Latest news with #CouncilonContemporaryFamilies
Yahoo
7 days ago
- Yahoo
Moms are calling this AI tool a ‘lifesaver' for the mental load they carry every day
From meal planning to daycare checklists, one mom's creative use of ChatGPT is giving exhausted parents everywhere a reason to exhale. When Lilian Schmidt hit her breaking point, it wasn't because of one big thing—it was the accumulation of everything. The German mom of two, living in Switzerland, was managing the morning chaos, a full-time job, overstimulated daycare pickups, and a running list of invisible tasks. She felt alone in the mental load, even though she had a supportive partner. 'It's not that I have to carry everything alone, but I still often feel that way,' Schmidt told Newsweek. 'Even if my partner and I try to split things 50/50, our brains just work differently.' So she turned to something unexpected: ChatGPT. In a now-viral TikTok that's been viewed more than 710,000 times, Schmidt (@heylilianschmidt) explained how she's using AI as an emotional and logistical support system—what some commenters called a 'co-parent,' 'therapist,' and even 'doula.' For Schmidt, the mental load wasn't just about remembering daycare pickup. It was about planning, anticipating, emotionally regulating, and making a thousand tiny decisions every single day. So she started giving those tasks to ChatGPT. Now, it: Plans a full week of meals her kids will actually eat Writes grocery lists Suggests age-appropriate birthday gifts Creates daycare and travel packing checklists Offers calm, thought-out responses when she's emotionally overwhelmed 'When I'm overwhelmed with so much to get done with work and the kids and house etc I list it all out and ask chat to help me be sat on the sofa by x time or in bed by x time. It gives me a full timed to-do list and it works every time,' shared user @ Related: The 'mental health walk' that wasn't: this mom's viral tiktok is our collective parenting nightmare Schmidt was clear that her partner is an active parent—not only to their 3-year-old but also as the primary caregiver for his 14-year-old son. But even in egalitarian households, the default parent role—and the cognitive load that comes with it—often falls to moms. Research shows that moms carry a significantly heavier share of the mental load at home. A 2023 brief from the Council on Contemporary Families found that partnered mothers spend more than twice as much time as fathers on cognitive labor—things like planning, organizing, and keeping track of family needs. That imbalance isn't just frustrating—it's linked to increased stress, burnout, and lower overall well-being for moms. That's why tools like ChatGPT, when used intentionally, can offer more than convenience. They offer clarity, relief, and the feeling of not carrying everything alone. The comments on Schmidt's video tell the story of a much bigger shift. Parents aren't just looking for productivity—they're desperate for emotional relief. @bridget provençalkitchen shared, 'I prompt it to create a recipe with what is left in the fridge. I think it helps with the mental load.' @cks wrote, 'I gave it background on my baby's sleep and it tracked it over a few days then told it to act like a sleep consultant and it tells me what to do for naps etc xx' @confidentsimone added, 'It helped me since two weeks with our sleep regression for our 18 months old' 'It's my sparring partner when I need to make a decision; my research assistant when I don't have three hours to scroll through Google; and my emotional buffer when I'm about to overthink something,' Schmidt shared. She emphasizes it's not about becoming more efficient. 'It's about doing the same things faster and with help,' she told Newsweek. 'My life has gotten 10 times easier and, for the first time in a long time, I feel like I have space to breathe.' Curious what moms are asking ChatGPT? We asked—and the responses were great: @ashm15: 'Baby sleep schedule and tips. Acitvities to do with baby at home.' @ 'Make signs for party. Find activities for kids. Meal ideas. Help with mental load.' @mqu2487: 'It walked me through secondary infertility. Mental support, and understanding results.' @lastjenks: 'Yes! For my infant – Wake windows, when to feed, goals for daytime/nighttime sleep.' Related: Dad took stroller walks to cope—what happened next sparked a movement for struggling fathers If you're curious but hesitant, there are simple ways to ease into using ChatGPT for everyday parenting stress. You can start by asking it to create a weeknight dinner plan that factors in leftovers and picky eaters. It can help generate packing checklists for daycare, suggest rainy day activities for toddlers, or draft a respectful message to reschedule a work meeting around a pediatric appointment. This isn't about outsourcing your role—it's about having support for the mental load that comes with it. What makes Schmidt's story stand out isn't the novelty of using AI. It's the honesty about what it feels like to be maxed out and still expected to remember sunscreen, RSVP to birthday parties, and stay calm through tantrums. In a world where moms are told to lean in, do more, and 'just get organized,' Schmidt's approach offers something gentler. A moment of space. A sense of support. A reason to exhale. And with more than 710,000 moms watching—and relating—it's clear she's not alone.
Yahoo
30-05-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
Lawmakers No Longer Understand the American Family
Imagine if our national economy, culture, and politics were rooted in the idea that the default American household is white and Christian. There would be no Spanish-language campaign ads and TV shows, no interracial families depicted in commercials, no fill-in-the-blank Heritage Day at ballparks. Workplaces would see no need to accommodate holiday schedules for Muslims or Jews. That was a good bet more than 50 years ago, when the country was 88 percent white and 90 percent Christian, and less than 5 percent of the population was foreign-born. Since then, politicians and business leaders have figured out they will lose out if they deny the existence of the new, far more diverse, face of America. They may be motivated more by votes and dollars than by principles, but they've broadened their pitches to reflect (at least in part) the modern American household. And yet, when it comes to the family structure itself, the system (public and private) is stuck in an earlier era, one which assumes a 'traditional' household made up of a married couple and their offspring. Lawmakers proudly brand themselves 'pro-family,' and vow to fight for 'working families.' There's Family Day at attractions and entertainment venues, and family discounts on everything from phone service to cars, retail and college tuition. The best value for consumables is the 'family-sized' version that will rot before a single person can finish it. Solo diners are shooed to the bar at restaurants, with tables reserved for couples or families. Single people subsidize family health insurance plans, pay higher tax rates for the same joint income of a married couple, and can't get Social Security death benefits awarded to a widowed spouse. Companies that brag about being 'family-friendly?' Ask a single person: That means they work nights and weekends. The fix has been in, for a long time, in favor of those who marry and have children. In times past, this was just a temporary irritant, since most people indeed ended up marrying (in their early 20s, back in 1970) and having a family. But that family prototype is no longer dominant—and all indications suggest we're not going back to the way things were. Why are policy-makers in denial about the country we have become? 'It's not that [leaders] don't understand that families have changed very much from what they used to be. It's that they don't want to confront the reasons why families have changed,' said Stephanie Coontz, author of five books on gender and marriage. It's not that people don't want to couple—most do, she added—but marriage is not necessary anymore, especially for women who no longer need a man for financial support and don't need to stay in an unhappy or abusive relationship. They want intimacy, but with equality, and 'women have the ability to say, if I don't get that, I'll hold out,' said Coontz, the director of research and public education for the Council on Contemporary Families and emeritus faculty of History and Family Studies at The Evergreen State College in Olympia, Washington. There's a misguided longing, especially among conservatives, to return to a storied American family that never really existed, Coontz argues in her book The Way We Never Were: American Families and the Nostalgia Trap. In reality, drug abuse, alcohol consumption, and sexually transmitted diseases were more prevalent in the 1950s, but economic conditions (in part because of government support for families) make the mid-20th century family look idyllic in retrospect, Coontz argues in the book. 'There's this ideology, it's really more of a worldview, that if you get married, you really will live happily ever after, and be healthier and morally superior' to unmarried people, said social scientist Bella DePaolo, author of Single at Heart: The Power, Freedom and Heart-Filling Joy of Single Life. But when it comes to how people actually behave and the choices they make, 'the place of marriage in our lives has been slipping,' she said. 'Fewer people are getting married—fewer people want to marry. That is threatening to people who want things to stay the same.' The statistics back her up: in 1970, 71 percent of households were made up of married couples; by 2022, that group became a minority, comprising just 47 percent of households. 'Non-family' households were an offbeat 19 percent of homes in 1970; the most recent Census Bureau statistics show that 36 percent of households now are 'non-family.' Married couples with children made up a solid plurality (40 percent) of 1970 homes. Now, such families comprise just 18 percent of households—strikingly, barely more than the category of women living alone, who make up 16 percent of American households, according to the Census Bureau. Even the current White House doesn't reflect the household ideal pushed by social conservatives. President Donald Trump is on his third marriage (with five kids from three wives); his wife Melania Trump is reportedly a part-time resident of the White House, and Trump hangs out with First Bro Elon Musk (who himself is reputed to have more than a dozen children from different mothers). There's been a steady trend towards later marriage, and even away from marriage entirely. The Pew Research Center, using data from the American Community Survey, points out that in 1970, 69 percent of Americans 18 and older were married, and 17 percent were never married. By 2010, just half of Americans over 18 were married, and a startling 31 percent had never been married. Those trends have caused agita among conservatives worried about the changing model (or the 'breaking down' of that model, as they characterize it) of the American family. Fiscal hawks rightfully worry, too, about demographic trends that indicate we will have an increasing number of old people drawing Social Security and Medicare, and not enough young people paying into the system. This is a legitimate concern; fertility rates in the United States reached an historic low in 2023. But the response to these phenomena has not been an examination of how public policy could be reoriented to the new reality of American households, but rather to try to force Americans back to an earlier, mythic demographic era. There's a deep, anti-social vein running through the strategies of those who'd force today's square-peg Americans back into the round hole of their nostalgic fantasies. There's the tactic of insulting or shaming unmarried women ('childless cat ladies,' as Vice President J.D. Vance called them). There's blaming feminism in general. 'We have this low birth rate in America … it just hit me right now because who's going to sleep with these ugly ass broke liberal women?' singer and Trump acolyte Kid Rock said on Fox News. Conservative essayist John Mac Ghlionn lays blame at the sparkly-booted feet of Taylor Swift, who—while being very successful and wealthy, he concedes in a column in Newsweek—is a terrible role model for young girls because 'at 34, Swift remains unmarried and childless.' Worse, the author screams in print, Swift has had a lot of famous boyfriends, and 'the glamorous portrayal of her romantic life can send rather objectionable messages.' The sneering message is clear: stop being so promiscuous or career-driven, and you'll attract a man who will give you what you want—marriage and children. Except that's not what women (necessarily) want. A 2024 Pew Research Center study found that just 45 percent of women 18-34 want to be parents someday. That's substantially less than the 57 percent of young men who feel that way. An earlier Pew study found that half of uncoupled men were looking for either a committed relationship or casual dating; 35 percent of single women said the same. And while women who were seeking relationships were more likely than men to say they wanted a committed union, instead of a casual arrangement, the survey results knock down the old trope of women being almost universally on the prowl for men who will offer them a ring and children. Bribing people to have children is another misguided approach, with the Trump administration mulling a laughably low 'baby bonus' of $5,000 to American women who have children. Yes, having kids is costly; the per-child cost can top $310,000, according to a Brookings Institution study. But it's not just a function of money. A growing percentage of adults under 50, in a 2024 Pew Research Center study, say they don't plan to have kids (47 percent are nixing the idea now, compared to 37 percent in 2018). The reason? 57 percent of those who aren't planning to have kids say they simply don't want to. 'I don't think you can solve what is ostensibly a cultural problem with financial incentives. That just doesn't work,' said Daniel Cox, director of the Survey Center on American Life at the American Enterprise Institute. 'I do think that the increasing costs of daily living, and the increase in housing costs, are all playing a role in (people) feeling more financially vulnerable and less secure,' he said. But structural issues—including women's fear of losing their autonomy or having their career advancement thwarted because of childcare demands—are leading to 'some real trepidation' towards marriage, he said. So, what is to be done? Instead of trying to make people want what they demonstrably don't want, government and business could instead adapt to the modern American household and the economy it has produced. There are about a thousand separate rights Americans acquire when they get married—everything from visitation rights at hospitals, to Social Security survivor benefits, to joint health insurance plans, said Gordon Morris, board chairman for the advocacy group Unmarried Equality. And that, he says, needs to change to reflect the fact that nearly half of U.S. adults are unmarried. Paying for Social Security and Medicare doesn't need to be fixed with a forced baby boom, either. One solution is to embrace immigrants, DePaolo said, since they (working legally) will contribute income and Social Security taxes. Another simpler fix, Morris said, is to remove the income cap for Social Security/Medicare contributions. 'It's a problem that's easy to solve, economically, Politically, it's very hard,' he acknowledged. But first and fundamentally, he argued, policymakers need to accept that the country is changing demographically—and that's not just about race or religion or national origin. Some of the most profound changes afoot in society revolve around the whens and whys Americans are getting married and having children. 'The problem is, there's an assumption that you're supposed to get married and you're supposed to have children. That assumption has got to change,' he said. The new reality, after all, has already arrived.
