Latest news with #JackOConnell
The Guardian
20 hours ago
- Entertainment
- The Guardian
‘Smooth with a sinister edge': readers on who the next James Bond should be
Bond should have an element of danger about him. So yes Tom Hardy immediately springs to mind. I also think Tom Hiddleston would be good at a more lighter touch Bond though, the Roger Moore to Hardy's Connery. All the other candidates either sound way to young or in the case of Idris Elba, great actor though he is, a bit old for the role. machinehead Whilst Idris and Tom Hardy would undoubtedly have been excellent – Tom Hardy, in particular, has that undercurrent of menace that Connery always carried – as, I think, would Christian Bale, their time has passed. I did think Nicholas Hoult might be a reasonable pick, though possibly too 'pretty'. But were I casting it, my money would go on Jack O'Connell: right age, English, dashing and could probably do rugged, thuggish violence if SAS Rogue Heroes is any guide. EvanByrne2 Ten years ago I'd have said Tom Hardy was a gimme, I think he still has the action chops for it, but is now over 50 so … Norton as the first ginger Bond? I reckon he's a good shout, Richard Madden and Kit Harington have also got to be in with a shout having both done pretty well in spy caper action roles before. DezzyDisco Jack O'Connell. Very impressed with his Paddy Mayne in SAS Rogue Heroes. The right blend of charm and danger. JudeScorpio I never would have believed that I would ever have typed the names James Bond and Eddie Redmayne in the same sentence. It would have been a bit like suggesting Kenneth Williams should on the shortlist. However, Mr Redmayne was chillingly good in The Jackal and he would be a very different kind of cold and calculating Bond. Nigeleastsussex I think the next one needs to be JANE BOND. Since fact is stranger than fiction, there are plenty of real life examples of heroic women of the cold war intelligence/espionage world, from which an excellent writer can draw upon. An exemplary performance was provided by Noomi Rapace in The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo (2009). Consider the economic success of the Wonder Woman movies – which may be difficult for Bezos to grasp. NotACustomer Definitely James Norton. He has the looks, the acting skills and experience and would be perfect as the next 007. christinen101 No more Bonds, for Heaven's sake! They lost the plot, over-hyped the character, killed any humour or charm and turned Bond into some kind of American action cartoon. Just watch Dr No or something and move on. fabcat21 Matthew Goode. I have nothing to add. Riotsnotdiets Hugh Laurie, obviously. He can play anything, especially upper-class Englishmen who can morph into convincing Americans when required. Erbium Boris Kodjoe! Handsome, tall, fit, wryly funny, and a pretty decent actor. Knowitallie I quite like the idea of Tom Ellis. He would be smooth after Daniel Craig's more gritty performance. I guess more in the Roger Moore range. But with Denis Villeneuve in the director's chair not sure it would work. Tom Hiddleston would also make a good choice. MillyTant I think George MacKay (1917) would make a great Bond. He's got that look that mixes vague meanness with woolly competence, so he could fit all kinds of different scenarios. Trying to replace Daniel Craig (RIP) with another toughie street fighter would be too easy. I think MacKay also adds a spoonful of the eccentric enigmatic, would make him tough to pin down but still quite vulnerable. studious1 Tom Hiddleston. Another visceral actor would just look shite compared to Craig so I would go for a more cerebral Bond but with enough gravitas to stop it looking like a parody (unlike Brosnan). FeedTheEnemy Chris Hemsworth might be a good option. Depends if they want to go hardcore like Craig's Casino Royale or if they want to ham it up like Roger Moore's tenure. TheMrGaffer Jack Lowden would be a good shout. I'd like to see the role reclaimed for Scotland. mikebhoy Tom Hiddleston, after seeing his work as Jonathan Pine in The Night Manager. Smooth with a sinister edge. DewinDwl Robert Pattinson. He played a suave agent in Tenet. He's got the looks, the charisma, the elegance. BTW my solution to the reboot problem is to take a leaf from The Man With the Golden Gun's book (literally, from the book). Bond has lost his memory (so no need to include his new family from No Time To Die). He also suffered burns in the explosion and has had to have plastic surgery so, cough, he looks completely different. But we get to keep his found family of SIS team members who I love – Ben Whishaw, Naomie Harris and Ralph Fiennes. catwhowalksbyitself How about Matthew Macfadyen? He can do the upper-class British thing, but after seeing him be a real asshole in Succession I think he can do just about anything. kirkmc1 My pick would be Ṣọpẹ́ Dìrísù, he has the action stuff, he has the acting chops; just check out the first few episodes of Gangs of London for the audition tape. Richlieu Like the idea of Tom Hardy; Idris – maybe a little too old? Don't know? Am I being ageist here? I see someone has mentioned James Norton – he has great charisma and range. JojoSum Tom Hardy is probably too old now, as he's pushing 50. Proper reboot territory should have Bond mid to late 30s. Theo James is a good call, he's already done the 'posh hardman' routine in The Gentlemen, like Craig, who basically got the gig after his turn in Layer Cake. Owlyross Regé-Jean Page is the obvious contender. He has a solid fanbase but is not yet typecast, and has a fluidity that would enable the role to be reimagined without changing 007 completely and alienating diehards. Not exactly unknown of course. Estella1960 Dan Stevens would be my choice. About the right age, looks the part and can prove experience in both action and comedy. And he did an excellent film a few years back called The Guest where he played a steely-eyed murderous bastard to perfection. Sadly he's one of those 'tipped for big things a decade ago' actors who might be regarded as a bit of a yesterday's man for such a high-profile role these days (although he's done fine work since). Kevcoe I would personally go for Jack O'Connell as an outside bet. It won't happen of course. And he's a bit short, but so was Craig. But he definitely has the charisma and the acting chops to pull it off. Lazygunn As a longtime fan of the Bond franchise, I'm surprised that one actor's name hasn't come up in casting speculation, and that is Tom Weston-Jones, who I first became aware of via his starring role in Copper. After just a couple of episodes, I thought from the intensity he projected, especially with his eyes, that he would make a great James Bond. Creative_Conquest
The Guardian
a day ago
- Entertainment
- The Guardian
‘Smooth with a sinister edge': readers on who the next James Bond should be
Bond should have an element of danger about him. So yes Tom Hardy immediately springs to mind. I also think Tom Hiddleston would be good at a more lighter touch Bond though, the Roger Moore to Hardy's Connery. All the other candidates either sound way to young or in the case of Idris Elba, great actor though he is, a bit old for the role. machinehead Whilst Idris and Tom Hardy would undoubtedly have been excellent – Tom Hardy, in particular, has that undercurrent of menace that Connery always carried – as, I think, would Christian Bale, their time has passed. I did think Nicholas Hoult might be a reasonable pick, though possibly too 'pretty'. But were I casting it, my money would go on Jack O'Connell: right age, English, dashing and could probably do rugged, thuggish violence if SAS Rogue Heroes is any guide. EvanByrne2 Ten years ago I'd have said Tom Hardy was a gimme, I think he still has the action chops for it, but is now over 50 so … Norton as the first ginger Bond? I reckon he's a good shout, Richard Madden and Kit Harington have also got to be in with a shout having both done pretty well in spy caper action roles before. DezzyDisco Jack O'Connell. Very impressed with his Paddy Mayne in SAS Rogue Heroes. The right blend of charm and danger. JudeScorpio I never would have believed that I would ever have typed the names James Bond and Eddie Redmayne in the same sentence. It would have been a bit like suggesting Kenneth Williams should on the shortlist. However, Mr Redmayne was chillingly good in The Jackal and he would be a very different kind of cold and calculating Bond. Nigeleastsussex I think the next one needs to be JANE BOND. Since fact is stranger than fiction, there are plenty of real life examples of heroic women of the cold war intelligence/espionage world, from which an excellent writer can draw upon. An exemplary performance was provided by Noomi Rapace in The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo (2009). Consider the economic success of the Wonder Woman movies – which may be difficult for Bezos to grasp. NotACustomer Definitely James Norton. He has the looks, the acting skills and experience and would be perfect as the next 007. christinen101 No more Bonds, for Heaven's sake! They lost the plot, over-hyped the character, killed any humour or charm and turned Bond into some kind of American action cartoon. Just watch Dr No or something and move on. fabcat21 Matthew Goode. I have nothing to add. Riotsnotdiets Hugh Laurie, obviously. He can play anything, especially upper-class Englishmen who can morph into convincing Americans when required. Erbium Boris Kodjoe! Handsome, tall, fit, wryly funny, and a pretty decent actor. Knowitallie I quite like the idea of Tom Ellis. He would be smooth after Daniel Craig's more gritty performance. I guess more in the Roger Moore range. But with Denis Villeneuve in the director's chair not sure it would work. Tom Hiddleston would also make a good choice. MillyTant I think George MacKay (1917) would make a great Bond. He's got that look that mixes vague meanness with woolly competence, so he could fit all kinds of different scenarios. Trying to replace Daniel Craig (RIP) with another toughie street fighter would be too easy. I think MacKay also adds a spoonful of the eccentric enigmatic, would make him tough to pin down but still quite vulnerable. studious1 Tom Hiddleston. Another visceral actor would just look shite compared to Craig so I would go for a more cerebral Bond but with enough gravitas to stop it looking like a parody (unlike Brosnan). FeedTheEnemy Chris Hemsworth might be a good option. Depends if they want to go hardcore like Craig's Casino Royale or if they want to ham it up like Roger Moore's tenure. TheMrGaffer Jack Lowden would be a good shout. I'd like to see the role reclaimed for Scotland. mikebhoy Tom Hiddleston, after seeing his work as Jonathan Pine in The Night Manager. Smooth with a sinister edge. DewinDwl Robert Pattinson. He played a suave agent in Tenet. He's got the looks, the charisma, the elegance. BTW my solution to the reboot problem is to take a leaf from The Man With the Golden Gun's book (literally, from the book). Bond has lost his memory (so no need to include his new family from No Time To Die). He also suffered burns in the explosion and has had to have plastic surgery so, cough, he looks completely different. But we get to keep his found family of SIS team members who I love – Ben Whishaw, Naomie Harris and Ralph Fiennes. catwhowalksbyitself How about Matthew Macfadyen? He can do the upper-class British thing, but after seeing him be a real asshole in Succession I think he can do just about anything. kirkmc1 My pick would be Ṣọpẹ́ Dìrísù, he has the action stuff, he has the acting chops; just check out the first few episodes of Gangs of London for the audition tape. Richlieu Like the idea of Tom Hardy; Idris – maybe a little too old? Don't know? Am I being ageist here? I see someone has mentioned James Norton – he has great charisma and range. JojoSum Tom Hardy is probably too old now, as he's pushing 50. Proper reboot territory should have Bond mid to late 30s. Theo James is a good call, he's already done the 'posh hardman' routine in The Gentlemen, like Craig, who basically got the gig after his turn in Layer Cake. Owlyross Regé-Jean Page is the obvious contender. He has a solid fanbase but is not yet typecast, and has a fluidity that would enable the role to be reimagined without changing 007 completely and alienating diehards. Not exactly unknown of course. Estella1960 Dan Stevens would be my choice. About the right age, looks the part and can prove experience in both action and comedy. And he did an excellent film a few years back called The Guest where he played a steely-eyed murderous bastard to perfection. Sadly he's one of those 'tipped for big things a decade ago' actors who might be regarded as a bit of a yesterday's man for such a high-profile role these days (although he's done fine work since). Kevcoe I would personally go for Jack O'Connell as an outside bet. It won't happen of course. And he's a bit short, but so was Craig. But he definitely has the charisma and the acting chops to pull it off. Lazygunn As a longtime fan of the Bond franchise, I'm surprised that one actor's name hasn't come up in casting speculation, and that is Tom Weston-Jones, who I first became aware of via his starring role in Copper. After just a couple of episodes, I thought from the intensity he projected, especially with his eyes, that he would make a great James Bond. Creative_Conquest
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Entertainment
- Yahoo
28 Years Later Viewers Are Still In Shock From That Teletubbies Callback In The Wild Final Scene
This article contains major spoilers for 28 Years Later. 28 Years Later viewers are still reeling from that shocking ending. Much has already been made of the fact that, in the film's final moments, teen protagonist Spike stumbles upon a renegade cult gang who appear to have modelled their appearance on the disgraced TV presenter Jimmy Savile, complete with colourful shellsuits and platinum blond wigs. It's worth pointing out that 28 Years Later is set in an alternate world in which the deadly 'rage virus' begins to spread in 2002, completely disrupting society, meaning it's entirely likely that in the timeline seen on screen, the allegations about Savile were never actually made public. However, there's another wild part of the ending that has also stayed with fans. Before we get into that, though, let's quickly flash back to the very beginning of the film. The first scene of 28 Years Later features a group of youngsters who are huddled together to watch a vintage episode of Teletubbies, before all hell breaks loose, and a member of the 'infected' wreaks havoc on the youngsters (the Teletubbies scene was first teased in a 28 Years Later trailer released earlier this year). We learn at the end of the film that cult leader Sir Jimmy Crystal – played by Jack O'Connell – was one of the survivors of this attack, with some also questioning whether or not those colourful tracksuits were also a nod to the Teletubbies, as well as another group of 90s and 2000s kids' TV icons, the Power Rangers. But that's not the only callback to the Teletubbies, though, with the gang's unpredictable fight scene being accompanied by a rock cover of the show's iconic theme tune (which famously topped the UK singles chart back in 1997 with a bit of help from Simon Cowell). Just got back from 28 Years LaterWhat an unsettling and depressing story the is full circled with the god damn Teletubbies…..great film! — Rion (@Rion_A_Lion) June 21, 2025 28 Years Later… standard depressing post apocalyptic zombie horror until the ending which is abrupt and involves screamo teletubbies theme 🧍♀️ huh. — girl_dm_ 🔪 villainess (definitely evil) (@Girl_Dm_) June 25, 2025 . #28YearsLater was a bloody good time! The music, cinematography and Jack O'Connell's character killing to the metal version of the Teletubbies theme. — Alex (@AlexMitchiex13) June 20, 2025 I am being dead serious when I say that 28 Years Later ends with a fucking Ninja Turtles parody, with the Teletubbies theme playing quickly turning into a rock song. I am saying this completely unironically. — Louis (@Moviefandumb345) June 20, 2025 Anyone know where I can listen to that Teletubbies metal song from the end of 28 Years Later? I want to listen to it again. #teletubbies#28yearslater — Alex-Mae (Rattfink's #1 Fan And Wife) (@Dementcia1) June 21, 2025 28 years later goes from horror, to intense thriller, to Erik, to timeless masterpiece and ends with satanic teletubbies — Tango (@TangoThr3) June 19, 2025 seeing surprisingly little online about the Jimmy Saville/Teletubbies kung fu death cult at the end of 28 Years Laterreally thought that would turn more heads — John (@ju4nathan) June 22, 2025 Still Thinking About # — Cinema Tweets (@CinemaTweets1) June 20, 2025 28 Years Later director Danny Boyle has already teased that the gang Spike encounters at the end of the film will form a major part of the film's sequel, which is due for release early next year. He claimed: 'The role of Jack O'Connell's character and his family, which is a replacement, really, for the family he loses at the beginning of the film, is to reintroduce evil into what has become a compassionate environment. 'I asked Alex [Garland, who wrote both films] right at the beginning to just tell me what's the nature of each of the films, and he said that the nature of the first film is about family. The second film is about the nature of evil. And you're about to meet a lot more of them when it'll be more appropriate to talk about them in the second film.' The Trainspotting director previously said that he hopes 28 Years Later and its sequel, subtitled The Bone Temple, will form the first two instalments of a new trilogy, the third of which is not yet greenlit. 28 Years Later 'Alpha' Chi Lewis-Parry Answers Everyone's 1 Big Question About The Film 28 Years Later Director Danny Boyle Reveals Meaning Behind That Truly Wild Twist Ending 28 Years Later Was Actually Filmed Using iPhones – Danny Boyle Explains Why
Gizmodo
4 days ago
- Entertainment
- Gizmodo
Zombie Dong Will Return in '28 Years Later: The Bone Temple'
Two topics of conversation dominated the opening weekend of Danny Boyle's new film, 28 Years Later. One, that wild ending that introduced a seemingly out-of-place controversial new character. And two was the sheer amount, and size, of the penises seen in the film. Throughout 28 Years Later, the Rage virus-infected zombies that run around the mainland are all naked. As one would be if you'd been running around killing people as a zombie for 30 years. That means, yes, there's lots of nudity in the film, with one character, the Alpha zombie, Samson, standing out beyond the rest. Samson stood out because he's big, he's strong, he's scary, and, well, he has a massive dong that flops all over the screen throughout the film. And though our heroes have multiple chances to kill Samson in the film, they don't, leaving the door open for the return of everyone's favorite well-endowed Alpha. 'The character you saw at the end of the first film, Jack O'Connell, he's a major character in the second film, with Ralph Fiennes — and the big Samson guy,' Boyle told the Hollywood Reporter. So, yes, that unforgettable dick is coming back. The second film Boyle refers to is called 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple, the second of three planned films in a 28 Years trilogy written by Alex Garland. Nia DaCosta, director of Candyman and The Marvels, directs, and everyone was so high on the series, the second movie was filmed before part one was released. It'll be out on January 16, 2026, just about 28 weeks after the first one. But what about the third film? Everyone involved with the series has been very clear that the planned conclusion to the trilogy would only happen if the first two were successful. And, if and when that happens, it will reunite Boyle, who'll return to direct, with original star Cillian Murphy. The recent Oscar winner became a household name after his turn in the first film, 28 Days Later, and returns as a producer on 28 Years. Boyle stated his character returns at the end of Bone Temple and would be a large part of the third film, if it happens. As large as Sampson's dong, though? Only time will tell. And speaking of one big piece… of news, the person who makes the decision if the third film happens or not, Sony Pictures' chairman Tom Rothman, is optimistic about it. 'I don't want to put a jinx on it. But, with such great reviews, and such a strong start globally, we hope so,' Rothman told the trade. Could Samson return for film three? Or will there be yet another Alpha? Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what's next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.
Gizmodo
5 days ago
- Entertainment
- Gizmodo
'28 Years Later' Filmmakers Break Down That Controversial Surprise Ending
The ending of 28 Years Later flips the entire movie on its head. After almost two hours of dread and pain, the film ends on a high-energy, seemingly out-of-left-field action sequence that leaves almost every audience member scratching their head. What the hell was that? What is the point? Well, clearly, you can interpret it however you'd like, but director Danny Boyle and writer Alex Garland do have some thoughts on the the film, the main character Spike leaves his protected home to fend for himself on the mainland. Quickly, he's almost run over by zombies, only to be saved by a group of jumpsuit-wearing killers led by Jimmy, the grown-up kid from the opening of the movie, played by Jack O'Connell. Jimmy, as you may remember, is a character we first meet watching TV shows like Teletubbies in the early 2000s when the Rage Virus took over the UK. He watched his family die and has had to survive on his own ever since. The timing there is crucial because 28 Years Later Jimmy is a purposeful reference to Jimmy Savile, one of the most notorious pedophiles in British history. Savile was a super popular media personality for decades, working with children on the make-a-wish-esque series Jim'll Fix It. But then, after his death in 2011, it was revealed that he was a horrific sex offender, assaulting hundreds of minors and adults over the course of his career. In the world of 28 Years Later, though, that public revelation never would have happened—28 Years' opening is set in 2002, Savile's crimes were public exposed in 2012—and so the film is commenting on history and perception in a very specific, very British way. 'He's as much to do with pop culture as he is to do with sportswear, to do with cricket, to do with the honors system,' Boyle told Business Insider. 'It's all kind of twisting in this partial remembrance, clinging onto things and then recreating them as an image for followers.' 'He's a kaleidoscope, isn't he, in a funny way,' Garland added. 'A sort of trippy, fucked up kaleidoscope.' So, in the movie, Jimmy of the film is presented as someone who was a fan of Savile, based his entire look on the person, but never learned the truth about him. Which is exactly the twisted point. 'The whole film, and if we ever get to make it, the whole trilogy, is in some ways about looking back and looking forwards,' Garland said. 'And the relationship between looking forward to better worlds or attempting to make better worlds, or trying to construct the world that you're in on the basis of old worlds, so there's sort of contrast or conflict between the two. And the thing about looking back is how selective memory is and that it cherry picks and it has amnesia, and crucially it also misremembers—and we are living in a time right now which is absolutely dominated by a misremembered past. And so it's that.' And so, history in this universe misremembered Jimmy Savile, which sets the stage for what's to come. '[The ending] is about reintroducing evil into what has been a compassionate environment,' Boyle explained to the Independent. 'I asked Alex right at the beginning [of the writing process] to tell me the nature of each of the films. He said that the first film is about the nature of family. The second film is about the nature of evil.' Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what's next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.
