logo
#

Latest news with #EuropeanConventionofHumanRights

Caster Semenya's right to a fair hearing was violated, ECHR rules
Caster Semenya's right to a fair hearing was violated, ECHR rules

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Sport
  • Yahoo

Caster Semenya's right to a fair hearing was violated, ECHR rules

Track and field athlete Caster Semenya's right to a fair hearing was violated by the Swiss judicial system, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has ruled. The 34-year-old has been unable to compete in her favoured 800 metres event since 2019, following the introduction of limits on testosterone levels for female athletes by World Athletics. Advertisement Semenya was legally identified as female at birth but has a condition which means her body naturally produces higher levels of testosterone than women without the condition. She was unsuccessful in challenging World Athletics' rules at the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) and the Swiss federal court, but in July 2023 a lower chamber of the ECHR found her rights had been violated by the Swiss government because it had failed to provide sufficient safeguards for her complaint to be examined effectively. The Swiss government referred the case to the ECHR's Grand Chamber in November 2023 and on Thursday morning, it was announced its judges had found by a 15 to two majority that Semenya's rights under Article 6 of the European Convention of Human Rights – the right to a fair hearing – had been violated. Advertisement A press release issued by the court said the judges had found the Swiss courts had 'fallen short' in providing what they felt should have been a 'rigorous judicial review that was commensurate with the seriousness of the personal rights at issue'. The ECHR ruling, which cannot be appealed, should mean the case returns to the Swiss federal court. The Grand Chamber ruled by a majority of 13 to four that complaints under Article 8 (right to respect for private life), Article 13 (right to an effective remedy) and Article 14 (prohibition of discrimination) were inadmissible. It found Semenya did not fall within Switzerland's jurisdiction in respect of those complaints. Seema Patel, an associate professor specialising in sports law at the Nottingham Law School, had said prior to the Semenya decision being handed down that it would be a 'pivotal moment for how sport engages with human rights in its rule making'. Advertisement World Athletics has not been a party to either of the ECHR proceedings but at the time of the 2023 ruling by the lower chamber it said it stood by its rules on lowering testosterone, describing them as 'a necessary, reasonable and proportionate means of protecting fair competition in the female category'. Caster Semenya was a gold medal winner in the women's 800m at the 2016 Rio Olympics, having also won the same event at London 2012 (Martin Rickett/PA) Earlier this year, track and field's global governing body strengthened its rules in this area further when its ruling council approved the introduction of cheek swab tests to determine biological sex. The introduction of these tests are designed to ensure only athletes found to be biologically female can compete in the female category, effectively barring transgender women and some athletes with differences of sexual development (DSD). Advertisement Semenya's legal team and World Athletics have been contacted for comment following the Grand Chamber ruling.

Caster Semenya's right to a fair hearing was violated, ECHR rules
Caster Semenya's right to a fair hearing was violated, ECHR rules

The 42

time2 days ago

  • Sport
  • The 42

Caster Semenya's right to a fair hearing was violated, ECHR rules

TRACK AND FIELD athlete Caster Semenya's right to a fair hearing was violated by the Swiss judicial system, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has ruled. The 34-year-old has been unable to compete in her favoured 800 metres event since 2019, following the introduction of limits on testosterone levels for female athletes by World Athletics. Advertisement Semenya was legally identified as female at birth but has a condition which means her body naturally produces higher levels of testosterone than women without the condition. She was unsuccessful in challenging World Athletics' rules at the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) and the Swiss federal court, but in July 2023 a lower chamber of the ECHR found her rights had been violated by the Swiss government because it had failed to provide sufficient safeguards for her complaint to be examined effectively. The Swiss government referred the case to the ECHR's Grand Chamber in November 2023 and on Thursday morning, it was announced its judges had found by a 15 to two majority that Semenya's rights under Article 6 of the European Convention of Human Rights – the right to a fair hearing – had been violated. A press release issued by the court said the judges had found the Swiss courts had 'fallen short' in providing what they felt should have been a 'rigorous judicial review that was commensurate with the seriousness of the personal rights at issue'. The ECHR ruling, which cannot be appealed, should mean the case returns to the Swiss federal court. The Grand Chamber ruled by a majority of 13 to four that complaints under Article 8 (right to respect for private life), Article 13 (right to an effective remedy) and Article 14 (prohibition of discrimination) were inadmissible. It found Semenya did not fall within Switzerland's jurisdiction in respect of those complaints. Seema Patel, an associate professor specialising in sports law at the Nottingham Law School, had said prior to the Semenya decision being handed down that it would be a 'pivotal moment for how sport engages with human rights in its rule making'.

Caster Semenya's right to a fair hearing was violated, ECHR rules
Caster Semenya's right to a fair hearing was violated, ECHR rules

Glasgow Times

time2 days ago

  • Sport
  • Glasgow Times

Caster Semenya's right to a fair hearing was violated, ECHR rules

The 34-year-old has been unable to compete in her favoured 800 metres event since 2019, following the introduction of limits on testosterone levels for female athletes by World Athletics. Semenya was legally identified as female at birth but has a condition which means her body naturally produces higher levels of testosterone than women without the condition. She was unsuccessful in challenging World Athletics' rules at the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) and the Swiss federal court, but in July 2023 a lower chamber of the ECHR found her rights had been violated by the Swiss government because it had failed to provide sufficient safeguards for her complaint to be examined effectively. Grand Chamber judgment Semenya v. Switzerland – Complaint by international athlete concerning set of World Athletics regulationshttps:// #CEDH #ECHRpress — ECHR CEDH (@ECHR_CEDH) July 10, 2025 The Swiss government referred the case to the ECHR's Grand Chamber in November 2023 and on Thursday morning, it was announced its judges had found by a 15 to two majority that Semenya's rights under Article 6 of the European Convention of Human Rights – the right to a fair hearing – had been violated. A press release issued by the court said the judges had found the Swiss courts had 'fallen short' in providing what they felt should have been a 'rigorous judicial review that was commensurate with the seriousness of the personal rights at issue'. The ECHR ruling, which cannot be appealed, should mean the case returns to the Swiss federal court. The Grand Chamber ruled by a majority of 13 to four that complaints under Article 8 (right to respect for private life), Article 13 (right to an effective remedy) and Article 14 (prohibition of discrimination) were inadmissible. It found Semenya did not fall within Switzerland's jurisdiction in respect of those complaints. Seema Patel, an associate professor specialising in sports law at the Nottingham Law School, had said prior to the Semenya decision being handed down that it would be a 'pivotal moment for how sport engages with human rights in its rule making'. World Athletics has not been a party to either of the ECHR proceedings but at the time of the 2023 ruling by the lower chamber it said it stood by its rules on lowering testosterone, describing them as 'a necessary, reasonable and proportionate means of protecting fair competition in the female category'. Caster Semenya was a gold medal winner in the women's 800m at the 2016 Rio Olympics, having also won the same event at London 2012 (Martin Rickett/PA) Earlier this year, track and field's global governing body strengthened its rules in this area further when its ruling council approved the introduction of cheek swab tests to determine biological sex. The introduction of these tests are designed to ensure only athletes found to be biologically female can compete in the female category, effectively barring transgender women and some athletes with differences of sexual development (DSD). Semenya's legal team and World Athletics have been contacted for comment following the Grand Chamber ruling.

Caster Semenya's right to a fair hearing was violated, ECHR rules
Caster Semenya's right to a fair hearing was violated, ECHR rules

Powys County Times

time2 days ago

  • Sport
  • Powys County Times

Caster Semenya's right to a fair hearing was violated, ECHR rules

Track and field athlete Caster Semenya's right to a fair hearing was violated by the Swiss judicial system, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has ruled. The 34-year-old has been unable to compete in her favoured 800 metres event since 2019, following the introduction of limits on testosterone levels for female athletes by World Athletics. Semenya was legally identified as female at birth but has a condition which means her body naturally produces higher levels of testosterone than women without the condition. She was unsuccessful in challenging World Athletics' rules at the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) and the Swiss federal court, but in July 2023 a lower chamber of the ECHR found her rights had been violated by the Swiss government because it had failed to provide sufficient safeguards for her complaint to be examined effectively. Grand Chamber judgment Semenya v. Switzerland – Complaint by international athlete concerning set of World Athletics regulations #ECHR #CEDH #ECHRpress — ECHR CEDH (@ECHR_CEDH) July 10, 2025 The Swiss government referred the case to the ECHR's Grand Chamber in November 2023 and on Thursday morning, it was announced its judges had found by a 15 to two majority that Semenya's rights under Article 6 of the European Convention of Human Rights – the right to a fair hearing – had been violated. A press release issued by the court said the judges had found the Swiss courts had 'fallen short' in providing what they felt should have been a 'rigorous judicial review that was commensurate with the seriousness of the personal rights at issue'. The ECHR ruling, which cannot be appealed, should mean the case returns to the Swiss federal court. The Grand Chamber ruled by a majority of 13 to four that complaints under Article 8 (right to respect for private life), Article 13 (right to an effective remedy) and Article 14 (prohibition of discrimination) were inadmissible. It found Semenya did not fall within Switzerland's jurisdiction in respect of those complaints. Seema Patel, an associate professor specialising in sports law at the Nottingham Law School, had said prior to the Semenya decision being handed down that it would be a 'pivotal moment for how sport engages with human rights in its rule making'. World Athletics has not been a party to either of the ECHR proceedings but at the time of the 2023 ruling by the lower chamber it said it stood by its rules on lowering testosterone, describing them as 'a necessary, reasonable and proportionate means of protecting fair competition in the female category'. Earlier this year, track and field's global governing body strengthened its rules in this area further when its ruling council approved the introduction of cheek swab tests to determine biological sex. The introduction of these tests are designed to ensure only athletes found to be biologically female can compete in the female category, effectively barring transgender women and some athletes with differences of sexual development (DSD).

Caster Semenya's right to a fair hearing was violated, ECHR rules
Caster Semenya's right to a fair hearing was violated, ECHR rules

The Herald Scotland

time2 days ago

  • Sport
  • The Herald Scotland

Caster Semenya's right to a fair hearing was violated, ECHR rules

Semenya was legally identified as female at birth but has a condition which means her body naturally produces higher levels of testosterone than women without the condition. She was unsuccessful in challenging World Athletics' rules at the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) and the Swiss federal court, but in July 2023 a lower chamber of the ECHR found her rights had been violated by the Swiss government because it had failed to provide sufficient safeguards for her complaint to be examined effectively. Grand Chamber judgment Semenya v. Switzerland – Complaint by international athlete concerning set of World Athletics regulationshttps:// #CEDH #ECHRpress — ECHR CEDH (@ECHR_CEDH) July 10, 2025 The Swiss government referred the case to the ECHR's Grand Chamber in November 2023 and on Thursday morning, it was announced its judges had found by a 15 to two majority that Semenya's rights under Article 6 of the European Convention of Human Rights – the right to a fair hearing – had been violated. A press release issued by the court said the judges had found the Swiss courts had 'fallen short' in providing what they felt should have been a 'rigorous judicial review that was commensurate with the seriousness of the personal rights at issue'. The ECHR ruling, which cannot be appealed, should mean the case returns to the Swiss federal court. The Grand Chamber ruled by a majority of 13 to four that complaints under Article 8 (right to respect for private life), Article 13 (right to an effective remedy) and Article 14 (prohibition of discrimination) were inadmissible. It found Semenya did not fall within Switzerland's jurisdiction in respect of those complaints. Seema Patel, an associate professor specialising in sports law at the Nottingham Law School, had said prior to the Semenya decision being handed down that it would be a 'pivotal moment for how sport engages with human rights in its rule making'. World Athletics has not been a party to either of the ECHR proceedings but at the time of the 2023 ruling by the lower chamber it said it stood by its rules on lowering testosterone, describing them as 'a necessary, reasonable and proportionate means of protecting fair competition in the female category'. Caster Semenya was a gold medal winner in the women's 800m at the 2016 Rio Olympics, having also won the same event at London 2012 (Martin Rickett/PA) Earlier this year, track and field's global governing body strengthened its rules in this area further when its ruling council approved the introduction of cheek swab tests to determine biological sex. The introduction of these tests are designed to ensure only athletes found to be biologically female can compete in the female category, effectively barring transgender women and some athletes with differences of sexual development (DSD). Semenya's legal team and World Athletics have been contacted for comment following the Grand Chamber ruling.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store