logo
#

Latest news with #IVAdditionalDistrictConsumerDisputesRedressalCommission

Bengaluru elderly man's 9-year wait for 1BHK flat turns into legal win: BDA ordered to refund over Rs 8 lakh with 18% interest
Bengaluru elderly man's 9-year wait for 1BHK flat turns into legal win: BDA ordered to refund over Rs 8 lakh with 18% interest

Time of India

time18-06-2025

  • Business
  • Time of India

Bengaluru elderly man's 9-year wait for 1BHK flat turns into legal win: BDA ordered to refund over Rs 8 lakh with 18% interest

The IV Additional District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has directed the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) to refund Rs 8.03 lakh to a 70-year-old man from Marathahalli, who waited nearly nine years for a flat promised under the EWS (Economically Weaker Sections) housing scheme. The flat was supposed to be delivered in just one year. What the Court Said On March 21, 2025, the Commission ruled that BDA must: Refund Rs 8.03 lakh with 18% interest from the date of the first payment, Pay Rs 1 lakh for service deficiency, Rs 25,000 for mental agony, And Rs 10,000 towards litigation costs. How It Began Suryaprakash H R booked a 1BHK flat at Gunjur village on March 7, 2014, paying Rs 1.12 lakh as an initial amount. Later, he was asked to pay the remaining Rs 7.87 lakh within six months. To manage this, he took a housing loan of Rs 8 lakh, which was released to BDA in four instalments. However, BDA did not provide a registration date or respond to his repeated follow-ups. At one point, officials even said they couldn't trace his file. Construction Delayed, Site Half-Done In 2016, when Suryaprakash visited the site, he found only two floors built. A letter from BDA later confirmed that the contractor, Deepak Cable India Ltd., failed to finish the work and the contract was re-tendered. Live Events Despite hunger strikes and multiple appeals to the Chief Minister and Deputy CM, there was no progress. Frustrated, Suryaprakash sent a legal notice in 2023 and filed a complaint in 2024. BDA's Defence Dismissed BDA argued in court that possession was denied due to Rs 1.16 lakh pending. But the court found that Suryaprakash had already paid 95% of the flat's cost by 2015. It also noted the flat was unfit to live in due to lack of basic amenities like drainage and parking. The court called BDA's excuse unjustified and ruled in favour of the senior citizen. Inputs from TOI

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store