Latest news with #DefenceofIndiaActandRules
India Gazette
25-06-2025
- Politics
- India Gazette
Biggest blot in history of Independent India: Union Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan on 50th anniversary of Emergency
New Delhi [India], June 25 (ANI): Union Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan on Wednesday termed imposition of Emergency as the 'biggest blot' in the history of Independent India. Lashing out at the Congress party on the 50th anniversary of the Emergency, Union Minister Chouhan stated that the countrymen should take a 'pledge' that such a day would not come again in India. 'Can those days be forgotten? The country will never forget that the day is the biggest blot in the democratic history of independent India - Samvidhan Hatya Diwas. The country should take a pledge that this day should not come again', Chouhan told ANI. The Union Minister highlighted that the Constitution was 'killed' and democracy was 'crushed' on June 25, 1975. Chouhan noted that the Congress should recall that 'dictatorship' is in their 'DNA'. He stated that Indira Gandhi made attempts to crush democracy across the country just for the sake to save her position. 'Constitution was killed on this day. Democracy was crushed, and today they roam around with a copy of the Constitution. They should recall that this is the same Congress that has dictatorship in its DNA. To save her post and to continue to be in power, Indira Gandhi made attempts to crush democracy across the country', Chouhan said. Recalling the Emergency period, the Union Agriculture minister said that the whole nation was turned into a 'jail' and the fundamental rights of the citizens were 'snatched'. The former Madhya Pradesh CM mentioned that the government also misbehaved with the press and a pillar of democracy was attempted to be crushed. 'To save her post and to continue to be in power, Indira Gandhi made attempts to crush democracy across the country. It has been 50 years but I still remember that dark day. I was 16 then. Inhumane atrocities were unleashed, the entire nation was turned into a jail. Fundamental rights were snatched. Anyone was jailed. Freedom of Expression was just leaders were jailed but even the Press was misbehaved with, a pillar of democracy was attempted to be crushed at that time so that she continues to be in power', Chouhan said. The Union Minister stated that the people were laid on slabs of ice and with their hands and feet broken. Remembering the Emergency period, Chouhan said that he was president at his school and thought that there would be agitation due to inflation, unemployment and a wrong education system, so he joined the Jayaprakash Narayan movement. However, the Union Minister was jailed under the Defence of India Act and rules and was taken to jail. 'Ordinary workers were jailed were electrocuted, made to lie down on slabs of ice, their hands and feet were broken. I was the president of my school. I felt that there should be an agitation against inflation, unemployment and wrong education system. So, I joined JP Movement. But I was jailed under Defence of India Act and Rules', Chouhan said. The BJP MP from Vidisha believed that the people who raised their voice against the 'murder of democracy' carried out a movement for its reinstatement; meanwhile, the ones who were sent to jail led the third movement for freedom. Chouhan recalled that he was not allowed to attend the last rites of her grandmother who had died during the Emergency period. He further stated that those who raised their voice to protect democracy should be called 'loktantra senani'. 'Those who raised their voice against the murder of democracy, those who carried out a movement for the reinstatement of democracy, those who went to jail to protect the Constitution - I believe this was the third movement for grandmother fell ill when I was jailed, she died later. There were several leaders who were not allowed to attend 'antim darshan' when the members of their family died. So, those who raised their voice to protect democracy should definitely be called 'loktantra senani'. So, I did this in Madhya Pradesh when I was CM,' the Union Minister said. The Bharatiya Janata Party is observing the 50th anniversary of the Emergency as the 'Samvidhan Hatya Diwas'. India was placed under a state of Emergency from June 25, 1975, to March 21 1977, following the implementation of Article 352 of the constitution. (ANI)
Hindustan Times
24-06-2025
- Politics
- Hindustan Times
Fifty years ago, tryst with fear
Fifty years ago, this day, India received a rude jolt when the Union government declared a national Emergency, that led to a suspension of constitutional rights, including civil liberties, and imposed authoritarian rule on the country. The 21 months that followed were a deeply lacerating time for a people who were building a republic on the foundations of the legacy of the national movement and the Constitution that gave legal sanctity to its ideals. Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, singed by the Allahabad High Court verdict that convicted her of electoral malpractices, declared her election null and void, and disqualified her from holding elected office for six years, chose the shroud of the Emergency to stay in office. A pliant President, Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed, did not object and the country slipped into a long night. Power supply to media offices was cut that night so that newspapers could not report the events underway. Politicians from Opposition parties, trade union leaders, and Sarvodoya leader Jayaprakash Narayan (JP), were arrested that night and organisations including the RSS, Ananda Marga, and Jamaat-e-Islami banned. A few such as Socialist Party chairman George Fernandes went underground to organise a pushback. An estimated 35,000 people were arrested under the Maintenance of Internal Security Act and 76,000 people were held under the Defence of India Act and Rules during the Emergency months. The government had its way with the Emergency because the institutions expected to provide the checks and balances failed to challenge the subversion of the Constitution. (HT Photo) The government had its way with the Emergency because the institutions expected to provide the checks and balances failed to challenge the subversion of the Constitution. Like the President's office, the Supreme Court, except one judge, Justice HR Khanna, cowed before an imperial prime minister and her coterie that unleashed a regime of fear by weaponising legal provisions, suppressing free speech, and imprisoning the regime's opponents. Well-intentioned public policies such as population control measures to anti-corruption and black marketeering provisions turned into symbols of State repression and instruments to jail people. The administration used its publicity arms to claim that all was well with the nation and its citizens. JP, ailing and in jail, was the moral hand that guided the resistance to the Emergency. The political dynamic unleashed by Indira Gandhi saw a coming together of the Opposition parties, and even dissenters within the Congress party, which led to her defeat in 1977. The Emergency marked a rupture in independent India's history. Political India was never the same thereafter, but the restoration of democracy following the massive mandate for the Janata Party was a redemptive action that instilled faith in the power of vote among citizens. The Emergency tested India's tryst with democracy; unlike most other post-colonial nations, it survived the fire, with scars.
Hindustan Times
21-06-2025
- Politics
- Hindustan Times
When India was turned into a vast prison house
On the 50th anniversary of its promulgation, falling on June 25, the horrors of the national Emergency (1975-1977) will be recalled by just about everyone as the darkest period in post-Independence India. The Emergency regime's abuse of power, its brutal suppression of democratic opposition and muzzling of free thought and expression will be excavated from the past, roundly and rightly rebuked. The ruling establishment will cite the Emergency's excesses, the Indian National Congress will not deny the venality of those excesses. Indeed, it cannot. But it will also respond by asking the government, 'What about yours?' In the slanging match that might ensue, the lessons that need to be learnt from its horrors may well get lost. Jayaprakash Narayan, as he was being taken to jail, is said to have remarked vinasha kaale viparita buddhi. (HT Archive) For me, the horror of all the horrors of the Emergency was that India had become a vast prison house. Fear gripped the political class, the intelligentsia, the business community, and the media. During the Emergency, it has been estimated that 34,988 people were arrested under the Maintenance of Internal Security Act and 75,818 people were arrested under the Defence of India Act and Rules. As a 30-year-old junior officer in the Tamil Nadu cadre of the IAS, I felt like I was suddenly imprisoned myself, unable to speak my mind without looking over my shoulders, for walls had overnight acquired ears, corridors eyes. Newspapers were under the strictest censorship, and the radio relayed only government-sponsored news. Word came through, nonetheless, of Jayaprakash Narayan, the country's tallest leader, having been woken up at three in the morning and taken to jail, and his saying, as he was being moved, vinasha kaale vipareeta buddhi (as perdition nears, the ruler loses his mind). National leaders like Morarji Desai, Atal Bihari Vajpayee, LK Advani, Charan Singh, Chandra Shekhar, were all taken in. As were student leaders including Prakash Karat and Sitaram Yechury of the CPM, and Arun Jaitley of the BJP. George Fernandes was captured after some months of being underground. His supporter Snehalatha Reddy was thrown into prison, tortured and died shortly after, while on parole. P Rajan, a student at the Regional Engineering College, Calicut, was arrested by the police in Kerala on March 1, 1976. He was tortured to death in custody. His body was never found. This sequence, transposed over what I had learnt of jailings during the British Raj, made the prison the ugliest symbol of the State for me. It also made the prison something I wanted to see and get to know in the course of my work as a civil servant. Had I become a district collector that chance would have come to me organically. But as it happened, that coveted position eluded me in my career in the IAS. I came to see the inside of a jail only years later when, working in West Bengal, I did what Prime Minister Manmohan Singh asked all governors to do. I visited correctional homes, as jails were by then called. In one, a bearded young man came up to me and said in Hindustani: 'Huzoor, I am a Pakistani. I wanted to visit Ajmer Sharif for a minnat (vow). I got a visa and came. But my mistake was I came alone. I was detained on the suspicion of being a terrorist. I want to make no request or complaint to you. I only want to thank you. By arresting me and putting me in this jail, India has done me a favour. I have found a copy of the Holy Quran in the library here and have read it for the first time from beginning to end…' I did not know what to say to him. Was he being ironic, sarcastic, genuinely appreciative? In any case, he was being totally intellectual. In another correctional home, as I was leaving, completely torn by the spectacle of elderly women sentenced for dowry killings, and by a section cruelly called pagal ward (ward of the mad), I was accosted by a young Bengali inmate. 'Saer,' he said breathlessly, in Bangla, 'Our library here… it needs a regular supply of good new books.' He could have been a final year student in any of our universities. In yet another, the inmates made a plain request: 'Can we have, just for the day, Sir, a TV installed to enable us to watch the Wimbledon Open?' This was done, to the great delight of the set there that might have included murderers, rapists, thieves. But all of them were for that day, tennis fans no different from other free followers of Rafael Nadal and Roger Federer. We who are 'out' do not know the story of those who are 'in'. India is under no Emergency today. But is the horror of Emergency horrors, the jail, call it by whatever name, not a grim reality? Are there no political detenus in India today? Is the threat of imprisonment not active in our political economy? The 50th anniversary of the promulgation of the Emergency should respect history, not serve politics. The Congress has a truly golden opportunity to offer an unequivocal and unstinting apology for each and every transgression committed in the course of that Emergency, across the gamut of human rights, political norms, legal nostrums. Would it be too much to expect the Congress president to call on arguably the seniormost living ex-prisoner of the Emergency era, Advaniji and offer him a personal apology? He should do this not as the president of the party that was in power during the Emergency, but the party that led India to freedom. And the government has a golden opportunity to do something beyond recalling the Emergency's horrors. What may that be? It can announce a chapter-turn in India's penological history by releasing all so-called political detenus, and by saying detaining persons for their political views, when not accompanied by incitement to violence, or hatred, will henceforth not happen. More, it can alter for all time, our prison profile, turning our jails into serious centres for state-of-the-art correctional services across physical and mental counselling, personality therapy, re-orientation, where there is no question of custodial torture, where prisoner-on-prisoner violence and perversions are erased, where in-jail crimes with outside collaboration, especially in drugs-abuse, are a thing of the past. Above all, it can put life into the amendment of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) which by, Section 436A (new Section 479 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita) allowing for the release of undertrial prisoners on bail after they have served half of the maximum sentence prescribed for their alleged offence, provided it is not a capital offence (punishable by death or life imprisonment). Seventy-five percent of the inmates of our scandalously overcrowded correctional homes are undertrials, most of whom are very likely innocent. The practice of releasing prisoners at anniversaries is an old and respected tradition across the world. The government of India will show by tangible deed its abhorrence of the imprisoning spree that marked the Emergency if it startles the nation by this radical reform. Gopalkrishna Gandhi is a student of modern Indian history and the author of The Undying Light: A Personal History of Independent India. The views expressed are personal.
