logo
#

Latest news with #DanburyCC

The odd cracked windscreen is price worth paying for cricket
The odd cracked windscreen is price worth paying for cricket

Times

time08-07-2025

  • Sport
  • Times

The odd cracked windscreen is price worth paying for cricket

'Cricket ball hits man on leg' is not usually an ­unfavourable turn of events in a match. It's often a moment of triumph for the fielding side if the batter's leg has blocked a ball from hitting his stumps. But not at Danbury Cricket Club in Essex. Players in this village team have been told that play on Dawson Memorial Field — home since 1799 not only to Danbury CC, but used also by two other teams, Tuskers and Oaklands — is suspended because a man in the car park was hit on the leg by a stray cricket ball while loading his car. Does such a punishment fit what is surely a freak event? In village cricket, where a fielder on the boundary can happily spend an innings filling out their tax return without fear of being disturbed, a ball struck so solidly that it flies over the boundary and into the car park is something so uncommon that it is usually a cause for, first, disbelief at the batter's hitherto hidden prowess and, later, celebration. But not at Danbury. Instead the parish council has pulled up stumps pending 'a ball trajectory risk ­assessment by professional sports specialists'. Nor are Danbury's cricketers suffering alone. Last summer batters at Southwick and Shoreham Cricket Club, which was formed in 1790 near Brighton, were banned from hitting sixes because those living near the pitch fretted that their houses and cars were in the firing line. In a bewildering inversion of scoring convention, players were warned that their first six would count as no runs. If they hit a second six they would be out. Parish councils and twitchy neighbours should reconsider their antipathy. Cricket is as emblematic of village life as trading unfounded gossip and treating anyone who arrived later than the Gladstone administration as a newcomer. A cracked windscreen once every few decades resulting from a stray ball should surely be a tolerable price to pay for the communal joy village cricket brings.

Cricket clubs' futures at risk after person hit by ball in car park
Cricket clubs' futures at risk after person hit by ball in car park

Telegraph

time27-06-2025

  • Politics
  • Telegraph

Cricket clubs' futures at risk after person hit by ball in car park

The Essex cricket ground controversially closed after a person was hit by a ball on the back of a leg in the car park will remain shut indefinitely. Two recent heated meetings failed to reach agreement on the return of cricket to the Dawson Memorial Field in Danbury. The parish council has been attacked for a lack of 'common sense' and 2,900 residents have signed a petition urging it to overturn its suspension of cricket, which has left three clubs – Danbury, Oaklands and Tuskers – unable to play home fixtures, placing their futures at risk. The council acted after a member of the public was hit by a ball as they were about to use the adjacent leisure centre. Last week, a public meeting was held at the village hall. This week a committee meeting discussed the closure. Rory Carlton, secretary of Danbury CC, claimed it was 'abundantly clear from attending both meetings that residents seem overwhelmingly in favour of cricket continuing in its current form'. Carlton said: 'It was terrific to see such overwhelming support for cricket in Danbury. Residents made some excellent points; they made it very clear that they felt the response to a single allegation was wholly disproportionate. Parallels were drawn with other activities such as football where a similar incident could easily be imagined. 'One alleged incident surely does not merit the prohibition of cricket which has been enjoyed by generations of villagers. That, in living memory, not a single member of the public has actually been injured. Aside from a few voices of reason, the council were not swayed from their course, insisting that 'process must be followed' whilst ignoring the fact that the entire premise of their argument was fundamentally flawed. 'It's terribly disappointing that a common-sense resolution couldn't be reached. Mistakes are made, as I said during the meeting; I'm sure the council believed they were acting in residents' best interests at the time, but it's very clear that their course of action was incorrect. 'The outcome we were hoping for – immediate resumption of cricket for the village – wasn't obtained. I genuinely fear the wider consequences, both for other activities that operate in Danbury which could fall foul of this approach or village teams up and down the country.' Carlton attacked the council's over-reliance upon a risk consultancy. He said: 'I and other residents made the point that advice is merely that. It can be followed, amended or discarded. Surely Danbury Parish Council are responsible for the governance of the village and not an appointed third-party consultancy?' When contacted by Telegraph Sport, Danbury Parish Council said that it was 'surprised at the low turnout' at the residents' meeting on June 19, saying that only 30 residents attended out of a population of 4,000. The council also reiterated that it hopes that the suspension of cricket will only be temporary and that representatives from the cricket teams and the parish council would meet as soon as possible to come up with reasonable solutions that would allow for the recommencement of cricket. In a statement, Danbury Parish Council said: 'The parish council has taken professional advice which will minimise the risks – the fact that there were at least two car windows, within the last year, smashed by cricket balls being hit into the adjacent car park, across a public footway, indicates that there is a risk to people who are accessing the facilities – and as such would be potentially invalidate its insurance cover and risk litigation if it were to totally ignore the advice that has been received. 'The parish council has set up the working party in good faith with representatives of the cricket team, in order that we can work together towards the re-commencement of cricket – we are waiting for the ball trajectory report that the Essex Cricket Board have recommended to both the cricket clubs and the parish council in order to determine the correct mitigation. The parish council remains committed to supporting sport in Danbury whilst ensuring that the many visitors and residents who enjoy the facilities on offer can access them in a safe manner.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store