Latest news with #InglouriousBasterds
Buzz Feed
3 days ago
- Entertainment
- Buzz Feed
29 Actors Who Were Cast At The Very Last Second
Recently, Reddit user ValoNoctis asked about last-minute casting that saved a movie, and I can't believe some of these actors almost didn't play these iconic roles. Here are actors who came in at the eleventh hour and killed it. Director Quentin Tarantino struggled to find the right actor to play Hans Landa in Inglourious Basterds. On the podcast The Moment With Brian Koppelman, Tarantino said the movie was already in pre-production, and they hadn't cast the role — which was a problem, as Tarantino had decided to shelve the project for a few years if he couldn't find the perfect actor. "It's Tuesday morning, and by Friday, Universal Pictures sign the check, and now we're making the movie for Universal. And I know if I'm gonna pull the plug, I've gotta pull it before Thursday," he revealed. On Wednesday, Christoph Waltz auditioned, and Tarantino immediately knew he'd found his Landa. Waltz would end up winning an Oscar for his portrayal. Suggested by u/bvmse Gene Wilder wanted the role of Jim in Blazing Saddles, but director Mel Brooks thought he was too young. "I need an older guy — someone who could look like an over-the-hill alcoholic," he told Wilder. He went with Gig Young, who was known to struggle with alcoholism in real life, which Brooks thought would work well with the character. However, on the very first morning of filming, Young was dealing with alcohol withdrawal — which was made worse by the fact that his character was upside-down. "We draped Gig Young's legs over and hung him upside down. And he started to talk and he started shaking." At first, Brooks thought this was just great acting. Suggested by u/hedbopper But..."The shaking never stopped, and green stuff started spewing out of his mouth and nose, and he started screaming." Brooks said he learned his lesson not to cast someone with alcoholism as a character with alcoholism: "I said, 'That's the last time I'll ever cast anybody who really is that person.'" He continued, "Poor Gig Young, it was the first shot on Friday, nine in the morning, and an ambulance came and took him away. I had no movie." Brooks quickly called up Wilder, who flew out the next day to film. They were shooting again on Monday. Wilder ended up being perfect for the role, cementing the movie in comedy history. Another actor who was replaced after filming started? Harvey Keitel in Apocalypse Now. He actually shot for a full week before being recast. The film's director, Francis Ford Coppola, apparently felt he wasn't right for the role, and also that Keitel was uncomfortable filming in the jungle (which Keitel has disputed). Coppola convinced Martin Sheen to take the role instead — he'd originally wanted Sheen for the role, but he was unavailable. Sheen's performance would end up being the most memorable part of the film. Suggested by u/congo66 Joaquin Phoenix was originally cast as the lead in Split, but dropped out only weeks before filming began. James McAvoy stepped in to play the role and said he only had two weeks to prepare. While Phoenix obviously is a talented actor, McAvoy's performance was stellar, garnering critical acclaim — one reviewer called it "the performance of his career." Suggested by u/ralo229 Tim Colceri spent weeks rehearsing for his role as a drill sergeant in Full Metal Jacket, with director Stanley Kubrick continuously telling him shooting would begin the next day, then not following through. Eventually, Colceri was given a letter by Kubrick stating he had been recast with R. Lee Ermey. Ermey, a Vietnam War veteran, had been initially hired as a technical consultant on the film. However, he won Kubrick over with an unsolicited audition tape, earning the role over Colceri, who had been cast eight months earlier. Ermey knocked it out of the park, with the scene of him yelling at the recruits — which was half improvised — becoming one of the most memorable parts of the film. Colceri was cast in a smaller role. Suggested by u/Alteredego619 Paul Dano only had about four days to prepare for his role as Eli in There Will Be Blood. He had already been cast as Paul, and Kel O'Neill had been cast as Eli (who was not initially Paul's brother). In fact, O'Neill had already filmed for weeks. However, O'Neill did not work well with the director, Paul Thomas Anderson, so Anderson decided to give Dano the additional role and make the characters twins. "I just went for it, threw myself in there and gave it everything I had," Dano said. "That was just guts and instinct, not a lot of preparation. ... I had to cut loose and go for it," he said. Dano was nominated for a BAFTA for his role as the twins. Suggested by u/MrAldoRayne Director John Carpenter was unsure about casting Kurt Russell as R.J. MacReady in The Thing and only decided on him the day they flew out to film the movie. There's actually a scene where MacReady flies a helicopter that's not even Russell — it's a pilot in the character's costume because they didn't have Russell on hand yet. The film ended up being one of Russell's best roles. Dianna Agron was cast the day before the pilot for Glee began shooting. Producers were actually about to cut her character as they hadn't found someone for the role — and her casting ended up vastly changing how they envisioned the character. Series creator Ryan Murphy said Agron "ruined the part" for him because she "humanized" Quinn. "She can cry at the drop of a hat. So now her character has a conscience, a soul, and great vulnerability." Murphy was right; Agron imbued the character with a complexity that elevated the role beyond a basic cheerleader role. Viggo Mortensen was cast after production began for The Lord of the Rings. He replaced Stuart Townsend, who was deemed too young for the role and fired the day before filming began. "I felt unprepared," Mortensen revealed. "The other actors had been there for weeks and months, in some cases, preparing for the arduous task of shooting the whole trilogy. I also felt awkward because I'd never been in a position of replacing another actor." Despite his fears, Mortensen killed it in the role. Suggested by u/revdon Stuart Townsend was also replaced in Thor just days before the start of filming. Josh Dallas was cast in the role instead after "creative differences" (though there were rumors Townsend had been late for a screen test and was fired), and he only had a few days before he had to film. Nevertheless, he did well in the small role. Stanley Tucci similarly replaced another actor days before production began. After Ryan Gosling was cast in The Lovely Bones, he started drinking melted ice cream and gained 60 pounds because he "really believed he should be 210 pounds." However, he didn't communicate this to director Peter Jackson, who "had a different idea of how the character should look." When Gosling showed up on set to film, Jackson fired him. Tucci was cast in the role instead, and was the perfect level of creepy. Peter Jackson's wife and collaborator Fran Walsh said it was more Gosling's youth that led to him being ousted, saying Gosling believed he was too young for the role and "was so uncomfortable moving forward, and we began to feel he was not right." Speaking of Tucci, he accepted his role in The Devil Wears Prada only 72 hours before the start of shooting. "I was cast at the 11th hour," Tucci told Entertainment Weekly. "But it was just such a beautiful piece of writing, and there's no way that you could ever say no to such a thing. ... It touched you emotionally. It's the perfect Hollywood movie." Today, it's one of Tucci's most beloved roles. Over 40 women auditioned to play Nurse Ratched in One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, and Louise Fletcher eventually nabbed the part — days before filming began. "It's a miracle I survived the first day. I was so scared. It was only later that I realized that everybody was scared," she said. Fletcher earned an Oscar for her portrayal. Michael Garza was cast as Ramón Morales in Scary Stories to Tell in the Dark only "a couple of days before filming" because writer/producer Guillermo del Toro and director Andre Ovredal couldn't find someone they wanted for the role. "It was a last-minute audition, and I got it. It was crazy, a whirlwind of emotions," Garza revealed. Garza was nominated for an Imagen Award for his portrayal. A week before Prison Break began shooting, it didn't have either of its leads. Wentworth Miller was cast only a week before shooting. And Dominic Purcell wasn't officially cast until three days prior to filming. Both actors were perfect for the role and contributed to the show lasting five seasons. Similarly, Richard Dreyfuss and Robert Shaw, who played two of the leading roles in Jaws, were cast only nine days before shooting began. Both earned critical acclaim for their performances. Michael J. Fox was cast in Back to the Future five weeks after it started filming. Eric Stoltz had initially been cast in the role and even filmed for multiple weeks before director Robert Zemeckis and writer Bob Gale decided he didn't have the right comedic tone for Marty. They decided to replace him with Fox, their first choice for the role. However, they couldn't do this right away (Fox was still busy shooting Family Ties) and continued to film with Stoltz for days knowing they wouldn't use the footage. It ended up becoming Fox's most memorable role. Suggested by u/Drewp655321 Sam Waterston was cast in Godless at the last minute because the actor who was supposed to play Marshal John Cook got sick. He only had four days to prepare for the role — yet he killed it in the critically acclaimed series. Chris Sheffield was cast in The Maze Runner so late that the director, Wes Ball, and the producers for the film were already in Louisiana, preparing the production. A few days later, Sheffield was heading to Louisiana, too, to shoot, crafting a strong performance despite his lack of preparation. David Hayman was cast days before Bull started shooting because the original actor had dropped out. "I had no time to think about it," Hayman revealed. "I love Paul Andrew Williams's work. His movies and work are challenging. I love the cast. So it was a no-brainer for me to do it." Hayman's performance was highly praised in reviews. Patrick Renna was the last actor cast in The Sandlot after another actor dropped out only two days before production started on location. Director David Mickey Evans called meeting Renna a "godsend" as he was perfect for the role. Michael Biehn was cast in Aliens weeks into filming, as James Remar had recently been fired after getting arrested for drug possession. According to Biehn, Aliens producer Gale Anne Hurd called him on a Friday and asked if he had a current passport — which, luckily, he did. By Monday, he was on set, giving a legendary performance. Suggested by u/jayseventwo Ed Harris was cast to play Christof in The Truman Show when principal photography was almost done, and shot for only 10 days. He replaced Dennis Hopper, who left the cast due to "creative differences." Harris was nominated for an Oscar for the role. In a pretty unprecedented move, Christopher Plummer was cast in All the Money in the World AFTER the film had been entirely shot. Replacing Kevin Spacey in the wake of his sexual assault allegations, Plummer reshot all of Spacey's scenes in just nine days. He was nominated for an Oscar for his work on the film. Suggested by u/boringwhitecollar Similarly, Tobey Maguire had already filmed all of his scenes for Life of Pi when the director decided to replace him because he was too famous, making his presence distracting. Rafe Spall was quickly cast in Maguire's role, putting him in the rare position of being cast AFTER a movie was technically "complete," though, of course, he had to reshoot all of Maguire's scenes. This was probably the right decision, as I can't picture Maguire in this role. Ben Whishaw was cast as the voice of the titular teddy bear in Paddington after the film was shot. Colin Firth had initially taken on the role but came to a mutual agreement with producers that his voice sounded too mature. "That was a bit scary because it was late in the process. We'd shot the film, but it was the right call," recalled producer David Heyman. Firth's exit was in June, and the film was set to come out in November. Luckily, since Whishaw was just providing a voice, they could still finish the movie for its November release. Paddington would end up becoming critically acclaimed, with Whishaw's voice fitting perfectly. The same happened with Scarlett Johansson in Her. Samantha Morton had originally been cast and worked on set throughout filming. While editing during post-production, director Spike Jonze "realized that what the character/movie needed was different from what Samantha and I had created together." They recast Johansson in the role in the 11th hour, re-recording the character's dialogue. Johansson's voice ended up being a much better fit for the role. And finally, Dougray Scott was originally meant to play Wolverine in the first X-Men film, but issues relating to Scott's role in Mission Impossible II forced him to drop out just as they were about to start shooting. Hugh Jackman — who had first auditioned for the role nine months earlier — took on the role at the 11th hour and was unprepared. In fact, Jackman said that they had to push back the first scene he was meant to shoot, which was a shirtless scene, because he needed time to bulk up. Jackman's performance would end up being one of the most memorable of his career. Suggested by u/Fun-Contribution-601 What do you think? Were these actors the right choice? How did they do considering they had no prep time? Let us know in the comments!
India Today
5 days ago
- Entertainment
- India Today
Hari Hara Veera Mallu review: Pawan Kalyan's star power can't save scattered epic
What hurts more than a film failing is when a film with strong ideas stumbles under the weight of generic, dull scenes that don't match the scale or ambition of the concept. In Indian cinema, most historical dramas tend to focus on royal wars or intense love stories rooted in tradition and belief systems. But there's another genre that's rarely explored: the historical Kalyan's 'Hari Hara Veera Mallu' is a bold attempt to explore that space. It starts with the promise of an exciting story: a thief with secret motives is hired to steal the Koh-i-Noor from Aurangzeb's palace. He is joined by a crew of misfits, each talented in their own way. On paper, it's a great setup for an the film adds another layer. It also tries to be a story of resistance, a fight against Aurangzeb's rule and the oppression of Hindus. This shifts the tone towards a drama hinging on people's rebellion, making the hero more than just a thief. There's also a third angle. The film blends fiction with real historical figures. Like 'RRR' or 'Inglourious Basterds', it plays with alternate history. So now we have a heist story, a rebellion, and a fictional take on real events - all in one film! Each idea works on its own. But 'Hari Hara Veera Mallu' struggles to tie them together in a smooth, balanced way. The film shifts the tone too often, and the story never fully commits to one clear direction. There's no question about the ambition behind it. With a star like Pawan Kalyan, a rich period setting, and a genre that offers a lot of potential, this could have been a unique and entertaining experience. Instead, the film gives us a few strong moments but doesn't hold together as a whole. Set in the 1650s, the story follows Veera Mallu (Pawan Kalyan), a Robin Hood-like outlaw drawn into a web of politics, resistance, and legend. Initially recruited by the King of Kollur, Veera escapes with Panchami (Nidhhi Agerwal) and impresses Qutub Shah (Dalip Tahil), who entrusts him with a greater task: steal the Koh-i-Noor from Mughal emperor Aurangzeb (Bobby Deol). But this isn't just about the diamond. Beneath the mission lies a personal journey, marked by buried secrets and emotional film opens with grandeur. The sets in the first half, particularly the palace interiors and the bustling Kollur town, are rich in texture and detail. The Machilipatnam port fight and the Charminar chase are staged with flair, and Pawan Kalyan brings his signature gravitas to the role. His presence is the glue holding everything together. Every scene he walks into gets a little more watchable. Even in moments where the script fumbles, he powers through with MM Keeravani's score complements this world well, though not every stretch lands musically. Some cues feel old-school, but when it works, especially during action set pieces and emotional peaks, the music elevates the action choreography is among the film's biggest assets. The first half features standout sequences: the Machilipatnam port fight and the Charminar battle, to be particular. Each is executed with scale and flair. The second half includes a compelling action block in a Mughal-ruled village, which stands out for its raw intensity. These sequences are uplifted by the energy of the stunts, Pawan Kalyan's involvement, and a sense of cinematic here's where the problems begin: tonal inconsistency. High moments are abruptly undercut by misplaced humour. A scene where Veera converses with wolves could've added mystique but is instead played for laughs. His team of misfits, featuring actors like Nasser and Subbaraju, have the potential to shine but are reduced to mere fillers. You're reminded of Kamal Haasan's squad in 'Vikram', and how underwritten this ensemble feels in comparison. They just exist, without a single standout oscillate between massy and meaningful, but even powerful lines get diluted by awkward editing and staging. A standout line by Sathyaraj comparing the sea approaching land to destruction deserved a better moment than the one it got. The comedy sequences and punchlines feel dated, and their timing often derails the scene's emotional weight. The film's second half is where the energy truly dips. With much of the narrative held back for the sequel, the makers insert filler scenes that test the viewer's patience. These segments, though passable in isolation, feel stretched and repetitive. Several scenes feel like climaxes, creating a sense of VFX is undoubtedly the biggest letdown of the film. For a film this ambitious, several key scenes, including the hilltop confrontation, suffer from subpar CGI. Scenes feel unfinished or patched together. It's clear the film has gone through production hurdles, and that shows in the uneven editing and occasional abrupt cuts. Some portions feel like they lacked footage, while others were oddly there are sparks. Bobby Deol makes a strong impression in his brief moments, bringing menace and intensity. Nidhhi Agerwal delivers her part with grace, though she fades into the background in the second half. Sathyaraj adds gravitas, but his character arc feels underdeveloped. Supporting actors like Sunil, Kabir Duhan Singh, and Raghu Babu serve their roles effectively but don't leave a lasting cinematography by Gnana Sekhar VS and Manoj Paramahamsa adds richness to the film's period setting. Director Krish Jagarlamudi's vision is evident throughout the portions he helmed. His historical detailing and narrative style lend depth to the film. Jyothi Krishna, who took over the reins from Krish, completed the film's remaining portions and handles them decently, but the tonal shift and change of vision is noticeable.'Hari Hara Veera Mallu: Part 1' is a film full of ideas, ambition, and star power, but its execution doesn't quite rise to match them. It sets the stage, offers glimpses of what could be an epic, but stumbles too often to leave a lasting impact. What it needed was tighter writing, better tonal control, and sharper visual storytelling.- Ends2 out of 5 for 'Hari Hara Veera Mallu: Part 1'.
Irish Independent
07-07-2025
- Entertainment
- Irish Independent
Today's top TV and streaming choices: Nationwide, The Story of Gaelic Football and Inglourious Basterds
Nationwide RTÉ One, 7pm The first edition of the show's Summer Holiday series explores Co Waterford's stunning Copper Coast, named after the mines that operated in the area during the 19th century. Presenter Bláthnaid Ní Chofaigh meets some intriguing locals while travelling along the 25km coastal route, including an environmental artist and a seaweed forager. An Ghig Mhór RTÉ One, 8pm Hip hop duo Tebi Rex help rising band Na hEasógaí — who perform a fusion of rock, traditional Irish and world music — organise a gig in Conamara. Hell for Leather: The Story of Gaelic Football RTÉ One, 9.35pm Cora Staunton, Jim McGuinness and Jack McCaffrey reveal how important the support of their local communities was in helping to drive forward their sporting careers. There's also a trip to Northern Ireland, where players past and present discuss how the game managed to survive during a century of strife. Inglourious Basterds TG4, 9.30pm Quentin Tarantino's wartime adventure stars Brad Pitt as the leader of a group of Jewish soldiers on a mission to kill as many Nazis as possible. Christoph Waltz co-stars in an Oscar-winning role. All The Sharks Netflix, streaming now If you're wondering, 'Why all the shark-related viewing of late?' Well, the simple answer is that we're currently in the run-up to July 14, which is Shark Awareness Day. This summer also happens to be the 50th anniversary of Jaws, so one should expect an inordinate level of shark-themed programming over the coming weeks. A lot of it, however, does seem somewhat at odds with itself. For instance, last week saw the release of Shark Whisperer, which featured a herd of conservationists expressing concern about people, like Instagrammer Ocean Ramsey, interfering with endangered sharks. Now, Netflix is proffering an almost oxymoronic competition show, where conservationists infiltrate the oceans to tick all the sharks off their assigned apex predator bingo cards. If you favour more traditional shark viewing — ie. without a nigh-dystopic gameshow element — Sharks Up Close With Bertie Gregory has landed on Disney+. Heads of State Prime Video, streaming now Have you ever considered a parallel universe where Idris Elba is the UK prime minister and John Cena is the US president? Well, now's your chance! For context, their 'special relationship' is under threat on account of their huge egos, but — once confronted with a common adversary — the pair must learn to rely on each other.
Hindustan Times
05-07-2025
- Entertainment
- Hindustan Times
F1 The Movie surpasses box office milestone, races past 3 dozen Brad Pitt movies
F1 The Movie is proving to be a serious box office success. The Formula 1 drama, starring Brad Pitt and directed by Top Gun: Maverick's Joseph Kosinski, has crossed the $100 million mark domestically. That's after opening on June 27 with $57 million, the biggest ever for an Apple Studios title, reported ScreenRant. US actor and producer Brad Pitt poses on the red carpet upon arrival for the European Premier of F1 The Movie, at Cineworld Leicester Square, central London, on June 23, 2025. (HENRY NICHOLLS / AFP) As of this weekend, the film is expected to hit a domestic total of about $109 million, according to Deadline. It is the ninth release of 2025 to reach that milestone. Also read: The last thing we want right now is a sequel': Lewis Hamilton not aboard bandwagon for part 2 of Brad Pitt's F1 Brad Pitt's latest closes in on his all-time top 10 According to ScreenRant, with $109 million in ticket sales, F1 The Movie now ranks as Brad Pitt's 12th highest-grossing film at the US box office. It has already outperformed over three dozen major projects in his career, including Interview with the Vampire, Se7en and Moneyball. It's still climbing. At its current pace, F1 could soon overtake Inglourious Basterds, which made just over $120 million. Can F1 The Movie break into the Top 5? Here's what stands between F1 The Movie and Brad Pitt's best-performing domestic releases: #10: Inglourious Basterds – $120.8M #9: Ocean's Twelve – $125.5M #8: Benjamin Button – $127.5M #7: Troy – $133.3M #6: Once Upon a Time… in Hollywood – $142.5M #5: Megamind – $148.4M F1 would need another $12 million to crack the top 10. That seems likely within the next two weeks. Breaking into the top five, however, means pulling in $40 million more. That's still possible, but it may take time. Competition ahead could slow momentum F1 The Movie dropped about 55 per cent in its second weekend. If it sees a similar dip in the coming weeks, it could add another $11 million by mid-July. That would secure its place in Pitt's top 10. Still, the race won't be easy. Several big titles are on the way-Jurassic World Rebirth, a new Superman and The Fantastic Four: First Steps. Any of them could edge F1 out of premium screens and impact its legs. Still a big win for Apple Studios Even if it doesn't break into Pitt's Top 5 box office grossers, F1 The Movie is a major success for Apple. With a production budget reportedly between $200 million and $300 million, it may not look wildly profitable at the box office alone. But Apple doesn't rely on theatrical revenue the way traditional studios do. Their strategy uses theatres to build buzz ahead of a movie's Apple TV+ release. On that front, F1 is already their biggest theatrical hit ever. Domestically, only Napoleon and Killers of the Flower Moon have made more. With strong word of mouth and Pitt's star power still pulling in audiences, F1 The Movie is on track to become one of Apple's biggest prestige wins to date. FAQs What is the budget of F1 The Movie? The film's production budget is estimated to be between $200 million and $300 million. Is F1 The Movie the most expensive movie ever made? No, several other blockbusters like Avatar: The Way of Water had higher production costs. What is the No. 1 box office movie right now? F1 The Movie is among the top earners in 2025, though not the global No. 1.
Daily Record
30-06-2025
- Entertainment
- Daily Record
Brad Pitt's top 10 films ranked by Rotten Tomatoes as fans 'speechless' at number 1
Brad Pitt's acting career has seen him star in almost 50 films, and now Rotten Tomatoes has ranked them all in order Brad Pitt, a titan in Hollywood and a household name, is synonymous with A-list status and one of the most distinguished faces in entertainment. So which of his silver screen appearances are considered the pinnacle of his career? Rotten Tomatoes has compiled a definitive ranking for film buffs. Utilising copious critiques from cinema-goers who inadvertently placed them, the films have been ordered from standout to less stellar. Now at 61 and with nearly half a century of films under his belt dating back to the late 1980s, Pitt has a plethora of performances that fans are keen to discuss. Rotten Tomatoes amalgamates these user reviews to conjure a cumulative score for each title, thereby curating Brad Pitt's comprehensive cinematic repertoire ranked from top-tier to lesser-known entries. To the anticipation of few, soaring to the top spot with an impressive 95% rating is '12 Years a Slave'. Debuted in 2013, this poignant piece showcases Pitt as an abolitionist amidst the zenith of America's slave era, cementing one of his most powerful portrayals, reports the Mirror US. A particular review from Rotten Tomatoes encapsulates the impact of the film: "This movie left me speechless. It's the kind of movie that is amazing in every way, but you never want to watch again. It's that effective with its emotional brutality. It doesn't shy away from the sheer horrors of American slavery." However, what might surprise film critics is that Pitt's second-highest rated film is actually one of his lesser-known roles, Moneyball. In 2011, the Hollywood A-lister starred in the sports drama, which tells the real-life story of the Oakland Athletics baseball team's ascent to fame through savvy financial decisions. The film boasts an impressive cast, including Jonah Hill, Chris Pratt, and Philip Hoffman, but for many viewers, Pitt's performance is a major factor in its high 94% rating. One fan raved: "This is one of my favorite Brad Pitt films," while others praised his "fantastic acting" as the baseball manager. A review reads: "All-Time Classic. Acting is excellent. Everyone gives really good performances, but Brad Pitt is excellent and just sends it over the top with an interesting character to boot." Not far behind in third place is a film that takes us back to the 90s and Pitt's minor role in True Romance. As far as films he's been a part of go, this one earns its high ranking thanks to its screenplay, penned by none other than Quentin Tarantino. Although Pitt's part is not a main casting, he did go on to work with Tarantino in other capacities, starring in both Inglourious Basterds and Once Upon a Time in Hollywood, both directed by the acclaimed filmmaker. One enthusiast hailed it as their "favourite film of all time." They penned: "This film has everything: great dialogue, a superb score/soundtrack, cinematography, story, humour, action, thrills, and, most importantly, great characters portrayed with a cast of some of my favourite actors." Among the entire list of 49 films, languishing at the bottom was an early work from Pitt's career, dating back to 1992. In this film, he portrays a cartoonist who finds himself immersed in a whimsical cartoon universe. Cool World is a blend of live action and animation, a combination that didn't sit well with most viewers, resulting in a dismal score of just 4%. Brad Pitt's Top 10 films ranked by Rotten Tomatoes 12 Years a Slave (2013) Moneyball (2011) True Romance (1993) Inglourious Basterds (2009) The Big Short (2015) 12 Monkeys (1995) Once Upon a Time... In Hollywood (2019) Thelma & Louise (1991) The Tree of Life (2011) Seven (1995)
