Latest news with #DistrictCourtof
Indian Express
03-07-2025
- Indian Express
Chandigarh court denies interim bail to accused in Rs 30 crore ‘fake' ITC scam, cites adequate medical care in jail
The District Court of Chandigarh has dismissed the plea of an accused in alleged Rs 30-crore fake Input Tax Credit (ITC) scam, seeking interim bail for two weeks. The accused, Manmohan Singh, was arrested by Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI), Chandigarh Zonal Unit, which claimed to have unearthed a major fake ITC racket involving bogus invoices and non-existent supplies. According to reports, accused Manmohan not only floated these bogus entities, but also orchestrated the issuance of fake invoices to generate and avail ineligible ITC. He is also alleged to have coordinated banking transactions and cash movements in exchange for commissions, in collusion with other individuals who are now under the scanner. Since lodged in Model Jail, Burail, the accused sought an interim bail for two weeks, claiming he is suffering from high blood pressure (BP) and paralytic stroke. The counsel for Manmohan Singh submitted that on June 8, while in judicial custody, he suffered a brain stroke resulting in paralysis on the right side of his body. He was taken by the Burail Jail authorities to Government Medical College and Hospital (GMCH), Sector 32, Chandigarh where he received emergency medical treatment. After administering initial treatment, the attending doctors prepared a detailed plan for the applicant's continued care and recovery, which include several diagnostic tests, ongoing treatment, regular medication and constant personal assistance, as he is presently bedridden and unable to walk or even sit up without support. His counsel further submitted that he being a paralysis patient, requires intensive medical attention, continuous monitoring and constant personal care, which cannot be adequately provided within the jail premises. The state counsel, however, submitted that there is no report of any doctor that would suggest that the treatment and follow up required to be administered to the applicant cannot be provided to him by or under the supervision of the jail authorities, and that Model Jail Medical Dispensary has a qualified medical officer providing regular care with daily monitoring of vital parameters, immediate referral system to GMCH-32, and adequate stock of prescribed medications. Following hearing all the arguments, the court held that the record shows that timely medical assistance and treatment has been provided to the applicant and he has been referred to Emergency OPD, GMCH-32, Chandigarh. 'If the applicant is not satisfied with the treatment.. then he can himself or through his family members or through DLSA request the jail authorities in writing to take him to any private hospital of his choice in Mohali or Chandigarh for his medical treatment. If the applicant moves such an application, the jail authorities are directed to take him to the private hospital of his choice in custody and do the needful as per jail manual,' the court said. The court, meanwhile, clarified that all the expenses of the private hospital will be borne by the accused on his own.
Yahoo
29-05-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
Here are the Trump tariffs that were struck down — then reinstated, for now
Update: Just after 3 p.m. Thursday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a brief order granting the Trump administration's request to pause an earlier ruling that voided several of the president's tariffs. As a result, those tariffs have been reinstated for now. The businesses challenging the tariffs have until June 5 to respond, while the administration has until June 9 to file any reply, the appeals court said. Earlier: On Wednesday, a federal trade court voided some of the tariffs the Trump administration has imposed as part of its effort to shore up the trade deficit and boost manufacturing. Less than 24 hours later, a second court, the District Court of Washington, D.C., issued a similar ruling just after noon on Thursday. The rulings have set the stage for a contentious court fight, as the White House immediately filed an appeal to the initial decision. The Trump administration may ask the U.S. Supreme Court as soon as Friday to pause the rulings, CNBC reported. In the meantime, under the terms of the initial decision, the U.S. has until June 9 to direct customs officials to cease collections of the import taxes the president imposed under an emergency-powers statute. These include the "fentanyl tariffs," Trump imposed at the outset of his second term, the "reciprocal tariffs" he announced on April 9 (which so far have extended only to China), and the de minimis tariffs on low-cost imports from China. The trade court also held that the U.S. must refund the tariffs it has collected under the emergency powers statute. Analysts with Nomura Holdings financial group said that even if Trump ultimately replicates those tariffs using other authorizations, that refund obligation would remain in place. The rulings inject further uncertainty into the markets and the economy. In the meantime, assuming the rulings are allowed to fully take effect, here are the tariffs that would, and would not, be affected. 10% universal baseline tariff 20% duties on Chinese goods in response to its alleged failures to combat fentanyl trafficking 10% "reciprocal" duty targeting all Chinese goods De minimis tariffs on Chinese goods valued at less than $800 25% on auto imports (excluding non-U.S. content of USMCA-compliant autos) 25% on auto parts imports (USMCA-compliant parts exempt) 25% on all steel, aluminum, and aluminum articles This article was originally published on
