Latest news with #GarminForerunner570
Tom's Guide
30-06-2025
- Business
- Tom's Guide
I review Garmin watches for a living — here's the 4 early Prime Day deals I'd shop now
If you've been waiting for Prime Day to upgrade your running watch, I've got good news — the sales have started early. I review running watches for a living, and have done so for the past decade, so I know exactly what I'm looking for when it comes to the tech on my wrist on race day. Garmin makes some of the best running watches on the market, and below, I've hand-picked the deals worth shopping ahead of Prime Day. All of the best Garmin watches will do a lot more than simply track your steps. They're all designed to be worn 24/7, and can help you get fitter, run faster, and gain a deeper understanding of your overall health. Here are the best deals to shop right now: The Garmin Forerunner 265 has been replaced by the Garmin Forerunner 570, but don't let this put you off. It's Garmin's mid-tier Forerunner, packed with advanced training features. It doesn't have some of the more techy stuff or built-in maps, but unless you're heading out on a multi-day adventure, you probably won't use them anyway. Right now, the sale is on the smaller verison of the Forerunner 265, the 42mm version, which is perfect for runners looking for a small, comfortable, lightweight watch. Find out more in our Garmin Forerunner 265 review. The Forerunner 165 is Garmin's mid-tier Forerunner, ideal for those who are becoming more serious about their training but don't want to spend hundreds of dollars. It doesn't have some of the more advanced training features, but it'll still track all of your runs, recovery, and has 11 days of battery life in smartwatch mode, meaning you can travel to a race abroad, without having to worry about packing your charger. Who said you need to spend a fortune to get a decent gadget? The Garmin Forerunner 55 is an affordable, entry-level running and workout watch well-suited for those looking to track their training but who don't need any extra bells or whistles. It still looks and feels like a Garmin watch without the hefty price tag. More importantly, it's just as accurate as far more advanced models. This is a great option if you're new to running, or you're not planning on wearing a sports watch 24/7. The Garmin Epix Pro is a top-of-the-line Garmin watch, designed for the ultimate adventure. This deal reduces the 51mm Epix Pro to its lowest ever price, and for $689 you're getting an incredible AMOLED sports watch that has best-in-class navigation tools on top of the tracking and training analysis it offers. As this is the largest watch in the Epix Pro range, you also get excellent battery life, and the titanium case and sapphire crystal screen mean that it's light and durable too.
Tom's Guide
24-06-2025
- Business
- Tom's Guide
Should you buy the Garmin Forerunner 570 or the Forerunner 965 in the Prime Day sale?
I review the best Garmin watches for a living and know how expensive it can be to upgrade your running watch. The good news is that the Garmin Prime Day deals have already started to drop, and right now, the Garmin Forerunner 965 is on sale for $555, making it the same price as the Garmin Forerunner 570. But which one should you buy? Below, I've put the two popular watches head to head to help you decide. The Garmin Forerunner 965 is a top-tier running watch, packed with some of Garmin's most advanced training features. It has since been replaced by the Garmin Forerunner 970, but don't let this put you off — it's still an excellent watch at a fantastic price. The watch has a beautiful AMOLED screen, with a resolution of 454 x 454 pixels; it's extremely bright and easy to see in all weather conditions. At the moment, the Garmin Forerunner 965 is on sale on Amazon in an early Prime Day sale for $555. The Garmin Forerunner 570 is the newer of the two watches, released in May 2025, and is on sale for $549. As a brand new watch, the Forerunner 570 is unlikely to drop in the Prime Day sales. The Garmin Forerunner 570 is the newer of the two watches, and is unlikely to go on sale this Prime Day, as it was only released in May this year. Right now it's $549 on Amazon, available in both the 42mm and the 47mm sizes. Both the Garmin Forerunner 965 and Forerunner 570 look like typical Garmin watches. They both have a round face, and five buttons to help you navigate around the watch — three on the left, two on the right. Both have bright AMOLED screens and are comfortable and lightweight on the wrist. The slight difference here is that the Forerunner 570 comes in two different sizes — a 42mm and a 47mm, whereas the Forerunner 965 only comes in one size, 47mm. The older watch doesn't come in as many fun color options as the Forerunner 570, but it has a durable titanium bezel, compared to the 570's aluminum bezel. The Forerunner 570 has a slightly brighter screen, although I'd argue you don't notice this all that much on the run. If battery life is a key consideration, the Forerunner 965 comes out on top. The 965 has more than double the battery life of the Forerunner 570, which could be a consideration for long-distance runners heading out on a multi-day adventure, or those who prefer less frequent charging. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. The battery life on the Forerunner 965 is up to 23 days in smartwatch mode, and up to 31 hours in GPS mode without music. The Forerunner 570 lasts up to 10 days in smartwatch mode in the 42mm version, 11 days in the 47mm version, and up to 18 hours in GPS mode. So what are the main differences between the two watches? You can dive deeper into both watches by reading our Forerunner 570 review and our Forerunner 965 review, but to sum it up, the Forerunner 965 has built-in maps and navigation. In contrast, the Forerunner 570 doesn't (although it does offer track and follow and direction features). It has advanced features like the Body Battery function, which aren't on the Forerunner 570, as well as a much longer battery life. The Forerunner 570 is the newer of the two watches, featuring Garmin's latest 5th-generation heart rate sensor, which supports additional health metrics, including skin temperature. It also features additional capabilities, including a built-in microphone and speaker for making calls directly from your wrist, as well as a flashlight. So, which should you buy? The answer depends on how much the latest technology and a speaker/microphone matter to you. The Forerunner 965 has advanced training metrics, built-in navigation, and a better battery life, plus it's probably cheaper in the Prime Day sales. If you're heading on a multi-day adventure, it's arguably the better watch to have on your wrist. That said, if you prefer the brighter colours of the Garmin Forerunner 570, or you'd prefer a smaller watch on your wrist, it's worth paying a little more for the newer watch.
Tom's Guide
21-06-2025
- Health
- Tom's Guide
I walked 5,500 steps with the Apple Watch 10 vs Garmin Forerunner 570 — here's the winner
The Garmin Forerunner 570 is one of Garmin's newest AMOLED-screen sporting smartwatches aimed at runners. It boasts loads of training tools, Garmin's best heart rate sensors and a small smattering of smart features. Meanwhile, the Apple Watch Series 10 is perhaps the best full-featured smartwatch on the market today. It's also no slouch when it comes to fitness and wellness tracking. While the Garmin Forerunner 570 is a tad pricier than the Apple Watch Series 10, both are well equipped to keep tabs on your daily workout efforts, whether you're a runner, walker, hiker or prefer the gym. Each watch sports an onboard GPS and the best holistic tech offered by Apple and Garmin, respectively. The question is, which one is more accurate when it comes to tracking a basic workout? I decided to find out. The Apple Watch Series 10 is my favorite full-featured smartwatch in 2025, sporting a thin and attractive design, gorgeous screen, endless apps and loads of useful onboard features. It's also a mighty reliable fitness and sleep tracker. The Garmin Forerunner 570 is one of the brand's latest smartwatches aimed squarely at runners and outdoor athletes, boasting Garmin's best holistic tech, excellent training and recovery tools, a bright AMOLED screen and a fun, colorful case design. For this walk test, I wore the Apple Watch Series 10 on my left wrist and the Garmin Forerunner 570 on my right wrist before setting out on my manually-counted jaunt around Seattle, Washington, on the longest day of the year. To keep track of my steps, I clicked an old-school tally counter every time my count hit 100 before starting over again at one. With my left foot taking only odd-numbered steps and my right foot only making even-numbered ones, I trekked three miles before ending tracking and examining the results. In addition to the manual count, I also recorded my walk using Strava as a control for distance, elevation and pace data. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. See all the results below: Apple Watch 10 Garmin Forerunner 570 Control Step count 5,568 steps 5,542 steps 5,500 steps (manual count) Distance 2.99 miles 2.98 miles 3.00 miles (Strava) Elevation gain 216 feet 207 feet 212 feet (Strava) Average pace 18 mins 23 secs per mile 18 mins 28 secs per mile 18 mins 6 secs per mile (Strava) Average heart rate 128 bpm 128 bpm n/a Max heart rate 163 bpm 164 bpm n/a Calories burned 437 calories 375 calories n/a Device battery usage 12% 6% n/a Both the Garmin and Apple Watch were within 100 steps of my manually-counted total, an impressive showing for sure! However, while the Series 10 overcounted by 68 steps, the Forerunner 570 only overcounted by 42. Strava, meanwhile, calculated my total steps at 5,548. All three devices measured roughly the same total distance covered and fairly similar elevation gain metrics. Assuming Strava is correct here, both watches are within five feet of the actual total. Pace data also matches up nicely across the board. It's worth noting that both Garmin and Strava offer two average pace figures, including a moving average and an elapsed average, the latter of which is reported above. Garmin's average moving pace for my walk was 16 minutes and 4 seconds per mile and Strava's was 16 minutes and 48 seconds per mile. Despite the Apple Watch being worn on my right wrist and the Garmin adorning my left, heart rate data is a near match between the two, though Apple calculated slightly more calories burned during my roughly 50-minute walk. Finally, the Series 10 burned roughly twice as much battery using its onboard GPS to track my trek compared to the Forerunner 570. Before acknowledging our winner, it's worth pointing out that both the Garmin Forerunner 570 and Apple Watch Series 10 did extremely well in this walk test, and I'd gladly reach for either before recording my next adventure. However, the Garmin Forerunner 570 officially takes the belt in this bout against the Apple Watch Series 10. The margin may be razor thin, but a win's a win. Which smartwatches or fitness trackers would you like to see me test head-to-head in a future walk test? Let me know in the comments below. Until then, get those steps in!
Tom's Guide
17-06-2025
- Health
- Tom's Guide
Could ‘Jeffing' be the secret to running faster? — I tried it, and here's what happened
A couple of weeks ago, I told you how I'd discovered Jeffing for the first time, despite running and writing about health and fitness for the past decade. I was inundated with messages from readers, some telling me how they'd 'Jeffed' all of their PR's, others asking for more advice. And I decided my dalliance with this run/walk method was far from over. With no races on the calendar for the foreseeable future (I'm still returning to fitness following the birth of my son, and have little time to think about training for a race right now), I decided to put the method to the test. One week I ran 10K, the next week, I 'Jeffed' the same route, and the results really surprised me — read on to find out more. As a reminder, for those who are new to the idea, Jeffing is a run, walk technique developed by US Olympian Jeff Galloway. In simple terms, you run for a bit, then you walk, allowing you to keep going for longer. 'By alternating running and walking from the start, runners stay strong, recover faster and finish feeling good,' says Galloway. As long as there's some form of walking interval from the offset, you're Jeffing. Instead of setting out for a run, and continuing at the same pace, Jeffing involves running for between 10-60 seconds, then walking for 30 seconds, from the beginning of the workout. The intervals are flexible — if you're a more experienced runner, you might want to increase the running element, or decrease the amount of time spent walking. As long as there's some form of walking interval from the offset, you're Jeffing. As mentioned above, I set out and ran a 10K on Monday, June 9. I ran without looking at my pace, and followed my regular route along the river. According to my Garmin Forerunner 570, I ran 6.5 miles, with an average pace of 8:09 minute miles. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. My average heart rate was 159 beats per minute (bpm), and my max heart rate was 178 bpm. A week later, I set out on the same run, but this time, I added walking intervals to see what Jeffing would do to my overall performance. I set up the run on the Garmin Connect app beforehand, programming five minutes of running, followed by a 30-second walk. Sure, these are slightly longer intervals than some run/walk plans, but as mentioned above, I'm an experienced runner. If you're new to running, I'd recommend a minute or two of running, followed by a walking break. The surprising thing was, when Jeffing a 10K on Monday, June 16, I ran 6.74 miles (to finish my final five-minute interval), at an average pace of 8:09 minute miles. My average heart rate was 163 bpm, and my max heart rate was 180 bpm. As well as keeping my pace and heart rate pretty much the same, I actually burned more calories while Jeffing, compared to running at a steady pace for the entire time — 606 calories, compared to 563 calories the week before. My splits were also more consistent. As I ran at a steady pace, I slowed down as I neared the end of my run and fatigued, whereas this wasn't the case while Jeffing. Split times and calories burned aside, I really enjoyed the Jeffing workout. The way I'd set it up on my Garmin beforehand meant I could only see what was happening in that segment of the workout. I didn't focus on my average pace; instead, I ran each five minutes to feel, and ended up consistently running a 7:45-7:50 minute pace throughout the workout. The 30-second walks felt a lot shorter than I thought they'd be as I set up the workout — it was barely long enough to catch my breath, and I was moving again. However, these little walking breaks allowed me to stop, breathe, and mentally reset for the next five minutes. I hadn't believed the hype when I started this Jeffing journey, but I've been humbled. Perhaps I'll join fellow Jeffers at my next major race!
Tom's Guide
16-06-2025
- Business
- Tom's Guide
The best running watch I've tested for most people is $100 off — get the lowest price ever now
If I got a dollar every time someone asked me which Garmin watch to buy, I'd probably still need to work for Tom's Guide, but I'd be a lot richer. My recommendation, and one of my favorite Garmins ever, is the Garmin Forerunner 265, and it it's $100 off right now. The fantastic little watch just dropped to $349 from $449 on Amazon in both the 42mm and the 46mm versions. The watch has been replaced by the newly released Garmin Forerunner 570 as the brand's mid-tier Forerunner, but don't let this put you off — it's still a fantastic running watch to have on your wrist, whatever you're training for. The Forerunner 265 is on sale in both sizes right now on Amazon. In the larger 46mm watch, it looks like the deal is on the aqua and black color watch. In the 42mm version, the watch is on sale in black/yellow, white, and pink. Act fast, this deal won't be around forever. In Garmin Forerunner 265 review, I said it was the best Garmin running watch for most people, and I stand by my decision, even with newer, snazzier watches on the market two years later. The Forerunner 265 is extremely light and comfortable, with a stunning AMOLED screen, and it has a lot of the advanced training features usually reserved for Garmin's more premium watches. At the time I wrote, 'The Forerunner 265 feels like a more premium running watch and it's all thanks to its beautiful screen. I've loved having this watch on my wrist — it's slim, it's lightweight, and when next to my Garmin Fenix 7, it looks so much brighter, whether I'm in the gym, or out in direct sunlight.' Next to my Apple Watch, the Forerunner 265 is lighter and more comfortable. I wear the 42mm version, which has a 15-day battery life in smartwatch mode, and a 24-hour battery life in GPS mode. The larger 46mm 265 has 13 days in smartwatch mode, and 20 hours in GPS mode. Normally, it's the larger of the two watches that has the longer battery life, but it seems with the bigger and brighter screen, the larger 265 will need charging ever so slightly sooner. If you're training for your first race or just hoping to get faster and stronger, this watch has plenty of features to help you train better and recover faster. It's a fantastic gadget to have on your wrist, and at $349, it's a fantastic price right now.
