Latest news with #Devils'
Time of India
5 days ago
- Business
- Time of India
NHL trade rumor: New Jersey Devils reportedly consider trading Dougie Hamilton as Elliotte Friedman reveals $63,000,000 defenseman's 10-team NMC list
NHL-Dougie Hamilton of the New Jersey Devils (Credit: Getty Images) The New Jersey Devils are reportedly considering trade options. That too for defenseman Dougie Hamilton as part of a wider effort to reshape their roster. NHL insider Elliotte Friedman revealed that Hamilton, signed through the 2027-28 season, has officially submitted a modified 10-team no-move clause list. This adds momentum to growing speculation that New Jersey may look to move the veteran blueliner in the coming months. Toronto Maple Leafs Signing Jack Roslovic? Dougie Hamilton Trade? Leafs Rumours - Elliotte Friedman Dougie Hamilton's $63 million deal poses trade challenges Hamilton's contract makes any potential trade more complicated. He carries an annual cap hit of $9 million, and with several years remaining on the deal. Only a limited number of teams may have both the cap space and the desire to absorb such a commitment; although his offensive skills and veteran presence are still valued. If a trade is to materialize, the Devils may need to retain salary or include additional assets to make the move viable for a contending team. Hamilton's 10-team NMC complicates Devils' trade outlook One of the main obstacles in trading Dougie Hamilton is his 10-team no-move clause. According to Friedman's report, the veteran defenseman has already submitted his list of blocked destinations, which restricts the Devils' ability to freely negotiate with all interested teams. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Gold Is Surging in 2025 — Smart Traders Are Already In IC Markets Learn More Undo With only 22 teams theoretically available, options become more limited when factoring in cap space and team needs. Devils' possible Hamilton trade signals broader team changes This development is one piece of a larger reset underway in New Jersey. After a frustrating season that saw the team miss the playoffs, General Manager Tom Fitzgerald has made it clear the organization is not content with the status quo. With the franchise building around younger stars like Jack Hughes, Luke Hughes, and Nico Hischier. Now moving Hamilton could open up cap space and opportunities for defensive depth, whether a trade comes this summer or closer to the trade deadline. This situation highlights the Devils' readiness to make tough decisions to compete again. Also Read: NHL trade rumor: Maple Leafs consider trading David Kampf, Calle Jarnkrok, and one defenseman amid offseason reshuffle Game On Season 1 continues with Mirabai Chanu's inspiring story. Watch Episode 2 here.
Time of India
7 days ago
- Business
- Time of India
NHL Trade Rumors: Devils are considering trading Dougie Hamilton in bold offseason shake-up
The New Jersey Devils are reportedly considering trading star defenseman Dougie Hamilton (Image via AP) After a frustrating season plagued by injuries and a disappointing playoff exit, the New Jersey Devils appear ready to make bold moves to reshape their roster. According to NHL insider Elliotte Friedman, one of those potential moves includes trading star defenseman Dougie Hamilton, a surprising development that signals the franchise's urgency to build a true Stanley Cup contender. Devils looking to move on from Dougie Hamilton's hefty contract and declining production Dougie Hamilton, who still has three years left on his contract at $9 million per season, is reportedly being dangled in trade discussions with multiple teams. While the 31-year-old blueliner remains one of the most recognizable names on the Devils' roster, his impact on the ice has noticeably dipped. Last season, he tallied nine goals and 31 assists in 64 games—solid, but far from his previous elite production levels. The Devils' front office, recognizing that their current core might not be enough to push them over the hump, is weighing options that would free up cap space and bring in fresh assets. Trading Hamilton could do both. His offensive upside and veteran leadership would still hold appeal for contending teams seeking a boost on the back end, especially if they believe he can thrive in a different system. A calculated risk that could reshape New Jersey's future While moving Hamilton would be a bold step, it's not one without precedent. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like เปรียบเทียบสเปรด: ระหว่าง Bitcoin และ Ethereum CFDs IC Markets อ่านเพิ่มเติม Undo Teams across the league are increasingly willing to part with big names in favor of flexibility and long-term planning. The Devils have a strong young foundation, but they're clearly not content with early playoff exits. Friedman's report underscores a growing belief within the NHL community that New Jersey is in the middle of a strategic pivot—prioritizing future success over sentimentality. Also Read: NHL Trade Rumors: Anaheim Ducks eye blockbuster move for Dallas Stars' Jason Robertson The final decision hasn't been made yet, and Hamilton's fate remains uncertain. However, the message is clear: no player is untouchable in the Devils' pursuit of a championship. Whether the star defenseman is moved or retained, New Jersey fans should brace for a busy and potentially transformative offseason. For real-time updates, scores, and highlights, follow our live coverage of the India vs England Test match here. Game On Season 1 continues with Mirabai Chanu's inspiring story. Watch Episode 2 here.
The Advertiser
23-06-2025
- Politics
- The Advertiser
Most voters want AFL stadium deal redo, poll shows
Both major parties are out of step with state voters in their unwavering support to build a $945 million stadium in a deal for an AFL team, a pre-election poll suggests. With a snap election weeks away, Tasmanian voters were surveyed on their attitude to the deal struck with the AFL to build a roofed stadium at Macquarie Point. The Hobart stadium is a condition of the licence for the Devils' inclusion in the competition in 2028. The online poll of 842 voters, conducted by YouGov on behalf of progressive think tank The Australia Institute from July 12 to 16, indicates most Tasmanians believe the stadium deal is unfair. More than two out of three (69 per cent) support Tasmanian parliament renegotiating with the AFL to avoid constructing a new stadium. Support to renegotiate was strongest among independent (81 per cent) and Greens voters (78 per cent). The idea was only mildly less popular with Labor supporters (71 per cent). Liberal voters were the most likely to disagree with the proposition (38 per cent) but a majority (56 per cent) still wanted parliamentarians to return to the negotiating table. More than two in three also believe the AFL is treating Tasmania unfairly in its requirements for granting Tasmania a license to join the national competition. Perhaps surprisingly, more men (72 per cent) than women (65 per cent) agreed with the statement. Over 65s were particularly scathing, with four out of five miffed with the AFL's treatment. Some analysts have described the Tasmanian election as a referendum on the stadium, but both Liberal Premier Jeremy Rockliff and Labor leader Dean Winters have been unwilling to budge on their support. The AFL has been staunch in its refusal to renegotiate the deal, declaring the stadium remains a non-negotiable for the Devils' licence. The Australia Institute's strategy director Leanne Minshull described the stadium deal as a "dud" and one of the most one-sided in Australian sport. She said residents of the Apple Isle were rightly appalled by the AFL's treatment, which effectively amounted to putting a "gun to the head of Tasmanians". "Whoever wins the state election on July 19 must stand up to the AFL and stand up for Tasmanians," she said. "This state deserves to have a team in the AFL, but Tassie taxpayers don't want to be on the hook for a billion-dollar indoor stadium they don't want." Final approval of the stadium is expected to come down to a vote of parliament. Both major parties are out of step with state voters in their unwavering support to build a $945 million stadium in a deal for an AFL team, a pre-election poll suggests. With a snap election weeks away, Tasmanian voters were surveyed on their attitude to the deal struck with the AFL to build a roofed stadium at Macquarie Point. The Hobart stadium is a condition of the licence for the Devils' inclusion in the competition in 2028. The online poll of 842 voters, conducted by YouGov on behalf of progressive think tank The Australia Institute from July 12 to 16, indicates most Tasmanians believe the stadium deal is unfair. More than two out of three (69 per cent) support Tasmanian parliament renegotiating with the AFL to avoid constructing a new stadium. Support to renegotiate was strongest among independent (81 per cent) and Greens voters (78 per cent). The idea was only mildly less popular with Labor supporters (71 per cent). Liberal voters were the most likely to disagree with the proposition (38 per cent) but a majority (56 per cent) still wanted parliamentarians to return to the negotiating table. More than two in three also believe the AFL is treating Tasmania unfairly in its requirements for granting Tasmania a license to join the national competition. Perhaps surprisingly, more men (72 per cent) than women (65 per cent) agreed with the statement. Over 65s were particularly scathing, with four out of five miffed with the AFL's treatment. Some analysts have described the Tasmanian election as a referendum on the stadium, but both Liberal Premier Jeremy Rockliff and Labor leader Dean Winters have been unwilling to budge on their support. The AFL has been staunch in its refusal to renegotiate the deal, declaring the stadium remains a non-negotiable for the Devils' licence. The Australia Institute's strategy director Leanne Minshull described the stadium deal as a "dud" and one of the most one-sided in Australian sport. She said residents of the Apple Isle were rightly appalled by the AFL's treatment, which effectively amounted to putting a "gun to the head of Tasmanians". "Whoever wins the state election on July 19 must stand up to the AFL and stand up for Tasmanians," she said. "This state deserves to have a team in the AFL, but Tassie taxpayers don't want to be on the hook for a billion-dollar indoor stadium they don't want." Final approval of the stadium is expected to come down to a vote of parliament. Both major parties are out of step with state voters in their unwavering support to build a $945 million stadium in a deal for an AFL team, a pre-election poll suggests. With a snap election weeks away, Tasmanian voters were surveyed on their attitude to the deal struck with the AFL to build a roofed stadium at Macquarie Point. The Hobart stadium is a condition of the licence for the Devils' inclusion in the competition in 2028. The online poll of 842 voters, conducted by YouGov on behalf of progressive think tank The Australia Institute from July 12 to 16, indicates most Tasmanians believe the stadium deal is unfair. More than two out of three (69 per cent) support Tasmanian parliament renegotiating with the AFL to avoid constructing a new stadium. Support to renegotiate was strongest among independent (81 per cent) and Greens voters (78 per cent). The idea was only mildly less popular with Labor supporters (71 per cent). Liberal voters were the most likely to disagree with the proposition (38 per cent) but a majority (56 per cent) still wanted parliamentarians to return to the negotiating table. More than two in three also believe the AFL is treating Tasmania unfairly in its requirements for granting Tasmania a license to join the national competition. Perhaps surprisingly, more men (72 per cent) than women (65 per cent) agreed with the statement. Over 65s were particularly scathing, with four out of five miffed with the AFL's treatment. Some analysts have described the Tasmanian election as a referendum on the stadium, but both Liberal Premier Jeremy Rockliff and Labor leader Dean Winters have been unwilling to budge on their support. The AFL has been staunch in its refusal to renegotiate the deal, declaring the stadium remains a non-negotiable for the Devils' licence. The Australia Institute's strategy director Leanne Minshull described the stadium deal as a "dud" and one of the most one-sided in Australian sport. She said residents of the Apple Isle were rightly appalled by the AFL's treatment, which effectively amounted to putting a "gun to the head of Tasmanians". "Whoever wins the state election on July 19 must stand up to the AFL and stand up for Tasmanians," she said. "This state deserves to have a team in the AFL, but Tassie taxpayers don't want to be on the hook for a billion-dollar indoor stadium they don't want." Final approval of the stadium is expected to come down to a vote of parliament.
Perth Now
22-06-2025
- Politics
- Perth Now
Most voters want AFL stadium deal redo, poll shows
Both major parties are out of step with state voters in their unwavering support to build a $945 million stadium in a deal for an AFL team, a pre-election poll suggests. With a snap election weeks away, Tasmanian voters were surveyed on their attitude to the deal struck with the AFL to build a roofed stadium at Macquarie Point. The Hobart stadium is a condition of the licence for the Devils' inclusion in the competition in 2028. The online poll of 842 voters, conducted by YouGov on behalf of progressive think tank The Australia Institute from July 12 to 16, indicates most Tasmanians believe the stadium deal is unfair. More than two out of three (69 per cent) support Tasmanian parliament renegotiating with the AFL to avoid constructing a new stadium. Support to renegotiate was strongest among independent (81 per cent) and Greens voters (78 per cent). The idea was only mildly less popular with Labor supporters (71 per cent). Liberal voters were the most likely to disagree with the proposition (38 per cent) but a majority (56 per cent) still wanted parliamentarians to return to the negotiating table. More than two in three also believe the AFL is treating Tasmania unfairly in its requirements for granting Tasmania a license to join the national competition. Perhaps surprisingly, more men (72 per cent) than women (65 per cent) agreed with the statement. Over 65s were particularly scathing, with four out of five miffed with the AFL's treatment. Some analysts have described the Tasmanian election as a referendum on the stadium, but both Liberal Premier Jeremy Rockliff and Labor leader Dean Winters have been unwilling to budge on their support. The AFL has been staunch in its refusal to renegotiate the deal, declaring the stadium remains a non-negotiable for the Devils' licence. The Australia Institute's strategy director Leanne Minshull described the stadium deal as a "dud" and one of the most one-sided in Australian sport. She said residents of the Apple Isle were rightly appalled by the AFL's treatment, which effectively amounted to putting a "gun to the head of Tasmanians". "Whoever wins the state election on July 19 must stand up to the AFL and stand up for Tasmanians," she said. "This state deserves to have a team in the AFL, but Tassie taxpayers don't want to be on the hook for a billion-dollar indoor stadium they don't want." Final approval of the stadium is expected to come down to a vote of parliament.
Yahoo
04-06-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
AFL's Tasmania expansion on a knife edge amid state political uncertainty
The proposed stadium at Hobart's Macquarie Point has become a sticking point for some in the AFL's expansion into Tasmania. The proposed stadium at Hobart's Macquarie Point has become a sticking point for some in the AFL's expansion into Tasmania. Photograph: Cox Architecture The AFL's expansion into Tasmania is on a knife edge as the state's politicians consider a move to oust premier Jeremy Rockliff, which would trigger a shake up and potentially torpedo the Devils' plans to join the league. The Devils on Wednesday said the political uncertainty was cause for 'great concern' and presented 'a serious risk … for the future of Tasmania Football Club'. Advertisement The club, which has already attracted 210,000 members, is due to enter the competition in 2028 under an agreement with the AFL, and move into the newly complete venue on the Hobart waterfront the following year. Related: Ferocious, cheeky or 'nightmare fuel'? Meet Rum'un, Tasmania's new AFL mascot One of the conditions set by the AFL for a new team in Tasmania was a roofed stadium, but the expensive project – set to cost around $1bn – faces opposition from some in Tasmania, who instead have called for the money to be spent elsewhere. The Greens have declared they support a motion of no-confidence in the premier put forward by Labor's opposition leader Dean Winter. Advertisement In Parliament on Wednesday morning, Greens leader Dr Rosalie Woodruff called for the motion to explicitly mention the government's handling of the stadium. But Winter responded by saying he would not support the amendment, and the no-confidence motion was focused on the state of the budget. In a dramatic day in Hobart, Devils' head of corporate affairs Kath McCann was emotional at a press conference as she described there is no 'plan B' to renegotiate the deal with the AFL. 'It'd be fair to say that the level of uncertainty would be significantly heightened, and in fact, some of those scenarios don't beg thinking about for the club here today,' McCann said, via the ABC. Advertisement 'The optics nationally and internationally are really negative for Tasmania, what this looks like is uncertainly, a risk to invest and a state that isn't unified.' The Devils had earlier taken the unusual step of offering a public statement amidst the political uncertainty. 'We ask that our political leaders understand the implications of their actions and decisions on the future of our state for all Tasmanians, a future which we know Tasmania Football Club can play a significant part,' it said. On Tuesday in Melbourne, AFL chief executive Andrew Dillon said the competition had already been planning for the weekly bye for one team that would come with entry of the Devils as 19th team, and anticipated the stadium's enabling legislation would be discussed in the lower house later this month and the upper house early in July. 'The Tasmanian government and [Devils CEO] Brendon Gale and the Tassie Devils have done a power of work and we're really confident in 2028,' he said.
