logo
#

Latest news with #HudsonSquare

The Latest EU Antitrust Attack On Google Shows It's Not A Monopoly
The Latest EU Antitrust Attack On Google Shows It's Not A Monopoly

Forbes

time6 days ago

  • Business
  • Forbes

The Latest EU Antitrust Attack On Google Shows It's Not A Monopoly

NEW YORK, NEW YORK - JANUARY 09: The exterior of the new headquarters of Google is seen at 550 ... More Washington Street in Hudson Square on January 09, 2024 in New York City. Designed by COOKFOX Architects, the 1.3-million-square-foot project involved the restoration and expansion of the St. John's Terminal building along the Hudson River waterfront. (Photo by Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images) Google possesses no monopoly in search. Evidence supporting the previous claim can be found in the antitrust attack on Google by independent publishers within the European Union. Over the weekend it was reported that 'Google's controversial AI-generated summaries — which have been blamed for crushing the traffic of U.S. news sites — have drawn an antitrust complaint in the European Union from a group of independent publishers.' Their very case wrecks their case. See Google's AI-generated summaries. In contemplating what Google's AI generation produces for visitors to the search site, it's easy to see where Google's attackers slip up. All one needs to do is contemplate the fruits of Google searches before November 30, 2022. The date mentioned is important and relevant to the accusations. That's because it was on November 30, 2022 that OpenAI officially launched ChatGPT to the public. And in incredibly rapid fashion even within a technology space known for its viral qualities, internet search was changed forever. Crucially, the change in search existed as a threat to Google's popularity. And for obvious reasons. Though internet searches on Google formerly directed users to internet locales away from it, including that of publishers, ChatGPT's rollout provided users of the internet with an all-new way to find voluminous information (including summaries) without endless clicking. Which means Google had to adapt. Put another way, a failure of Google to adapt to the soaring popularity of ChatGPT, along with all manner of others (think Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek, and surely many more on the way) to ChatGPT's successful alteration of user wants was existential for Google, as it is for any business that rests on its laurels. Thought of in terms of the attack on Google discussed within this opinion piece, what has independent publishers (among others) within the EU up in arms is evidence not of Google's monopoly power, but of a growing sector within the global economy (search) defined by enormous competition. Which, when you think about it, describes all sectors in which there are highly valued corporations. Specifically, it's the lofty valuation of corporations naively assumed to possess monopoly powers that implies feverish competition. Looked at through the prism of Google, its global popularity is all the evidence we need that it's not a monopoly now, and most certainly won't be one in the future. Corporations quite simply cannot achieve on the level that Google has without facing challenges to their primacy. Google has seen this not just from established giants (think Microsoft and Bing), but from former unknowns eager to achieve Google's much-coveted status as noun, verb, and adjective. Which explains the unexpected arrival of ChatGPT onto the search scene yet again. Of course, the incredibly fast adoption of ChatGPT from November 30, 2022 onward is the undoing of the latest harassment of Google from the proverbial Commanding Heights. The nature of a Google search today doesn't signal its monopolization of search, rather it signals an evolution of search born of intense, innovative and and well-funded competition. Google isn't a monopoly per the latest EU complaint, rather it's a competitor in an increasingly crowded space. The previous truth can be found in the very complaint brought by independent publishers.

Spring/Break May Be a Little Older, but It Still Parties On
Spring/Break May Be a Little Older, but It Still Parties On

New York Times

time08-05-2025

  • Entertainment
  • New York Times

Spring/Break May Be a Little Older, but It Still Parties On

When Spring/Break Art Show began in 2012, it was a kind of anti-fair: The married organizers, Andrew Gori and Ambre Kelly, filled an defunct schoolhouse with curated, thematic presentations. Artworks were for sale, but there weren't really booths so much as rooms and installations. The vibe was D.I.Y., experimental and a bit zany. More than a decade later, Spring/Break has, perhaps inevitably, grown up. It retains the same system: housed in a disused space — this year, one floor of an office building near Hudson Square — with curators submitting proposals based on a loose theme; for 2025, 'Paradise Lost and Found.' There are now solo artist spotlights, too. But the purposefully titled 'art show' feels more buttoned-up and closer to the thing it was once bucking against, an art fair. I suppose maturation is inevitable. What remains rare about Spring/Break is its accessibility: Artists who don't have gallery representation can show alongside those who do. As with any fair, though, the quality of the work can be mixed. That's the case with this year's 120 or so presentations, but it makes finding the good stuff more rewarding. Here are some of my favorites. Eve Sussman + Simon Lee (C8) The longtime collaborators Eve Sussman and Simon Lee are among the highest profile and most steadfast Spring/Break participants. And whether they're curating others' work or showing their own, their installations tend to be elaborate. This year's entry, 'The Stellas: A Fugue for Day Players,' is a multichannel film made with the composer Volkmar Klien. For it, a series of actors performed a scene from the 1960s soap opera 'Peyton Place' while constantly rotating roles and moving through a house. The result feels both high stakes and deconstructed — twin hallmarks of Sussman and Lee's practice. The installation includes microphones so that anyone can jump in and read lines, becoming a part of the drama. Eric Diehl (A4) One indicator of the influence of the market on Spring/Break is the abundance of paintings, which are more sellable than, say, a papier-mâché reconstruction of a home. Among the painters showing this year, many of them figurative, Eric Diehl stands out. His film-inspired American Western scenes are largely devoid of people, instead filled with cars and architecture that frame or impose on the land. They're meticulously composed and suffused with light that is sometimes ethereal, other times eerie. That changeability hits at the heart of Diehl's work: Rather than passing judgment, he is attempting to capture a state of isolation that's as seductive as it is uneasy. Rosebud Contemporary (A18) RJ Calabrese's paintings may be the opposite of Diehl's: small, claustrophobic and inspiring visceral dread. The cartoonish images depict white men in bizarre spaces and situations involving dismembered body parts, some of which Calabrese fashions from clay and attaches to the works' wooden surfaces. This is a vision of a systematic hell with people as willing participants. The booth's second artist, Ebenezer Singh, provides an emotional counterpoint: big, sparkly sculptural tableaus of dinosaurs interacting with Jesus; in one, he stands atop a triceratops. The pieces are funny, sacrilegious and campy. Are they also great? Maybe. Indira A. Abiskaroon (F3) Spring/Break exhibitors have to work with the spaces they get, whether an open area without walls or a corner office. The best entries adapt well, like the curator Indira A. Abiskaroon's presentation of Aiza Ahmed's 'Border Play.' The project focuses on India and Pakistan's Attari-Wagah border, where soldiers from both sides perform a highly choreographed daily ceremony for cheering spectators. (The ceremony was suspended this week, after India's airstrikes on Pakistan.) Ahmed has created a mini-theater for her satire of the spectacle, replete with brushy, life-size caricatures, pink curtains and a red carpet, as well as a video projection. Taraka Larson (B16) In 2017, Taraka Larson spent three and half weeks living in a gallery in Austin, Texas, with a snake. The space was part desert habitat, part throwback to her adolescence, and she wrote songs there. The songs became her first solo album, and the installation morphed into what's here — an imagined, alternative version of her teenage bedroom. Sprawling, handmade and earnest, the project is quintessential Spring/Break, and Larson will be lounging and performing there for the run of the show. When you've been at the fair too long, go hang out and chat, or watch her trippy music videos and let them wash over you.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store