Latest news with #DNANetworks
Time of India
17-06-2025
- Politics
- Time of India
Bengaluru Stampede: Karnataka High Court questions government over placing report in 'sealed cover'
The Karnataka High Court has questioned the state government about keeping the stampede report sealed. This relates to the incident on June 4, which caused 11 deaths. The court wants transparency in the investigation. It plans to appoint an amicus curiae for assistance. The court also intends to involve KSCA, RCB, and DNA Networks in the proceedings. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The Karnataka High Court on Tuesday questioned the state government for insisting on keeping its status report on the stampede in a sealed cover and underlined transparency and accountability in the investigation the suo motu petition over the stampede, that claimed 11 lives on June 4, came up for hearing before Acting Chief Justice V Kameswar Rao and Justice CM Joshi, Advocate General Shashi Kiran Shetty said the government was not shying away from disclosure, but wanted to avoid prejudicing ongoing inquiries."We will place both reports next week," he said, referring to preliminary findings and interim assessments prepared by the state. The AG stressed that certain observations in the report were of preliminary nature and could be sensationalised by the media if made public bench reiterated that it would consider the question of keeping the status report inside a sealed cover and announced its decision to appoint an amicus curiae. Further, the court said it would seek assistance from the amicus curiae before arriving at a decision on the court indicated a clear preference for transparency and accountability in the investigation AG sought an adjournment of 20 to 25 days to allow all reports to come in. However, the bench appeared unconvinced. "Why should that restrict us?" the court asked, reiterating that the proceedings were not limited by the state's internal court said it intended to implead the Karnataka State Cricket Association (KSCA), Royal Challengers Bangalore (RCB), and DNA Networks -- three entities involved in the conduct and management of the IPL match Advocates representing various applicants called for public disclosure of the state's report, arguing that transparency and accountability are vital.A counsel, quoting from a legal precedent, said, "A one-sided submission causes serious violation of natural justice." Another added, "Sealed covers lead to a culture of opacity."The bench directed the counsel seeking enhancement of compensation for victims to submit their application to the Advocate General so the state could respond court ordered that notices be issued to KSCA, RCB, and DNA Networks, making them party respondents. The next hearing is scheduled for June 23.
Hindustan Times
17-06-2025
- Politics
- Hindustan Times
Stampede: Karnataka HC questions govt over placing report in 'sealed cover'
Bengaluru, The Karnataka High Court on Tuesday questioned the state government for insisting on keeping its status report on the stampede in a sealed cover and underlined transparency and accountability in the investigation process. When the suo motu petition over the stampede, that claimed 11 lives on June 4, came up for hearing before Acting Chief Justice V Kameswar Rao and Justice CM Joshi, Advocate General Shashi Kiran Shetty said the government was not shying away from disclosure, but wanted to avoid prejudicing ongoing inquiries. "We will place both reports next week," he said, referring to preliminary findings and interim assessments prepared by the state. The AG stressed that certain observations in the report were of preliminary nature and could be sensationalised by the media if made public prematurely. The bench reiterated that it would consider the question of keeping the status report inside a sealed cover and announced its decision to appoint an amicus curiae. Further, the court said it would seek assistance from the amicus curiae before arriving at a decision on the matter. The court indicated a clear preference for transparency and accountability in the investigation process. The AG sought an adjournment of 20 to 25 days to allow all reports to come in. However, the bench appeared unconvinced. 'Why should that restrict us?' the court asked, reiterating that the proceedings were not limited by the state's internal timelines. The court said it intended to implead the Karnataka State Cricket Association , Royal Challengers Bengaluru , and DNA Networks three entities involved in the conduct and management of the IPL match. Advocates representing various applicants called for public disclosure of the state's report, arguing that transparency and accountability are vital. A counsel, quoting from a legal precedent, said, 'A one-sided submission causes serious violation of natural justice.' Another added, 'Sealed covers lead to a culture of opacity.' The bench directed the counsel seeking enhancement of compensation for victims to submit their application to the Advocate General so the state could respond accordingly. The court ordered that notices be issued to KSCA, RCB, and DNA Networks, making them party respondents. The next hearing is scheduled for June 23.
Time of India
13-06-2025
- Time of India
Bengaluru stampede: Deeming arrests unlawful, high court grants bail to 4 executives
Bengaluru: Karnataka high court Thursday granted conditional interim bail to RCB marketing executive Nikhil Sosale and three executives from event organisers DNA Networks, holding that the arrests lacked strong legal ground and are 'vitiated'. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The court instructed immediate release of the four individuals -- DNA Entertainment Networks' Sunil Mathew, Kiran Kumar Sand Shamant NP Mavinakere, besides Sosale -- upon receipt of the bail order. After their arrest last week, the accused had said the FIR contained only the names of their companies. The bail conditions include restrictions on witness tampering, cooperation with probes, execution of personal bonds worth Rs 1 lakh with sureties, and submission of passports within two weeks. Justice Krishna Kumar said a perusal of FIRs containing alleged offences will, prima facie, indicate that the petitioners cannot be charged with voluntarily causing hurt, unlawful assembly and using criminal force to deter a public servant from discharging duties under BNS. The court further said offences like culpable homicide and endangering life or liberty are bailable and carry a maximum punishment of three years or a fine or with both. It held the view that the grounds of arrest – no material to support charges and the petitioners are not named in FIRs -- were not justified "without any investigation prior to their arrest". At the time of petitioners' arrest, the investigating officer did not furnish checklist/documents in accordance with guidelines mandated in Arnesh Kumar and DK Basu cases. The court said the arrest of the petitioners is vitiated. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The judge said that material on record will, prima facie, indicate that the petitioners were deprived of their personal liberty by the CCB police, who directly took petitioners to the Cubbon Park police station immediately thereafter. The court said the grounds of arrest are also vitiated by the arrests carried out by CCB, which did not have jurisdiction or authority to secure arrests.
United News of India
09-06-2025
- Sport
- United News of India
RCB cites CM's public invite in plea to quash stampede FIR
Bengaluru, June 9 (UNI) A public tweet by Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah inviting "all citizens" to join the Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB) IPL victory celebrations has come under sharp scrutiny, with Royal Challengers Sports Private Limited (RCSPL) citing it in a petition before the Karnataka High Court to quash an FIR registered against them in connection with the Bengaluru stampede. The X post, which forms a key part of RCSPL's defence, is being portrayed as a direct endorsement by the state's highest authority for mass participation in the event that ended in tragedy. The petition argues that this public call by the Chief Minister mirrors RCB's own social media invitation, yet only private organisers have been targeted in the criminal case. RCSPL and its COO Rajesh V Menon, on Monday, contended in court that they made the announcement for the victory parade and trophy celebration only after extensive discussions with DNA Networks, Karnataka State Cricket Association (KSCA), and the police, followed by oral approval. The post, shared on June 4 across RCB's official handles, made it clear that entry was strictly through prior registration and valid passes based on stadium capacity. The plea further reveals that on the morning of June 4, RCB was abruptly informed that police had withdrawn permission for the victory parade. At the same time, the team was told that the Chief Minister and Deputy Chief Minister would be felicitating the players at the Vidhana Soudha, and the team could proceed to the stadium for celebrations thereafter. According to the plea, the felicitation at the Vidhana Soudha was not only attended by the RCB team but was also thrown open to the general public at the Chief Minister's own invitation, now reproduced in court as a crucial piece of evidence. The RCSPL petition asserts that following the Vidhana Soudha event, the team reached the stadium, where celebrations were abruptly called off after the management was informed about fatalities due to a stampede outside the venue. The company has called the FIR against it "illegal," "contrary to law," and "an abuse of process," stressing the absence of any mens rea (criminal intent) or criminal act on its part. "The very same act of inviting the public to a celebration was committed by the Chief Minister," the plea states, arguing that scapegoating RCB while sparing state functionaries smacks of bias. The petition accuses the government of attempting to shift blame to private entities like RCSPL, especially in the wake of the Chief Minister's own public directive to "immediately arrest" RCB officials. even as an official inquiry into the incident and suspensions of police personnel for dereliction of duty were ongoing. RCSPL also highlights that the entire event was outsourced to DNA Networks, yet RCB has still been named as an accused. The company is seeking quashing of the FIR and an interim stay on further proceedings. Meanwhile, the High Court has already granted interim protection to officials of the Karnataka State Cricket Association. Nikhil Sosale, RCB's Marketing and Revenue Head, has also moved court challenging his arrest in the case. The case is fast snowballing into a legal and political flashpoint, with mounting pressure on the Chief Minister to explain his role in endorsing the event that ended in tragedy. UNI BDN PRS
