Latest news with #DougBarrowman
Daily Mail
08-07-2025
- Business
- Daily Mail
Government suing firm linked to 'Baroness Bra' for £122m because of 'buyer's remorse' after Covid contract, High Court told
The Government is suing a firm linked to Michelle Mone for £122m claiming it had 'buyer's remorse' over a Covid PPE contract. The bra tycoon and Tory peer had recommended PPE Medpro, which went on to provide 25 million 'faulty' surgical gowns during the coronavirus pandemic. PPE Medpro is now being sued by the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC), with Government lawyers claiming the gowns couldn't be used because they were not sterile. The department wants more than £121 million back from PPE Medpro, plus storage costs of over £8 million. PPE Medpro is also accused of supplying the gowns without CE markings, which shows if a product meets certain medical standards. The consortium, led by the Tory peer's husband Doug Barrowman, was awarded contracts by the former Conservative administration. Following a month-long trial at the High Court in London, lawyers for PPE Medpro said in closing that the Government had ordered 10 years' worth of excess gowns by December 2020. Charles Samek KC, for PPE Medpro, said in written submissions: 'That simple fact explains why, once the PPEM gowns landed in the UK, they were no longer needed or wanted.' He described the Government's assessment at the time as 'wildly and hopelessly wrong', adding: 'DHSC's obvious buyer's remorse was channelled into looking for ways to escape from a contract it wished it had never made.' PPE Medpro has issued a counterclaim saying DHSC owed a duty of care to the company to advise it on compliance with the contract. Mr Samek said DHSC approved the gowns without seeing a valid CE mark because they did not need one, adding that it is 'obvious' that PPE Medpro 'did not have and did not pretend to have a valid CE mark'. Testing of 140 gowns after delivery showed that 103 failed to meet the sterilisation standard, the court was previously told. Mr Samek said that after delivery to the UK, the gowns were kept in shipping containers for 'at least three months'. Contamination therefore likely happened 'subsequent to delivery, most probably during the subsequent transportation, storage and handling of the tested gowns', he added. Paul Stanley KC, for DHSC, said PPE Medpro did not follow a validated sterilisation process and did not keep sufficient records. He said the bioburden, or level of microbial contamination prior to sterilisation, was not properly assessed and that PPE Medpro has been unable to show evidence of this assessment. In written submissions, he said: 'The absence of such documentation is compelling evidence that the assessment of bioburden did not take place.' He continued: 'DHSC invites the court to find as a matter of fact that this fundamental step in a validated process for sterilisation was not done.' The barrister also referenced photographs that he said showed how the gowns were not manufactured in a way that would reduce microbial contamination. These included workers wearing short sleeves, gowns trailing on the floor and personnel wearing street shoes and working without hair protection, he said. Mr Stanley denied that DHSC owed a duty of care to PPE Medpro and said DHSC 'is entitled to repayment of the price, and to recover damages for storage costs'. He added: 'The gowns were not sterilised using a properly validated process and were not, as a result, compliant with the contractual standard or (in the true commercial sense) 'sterile' gowns at all.' Closing submissions are expected to conclude on Thursday with a written judgment given at a later date.
Times
22-06-2025
- Business
- Times
What happened to Michelle Mone's Dubai bitcoin property empire?
Baroness Mone's £250 million Dubai property project, hailed as the first major development to be sold using bitcoin, was never actually built, it has emerged. Mone, who was made a peer in 2015 for services to business, announced proposals to build two 40-floor skyscrapers complete with shopping centre and sports facilities. With her husband, Doug Barrowman, Mone announced in 2017 that the properties would be available to buy for virtual currency rather than cash. However, work on the site has been abandoned, despite claims from Mone and Barrowman that buyers had already invested in flats using cryptocurrency. 'I'm a baroness so I wouldn't be getting involved in it if it was a kind of 'dodgy' industry,' Monetold an American news network at the time. Yet, the Mail on Sunday reports, Dubai government records show that the couple's Aston Plaza and Residences, located in the Science Park district of the city, were never built. A property inspection report carried out by the Dubai Real Estate Regulatory Agency confirmed that the project started but was later 'cancelled' at just 32 per cent completion. Pictures taken by inspectors who visited the site in January 2018 show the concrete shell of one tower abandoned in the middle of the desert. Promotional mock-ups on the project's website showed sleek, minimalist homes set across two glass tower blocks. According to the development's website, 150 apartments were available to buy directly from the developers using bitcoin, a digital currency. It added: 'The highly anticipated selection of 1,133 studio, one and two bedroom apartments, is due for completion in summer 2019. Apartments offer floor-to-ceiling windows with unobstructed views of the Dubai Hills and the iconic city skyline.' The project was sold on to a Dubai-based developer. Representatives for Mone and Barrowman said that no one lost any money and all deposits were held in escrow, in accordance with the law in Dubai. In the UK the Scottish business couple are at the centre of an anti-corruption inquiry connected to the coronavirus pandemic which has led to £75 million of their assets being frozen by the National Crime Agency. Investigators are focused on PPE Medpro, a company led by Barrowman, which was placed in a VIP priority lane for government personal protective equipment contracts worth £203 million of taxpayers' money after a recommendation by Mone. The Department of Health and Social Care is suing PPE Medpro over claims that surgical gowns supplied by the firm were not fit for use. The government told the High Court in London recently that the company should pay back more than £121 million for breaching a Covid contract for 25 million of the gowns.
Daily Mail
21-06-2025
- Business
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Michelle Mone's £250 million Dubai property project was never finished and is now just a desert shell
's £250 million Dubai property project – hailed as the first major development to be sold using Bitcoin – was never actually built, The Mail on Sunday can reveal. In 2017, former lingerie tycoon Ms Mone, 53 – dubbed Baroness Bra after being awarded a peerage – and husband Doug Barrowman, 60, unveiled proposals to erect two 40-floor skyscrapers as part of a luxury desert complex boasting high-end homes, a shopping centre and sports facilities. To much fanfare, they said the apartments could be bought using virtual currency rather than hard cash. Within months they claimed that buyers had already invested in 'a number of apartments' using the crypto tokens. Ms Mone even told an American news network that Bitcoin (BTC) was 'the currency of the future', adding: 'I'm a Baroness – so I wouldn't be getting involved in it if it was a kind of 'dodgy' industry.' Yet Dubai government records show that the couple's Aston Plaza and Residences, located in the Science Park district of the Middle Eastern city, were never actually built. A property inspection report carried out by the Dubai Real Estate Regulatory Agency and obtained by The Mail on Sunday confirms that the project started but was later 'cancelled' at just 32 per cent completion. Pictures taken by inspectors who visited the site in January 2018 show the concrete shell of one mega tower abandoned in the middle of the desert. The images are a far cry from the promotional mock-ups that were advertised on the project's website, which showed sleek, minimalist homes set across two glass tower blocks. The revelation comes after the UK Government told the High Court in London recently that a company linked to Ms Mone and Mr Barrowman should pay back more than £121 million for breaching a Covid contract for 25 million surgical gowns. And earlier this month we told how the couple from Glasgow were offloading some of their British property empire as they look to start a new life in Florida. The Aston Plaza and Residences promised to offer 'exceptional real estate for discerning professionals and young families living in the United Arab Emirates', adding that the 'company's ethos is delivered through its meticulous attention to detail when creating homes'. A press release put out by the Aston team said that the project was the 'first joint business venture between the two business icons' Ms Mone and her husband, who is chairman of the Knox group of companies. According to the development's website, 150 apartments were available to buy directly from the developers using Bitcoin, a digital currency that fluctuates in value depending on market sentiment. It continued: 'The highly-anticipated selection of 1,133 studio, one and two bedroom apartments, is due for completion in summer 2019. 'Apartments offer floor-to-ceiling windows with unobstructed views of the Dubai Hills and the iconic city skyline.' The website added: 'The development also boasts the Plaza – three floors dedicated to retail which will include boutiques, cafes, restaurants and a supermarket.' Studio apartments started at 33BTC, which is the equivalent of almost £3 million if linked to today's sterling markets. Speaking to The Mail on Sunday in December 2017, Ms Mone, who founded the Ultimo lingerie brand, said she had already sold 'a number of apartments' to buyers using the cryptocurrency. Aston Towers, known as Project 152 in property databases, is listed as 'permanently closed' on Google. Records show that although the project was transferred to a different Dubai-based company around 2019, work on the development continues to be 'cancelled'. The Mail on Sunday recently told how Ms Mone and Mr Barrowman had sold two townhouses in Glasgow to celebrity friends in the last 12 months, pocketing a profit of £2 million. The new owners are Nick Haddow, the photographer who shot one of Ms Mone's most risqué Ultimo push-up bra campaigns, and Paul McManus – the drummer in Scots rock band Gun and a high-profile Scottish Labour Party donor. Meanwhile, a quaint Chelsea mews house in London linked to a company of Ms Mone's son Declan has been sold for £2.185 million to a senior member of a Middle Eastern royal family. Last year the couple also sold their £19 million London townhouse as well as their £6.8 million Lady M yacht. Ms Mone's friends say she has told them that she is seeking to start afresh in Miami. The Scots business moguls are currently at the centre of an anti-corruption PPE fraud probe which saw £75 million of their assets frozen by the National Crime Agency. Investigators are focused on PPE Medpro, a company led by Mr Barrowman, which was placed in a VIP priority lane for government contracts worth £203 million of taxpayers' money following a recommendation by Ms Mone. This came after Ms Mone was made a peer by Prime Minister David Cameron in 2015. The Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) is suing PPE Medpro over claims that surgical gowns supplied by the firm were not fit for use. On June 11, Paul Stanley, KC, for the DHSC, told the High Court: 'The Government is seeking to recover the costs of the contract, as well as the costs of transporting and storing the items, which amount to an additional £8,648,691.' The Dubai property project was sold on to a Dubai-based developer. Representatives for Ms Mone and Mr Barrowman said that no one lost any money and all deposits were held in escrow, in accordance with the law in Dubai.
The Independent
12-06-2025
- Business
- The Independent
Baroness Michelle Mone-linked company must pay back £121m for ‘faulty' PPE, High Court told
A company linked to Baroness Michelle Mone should pay back more than £121 million for breaching a government contract for 25 million surgical gowns during the coronavirus pandemic, the High Court has heard. The Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) is suing PPE Medpro for allegedly breaching a deal for the gowns, with their lawyers telling the court they were 'faulty' because they were not sterile. The company, a consortium led by Baroness Mone's husband, businessman Doug Barrowman, was awarded government contracts by the former Conservative administration to supply PPE during the pandemic, after she recommended it to ministers. Both have denied wrongdoing. The government is seeking to recover the costs of the contract, as well as the costs of transporting and storing the items, which amount to an additional £8,648,691. PPE Medpro said it 'categorically denies' breaching the contract, and its lawyers claimed the company has been 'singled out for unfair treatment'. Opening the trial on Wednesday, Paul Stanley KC, for the DHSC, said: 'This case is simply about whether 25 million surgical gowns provided by PPE Medpro were faulty. 'It is, in short, a technical case about detailed legal and industry standards that apply to sterile gowns.' Mr Stanley said in written submissions the 'initial contact with Medpro came through Baroness Mone', with discussions about the contract then going through one of the company's directors, Anthony Page. Baroness Mone remained 'active throughout' the negotiations, Mr Stanley said, with the peer stating Mr Barrowman had 'years of experience in manufacturing, procurement and management of supply chains'. But he told the court Baroness Mone's communications were 'not part of this case', which was 'simply about compliance'. He said: 'The department does not allege anything improper happened, and we are not concerned with any profits made by anybody.' In court documents from May this year, the DHSC said the gowns were delivered to the UK in 72 lots between August and October 2020, with £121,999,219.20 paid to PPE Medpro between July and August that year. The department rejected the gowns in December 2020 and told the company it would have to repay the money, but this has not happened and the gowns remain in storage, unable to be used. In written submissions for trial, Mr Stanley said 99.9999% of the gowns should have been sterile under the terms of the contract, equating to one in a million being unusable. The DHSC claims the contract also specified PPE Medpro had to sterilise the gowns using a 'validated process', attested by CE marking, which indicates a product has met certain medical standards. He said 'none of those things happened', with no validated sterilisation process being followed, and the gowns supplied with invalid CE marking. He continued that 140 gowns were later tested for sterility, with 103 failing. He said: 'Whatever was done to sterilise the gowns had not achieved its purpose, because more than one in a million of them was contaminated when delivered. 'On that basis, DHSC was entitled to reject the gowns, or is entitled to damages, which amount to the full price and storage costs.' In his written submissions, Charles Samek KC, for PPE Medpro, said the 'only plausible reason' for the gowns becoming contaminated was due to 'the transport and storage conditions or events to which the gowns were subject', after they had been delivered to the DHSC. He added the testing did not happen until several months after the gowns were rejected, and the samples selected were not 'representative of the whole population', meaning 'no proper conclusions may be drawn'. He said the DHSC's claim was 'contrived and opportunistic' and PPE Medpro had been 'made the 'fall guy' for a catalogue of failures and errors' by the department. He said: 'It has perhaps been singled out because of the high profiles of those said to be associated with PPE Medpro, and/or because it is perceived to be a supplier with financial resources behind it. 'In reality, an archetypal case of 'buyer's remorse', where DHSC simply seeks to get out of a bargain it wished it never entered into, left, as it is, with over £8 billion of purchased and unused PPE as a result of an untrammelled and uncontrolled buying spree with taxpayers' money.' He also said there was a 'delicious irony' that Baroness Mone was mentioned in the DHSC's written submissions, when she had 'zero relevance to the contractual issues in this case'. Neither Baroness Mone nor Mr Barrowman is due to give evidence in the trial, and Baroness Mone did not attend the first day of the hearing on Wednesday. A PPE Medpro spokesperson said the company 'categorically denies breaching its obligations' and will 'robustly defend' the claim. The trial before Mrs Justice Cockerill is due to last five weeks, with a judgment expected in writing at a later date.
Daily Mail
11-06-2025
- Business
- Daily Mail
Firm linked to Baroness Bra 'must pay back £122m for faulty PPE': Government suing over Covid contract 'initiated' by Tory peer
A firm linked to Michelle Mone must repay £122million for allegedly breaching a Covid PPE contract, a court heard yesterday. The bra tycoon had recommended PPE Medpro, which went on to provide 25 million 'faulty' surgical gowns. The consortium, led by the Tory peer's husband Doug Barrowman, was awarded contracts by the former Conservative administration during the pandemic. PPE Medpro is now being sued by the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC), with Government lawyers claiming the gowns couldn't be used because they were not sterile. Baroness Mone and the firm both deny any wrongdoing. The Government is seeking to recover the costs of the contract, plus an additional £8,648,691 for transporting and storing the items. PPE Medpro said it 'categorically denies' breaching the contract, with its lawyers claiming the company has been 'singled out for unfair treatment'. Opening the trial, Paul Stanley KC, for the DHSC, said: 'This case is simply about whether 25 million surgical gowns provided by PPE Medpro were faulty. It is, in short, a technical case about detailed legal and industry standards that apply to sterile gowns.' Mr Stanley said in written submissions the 'initial contact with Medpro came through Baroness Mone', with contract discussions then going through one of the firm's directors, Anthony Page. Baroness Mone remained 'active throughout' negotiations, he said, with the peer stating Mr Barrowman had 'years of experience in manufacturing, procurement and management of supply chains'. But he said Baroness Mone's communications were not part of this case, which was 'simply about compliance'. He added: 'The department does not allege anything improper happened, and we are not concerned with any profits made by anybody.' In court documents from May this year, the DHSC said the gowns were delivered to the UK in 72 lots between August and October 2020, with almost £122million paid to PPE Medpro between July and August that year. The department rejected the gowns in December 2020 and told the firm it would have to repay the money, but this has not happened and the gowns remain in storage. Mr Stanley said 99.9999 per cent of the gowns should have been sterile under the terms of the contract. The DHSC claims the deal also specified PPE Medpro had to sterilise them using a 'validated process', attested by CE marking, which indicates a product has met certain medical standards. He said 'none of those things happened', and that of 140 gowns tested for sterility, 103 failed. He added that the DHSC 'was entitled to reject the gowns, or is entitled to damages, which amount to the full price and storage costs'. Charles Samek KC, for PPE Medpro, said the 'only plausible reason' for the gowns becoming contaminated was due to 'the transport and storage conditions or events to which the gowns were subject' after delivery. He said testing was done several months after the gowns were rejected, and that the samples were not 'representative of the whole population'. Mr Samek described the DHSC's claim as 'contrived and opportunistic', with PPE Medpro 'made the fall guy for a catalogue of failures... and uncontrolled buying spree with taxpayers' money'. Neither Baroness Mone nor Mr Barrowman is due to give evidence during the five-week trial. A PPE Medpro spokesman said it 'categorically denies breaching its obligations' and will 'robustly defend' the claim.
