Latest news with #ChristianScienceMonitor
Wall Street Journal
a day ago
- Entertainment
- Wall Street Journal
Can Superman Save Warner? - The Journal.
Previously, Jess was the show's audio reporter. Before joining the Journal, she was an editor and producer at NPR's "It's Been a Minute." She also spent seven years at the Christian Science Monitor, where she was first West Coast correspondent and then a political reporter. She later joined the Monitor's then-growing audio team. In that role, she hosted and produced narrative podcasts, including one about language and identity, which was nominated for an Online Journalism Award. Jess is originally from Manila. She's currently based in Washington, D.C.
Wall Street Journal
03-07-2025
- Entertainment
- Wall Street Journal
Why Meta Is Offering $100 Million for AI Geniuses - The Journal.
Previously, Jess was the show's audio reporter. Before joining the Journal, she was an editor and producer at NPR's "It's Been a Minute." She also spent seven years at the Christian Science Monitor, where she was first West Coast correspondent and then a political reporter. She later joined the Monitor's then-growing audio team. In that role, she hosted and produced narrative podcasts, including one about language and identity, which was nominated for an Online Journalism Award. Jess is originally from Manila. She's currently based in Washington, D.C.
Wall Street Journal
30-06-2025
- Entertainment
- Wall Street Journal
The Supreme Court's Season Finale, Explained - The Journal.
Previously, Jess was the show's audio reporter. Before joining the Journal, she was an editor and producer at NPR's "It's Been a Minute." She also spent seven years at the Christian Science Monitor, where she was first West Coast correspondent and then a political reporter. She later joined the Monitor's then-growing audio team. In that role, she hosted and produced narrative podcasts, including one about language and identity, which was nominated for an Online Journalism Award. Jess is originally from Manila. She's currently based in Washington, D.C.
Time of India
21-06-2025
- Politics
- Time of India
Steve Bannon's backroom role? Secret talks with Trump raise questions about U.S Iran strike strategy
Trump's secret meeting with Steve Bannon fuels speculation ahead of Iran-Israel decision- Trump's meeting with Steve Bannon at the White House just hours before announcing a delay in his decision on U.S. involvement in the Iran-Israel conflict has raised serious questions across Washington. With Trump confirming a two-week pause to assess diplomatic options, the MAGA movement is deeply split. Bannon, who opposes immediate military action, urged Trump to weigh alternatives before striking Iran's Fordo facility. The meeting, confirmed by Politico, comes as key MAGA voices either press for diplomacy or demand action. Trump's delay highlights both internal tensions and a potential opening for peace talks. Why did Trump meet Steve Bannon just before the Iran announcement? President Donald Trump hosted Steve Bannon—his former White House strategist and longtime MAGA ally—for a private lunch Thursday at the White House. The meeting came just hours before Trump officially delayed his decision on possible U.S. military action in response to the Iran-Israel crisis. The White House confirmed through press secretary Karoline Leavitt that Trump would wait two more weeks before making a final call on U.S. involvement. The timing of Bannon's visit was no coincidence. Known for his firm stance against foreign entanglements, Bannon had publicly urged caution just one day earlier. In an interview with Politico's Playbook , Bannon avoided specifics but shared this takeaway: 'The MAGA movement tonight is in a great place.' What did Bannon say about military action and diplomacy? At a Christian Science Monitor breakfast held Wednesday, Bannon issued a clear message to the president: don't rush into a strike. Referring to a potential hit on Iran's Fordo nuclear facility, Bannon warned against acting in haste. Live Events 'This strike does not have to happen tomorrow, or the next day, or the next day,' he said, suggesting the president 'take his time and think this through with his advisers.' Bannon emphasized that Trump has always favored diplomacy first. 'Before he turns to violence in terms of military kinetic action,' Bannon explained, 'he looks at every other alternative.' This aligns with what Trump reportedly told Bannon during their private lunch—that he wants to explore "other alternatives" before escalating tensions. Is the MAGA movement united on the Iran-Israel conflict? Not quite. The MAGA base is visibly divided over how to respond to the growing tensions in the Middle East. On one side are voices like Bannon, calling for strategic patience. On the other are MAGA hardliners urging stronger U.S. backing for Israel's military campaign. Despite the division, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) voiced support for Trump's decision to hold off, writing on X: 'I'm so glad President Trump is giving time for diplomacy to work with Iran and Israel.' Meanwhile, conservative activist Charlie Kirk also praised the move, describing Trump's unpredictability as a strategic advantage and criticizing those who push for regime change in Iran. Why did Trump choose another 'two-week delay'? The phrase 'two-week delay' has become a familiar refrain in Trump's presidency. Critics note that he's used it before when facing politically sensitive issues. But this time, Trump's team insists it's a calculated move. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt pushed back against the narrative of procrastination. 'If there is a chance for diplomacy, the president will grab it,' she said. 'But he is not afraid to use strength.' This statement underlines Trump's dual-track approach: projecting power while keeping doors open for negotiation. The current delay suggests that backchannel talks—possibly with Israel and regional partners—may be underway. Could this meeting reshape Trump's Iran strategy? That's the big question. Steve Bannon is no longer a formal adviser, but he remains a powerful ideological voice within MAGA circles. His influence, especially when combined with public pressure from Trump's base, could steer the administration away from immediate military action. It's also worth noting that Bannon publicly stated Israel must "finish what it started', indicating that while he supports Israel's broader goals, he doesn't believe the U.S. should lead or rush into a war on its behalf. The next two weeks will be crucial. Whether this delay leads to diplomacy or just postpones a larger crisis remains to be seen. FAQs: Q1: Why did Trump delay the Iran decision after meeting Bannon? Trump delayed to explore peaceful options before any military action, as Bannon advised. Q2: What did Bannon say about the Iran-Israel conflict? Bannon urged Trump to wait and avoid rushing into a strike on Iran's Fordo site.
Yahoo
21-06-2025
- Politics
- Yahoo
Bannon: MAGA will ‘get on board' if Trump decides to join Israel against Iran
Steve Bannon, former chief strategist to President Trump, predicted that the 'Make America Great Again' (MAGA) movement will ultimately support the president if he decides to join Israel in its strikes against Iran. Bannon, speaking to reporters at a Christian Science Monitor event on Wednesday, predicted that Trump would walk through his decision-making and that MAGA supporters would back him, even though he and Vice President Vance have been known for wanting to keep the U.S. out of foreign wars. 'If President Trump decides there's not a diplomatic alternative … because he's been consistent, no nuclear weapon,' Bannon said. 'If President Trump decides to do that, I know, and particularly his skills as a communicator, that he will come and walk people through it and the MAGA movement — look, they'll be some — but the vast majority of the MAGA movement will say, 'look, we trust your judgment, you walked us through this … maybe we hate it but you know, we'll get on board.'' The idea of Trump involving the U.S. in Israel's strikes against Iran has created clear divisions within the MAGA movement. Trump on Wednesday morning dodged a question about whether he's moving closer to ordering a strike against Iranian nuclear facilities, saying, 'I may do it, I may not do it.' Some Trump allies have expressed skepticism — and at times outright indignation — at the idea of the U.S. involved in another conflict in the Middle East, while others have offered wholehearted support. But Bannon said it won't cause support to fall for Trump among his most loyal followers. 'If the president as commander-in-chief makes a decision to do this and comes forward and walks people through it, the MAGA movement — they'll lose some — but the MAGA movement, the [Rep.] Marjorie Taylor Greenes, the [former Rep.] Matt Gaetzes, we will fight it up to the end and make sure you get full information but if he has more intelligence and makes that case to the American people, the MAGA movement will support President Trump,' he said. Trump's choice on how involved the U.S. should be in the war is largely around a potential attack on the Fordow nuclear facility. An attack would require the involvement of the U.S. because B-2 bombers dropping bunker busters are the only way to destroy the capabilities of a plant hidden deep in an Iranian mountain. Bannon said Trump likes 'optionality' before he decides what to ultimately do in a situation like Iran. 'What you never want to do is give him a recommend a passive decision that you don't have options down the road. You have to think it through, second- and third-tier ramifications. And I think that's what they're doing,' he said. 'That's why I think they're prepositioning assets in place right now to give him the alternatives, if he decides to do either a strike on Fordow or something broader.' Bannon thinks it should be up to Israel to finish the conflict that began over the weekend. 'My mantra right now, the Israelis have to finish what they started. They started this, they should finish it. They have air superiority,' he said. Trump on Tuesday met in the Situation Room at the White House with members of his national security team. And, in recent days, the president's rhetoric has gotten more threatening towards Tehran; on Tuesday he called for Iran's 'unconditional surrender' and posted on Truth Social that Iran's 'Supreme Leader' is an 'easy target,' but that there are no plans to take him out — 'at least for now.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
