logo
#

Latest news with #GaleHolland

Letters to the Editor: There is no solution to homelessness that doesn't involve denting property values
Letters to the Editor: There is no solution to homelessness that doesn't involve denting property values

Yahoo

time6 days ago

  • Business
  • Yahoo

Letters to the Editor: There is no solution to homelessness that doesn't involve denting property values

To the editor: I would have liked to see Mitchell Landsberg and Gale Holland write more about Proposition 13 as a factor in our city's housing crisis ('The real story of how L.A. became the epicenter of America's homeless crisis,' July 10). It receives but a paragraph's attention, and is faulted only for starving local governments of funds to deal with homelessness. In fact, the gravest consequence of Proposition 13 has been to subsidize property owners, allowing them to so dearly cling to their holdings as to distort the market in their favor. By holding assessed value for tax purposes close to the price at the time of purchase, Proposition 13 disincentivizes longtime owners to sell, thereby perpetually constraining inventory on the public's dime. The housing crisis is fundamentally driven by sky-high real estate prices, and there is no solution whatsoever that does not involve denting owners' precious property values. Repealing Proposition 13 in favor of a heavy tax on the present value of land, preferably with improvements exempted, is the single most efficient means to such an end. If we are not willing to tank California's real estate market, then we are not willing to solve the problem. Michael Raley, Los Angeles This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

Letters to the Editor: There is no solution to homelessness that doesn't involve denting property values
Letters to the Editor: There is no solution to homelessness that doesn't involve denting property values

Los Angeles Times

time6 days ago

  • Business
  • Los Angeles Times

Letters to the Editor: There is no solution to homelessness that doesn't involve denting property values

To the editor: I would have liked to see Mitchell Landsberg and Gale Holland write more about Proposition 13 as a factor in our city's housing crisis ('The real story of how L.A. became the epicenter of America's homeless crisis,' July 10). It receives but a paragraph's attention, and is faulted only for starving local governments of funds to deal with homelessness. In fact, the gravest consequence of Proposition 13 has been to subsidize property owners, allowing them to so dearly cling to their holdings as to distort the market in their favor. By holding assessed value for tax purposes close to the price at the time of purchase, Proposition 13 disincentivizes longtime owners to sell, thereby perpetually constraining inventory on the public's dime. The housing crisis is fundamentally driven by sky-high real estate prices, and there is no solution whatsoever that does not involve denting owners' precious property values. Repealing Proposition 13 in favor of a heavy tax on the present value of land, preferably with improvements exempted, is the single most efficient means to such an end. If we are not willing to tank California's real estate market, then we are not willing to solve the problem. Michael Raley, Los Angeles

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store