Latest news with #HarvardTHChanSchool
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Health
- Yahoo
It's a girl — again! And again! Why a baby's sex isn't random.
A baby's sex may not be up to mere chance. A study published Friday in the journal Science Advances describes the odds of having a boy or girl as flipping a weighted coin, unique to each family. It found evidence that an infant's birth sex is associated with maternal age and specific genes. Subscribe to The Post Most newsletter for the most important and interesting stories from The Washington Post. The findings challenge assumptions that birth sex is random. They mirror the results of similar studies in Europe that have also found that birth sex does not follow a simple 50-50 distribution. Scientists have long documented a global imbalance in which slightly more boys are born than girls. The new study examined the murkier patterns of birth sex within individual families. To do so, researchers at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health analyzed data from more than 146,000 pregnancies from 58,000 nurses in the United States between 1956 and 2015. They found that some families were more likely to have children of the same sex than would be expected if each baby had an equal chance of being a boy or a girl. Moms with three or more kids were more likely to have all boys or all girls than expected by chance. The study suggests that sex at birth follows a weighted probability and that biological influences may sway the sex of the child. 'If you've had two girls or three girls and you're trying for a boy, you should know your odds are not 50-50,' said Jorge Chavarro, the study's senior author. 'You're more likely than not to have another girl.' Researchers estimated that families with three girls had a 58 percent chance of having another girl, while families with three boys had a 61 percent chance of having a fourth boy. Maternal age is a key factor. Women who started having children after age 28 were slightly more likely to have only boys or only girls. Chavarro said this could reflect age-related biological changes that influence the survival of the Y chromosome carried by boys, such as increased vaginal acidity. Paternal factors could also play a role because maternal and paternal ages are often closely linked. But the study did not include data on fathers, which was noted as a limitation. Researchers also identified two genes associated with giving birth to only boys or only girls. 'We don't know why these genes would be associated with sex at birth, but they are, and that opens up new questions,' Chavarro, a professor of nutrition and epidemiology, said. Iain Mathieson, a professor of genetics at the University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine who was not involved in the study, said the genetic associations should be viewed cautiously. He said the study's genetic analysis was based on a relatively small sample and may be influenced by other factors, making the results more speculative until confirmed by further research. 'I don't find the genetic factors identified here particularly convincing,' Mathieson said in an email. The researchers also found that parents were more likely to have one boy and one girl than would be expected by chance, a pattern they believe reflects a tendency to stop having children once both sexes are represented. To reduce bias from such family planning decisions, they analyzed data after removing each woman's final child. They also excluded women who had experienced miscarriages or stillbirths to test whether pregnancy loss changed the results. They still found the same pattern: The odds of birth sex did not follow mere chance. The study suggests it may not have been so improbable for the fictional parents in the TV sitcom 'Malcolm in the Middle' to have five sons or for the Bennet family in 'Pride and Prejudice' to have five daughters. Even in history, patterns like this have drawn attention. King Louis VII of France, for example, remarried after his first two wives each gave birth to daughters, depriving him of a male heir. Chavarro said it might take years to fully understand why some families consistently have children of one sex, but this research is an important place to start. His team said future studies should explore how lifestyle, nutrition and exposure to environmental chemicals might affect these patterns. Certain factors such as race, natural hair color, blood type, body mass index and height were not associated with having children of only one sex. But the study sample was 95 percent White and made up entirely of nurses, a group that may have different occupational exposures or health patterns compared with the general population. David A. Haig, an evolutionary biologist at Harvard University who was not involved in the study, said it offers evidence that the probability of a baby's sex varies by family. 'Different families are flipping different coins with different biases,' Haig said. 'It speaks to something very intuitive and personal, even if the underlying biology is complex.' Related Content Family adopts a shelter dog — then learns he's the father of their late dog Can the Fed stay independent? Trump-era adviser may put it to the test. The Hubble telescope zooms in on the galaxy next door Solve the daily Crossword
The Independent
6 days ago
- Health
- The Independent
Using a fan during summer could help you sleep better – and it's not just about the temperature
Using a fan on a hot summer night may help you sleep better — and it's not just about the temperature. While a whirring fan may provide some much-needed relief from sky-high dew points and lingering heat, they can also alleviate noise pollution. 'Tuning out environmental noises with the soothing sound of white noise from a fan can significantly improve sleep quality,' the Better Sleep Council advises. In a survey of Americans' sleep, 27 percent of respondents who considered themselves to be excellent sleepers reported regularly sleeping with a fan in their bedroom. But, there are even more benefits. Here's what to know... It's not just white noise With people awake longer hours during summer months, there's more noise pollution, or unwanted and disturbing sound. Fans can help to fight the negative effects of noise pollution, such as sleep disruption, insomnia, and chronic health conditions that include heart disease, depression, anxiety, and cognitive impairment. Loud noises can even trigger an acute stress response commonly known as 'fight-or-flight,' according to Peter James, an associate professor at Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. James and colleagues found in 2017 that low-income communities and areas with a large proportion of nonwhite residents are disproportionately impacted by traffic noise. So are people who live in urban areas. 'We've made these conscious or subconscious decision as a society to put minority-race communities who have the least amount of political power in areas near highways and airports,' he told Kaiser Health News. Tuning out these sounds can significantly improve sleep quality. Fans produce a consistent ambient noise that can 'mask some of the lower-level fluctuations in background noise so that you're not alerted to those signals,' Norah Simpson, a clinical professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at Stanford University, told The Washington Post. White noise may also make the ringing sound associated with tinnitus less noticeable. The audiological and neurological condition impacts approximately 10 percent of American adults, according to the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders. There are other more obvious benefits For one, fans can clear the air in a room. 'If you're blowing a fan on you to help you cool, that's great. But if you're in a stuffy room, you actually want the fan to blow out all the carbon dioxide that has built up in the room,' John Saito, spokesperson for the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, told The Post. Exposure to too much carbon dioxide in a room may put people at an increased risk of tiredness, headache, eye irritation, sore or dry throat, dizziness, and congestion. Secondly, fans cannot lower the temperature in the room, but they can make you feel more cool. Fans are able to cool people by displacing warmer air, and helping to evaporate sweat from the skin, according to NASA. Getting the seven hours of sleep adults need to stay healthy is greatly impacted during hot and humid summers. And the season is becoming even hotter due to the impacts of human-caused climate change. Hot and bothered Americans already lose over an hour of sleep each week in summer, according to SleepScore Labs, impacting an already shorter average sleep duration. 'In summer, the delta between the sleep we need and the sleep we get widens,' Nate Watson, SleepScore Labs' Sleep Advisory Board chair, told 'Warmer temperatures' impact on our ability to fall asleep along with increased social activities competing with sleep time are likely additional factors impacting these findings." Bear this in mind Oscillating fans prevent air flow from moving in just one direction, according to Healthline. The publication notes that fans can circulate dust and pollen, dry out your eyes and skin, and result in muscle aches. Furthermore, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends using fans only if indoor temperatures are less than 90 degrees. 'In temperatures above 90 degrees, a fan can increase body temperature,' the agency said. 'When you're sitting in front of a fan, it makes you feel cool. But just because you feel cool doesn't mean that it's exactly reducing the burden that your body faces,' Glen Kenny, a physiology professor at the University of Ottawa, told InsideClimate News.
