Latest news with #Enterobacteriaceae
Los Angeles Times
6 days ago
- Health
- Los Angeles Times
Brain Abscess: How Modern Medicine Wins the Fight Against This Dangerous Infection
A brain abscess is a serious condition that's life threatening. It's a collection of pus in the brain tissue. A brain abscess is an emergency. Think of it as a boil but in the most complex organ of your body. If not treated promptly, brain abscess can cause brain damage. It's usually caused by a bacterial or fungal infection and if not treated quickly can lead to severe neurological damage or even death. Cerebral abscesses are a type of intracranial infection and a big concern in the field of infectious diseases. Luckily, thanks to advances in medical science, the prognosis for patients with brain abscess has improved significantly. Modern diagnostic tools, advanced surgical techniques and targeted antimicrobial therapies have changed the way we manage this once dreaded condition. Let's get into what causes a brain abscess and how today's multidisciplinary teams are tackling it. A brain abscess doesn't just appear out of nowhere. It's almost always the result of an infection that starts elsewhere and finds its way into the brain. There are three ways this can happen: The usual suspects behind these infections are often bacteria or fungi, with bacterial infections being the primary cause. Common organisms include bacteria that live in our mouths like oral streptococci and other common culprits like Staphylococcus aureus, anaerobes (bacteria that don't need oxygen) and Enterobacteriaceae [3][9]. Identifying and treating bacterial infections is key to preventing serious complications. Diagnosing a brain abscess early is crucial but can be tricky because the symptoms can be vague and mimic other neurological conditions. Recognizing brain abscess symptoms and understanding the clinical characteristics that distinguish them from other neurological conditions is important for timely intervention. The 'classic triad' of symptoms includes fever, persistent headache and focal neurological deficits – like weakness in an arm or leg or trouble speaking. However research shows this classic combination is only present in about 20-30% of patients [9]. Many people experience other symptoms of a brain abscess which can include: Given the variability in clinical characteristics, a high index of suspicion is key for healthcare providers when these symptoms appear. Early diagnosis of brain abscess is crucial for better outcomes and preventing serious complications. Once a brain abscess is suspected, getting a clear picture of what's happening inside the brain is the top priority. Imaging tests like a CT or MRI scan are essential for confirming the diagnosis of brain abscess. These imaging tests can show a ring enhancing lesion which is a characteristic finding of a brain abscess and indicates a space occupying lesion within the brain. Additionally, imaging can show multiple lesions or multiple brain abscesses which may require different management strategies. This is where modern imaging and diagnostic techniques have become game-changers [4]. The gold standard for diagnosing a brain abscess is a Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scan with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). This powerful imaging technique is very sensitive and can clearly distinguish a pus-filled abscess from other brain lesions like a necrotic (dead tissue) tumor [2]. The DWI sequence is particularly useful because it highlights the restricted movement of water molecules within the thick, purulent material of the abscess making it light up brightly on the scan. A CT scan is often used in emergency situations because it's fast and widely available. CT scan with contrast is useful for visualizing brain abscesses especially when multiple abscesses are present. Imaging may show abscesses in the frontal lobes especially when infections originate from the ethmoid sinuses and in the inferior temporal lobe due to contiguous spread from otitis media, mastoiditis or sinusitis. CT and MRI findings often show brain swelling and changes in the brain parenchyma like edema or necrosis which are critical for diagnosis and management. However, CT is less sensitive than MRI especially in the early stages of abscess formation. Identifying the exact pathogen causing the infection is critical for antibiotic treatment. Pyogenic brain abscess, a common type of brain abscess, is usually caused by bacterial infection. Gram positive bacteria like streptococci and Staphylococcus aureus are common pathogens, Mycobacterium tuberculosis can also be a causative agent especially in endemic regions. To identify the pathogen neurosurgeons can perform a stereotactic aspiration or excision. This minimally invasive procedure uses advanced imaging to guide a needle to the abscess to drain the pus. The collected sample is then sent to the lab for culture. Laboratory analysis of the pus often shows an accumulation of white blood cells which are part of the immune response and gather at the infection site to fight the invading microorganisms leading to inflammation and abscess formation. In some cases analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) may be performed to aid in diagnosis and help differentiate between various intracranial infections. In some cases the cultures come back negative especially if the patient has already started antibiotics. This is where metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is making a huge impact. This cutting edge technology can identify the genetic material of virtually any pathogen—bacteria, fungi or viruses—directly from the pus sample even when traditional cultures fail [8]. As a recent case report highlights, mNGS can be crucial in guiding treatment for abscesses caused by hard-to-culture organisms. When choosing antibiotic therapy it is important to consider the ability of antibiotics to cross the blood brain barrier as this determines their effectiveness in treating brain abscesses. Treating a brain abscess is a two pronged attack that combines powerful antimicrobial treatment with in many cases surgical intervention. During management it is important to monitor for intracranial complications as well as orbital and intracranial complications since the infection can spread from adjacent structures like the sinuses or ears. Rare complications can also occur such as unusual pathogens or atypical presentations that require special attention. As the abscess matures necrosis and liquefaction occur and eventually a distinct capsule forms around the lesion. Once a brain abscess is suspected doctors will start empiric antimicrobial treatment. This means they will use a broad spectrum combination of antibiotics that are effective against the most common culprits including anaerobes, oral streptococci, Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) and gram negative bacilli. A common and effective cocktail is a third generation cephalosporin like ceftriaxone or cefotaxime paired with metronidazole. Vancomycin may be added if methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a concern [3][5]. Guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society provide expert recommendations on the antimicrobial treatment and clinical management of brain abscesses. Once the lab identifies the specific pathogen the antibiotic regimen can be narrowed to target it directly. Treatment is a long haul typically lasting six to eight weeks and is guided by follow up imaging to ensure the abscess is shrinking [1][6]. For certain drugs like vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring may be used to ensure the dosage is both effective and safe especially for patients with kidney issues or those on long term therapy [8]. Medication alone is not enough. Brain surgery such as surgical drainage or excision of the abscess is necessary for larger abscesses, those causing significant pressure on the brain (mass effect) or abscesses that are not responding to antibiotics. As the American Association of Neurological Surgeons explains removing the pus not only relieves pressure but also provides a definitive diagnosis. Modern minimally invasive stereotactic surgery has made this process safer and more precise than ever. By using a 3D mapping system of the brain surgeons can navigate directly to the abscess with pinpoint accuracy and minimize damage to surrounding healthy tissue [5]. Managing a brain abscess requires a coordinated team of specialists. This 'all hands on deck' approach ensures every aspect of the patient's care is covered. The core team typically includes: Expertise in central nervous system and nervous system infections is key to optimal patient care as these infections can lead to severe neurological complications. This team approach is especially important for complex cases such as immunocompromised patients where the stakes are higher [6][7]. The field is evolving. There is a movement towards protocolized treatment plans where care is standardized based on imaging and clinical response. Researchers are calling for more multicenter clinical trials to refine treatment guidelines especially on the duration of antibiotic therapy [5][9]. Systematic review of brain abscess cases has provided valuable insights into clinical outcomes and best practices and highlights the importance of large data in shaping evidence based recommendations. Perhaps most exciting is the increasing integration of advanced molecular diagnostics like mNGS into routine clinical practice. As technology becomes more available it will revolutionize how quickly and accurately we can identify the cause of these infections and lead to more personalized treatment [1][8]. Recent studies continue to show the value of these integrated approaches in improving patient outcomes. A brain abscess is a tough medical problem but one we are getting better at. With early recognition, sophisticated imaging, precise surgery and targeted antimicrobial therapy we can beat this infection. The multidisciplinary team is the key to this success and ensures patients get comprehensive care tailored to their needs. By embracing new technology and refining treatment protocols we can improve the prognosis for those affected by this serious condition and reduce its long term impact and get them back to their lives. [1] Omland, L. H., Nielsen, H., & Bodilsen, J. (2024). Update and approach to patients with brain abscess. Current opinion in infectious diseases, 37(3), 211–219. [2] De Andres Crespo, M., McKinnon, C., & Halliday, J. (2020). What you need to know about brain abscesses. British journal of hospital medicine (London, England : 2005), 81(8), 1–7. [3] Sonneville, R., Ruimy, R., Benzonana, N., Riffaud, L., Carsin, A., Tadié, J. M., Piau, C., Revest, M., Tattevin, P., & ESCMID Study Group for Infectious Diseases of the Brain (ESGIB) (2017). An update on bacterial brain abscess in immunocompetent patients. Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 23(9), 614–620. [4] Mathisen, G. E., & Johnson, J. P. (1997). Brain abscess. Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 25(4), 763–781. [5] Brouwer, M. C., & van de Beek, D. (2017). Epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of brain abscesses. Current opinion in infectious diseases, 30(1), 129–134. [6] Corsini Campioli, C., Castillo Almeida, N. E., O'Horo, J. C., Esquer Garrigos, Z., Wilson, W. R., Cano, E., DeSimone, D. C., Baddour, L. M., Van Gompel, J. J., & Sohail, M. R. (2021). Bacterial Brain Abscess: An Outline for Diagnosis and Management. The American journal of medicine, 134(10), 1210–1217.e2. [7] Muzumdar, D., Jhawar, S., & Goel, A. (2011). Brain abscess: an overview. International journal of surgery (London, England), 9(2), 136–144. [8] Tian, C., Liu, J., Chen, Z., & Li, L. (2025). Case report: Analysis of the efficacy and safety of anti-infectious treatment for brain abscess caused by oral anaerobes. Frontiers in pharmacology, 16, 1506879. [9] Brouwer, M. C., Coutinho, J. M., & van de Beek, D. (2014). Clinical characteristics and outcome of brain abscess: systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurology, 82(9), 806–813.
Korea Herald
7 days ago
- Health
- Korea Herald
Infectious disease cases up 54.5% in South Korea
South Korea saw a 54.5 percent rise in non-COVID notifiable infectious disease cases in 2024 compared to the previous year, driven largely by a surge in respiratory illnesses among children, according to a new report from the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency on Thursday. The 2024 annual report on infectious disease, based on data from the newly launched integrated control information system, found that 168,586 cases of first to third-tier notifiable diseases — excluding COVID-19 and syphilis, which both had changes in their tiers — were reported last year, up from 109,087 in 2023. Pertussis, otherwise known as whooping cough, accounted for much of the increase, with cases jumping from just 292 in 2023 to 48,048, over a 164-fold increase, in 2024. Scarlet fever and chickenpox also surged, with 6,642 and 31,892 cases reported, respectively. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, a dangerous antibiotic-resistant infection, reached 42,347 cases. Despite the overall increase in these illnesses, the total number of reported cases of all monitored infectious diseases plummeted by 97 percent from 2023, largely due to the reclassification of COVID-19 as a lower-tier disease. The number of deaths from notifiable diseases, excluding tuberculosis, rose 18.2 percent to 1,238 in 2024. CRE infections were the leading cause of death among these, with 838 fatalities. KDCA Commissioner Jee Young-mee emphasized the importance of early reporting by medical institutions. "Reporting infectious disease is the first line of defense to minimize the damage from the spread of diseases, by detecting them at an early stage and stop its transmission to the community," she said.
Indian Express
08-06-2025
- Health
- Indian Express
‘A dahi, which won't fall, is the dahi you want': Celeb nutritionist Rujuta Diwekar recommends the ‘spoon test' before consuming curd
Celebrity nutritionist Rujuta Diwekar's words of wisdom have helped prominent Bollywood A-listers such as Kareena Kapoor Khan, Alia Bhatt and Varun Dhawan lose weight and transform their physique without compromising on health. In a recent Instagram post, the expert shared a popular 'spoon test' that can determine the efficacy of the dahi (curd) you make at home. In the caption underneath her post, Diwekar listed out a detailed step-by-step recipe to make the best dahi: 'Try it at home. 1. Buy whole milk, preferably buffalo (better for setting thick curd) 2. When you heat it, pour some aside in a small katori (silver, ceramic, mitti – your choice) 3. While it's still little hotter than warm, put a small culture of previously set home set curd to it. 4. Stir 32 times 5. Wait for the milk to settle 6. Cover with a light cloth (I don't use a metal lid) 7. Then store it in a cool and dark place 8. On completion of 8-12 hrs, set another batch and then refrigerate if you don't immediately plan to eat it.' CV Aishwarya, a clinical nutritionist and lecturer at Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, told that the spoon test for curd is a simple yet effective method to assess its consistency, fermentation quality, and microbial activity. It involves scooping a portion of curd with a spoon. If the curd holds its shape and appears firm, it indicates proper setting. If it breaks apart or appears watery, it may suggest poor fermentation or microbial imbalance. 'Curd is formed through the fermentation of milk by lactic acid bacteria. During proper fermentation, these bacteria produce lactic acid, which coagulates the milk proteins, forming a gel-like structure. A well-set curd is more likely to contain viable probiotic cultures, which are essential for gut health. In contrast, poorly fermented or runny curd might lack a sufficient live bacterial count due to contamination or inappropriate incubation conditions,' explained Aishwarya. According to her, the spoon test is an effective and practical preliminary method for assessing the setting quality and probable microbial health of curd. However, for scientific validation of curd efficacy—particularly in research or clinical contexts—additional analyses such as pH testing, microbial culturing, and probiotic viability assays are required. Kanikka Malhotra, consultant dietician and certified diabetes educator revealed that regular consumption of curd after lunch can significantly alter gut microbiota composition due to its probiotic content, primarily Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains. 'These live cultures enhance beneficial bacterial populations, improving microbial diversity and suppressing harmful bacteria like Enterobacteriaceae and Staphylococcus,' she said, adding that the lactic acid bacteria in curd strengthen gut barrier function, reduce inflammation, and promote short-chain fatty acid production, which supports colon health. 'Daily intake sustains transient probiotic effects, such as increased Lactobacillus gasseri and Bifidobacterium lactis, aiding digestion and immune modulation,' mentioned the expert. Curd's probiotics also improve nutrient absorption, reduce bloating, and may lower the risk of inflammatory bowel conditions by balancing gut flora. However, Malhotra noted that individual responses vary based on baseline microbiota and dietary habits. This is to say that pairing curd with fiber-rich meals can amplify these benefits through synergistic prebiotic-probiotic interactions. However, Malhotra also warned of overconsumption, which can also cause digestive discomfort and contribute to weight gain. 'Additionally, excessive calcium intake from curd might slightly reduce the absorption of iron and zinc,' she said. 'Go ahead and add it to your lunch routine, but be mindful of your body's response and adjust accordingly,' To enjoy curd's benefits without drawbacks, she urged moderation. DISCLAIMER: This article is based on information from the public domain and/or the experts we spoke to. Always consult your health practitioner before starting any routine.
