Latest news with #ChrisMcGovern
Daily Mail
3 days ago
- Daily Mail
How much parents will save on holidays at the Norfolk schools offering an extra week off at half-term
Parents whose children are being given an extra week off this autumn half-term for 'cheaper holidays' can cut the price of a trip abroad by nearly 50 per cent. Pupils in some areas are having the break extended from one week to two – with school days then extended slightly throughout the year to make up the deficit. But critics have attacked the 'ridiculous' changes, warning that they are more about 'making life easy for teachers' and are 'dumbing down' education – while claiming parents will struggle to take time off or arrange childcare during the time off. Schools spearheading the revolution include North Walsham High School and Long Stratton High School, both run by the same trust in Norfolk. One of the headteachers claimed the change would help parents avoid price hikes by holiday firms at peak times and reduce staff absence by giving them a 'better break'. But Chris McGovern, from the Campaign for Real Education, said: 'We have to ask what's more important – a passport to Majorca or a passport to [children's] futures?' To analyse the difference, research by MailOnline looked at the comparative costs of going abroad during the autumn half-term later this year of Saturday, October 25 to November 1 - and the extra week for the schools between November 1 and 8. Prices were analysed for a family of four – two adults and two children aged 13, for the cheapest all-inclusive package holiday to Benidorm in Spain for seven days. The biggest difference was with easyJet Holidays, where a trip to the three-star Magic Cristal Park Hotel is £2,143 during the half-term week, or £1,189 the week after. The same hotel was available with Tui for £2,236 in half-term or £1,576 the week after; or with On The Beach for £1,813 in half-term or £1,440 the week after. Separate research by On The Beach has found more children are taken out of school for holidays this week than in any other term-time week of the year. What is the fine for taking your child on holiday in term-time? Parents in England can face paying a fine for unauthorised term time holidays under national rules – although individual councils decide when these should be issued. All schools have to consider a fine when a child has missed ten or more sessions – which equates to five days, morning and afternoon - for unauthorised reasons. Since August last year, the fine for school absences across the country has been set at £80 if paid within 21 days, or £160 if paid within 28 days. But if a parent receives a second fine for the same child within any three-year period, the fine will be charged at a higher rate of £160. Fines per parent are capped to two fines within any three-year period. Once this limit is reached, other actions can be considered such as a parenting order or even prosecution. Someone who is prosecuted and attends court because their child has not been attending school can be fined up to £2,500. It added that term-time breaks are up to £649 cheaper than school summer holidays, despite the threat of an £80 fine for a week's unauthorised absence. The difference was calculated by taking the average cost of all seven-night stays for families with children aged between four and 16 during term time, compared to all holidays during school holidays. Some 443,322 school holiday fines were issued in England for the 2023/24 year, according to the Department for Education (DfE). This was 24 per cent up on the year before, and three times higher than when records began in 2016/17. Zoe Harris, chief customer officer at On the Beach, told MailOnline: 'Time away together isn't a luxury - it's essential for children's wellbeing and learning about the wider world. 'Parents tell us they're fed up of being punished for wanting to give their kids these experiences and for many, the only way they can afford a family holiday is by travelling during term time.' More than 180,000 people signed a petition calling for an end to term-time holiday fines which closed in January, but MPs have not yet debated the issue. Ms Harris added: 'The Government needs to look at ways to support more families so they can afford a break. 'We need a solution that prioritises attendance and helps more families holiday for less, and we're more than happy to start having those conversations with senior figures.' The DfE's position is that evidence has diproved pulling a child out of education for holidays is harmless - and allowing them to regularly miss school can be detrimental to their chances in life. It comes as a separate survey revealed half of frazzled parents want summer holidays to be slashed from six to four weeks and half terms extended. Research by the charity Parentkind found many families think the summer break is too long, and would prefer time off to be spread more evenly throughout the year. Mr McGovern said decisions about school breaks should be based on children's education, rather than convenience to parents. He said: 'We need to be upping the academic demands on children. This is dumbing down.' He added: 'Children need to have shorter lessons, rather than longer lessons. They get tired during the day. 'They have to provide a minimum number of hours per year, so in theory they could just make days longer and longer and the number of days shorter and shorter. 'Education is not about making life easier for teachers – it's what's in the best interests for children. 'The workload for teachers has been reduced, for example school reports are now AI-generated. In some respects, they have never had it so good. 'It is still a hard job but it's a vocation as well. We shouldn't be changing the school year to fit in with the holiday plans of teachers.' Announcing the new school year – which includes adding ten minutes a day to make up for the extra week off - North Walsham executive headteacher James Gosden said: 'Over the past few years, we have had numerous requests for holidays which we cannot authorise. 'This would provide an opportunity for parents and carers to access cheaper holidays.' He added: 'At a time when sickness increases due to the winter months and fatigue, this would add a lengthier break into the longest term to support a reduction in absence – as students would have a greater opportunity to rest and enjoy the break. 'This would also give staff the chance for a better break and ensure less absence, thus minimising cover lessons and ensuring staff are rested, so they can continue to do an excellent job.' Parents had supported the change, Mr Gosden said, with 78 per cent of the 157 families who responded to a consultation in favour. But one parent, who asked not to be named, complained: 'It's ridiculous. October isn't when most families are taking holidays. 'I was against this because I don't see how it's going to benefit my kids. I've also got to make arrangements for them on these days, while teachers get more time off.' Another said: 'Ten minutes a day won't make up for losing a whole week in school. 'And a week either side of the summer holidays would have been better than a week at Hallowe'en.' There was further criticism online, with comments including: 'Are holidays more important than getting an education? 'And who can afford a two-week autumn holiday anyway except teachers?' Another said: 'Public schools have been doing this for decades, they don't think TUI has twigged?' Others supported the plans, with one saying: 'Good idea. My school day was much longer than most high school days at present.' Another commented: 'If 78 per cent of families responded favourably then it sounds like the trust is onto something with this. 'Two weeks for autumn half term makes a lot of sense, especially if the children don't lose any education as a result.' Priestlands School in the New Forest has already introduced a similar scheme, while three others in Hampshire – secondaries Wildern and Deer Park and Boorley Park Primary schools – announced in March they were looking into doing the same. But there was opposition from residents, with one, Stacey Rabbetts, arguing children rely on routine and the changes would 'give them great stress'. Claire Jenkins pointed out if only a few schools extended the autumn half term, there would not be sufficient demand for holiday clubs to take the pressure off parents who have to work and have no other options for childcare. The Enrich Learning Trust, which runs North Walsham and Long Stratton high schools, said there were no immediate plans for the changes to be introduced at its seven other schools in the area – but admitted other trusts had adopted it. A spokesman added: 'Having consulted with their school communities, they are planning a pilot of a two-week half-term in October 2025, with the aim of improving attendance in the second half of the autumn term, having had a slightly longer break. 'It is our understanding that this is something that is being tested by other trusts too.' In April, it emerged another Norfolk school was planning to close early on Fridays to reduce 'financial pressures'. Buxton Primary School said 8.30am to 3pm school days would become 8.10am to 3.05pm. A similar scheme launched at several English schools, particularly Birmingham, in 2019 led to protest marches in Westminster. Today's Parentkind research comes ahead of state schools starting to break up for the summer this weekend. It found that as well as parents, most teachers also support cutting the summer break from six to four weeks, as long as they do not lose the total amount of holiday they get throughout the year. Previous studies have shown pupils regress during the holidays because they get out of practice with their reading and writing. The charity's research is based on its own poll of 3,000 parents and a separate poll of 9,000 teachers by Teacher Tapp. It found that 53 per cent of parents would back plans to reduce the school summer break to four weeks from six and only 33 per cent would oppose this. Many parents would prefer two-week half-term breaks and a longer Christmas holiday. A shorter summer break was seen as a financial positive by 32 per cent of parents, compared with 17 per cent who saw it as a negative. Thirty-seven per cent of parents said a shorter break would be beneficial for childcare, compared with 14 per cent overall who said it would be detrimental. The Teacher Tapp polling found that 62 per cent of teachers would accept a shorter summer holiday, 38 per cent would support it being reduced from six weeks to five and 24 per cent were in favour of it being cut to four weeks. However, 35 per cent wanted to stick with the traditional six weeks, while the remainder gave other answers. Jason Elsom, the chief executive of Parentkind, told the Times : 'While children will no doubt be looking forward to extended time away from school, the long summer break is a challenge for some parents. 'Our large parent poll shows that most parents want to knock two weeks off the six-week summer break to give teachers and children a month off instead. 'Parents tell us that a shorter summer holiday would help with costs and childcare, which would be particularly welcome at a time when some families are struggling to keep their heads above water. 'We need to make sure the long summer break doesn't add further stress and hardship for parents, particularly those on low incomes.'
Daily Mail
4 days ago
- Politics
- Daily Mail
Schools will give pupils an extra WEEK off over half term so 'families can go on cheaper holidays'
Schools are giving children an extra week off so that parents can afford 'cheaper holidays', it has emerged. Under the controversial schemes, pupils are having the autumn half term holiday extended from one week to two. School days are then extended slightly throughout the year to make up the deficit. But critics have attacked the 'ridiculous' changes, warning they more about 'making life easy for teachers' and are 'dumbing down' education. They have also warned parents will struggle to take time off or arrange childcare during the time off. Schools spearheading the revolution include North Walsham High School and Long Stratton High School, both run by the same trust in Norfolk. One of the headteachers claimed the change would help parents avoid price hikes by airlines and holiday firms in peak periods and reduce staff absence by giving them a 'better break'. But Chris McGovern, the chairman of the Campaign for Real Education, told the Mail: 'We have to ask what's more important – a passport to Majorca or a passport to [children's] futures? 'We need to be upping the academic demands on children. This is dumbing down.' He added: 'Children need to have shorter lessons, rather than longer lessons. They get tired during the day. 'They have to provide a minimum number of hours per year, so in theory they could just makes days longer and longer and the number of days shorter and shorter. 'Education is not about making life easier for teachers – it's what's in the best interests for children. 'The workload for teachers has been reduced, for example school reports are now AI-generated. In some respects, they have never had it so good. 'It is still a hard job but it's a vocation as well. We shouldn't be changing the school year to fit in with the holiday plans of teachers.' Announcing the new school year – which includes adding ten minutes a day to make up for the extra week off - North Walsham executive headteacher James Gosden said: 'Over the past few years, we have had numerous requests for holidays which we cannot authorise. 'This would provide an opportunity for parents and carers to access cheaper holidays.' He added: 'At a time when sickness increases due to the winter months and fatigue, this would add a lengthier break into the longest term to support a reduction in absence – as students would have a greater opportunity to rest and enjoy the break. 'This would also give staff the chance for a better break and ensure less absence, thus minimising cover lessons and ensuring staff are rested, so they can continue to do an excellent job.' Parents had supported the change, Mr Gosden said, with 78 per cent of the 157 families who responded to a consultation in favour. But one parent, who asked not to be named, complained: 'It's ridiculous. October isn't when most families are taking holidays. 'I was against this because I don't see how it's going to benefit my kids. 'I've also got to make arrangements for them on these days, while teachers get more time off.' Another said: 'Ten minutes a day won't make up for losing a whole week in school. 'And a week either side of the summer holidays would have been better than a week at Hallowe'en.' There was further criticism online, with comments including: 'Are holidays more important than getting an education? 'And who can afford a two-week autumn holiday anyway except teachers?' Another said: 'Public schools have been doing this for decades, they don't think TUI has twigged?' Others supported the plans, with one saying: 'Good idea. My school day was much longer than most high school days at present.' Another commented: 'If 78 per cent of families responded favourably then it sounds like the trust is onto something with this. 'Two weeks for autumn half term makes a lot of sense, especially if the children don't lose any education as a result.' Priestlands School in the New Forest has already introduced a similar scheme, while three others in Hampshire – secondaries Wildern and Deer Park and Boorley Park Primary schools – announced in March they were looking into doing the same. But there was opposition from residents, with one, Stacey Rabbetts, arguing children rely on routine and the changes would 'give them great stress'. Claire Jenkins pointed out if only a few schools extended the autumn half term, there would not be sufficient demand for holiday clubs to take the pressure off parents who have to work and have no other options for childcare. The Enrich Learning Trust, which runs North Walsham and Long Stratton high schools, said there were no immediate plans for the changes to be introduced at its seven other schools in the area – but admitted other trusts had adopted it. A spokesman added: 'Having consulted with their school communities, they are planning a pilot of a two-week half-term in October 2025, with the aim of improving attendance in the second half of the autumn term, having had a slightly longer break. 'It is our understanding that this is something that is being tested by other trusts too.' In April, it emerged another Norfolk school was planning to close early on Fridays to reduce 'financial pressures'. Buxton Primary School said 8.30am to 3pm school days would become 8.10am to 3.05pm. A similar scheme launched at several English schools, particularly Birmingham, in 2019 led to protest marches in Westminster.
Malaysian Reserve
7 days ago
- Politics
- Malaysian Reserve
Building education equity: New study highlights Digital Divide among children in the Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians
Connected Nation Michigan and Tribal leaders assess broadband and computer access in households with children SAULT STE. MARIE, Mich., July 14, 2025 /PRNewswire/ — Connected Nation Michigan (CN Michigan), with support from the Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians, has released a new study examining how the Digital Divide impacts Tribal households with children in northern Michigan. The report, titled 'Building Education Equity: Understanding the Digital Divide among Children in the Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians,' analyzes data from a 2023 survey of Tribal member households. It focuses on computer ownership and internet access — two vital tools for educational success — and reveals that while many families are connected, significant gaps remain for others. 'Broadband and computers are no longer optional. They are essential for a child's education,' said Chris McGovern, Director of Research Development, Connected Nation and CN Michigan. 'This study shows how the Tribe continues its leadership in this work to close the Digital Divide.' In 2023, CN Michigan surveyed 940 member households in collaboration with Tribal leadership. The findings among households with children showed the following key findings: 84% of Tribal households with children have both a computer and home internet access. 16% fall into the Digital Divide: 7% do not own a computer. 6% do not subscribe to home internet. 3% lack both a computer and internet service. In households earning more than $35,000 annually, 93% have internet and 94% own a computer. In households earning less than $35,000, those numbers drop to 83% and 75%, respectively. The Tribe has already taken several steps to improve connectivity by securing a Rural Development Broadband ReConnect grant and a National Tribal Broadband Grant, which is aimed at building fiber networks and evaluating broadband infrastructure. Additionally, outreach about the now-defunct Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP) helped many families reduce costs and obtain discounted devices. However, with the end of that federal program, the search for alternative options is ongoing. The report also provides some recommendations and next steps. They include: Continue broadband deployment and infrastructure investment on Tribal lands. Increase access to affordable devices through awareness campaigns and funding programs. Explore creative solutions to ensure that everyone has access to affordable home broadband service, particularly in rural and Tribal areas. To download and read the full report, click here. About Connected Nation: Founded in 2001, the national nonprofit's mission is to improve lives by providing innovative solutions that expand access to and increase the adoption and use of broadband (high-speed internet) and its related technologies for all people. Everyone belongs in a Connected Nation. Learn more at About the Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians:Sault Tribe is a 44,000-strong federally recognized Indian Tribe that is an economic, social, and cultural force in its community across the eastern Upper Peninsula counties of Chippewa, Luce, Mackinac, Schoolcraft, Alger, Delta, and Marquette. The Tribe comprises housing and Tribal centers, casinos, and other enterprises that employ both Natives and non-Natives and fund Tribal programs.
The Sun
10-07-2025
- Climate
- The Sun
Fury as schools ‘to BAN outdoor playtime for kids across UK' as playgrounds deemed ‘unsafe' in hot weather
SCHOOLS have been urged to ban outdoor play for kids in extreme heat - sparking fury from critics. The controversial idea has been put forward by the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF), which warns in a new report that sun-scorched tarmac, concrete and artificial grass are making school grounds dangerously hot and putting children at risk. 2 The charity is urging schools and the government to act — and some schools appear to be responding by introducing so-called 'hot play' restrictions, which see children kept inside during breaktimes when surfaces are deemed too hot to use safely. While the guidance is well-intentioned, critics say the measures are excessive and risk doing more harm than good. Parents, campaigners and politicians have voiced anger over the bans, arguing that children should be encouraged to play outside — not kept indoors because of warm weather. Chris McGovern, a former headteacher and chairman of the Campaign for Real Education, said: 'I taught for 35 years. "Any teacher knows that the worst thing you can do on a hot day is to keep children confined in the classroom. 'Of course, there are always cases where a vulnerable child may need to stay indoors, and there should be areas of shade within the playground. "But generally, the idea of locking all children inside is completely misguided. 'Just as in cold weather, they should be out running around. "So we're making them into wimps. We don't want to make children into wimps. "We want to toughen them up a little bit.' He also raised concerns about the wider consequences for mental health and development, warning that keeping children indoors could encourage more screen time and less physical activity- concerns first reported by The Telegraph. Others have echoed his concerns. Tory MP Greg Smith said: 'It's absolute nonsense to attempt to wrap children in bubble wrap and away from anything that might be a bit uncomfortable. 'The correct answer is to take precautions in heat – hats, sun cream, light clothing – not hide from warm weather.' Former Cabinet minister Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg questioned WWF's role in the debate, saying: 'I am surprised that the World Wildlife Fund thinks children count as wildlife. I am not sure the children of England are that feral. 'Letting children enjoy the sunshine is only natural, and I fear these woke charities have too much time and money on their hands.' WWF, however, argues that its suggestions are grounded in evidence and environmental urgency. The charity says climate change is already making school grounds more extreme and less safe, with traditional building materials intensifying the effects of both heat and heavy rain. Rosalind Mist, WWF's director of campaigns, education and youth, said: 'We can all see that we're facing more and more extreme weather due to climate change, from heatwaves to intense downpours. 'The current regulations are leading to schools being particularly vulnerable to risks of overheating and flooding. 'Luckily, there is an easy and reasonably cheap solution – adding more nature and more natural surfaces to school grounds. "Not only does this help mitigate the effects of extreme weather, it also has a wide range of benefits for pupils, from increasing resilience and concentration to better mental health.' WWF is now urging the Government to update school premises regulations — which haven't seen major changes since the 1950s — and introduce minimum requirements for green space in school environments. The charity says greener playgrounds don't just help with heatwaves and heavy rain, they boost kids' focus, behaviour and mental health too. Currently, there is no legal obligation for schools to include natural surfaces in play areas, despite mounting research suggesting the benefits of doing so. Campaigners believe that reintroducing greenery, such as trees, shrubs and shaded zones, would allow children to continue playing safely outdoors even during periods of hot weather. But in the absence of such infrastructure, some schools have taken matters into their own hands by restricting outdoor time. Those decisions have sparked backlash from families who say the approach is heavy-handed and that a bit of sunshine shouldn't mean the end of outdoor play. For now, as climate concerns grow and summer temperatures climb, the tension between environmental caution and childhood freedom looks set to continue, with schoolyards becoming the latest battleground in the climate conversation.
Telegraph
10-07-2025
- Climate
- Telegraph
Schools ban children from playing outside during heatwaves
Schools are banning children from playing outside during heatwaves. Teachers are keeping pupils inside for 'hot play' breaks when their playgrounds are deemed to be 'too hot to use safely'. The move is designed to keep children away from outdoor surfaces that can become very hot to touch in the sun. But the concept has been branded 'absolute nonsense' by critics, who warned that it risked raising a generation of 'wimps' taught to ' hide from warm weather '. 'Hot play' Schools routinely hold 'wet play' sessions when it rains, where children play indoors between lessons instead of going outside. But 'hot play', which is the equivalent for heatwaves, appears to be a relatively new idea. The practice has been highlighted by the WWF, the environmental group, which is calling for schools to use more natural surfaces, as opposed to artificial ones, to 'mitigate the effects of extreme weather'. Chris McGovern, a former head teacher and chairman of the Campaign for Real Education, warned that keeping pupils indoors during hot weather was the 'worst thing' for them. He said: 'I taught for 35 years. Any teacher knows that the worst thing you can do on a hot day is to keep children confined into the classroom. It's about the worst thing you can do. 'Of course, there can be situations where a particular child needs to stay indoors, and of course there should be areas of shade within the playground. But using common sense, it's the worst possible way forward for helping these children. 'Just as in cold weather, they should be out running around. So we're making them into wimps. We don't want to make children into wimps. We want to toughen them up a little bit.' He also warned that constraints on children's freedom risked damaging their mental health in the long term. 'Absolute nonsense' He added: 'It's an awful childhood we're inflicting on children. And, of course, it encourages them to use their iPads and mobile phones if they're confined. 'The worst thing they can be doing is staying indoors, playing on their mobile phones, and this is sort of encouraging them to do that. So yeah, it's the opposite of what we want.' Greg Smith, the Tory MP for Mid Buckinghamshire, said it was 'absolute nonsense' to attempt to 'wrap children in bubble wrap and away from anything that might be a bit uncomfortable'. 'The correct answer is to take precautions in heat – hats, sun cream, light clothing – not hide from warm weather,' he said. Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg, the former Tory Cabinet minister, added: 'I am surprised that the World Wildlife Fund [WWF] thinks children count as wildlife, I am not sure the children of England are that feral. 'Letting children enjoy the sunshine is only natural and I fear these woke charities have too much time and money on their hands.' More green space needed The WWF claimed that in many schools, natural features such as grass and trees have been replaced with heat-retaining materials such as tarmac, which can 'exacerbate the impact of high temperatures'. The charity is urging the Government to update its 'outdated' school premises regulations, which it said have remained largely unchanged since the 1950s, to ensure pupils have access to natural surfaces such as grass, soil and sand. At the moment, there is no specific requirement for schools to provide green space for physical education and play. In addition to becoming very hot, the WWF warned that artificial surfaces can leave playgrounds vulnerable to flooding, which is becoming a mounting concern due to climate change. Rosalind Mist, the charity's director of campaigns, education and youth, said: 'We can all see that we're facing more and more extreme weather due to climate change, from heatwaves to intense downpours. 'The current regulations are leading to schools being particularly vulnerable to risks of overheating and flooding. 'Luckily, there is an easy and reasonably cheap solution – adding more nature and more natural surfaces to school grounds. Not only does this help mitigate the effects of extreme weather, it also has a wide range of benefits for pupils, from increasing resilience and concentration to better mental health.
