Latest news with #GarminForerunner570
Android Authority
16 hours ago
- Android Authority
The Garmin Forerunner 570 is a powerful running watch but the price is all wrong
Garmin Forerunner 570 The Garmin Forerunner 570 is a sleek, high-performing running watch that nails the essentials and then some, but its price puts it in a strange no man's land between its better-value siblings. With advanced training tools, added smart tools, and highly accurate sensors, it's easy to love while wearing it, but unless you find it discounted, it's tricky to justify buying in the first place. I've spent the past few weeks testing the Garmin Forerunner 570, Garmin's latest addition to its long-running Forerunner lineup. On paper, it's as close to perfect as a running watch gets. I love everything from its looks to its excellent battery life, and it offers the kind of performance data serious endurance athletes will fully appreciate. But as good as it is, I've come away wondering who it's actually for. Depressingly priced at a princely $549, it's too expensive (and frankly too advanced) for casual users, yet probably not comprehensive enough for the high-end Garmin crowd. Looking the part Kaitlyn Cimino / Android Authority Starting with what I genuinely loved, the Forerunner 570's aesthetics nail the balance between athletic and refined. The watch is available in two case sizes, 42mm and 47mm, both of which feature an aluminum bezel that adds just enough polish to make it elevated without going full luxury. I tested the 42mm model in Cloud Blue, which is white with icy blue detailing, and could easily award it a permanent spot in my everyday wardrobe. It's subtle, modern, and versatile enough to wear all day, not just during workouts. Both case sizes come in a few different colorways, and while I haven't worn all of them myself, every version looks equally attractive, even if some are quite a bit bolder. The full lineup touts colorful AMOLED displays just like the 265 and 965, suggesting Garmin has really nailed the coffin shut on new MIPS in this product line. The 570's case itself is a little thick, but still lightweight enough to feel plenty comfortable during long runs. The bulk was also non-issue when I wore it to bed for sleep tracking. The adjustable band is soft, breathable, and very easy to rinse. Most importantly, it keeps the watch flush on my wrist with zero movement or bounce during workouts. With a polished look and a full-color AMOLED display, the Forerunner 570 is as attractive as it is comfortable. It's not just the hardware that shines either. Below the glass, Garmin's revamped interface is also a noticeable upgrade. The updated look, which has been making its way across the Garmin stable, feels long overdue and makes the watch far easier to navigate. The software experience is faster, more modern, and just nicer to use. Overall, it's a watch that doesn't scream 'serious triathlete,' but definitely whispers it. A packed feature list with confusing omissions Kaitlyn Cimino / Android Authority The Forerunner 570 brings almost every modern Garmin feature to the table. It includes dual-band GNSS and a boatload of sport modes (including more than 20 new ones), plus a broad list of health tracking features and uniquely Garmin tools like Body Battery. Health-wise, the device adds overnight skin temperature tracking and past ovulation estimations for those who menstruate. Training-wise, it adds a bit more. Many of its fitness tracking upgrades have been seen elsewhere in the Garmin stable, but new adds include Finish Line Estimates, Automatic Lap by Timing Gate and structured multisport workouts, plus access to new Garmin Coach Triathlon Plans, all of which highlight that this is a watch designed for runners (in case the name didn't make it clear). I used it for tempo runs, long hikes, treadmill sessions, and neighborhood jogs, and it kept up without missing a beat. The 570 packs a range of new features for runners, plus all the expected health and fitness tracking tools. I also loved the addition of Projected Race Time. I don't have any events on the calendar, but checking what my potential 5K or 10K time might be helped me analyze my training regimen, aka motivated me to run a little harder. As for smartwatch tools, the watch still boasts 8GB to support onboard music storage, but now adds a built-in speaker as well as a microphone. This lets you go full James Bond with Bluetooth-connected phone calling as well as voice assistance and onboard voice commands. I can't say I see myself making many calls from my wrist, and I don't typically carry my phone on runs or rides, but the quality here is good if needed in a pinch. Voices came through clearly, and the watch registered my input efficiently. The newest Forerunners also debut Evening Reports, which offer recaps of your activity plus guidance for your evening and the following day. It's basically that one coworker in an excessively long meeting who pays really good attention so they can sum up all the key takeaways at the end in case you zoned out. I love this automated summary and the sleep coach tips it hits me with right as I start thinking about whether or not to put on a show or hit the bed. Kaitlyn Cimino / Android Authority Yet even with a truly bloated feature set, I'm left wanting. With a price tag listed at $549, it is hard to ignore what is missing. First, while the Forerunner 570 features Garmin's Elevate Gen5 optical HR sensor, it does not include the brand's ECG app. This is baffling when you consider the Garmin Venu 3, priced much lower at $349, offers ECG support. It is also a feature shoppers expect from most smartwatches in this price range. Leaving it off makes the watch feel intentionally limited, potentially so that the company can justify the 970s price tag. While the Forerunner 570 boasts Garmin's latest heart rate sensor, it does not feature ECG support. Likewise, the watch doesn't add a flashlight like the 970 and lacks any built-in mapping. I appreciated the ability to follow a breadcrumb trail when I veered off-path, but I am disappointed that the device doesn't have detailed topographic maps like the 970, especially at this price bump. There are other tools differentiating the pricier model from this mid-tier one, and that's fair, but these are the biggest offenders in my mind when asking shoppers to drop half a grand. The 570 is, without a doubt, a better watch than the 265. But it is not a huge leap forward. And when you compare it to the 970, which adds ECG, the 570 feels like it is stuck in a weird in-between space. It is a tough sell when the 265 gives you 90 percent of the experience for $200 less, or the 970 gives you everything for just $100 to $150 more. Accurate as always Kaitlyn Cimino / Android Authority When it comes to core metrics like GPS and heart rate tracking, Garmin is nothing if not consistent. The Forerunner 570 delivers accuracy on both fronts. I compared its dual-band GNSS tracking to routes logged with a chest strap and reference-grade devices, and the results were near flawless. It hugged tight corners accurately, avoided common GPS drift in tree cover and urban areas, and maintained smooth, believable pace and elevation data even during trail runs. On the map above, you can see one of my tracked neighborhood runs that nearly matches the route recorded by my Apple Watch Ultra 2. There are small fluctuations, but not enough to impact my training data, and the two devices recorded identical total distances. Heart rate performance was just as reliable. Across tempo efforts, interval sessions, and long steady-state runs, the Elevate Gen 5 sensor held impressively close to my chest strap readings with minimal lag. I've garnered the same level of results from other devices with the same hardware, like the Venu 3, so I wasn't surprised, but still pleased. Whether you're training by heart rate zone or just need confidence in your data, the 570 doesn't flinch. Garmin Forerunner 570: The verdict Kaitlyn Cimino / Android Authority The Garmin Forerunner 570 is a polished, high-performing, and impressively accurate running watch. It is comfortable, looks great, and has nearly every feature a serious runner could want. But at $549, it is also a watch that feels caught between tiers. It doesn't offer enough over the Forerunner 265 ($449.99 at Garmin), which often goes on sale to below $400, to warrant the price bump for most users, and it holds back just enough to make the Forerunner 970 ($749.99 at Amazon) a better long-term investment. It's a fantastic watch caught in a pricing purgatory. For most people, better value lies on either side. In a vacuum, the 570 is a fantastic watch, but its price and feature set are hard to position in Garmin's stable. Every time I start a Garmin review, I assume I'm going to love the device. The truth is that the company rarely misses. In a vacuum, the Forerunner 570 retains that pattern with reliable hardware, a refined interface, and more training tools than I can reasonably make use of in one review period. But the watch doesn't exist in a bubble, and that makes it hard to recommend. Garmin Forerunner 570 MSRP: $549.00 Accurate running watch. The Garmin Forerunner 570 is a sleek, high-performing running watch with advanced training tools, added smart tools, and highly accurate sensors. See price at Amazon Positives Stylish, attractive aesthetic Stylish, attractive aesthetic Full-color AMOLED display Full-color AMOLED display Updated, more premium UI Updated, more premium UI Accurate heart rate and GPS tracking Accurate heart rate and GPS tracking New training features, especially for runners New training features, especially for runners Added smartwatch tools and Evening reports Cons Baffling price positioning in Forerunner series Baffling price positioning in Forerunner series No ECG support No ECG support No built-in maps
Tom's Guide
30-06-2025
- Business
- Tom's Guide
I review Garmin watches for a living — here's the 4 early Prime Day deals I'd shop now
If you've been waiting for Prime Day to upgrade your running watch, I've got good news — the sales have started early. I review running watches for a living, and have done so for the past decade, so I know exactly what I'm looking for when it comes to the tech on my wrist on race day. Garmin makes some of the best running watches on the market, and below, I've hand-picked the deals worth shopping ahead of Prime Day. All of the best Garmin watches will do a lot more than simply track your steps. They're all designed to be worn 24/7, and can help you get fitter, run faster, and gain a deeper understanding of your overall health. Here are the best deals to shop right now: The Garmin Forerunner 265 has been replaced by the Garmin Forerunner 570, but don't let this put you off. It's Garmin's mid-tier Forerunner, packed with advanced training features. It doesn't have some of the more techy stuff or built-in maps, but unless you're heading out on a multi-day adventure, you probably won't use them anyway. Right now, the sale is on the smaller verison of the Forerunner 265, the 42mm version, which is perfect for runners looking for a small, comfortable, lightweight watch. Find out more in our Garmin Forerunner 265 review. The Forerunner 165 is Garmin's mid-tier Forerunner, ideal for those who are becoming more serious about their training but don't want to spend hundreds of dollars. It doesn't have some of the more advanced training features, but it'll still track all of your runs, recovery, and has 11 days of battery life in smartwatch mode, meaning you can travel to a race abroad, without having to worry about packing your charger. Who said you need to spend a fortune to get a decent gadget? The Garmin Forerunner 55 is an affordable, entry-level running and workout watch well-suited for those looking to track their training but who don't need any extra bells or whistles. It still looks and feels like a Garmin watch without the hefty price tag. More importantly, it's just as accurate as far more advanced models. This is a great option if you're new to running, or you're not planning on wearing a sports watch 24/7. The Garmin Epix Pro is a top-of-the-line Garmin watch, designed for the ultimate adventure. This deal reduces the 51mm Epix Pro to its lowest ever price, and for $689 you're getting an incredible AMOLED sports watch that has best-in-class navigation tools on top of the tracking and training analysis it offers. As this is the largest watch in the Epix Pro range, you also get excellent battery life, and the titanium case and sapphire crystal screen mean that it's light and durable too.
Tom's Guide
24-06-2025
- Business
- Tom's Guide
Should you buy the Garmin Forerunner 570 or the Forerunner 965 in the Prime Day sale?
I review the best Garmin watches for a living and know how expensive it can be to upgrade your running watch. The good news is that the Garmin Prime Day deals have already started to drop, and right now, the Garmin Forerunner 965 is on sale for $555, making it the same price as the Garmin Forerunner 570. But which one should you buy? Below, I've put the two popular watches head to head to help you decide. The Garmin Forerunner 965 is a top-tier running watch, packed with some of Garmin's most advanced training features. It has since been replaced by the Garmin Forerunner 970, but don't let this put you off — it's still an excellent watch at a fantastic price. The watch has a beautiful AMOLED screen, with a resolution of 454 x 454 pixels; it's extremely bright and easy to see in all weather conditions. At the moment, the Garmin Forerunner 965 is on sale on Amazon in an early Prime Day sale for $555. The Garmin Forerunner 570 is the newer of the two watches, released in May 2025, and is on sale for $549. As a brand new watch, the Forerunner 570 is unlikely to drop in the Prime Day sales. The Garmin Forerunner 570 is the newer of the two watches, and is unlikely to go on sale this Prime Day, as it was only released in May this year. Right now it's $549 on Amazon, available in both the 42mm and the 47mm sizes. Both the Garmin Forerunner 965 and Forerunner 570 look like typical Garmin watches. They both have a round face, and five buttons to help you navigate around the watch — three on the left, two on the right. Both have bright AMOLED screens and are comfortable and lightweight on the wrist. The slight difference here is that the Forerunner 570 comes in two different sizes — a 42mm and a 47mm, whereas the Forerunner 965 only comes in one size, 47mm. The older watch doesn't come in as many fun color options as the Forerunner 570, but it has a durable titanium bezel, compared to the 570's aluminum bezel. The Forerunner 570 has a slightly brighter screen, although I'd argue you don't notice this all that much on the run. If battery life is a key consideration, the Forerunner 965 comes out on top. The 965 has more than double the battery life of the Forerunner 570, which could be a consideration for long-distance runners heading out on a multi-day adventure, or those who prefer less frequent charging. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. The battery life on the Forerunner 965 is up to 23 days in smartwatch mode, and up to 31 hours in GPS mode without music. The Forerunner 570 lasts up to 10 days in smartwatch mode in the 42mm version, 11 days in the 47mm version, and up to 18 hours in GPS mode. So what are the main differences between the two watches? You can dive deeper into both watches by reading our Forerunner 570 review and our Forerunner 965 review, but to sum it up, the Forerunner 965 has built-in maps and navigation. In contrast, the Forerunner 570 doesn't (although it does offer track and follow and direction features). It has advanced features like the Body Battery function, which aren't on the Forerunner 570, as well as a much longer battery life. The Forerunner 570 is the newer of the two watches, featuring Garmin's latest 5th-generation heart rate sensor, which supports additional health metrics, including skin temperature. It also features additional capabilities, including a built-in microphone and speaker for making calls directly from your wrist, as well as a flashlight. So, which should you buy? The answer depends on how much the latest technology and a speaker/microphone matter to you. The Forerunner 965 has advanced training metrics, built-in navigation, and a better battery life, plus it's probably cheaper in the Prime Day sales. If you're heading on a multi-day adventure, it's arguably the better watch to have on your wrist. That said, if you prefer the brighter colours of the Garmin Forerunner 570, or you'd prefer a smaller watch on your wrist, it's worth paying a little more for the newer watch.
Tom's Guide
21-06-2025
- Health
- Tom's Guide
I walked 5,500 steps with the Apple Watch 10 vs Garmin Forerunner 570 — here's the winner
The Garmin Forerunner 570 is one of Garmin's newest AMOLED-screen sporting smartwatches aimed at runners. It boasts loads of training tools, Garmin's best heart rate sensors and a small smattering of smart features. Meanwhile, the Apple Watch Series 10 is perhaps the best full-featured smartwatch on the market today. It's also no slouch when it comes to fitness and wellness tracking. While the Garmin Forerunner 570 is a tad pricier than the Apple Watch Series 10, both are well equipped to keep tabs on your daily workout efforts, whether you're a runner, walker, hiker or prefer the gym. Each watch sports an onboard GPS and the best holistic tech offered by Apple and Garmin, respectively. The question is, which one is more accurate when it comes to tracking a basic workout? I decided to find out. The Apple Watch Series 10 is my favorite full-featured smartwatch in 2025, sporting a thin and attractive design, gorgeous screen, endless apps and loads of useful onboard features. It's also a mighty reliable fitness and sleep tracker. The Garmin Forerunner 570 is one of the brand's latest smartwatches aimed squarely at runners and outdoor athletes, boasting Garmin's best holistic tech, excellent training and recovery tools, a bright AMOLED screen and a fun, colorful case design. For this walk test, I wore the Apple Watch Series 10 on my left wrist and the Garmin Forerunner 570 on my right wrist before setting out on my manually-counted jaunt around Seattle, Washington, on the longest day of the year. To keep track of my steps, I clicked an old-school tally counter every time my count hit 100 before starting over again at one. With my left foot taking only odd-numbered steps and my right foot only making even-numbered ones, I trekked three miles before ending tracking and examining the results. In addition to the manual count, I also recorded my walk using Strava as a control for distance, elevation and pace data. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. See all the results below: Apple Watch 10 Garmin Forerunner 570 Control Step count 5,568 steps 5,542 steps 5,500 steps (manual count) Distance 2.99 miles 2.98 miles 3.00 miles (Strava) Elevation gain 216 feet 207 feet 212 feet (Strava) Average pace 18 mins 23 secs per mile 18 mins 28 secs per mile 18 mins 6 secs per mile (Strava) Average heart rate 128 bpm 128 bpm n/a Max heart rate 163 bpm 164 bpm n/a Calories burned 437 calories 375 calories n/a Device battery usage 12% 6% n/a Both the Garmin and Apple Watch were within 100 steps of my manually-counted total, an impressive showing for sure! However, while the Series 10 overcounted by 68 steps, the Forerunner 570 only overcounted by 42. Strava, meanwhile, calculated my total steps at 5,548. All three devices measured roughly the same total distance covered and fairly similar elevation gain metrics. Assuming Strava is correct here, both watches are within five feet of the actual total. Pace data also matches up nicely across the board. It's worth noting that both Garmin and Strava offer two average pace figures, including a moving average and an elapsed average, the latter of which is reported above. Garmin's average moving pace for my walk was 16 minutes and 4 seconds per mile and Strava's was 16 minutes and 48 seconds per mile. Despite the Apple Watch being worn on my right wrist and the Garmin adorning my left, heart rate data is a near match between the two, though Apple calculated slightly more calories burned during my roughly 50-minute walk. Finally, the Series 10 burned roughly twice as much battery using its onboard GPS to track my trek compared to the Forerunner 570. Before acknowledging our winner, it's worth pointing out that both the Garmin Forerunner 570 and Apple Watch Series 10 did extremely well in this walk test, and I'd gladly reach for either before recording my next adventure. However, the Garmin Forerunner 570 officially takes the belt in this bout against the Apple Watch Series 10. The margin may be razor thin, but a win's a win. Which smartwatches or fitness trackers would you like to see me test head-to-head in a future walk test? Let me know in the comments below. Until then, get those steps in!
Tom's Guide
17-06-2025
- Health
- Tom's Guide
Could ‘Jeffing' be the secret to running faster? — I tried it, and here's what happened
A couple of weeks ago, I told you how I'd discovered Jeffing for the first time, despite running and writing about health and fitness for the past decade. I was inundated with messages from readers, some telling me how they'd 'Jeffed' all of their PR's, others asking for more advice. And I decided my dalliance with this run/walk method was far from over. With no races on the calendar for the foreseeable future (I'm still returning to fitness following the birth of my son, and have little time to think about training for a race right now), I decided to put the method to the test. One week I ran 10K, the next week, I 'Jeffed' the same route, and the results really surprised me — read on to find out more. As a reminder, for those who are new to the idea, Jeffing is a run, walk technique developed by US Olympian Jeff Galloway. In simple terms, you run for a bit, then you walk, allowing you to keep going for longer. 'By alternating running and walking from the start, runners stay strong, recover faster and finish feeling good,' says Galloway. As long as there's some form of walking interval from the offset, you're Jeffing. Instead of setting out for a run, and continuing at the same pace, Jeffing involves running for between 10-60 seconds, then walking for 30 seconds, from the beginning of the workout. The intervals are flexible — if you're a more experienced runner, you might want to increase the running element, or decrease the amount of time spent walking. As long as there's some form of walking interval from the offset, you're Jeffing. As mentioned above, I set out and ran a 10K on Monday, June 9. I ran without looking at my pace, and followed my regular route along the river. According to my Garmin Forerunner 570, I ran 6.5 miles, with an average pace of 8:09 minute miles. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. My average heart rate was 159 beats per minute (bpm), and my max heart rate was 178 bpm. A week later, I set out on the same run, but this time, I added walking intervals to see what Jeffing would do to my overall performance. I set up the run on the Garmin Connect app beforehand, programming five minutes of running, followed by a 30-second walk. Sure, these are slightly longer intervals than some run/walk plans, but as mentioned above, I'm an experienced runner. If you're new to running, I'd recommend a minute or two of running, followed by a walking break. The surprising thing was, when Jeffing a 10K on Monday, June 16, I ran 6.74 miles (to finish my final five-minute interval), at an average pace of 8:09 minute miles. My average heart rate was 163 bpm, and my max heart rate was 180 bpm. As well as keeping my pace and heart rate pretty much the same, I actually burned more calories while Jeffing, compared to running at a steady pace for the entire time — 606 calories, compared to 563 calories the week before. My splits were also more consistent. As I ran at a steady pace, I slowed down as I neared the end of my run and fatigued, whereas this wasn't the case while Jeffing. Split times and calories burned aside, I really enjoyed the Jeffing workout. The way I'd set it up on my Garmin beforehand meant I could only see what was happening in that segment of the workout. I didn't focus on my average pace; instead, I ran each five minutes to feel, and ended up consistently running a 7:45-7:50 minute pace throughout the workout. The 30-second walks felt a lot shorter than I thought they'd be as I set up the workout — it was barely long enough to catch my breath, and I was moving again. However, these little walking breaks allowed me to stop, breathe, and mentally reset for the next five minutes. I hadn't believed the hype when I started this Jeffing journey, but I've been humbled. Perhaps I'll join fellow Jeffers at my next major race!
