3 days ago
‘Can't ignore preservation concerns as Mumbai grows': HC directs MMRCL to restore heritage feature of JN Petit Institute
The Bombay High Court emphasised on Thursday that while the city's development march cannot be halted, it cannot run roughshod over concerns for the preservation and maintenance of historic or heritage structures. In doing so, the high court disposed of a plea by trustees of the over 100-year-old J N Petit Institute's heritage building in the Fort area of South Mumbai that raised apprehensions of damage due to works for the Metro Line-3 project.
A division bench of Justices Mahesh S Sonak and Jitendra S Jain, on July 10, directed the Mumbai Metro Rail Corporation Limited (MMRCL) to abide by its assurance to reconstruct a fallen limestone finial, a heritage feature that adorned a portion of the said historic building situated at Dadabhai Naoroji (DN) Road. The finial is an architectural ornamental and decorative feature, usually crafted from limestone and often placed on the top of structure.
The plea claimed that despite having renovated the building in 2014-15 to its earlier glory, the finial in question collapsed on August 25, 2017. The MMRCL, however, said that it had taken due precautions during the work.
This came after the MMRCL made a statement that without prejudice to its rights and contentions and without accepting any liability, it has agreed to reconstruct at its own expense one of the limestone finials that earlier formed part of the building.
'There can be no doubt that the protection and preservation of the petitioners' building is a must. Whilst the march of development and infrastructural projects cannot be halted in a city like Mumbai, such a march cannot be permitted to run roughshod over the concerns of preserving and maintaining heritage buildings for posterity,' the court said.
The court noted that the respondent authorities, including MMRCL and Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA) represented by advocates Mayur Khandeparkar and Kavita N Solunke, respectively, must conduct their activities by ensuring they don't harm or unduly destroy heritage structures.
'There are cases where such Heritage Areas or Structures are irreversibly harmed or destroyed, and the authorities responsible for such destruction or those whose lack of oversight caused it often plead fait accompli (something that already happened and can't be changed). This conduct cannot be tolerated,' the high court added.
The high court recorded MMRCL's statement suggesting that the Metro tunnel's alignment was not directly under the Petit building and the tracks ran approximately 4 to 5 metres away horizontally and around 25 metres below the ground level from the building.
The J N Petit building is a Grade-II A heritage structure constructed in the Neo-Gothic Revival style in 1898 and was conferred with the UNESCO Award of Distinction for Cultural Heritage Conservation in 2015.
The Jamsetji Nusserwanji Petit Trust said the building has a reading room and a library housing nearly 1 lakh books, including 2,400 rare books and 12 manuscripts, some of which date back to the 17th century, as per the judgment.
The high court directed the petitioner Trust to fully cooperate for the reconstruction of the finial and to obtain prior permissions from the concerned authorities, including heritage bodies, for such restoration. The MMRCL shall complete restoration within eight months of obtaining approvals.
'We find it difficult to accept the petitioners' belated contention about some serious damage to the petitioners' building on account of the works which, according to the petitioners, were completed in 2023,' the high court noted.
In September 2017, the high court had stayed excavation or tunnelling in the area around the heritage building. In November that year, it had ordered resumption of work after perusing the MMRCL's submission that they had completed precautionary measures recommended by a court-appointed Expert Committee.
The court observed that the building required protection and maintenance, however it was 'difficult to uphold the allegations of callousness or disregard to the concerns expressed by the petitioners regarding their Heritage Building.' It said the authorities had 'substantially complied' with recommendations of the Expert Panel.
Disposing of the plea, the bench said that at present, it was not appropriate to address concerns over damage to the building after the Metro line becomes operational as it would be 'too speculative,' and the Trust can seek remedies in future.
