logo
#

Latest news with #JalosjosJr.

SC rules 2nd placers can't replace disqualified election winners
SC rules 2nd placers can't replace disqualified election winners

GMA Network

time23-06-2025

  • Politics
  • GMA Network

SC rules 2nd placers can't replace disqualified election winners

The Supreme Court has ruled that candidates who rank second in the elections cannot be proclaimed winner should the candidate that received the majority of votes be disqualified or declared ineligible, saying this undermines the public's choice. In a 37-page ruling, the SC En Banc said the second placer rule has no basis in law, abandoning its previous ruling in Jalosjos Jr. v Comelec that the rule should be limited to situations where the certificate of candidacy of the first placer was valid at the time of the filing. However, the SC noted that the Court in Jalosjos also did not provide any legal basis for declaring the second placer upon the disqualification or ineligibility of the winning candidate. 'No law authorizes the proclamation of the second placer in the elections in case the candidate who received the most votes is disqualified or turned out to be ineligible,' the SC said. 'The second placer rule undermines the people's choice in every election and is repugnant to the people's constitutional right to suffrage. The Court cannot impose upon the electorate to accept as their representative, the candidate whom they did not choose in the elections,' it added. According to the High Court, the rules on succession under the Local Government Code shall apply in all cases. '[A] permanent vacancy results from a local elective official's disqualification from office regardless of the proceedings involved,' the SC said. The SC issued this as it dismissed the petition of a candidate against a ruling of the Comelec that canceled his certificate of candidacy for Sultan Kudarat governor in the 2022 elections due to false material representation. Comelec chairperson George Garcia declined to comment, saying the decision is not yet final. However, he said they are now looking into the possible filing of a motion for reconsideration. "Since the decision is not yet final, we will reserve in the meantime our comment. But we are now studying the possibility of filing an MR," Garcia said in a message to reporters. The ruling, penned by Associate Justice Samuel Gaerlan, was promulgated in April 2025 and made public in June 2025. —AOL, GMA Integrated News

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store