States and European countries, he maintained that the actual fighting remained fully under Pakistani command. 'So, in that backdrop [of China being a major defense supplier], you can always speculate that China was very helpful to us in this conflict,' he said. 'But physical participation or participation through satellites or through other means, I don't think so.' China has been Pakistan's closest defense partner since the 1960s and the Pakistan Air Force operates a fleet of Chinese JF-10C multirole fighters, and JF-17 Thunder planes, jointly developed and assembled in Pakistan to reduce dependence on Western defense equipment. After the India standoff, Beijing is also widely reported to be fast-tracking the sale of fifth-generation J-35 stealth jets to Islamabad, potentially giving Pakistan deep-strike capabilities into Indian airspace. Asked if the J-35 jets would be delivered in 2026 as suggested in recent media reports, Asif responded: 'I think it's only in the media, you know. It's only in the media and it's good for sales, Chinese defense sales.' NUCLEAR ALERT POSTURE? A full-scale war between India and Pakistan — both nuclear powers — remains one of the most dangerous strategic flashpoints in the world. Experts have long warned that even limited, high-intensity skirmishes run the risk of unintended escalation toward nuclear war. Asked if last month's clash had triggered any consideration of moving to a nuclear alert posture, Asif was categorical: 'No… Absolutely, with certainty I can say that.' He also dismissed the idea that Pakistan had considered launching a broader conventional offensive across the border, saying modern warfare was no longer dependent on crossing territorial lines: 'Now you don't have to cross the border. You don't have to capture the territory. Capturing territory or crossing over... that is something which is obsolete. War is being fought now... cyber.' The defense minister also said there had been no back-channel diplomacy between Islamabad and New Delhi following the May 10 ceasefire, although military operations heads in both countries had been in contact via a hotline. And while the Pakistan-India clash may have faded from global headlines amid the ongoing crisis between Israel and Iran in the Middle East, Asif said India remained Pakistan's most pressing security concern. 'We have been on alert so we have not lowered guards, that I can confirm,' the defense minister said, particularly due to concerns Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi could resort to fresh military action as he was under pressure from a public questioning how Pakistani forces struck military facilities deep inside the country and downed Indian jets. Modi also has domestic political pressures to manage ahead of elections in Bihar, a pivotal swing state that is crucial for both national and state-level power equations. 'Modi has internal compulsions to avenge [the May conflict] … There are elections around the corner… and his popularity has plummeted, his political opponents can smell blood, politically,' Asif said. 'That can drive him to some desperate measures, otherwise, I don't think so there is a possibility of some replay of what happened a month back.'
