Latest news with #Dynata
Sky News AU
29-06-2025
- Politics
- Sky News AU
Australians push back on Welcome to Country ceremonies, new poll from Institute of Public Affairs reveals
The majority of Australians believe Welcome to Country ceremonies have become divisive, according to new polling released by the Institute of Public Affairs (IPA). According to the survey, conducted by research firm Dynata, 56 per cent of people believe the ceremonies have become divisive. Twenty-seven per cent of people said they were unsure while 17 per cent disagreed that the ceremonies had become divisive. Half of all people (49 per cent) said Welcome to Country ceremonies should not be performed at sporting matches. Thirty per cent supported the ceremonies at sporting matches while 21 per cent were unsure. Among younger people, aged 18 to 24, 48 per cent agreed the ceremonies are divisive - more than double the 22 per cent who disagreed. Deputy Executive Director of the IPA Daniel Wild said the findings reflected widespread frustration with what he described as 'divisive and pointless' cultural rituals. 'Australians have had an absolute gutful of divisive and pointless Welcome to Country ceremonies,' Mr Wild said on Sunday. 'Only one-third (of people said) they want the ceremonies performed before major events such as ANZAC Day and sporting matches,' Mr Wild said. 'Even younger Australians, who the political class insist are left-wing and woke, by a two-to-one margin believe Welcome to Country performances are divisive.' The survey comes after the official Anzac Day dawn service in Melbourne was protested with members of the crowd booing and yelling during the Welcome to Country. According to the survey, 46 per cent of Australians do not want Welcome to Country ceremonies at ANZAC Day events. The release of the polling coincides with new Opposition Leader Sussan Ley adopting an Acknowledgement of Country in her first National Press Club address. She practiced the ritual after former opposition leader Peter Dutton argued they were overdone, and said he would not use aboriginal flags if elected prime minister. Ms Ley told journalists she supported Acknowledgement and Welcome of Country ceremonies when they were 'meaningful'. 'With respect to Welcome to Country, it's simple: if it's meaningful, if it matters, if it resonates, then it's in the right place,' she said, after being elected as opposition leader. Mr Wild criticised Ms Ley's approach, arguing it remains out of step with public opinion. 'Her stance on holding welcome to country ceremonies 'in significant moments' is at odds with modern Australia, with just one-third backing the practice,' Mr Wild said. 'Common-sense, working-class, mainstream Australians understand something that the highly credentialed elites do not. "Australians do not want to be divided by race, and we do not want or need to be welcomed to our own country."
Yahoo
22-06-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
One in seven people ‘have lost money to fraud in past year'
One in seven people say they have lost money to fraud in the past year, according to a survey. Some 14% of people surveyed in February said they had lost money to fraud in the past 12 months, financial insights company TransUnion found. Half (50%) said that a fraud attempt had been made against them in the past three months. The 'consumer pulse' survey also found that a significant proportion of people favour account security processes over ease of access, with over three-quarters (78%) saying they do not want access to their accounts without being explicitly authenticated first. Nearly half (49%) of people said they do not mind being authenticated again after an initial login, for example, when making a payment or changing a password. Chad Reimers, general manager of fraud and identity at TransUnion in the UK said: 'Quick and seamless journeys have become the norm. 'However, consumers are increasingly demanding trust as part of their interactions with digital channels. 'There are increasing demands from consumers to ensure security and authentication – and this spans across sectors, from financial services, to gaming, to online dating.' TransUnion commissioned Dynata to carry out the survey among 1,000 people aged 18 or over across the UK. As well as reporting incidents to the police, people who are concerned that they may have fallen victim to fraud should tell their bank or payments provider as soon as they can. 'This may help the provider to claw the money back and could also help to prevent further fraud attempts on the account. Many banks have signed up to the 159 service – a memorable number that people can call if they have received contact that they suspect to be fraudulent. People can also check their credit reports for any activity which may indicate fraud. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
22-06-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
One in seven people ‘have lost money to fraud in past year'
One in seven people say they have lost money to fraud in the past year, according to a survey. Some 14% of people surveyed in February said they had lost money to fraud in the past 12 months, financial insights company TransUnion found. Half (50%) said that a fraud attempt had been made against them in the past three months. The 'consumer pulse' survey also found that a significant proportion of people favour account security processes over ease of access, with over three-quarters (78%) saying they do not want access to their accounts without being explicitly authenticated first. Nearly half (49%) of people said they do not mind being authenticated again after an initial login, for example, when making a payment or changing a password. Chad Reimers, general manager of fraud and identity at TransUnion in the UK said: 'Quick and seamless journeys have become the norm. 'However, consumers are increasingly demanding trust as part of their interactions with digital channels. 'There are increasing demands from consumers to ensure security and authentication – and this spans across sectors, from financial services, to gaming, to online dating.' TransUnion commissioned Dynata to carry out the survey among 1,000 people aged 18 or over across the UK. As well as reporting incidents to the police, people who are concerned that they may have fallen victim to fraud should tell their bank or payments provider as soon as they can. 'This may help the provider to claw the money back and could also help to prevent further fraud attempts on the account. Many banks have signed up to the 159 service – a memorable number that people can call if they have received contact that they suspect to be fraudulent. People can also check their credit reports for any activity which may indicate fraud.
The Independent
22-06-2025
- Business
- The Independent
One in seven people ‘have lost money to fraud in past year'
One in seven people say they have lost money to fraud in the past year, according to a survey. Some 14% of people surveyed in February said they had lost money to fraud in the past 12 months, financial insights company TransUnion found. Half (50%) said that a fraud attempt had been made against them in the past three months. The 'consumer pulse' survey also found that a significant proportion of people favour account security processes over ease of access, with over three-quarters (78%) saying they do not want access to their accounts without being explicitly authenticated first. Nearly half (49%) of people said they do not mind being authenticated again after an initial login, for example, when making a payment or changing a password. Chad Reimers, general manager of fraud and identity at TransUnion in the UK said: 'Quick and seamless journeys have become the norm. 'However, consumers are increasingly demanding trust as part of their interactions with digital channels. 'There are increasing demands from consumers to ensure security and authentication – and this spans across sectors, from financial services, to gaming, to online dating.' TransUnion commissioned Dynata to carry out the survey among 1,000 people aged 18 or over across the UK. As well as reporting incidents to the police, people who are concerned that they may have fallen victim to fraud should tell their bank or payments provider as soon as they can. 'This may help the provider to claw the money back and could also help to prevent further fraud attempts on the account. Many banks have signed up to the 159 service – a memorable number that people can call if they have received contact that they suspect to be fraudulent. People can also check their credit reports for any activity which may indicate fraud.
Scoop
19-06-2025
- Politics
- Scoop
8 In 10 People Support Taxing Oil And Gas Corporations To Pay For Climate Damages, Global Survey Finds
Bonn, Germany A vast majority of people believe governments must tax oil, gas and coal corporations for climate-related loss and damage, and that their government is not doing enough to counter the political influence of super rich individuals and polluting industries. These are the key findings of a global survey, which reflect a broad consensus across political affiliations, income levels and age groups.[1] The study, jointly commissioned by Greenpeace International and Oxfam International, was launched today at the UN Climate Meetings in Bonn (SB62), where government representatives are discussing climate policies, including ways to raise at least US$ 1.3 trillion annually in climate finance for Global South countries by 2035. The survey was conducted across 13 countries, including most G7 countries. Mads Christensen, Executive Director of Greenpeace International said: 'These survey results send a clear message: people are no longer buying the lies. They see the fingerprints of fossil fuel giants all over the storms, floods, droughts, and wildfires devastating their lives, and they want accountability. By taxing the obscene profits of dirty energy companies, governments can unlock billions to protect communities and invest in real climate solutions. It's only fair that those who caused the crisis should pay for the damage, not those suffering from it.' The study, run by Dynata, was unveiled alongside the Polluters Pay Pact, a global alliance of communities on the frontlines of climate disasters. The Pact demands that – instead of piling the costs on ordinary people – governments make oil, gas and coal corporations pay their fair share for the damages they cause, through the introduction of new taxes and fines. The Pact is backed by firefighters and other first responders, trade unions and worker groups, and mayors from countries including Australia, Brazil, Bangladesh, India, the Philippines, Sri Lanka, Nigeria, and South Africa, the US, and plaintiffs in landmark climate cases from Pacific island states to Switzerland. The Pact is also supported by over 60 NGOs, including Oxfam International, Avaaz, Islamic Relief UK, Asociación Interamericana para la Defensa del Ambiente (AIDA), Indian Hawkers Alliance, Pacific Islands Students Fighting Climate Change, Jubilee Australia and the Greenpeace network. The survey's findings published today reveal broad public support for the core demands of the Polluters Pay Pact, as climate impacts worsen worldwide and global inequality grows. Key findings of the survey include: 81% of people surveyed would support taxes on the oil, gas, and coal industry to pay for damages caused by fossil-fuel driven climate disasters like storms, floods, droughts and wildfires. 86% of people in surveyed countries support channeling revenues from higher taxes on oil and gas corporations towards communities most impacted by the climate crisis. Climate change is disproportionately hitting people in Global South countries, who are historically least responsible for greenhouse gas emissions. When asked who should be taxed to pay for helping survivors of fossil-fuel driven climate disasters, 66% of people across countries surveyed think it should be oil and gas companies, while just 5% support taxes on working people, 9% on goods people buy, and 20% favour business taxes. 68% felt that the fossil fuel industry and the super-rich had a negative influence on politics in their country. 77% say they would be more willing to support a political candidate who prioritises taxing the super-rich and the fossil fuel industry. Amitabh Behar, Executive Director of Oxfam International, said: 'Fossil fuel companies have known for decades about the damage their polluting products wreak on humanity. Corporations continue to cash in on climate devastation, and their profiteering destroys the lives and livelihoods of millions of women, men and children, predominantly those in the Global South who have done the least to cause the climate crisis. Governments must listen to their people and hold polluters responsible for their damages. A new tax on polluting industries could provide immediate and significant support to climate-vulnerable countries, and finally incentivise investment in renewables and a just transition.' The Polluters Pay Pact demonstrates popular support for the campaign to make polluters pay. The campaign is being waged throughout 2025 in countries worldwide and in critical international forums, including the 4th International Conference on Financing for Development (FFD4), the UN Climate Change Conference (COP30), and negotiations for a UN tax convention that could include new rules to make multinational oil and gas companies pay their fair share for their pollution. Notes: [1] The research was conducted by first-party data company Dynata in May-June, 2025, in Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Kenya, Italy, India, Mexico, the Philippines, South Africa, Spain, the UK and the US, with approximately 1200 respondents in each country and a theoretical margin of error of approximately 2.83%. Together, these countries represent close to half the world's population. Statistics available here. Additional background information, including further reactions to the survey results from Ali Mohamed, Special Envoy for Climate Change, Kenya available here. [2] Learn more about the Polluters Pay Pact: [3] Additional quotes here from people around the world who are backing the Polluters Pay Pact, including first responders, local administration, youth, union representatives and people bringing climate cases to courts
