Latest news with #JanHavenga

IOL News
18-06-2025
- Business
- IOL News
We need serious action and leadership from government to push Transnet in the right direction
Stellenbosch University professor Jan Havenga has estimated that Transnet costs the economy R1bn every day thanks to its poor performance in moving goods around the country and out through our ports. Image: Supplied By Busisiwe Mavuso I was astounded to see news last week of Transnet's capitulation to union strike threats, agreeing to give workers 6% pay rises in each of the next three years. This agreement represents a failure of leadership on both sides – militant unions holding the country hostage with strike threats, and management caving to their demands without a fight. While South African businesses slash costs and workers face retrenchments, Transnet workers will get pay rises that are double the inflation rate, funded by taxpayers already struggling to make ends meet. Inflation is running at 2.7% and the economy is expected to only grow 1.4% this year. The news came days after National Treasury had agreed to give Transnet additional guarantees to enable it to manage its huge debt pile. In the private sector, the bleak economic outlook is leading to severe belt-tightening. Managers everywhere are having to find ways to save and try to hoard cash to be able to trade through tough conditions. Inevitably, some firms are going to fail, and workers will find themselves out of a job. Yet the unions threatened to bring the entire logistics network to a standstill unless their excessive demands were met, showing complete disregard for the economic factors that affect us all. It is even more shocking when you consider the role Transnet plays in perpetuating our economic predicament. Transnet's poor performance has been a major contributor to our dismal growth outlook. Stellenbosch University professor Jan Havenga has estimated that Transnet costs the economy R1bn every day thanks to its poor performance in moving goods around the country and out through our ports. That is equivalent to wiping out the entire annual budget of a midsize municipality every day. It equates to about 5% of GDP. The unions are acting as if we live in a world we haven't seen for 15 years, when growth was running at over 5% and government boasted a budget surplus. Instead, we live in a world where Goodyear Tyres has just let go of over 900 workers after having to shut its 78-year-old plant in the Eastern Cape, affecting thousands more jobs down the value chain. Where SAB is engaging with unions about retrenching workers across its operations. Where mines across the country are retrenching thousands because they cannot get their output to the markets. In many of these cases, union action at Transnet is a direct contributor to this job carnage. The failure here is twofold: unions' refusal to accept performance-linked pay, and management's refusal to insist on it. If workers were to get increases indexed to Transnet's performance, we could support these. Bonuses could be tied to improvements in volumes shipped through ports and on rails, or specific metrics like international port efficiency rankings, which currently put SA's ports among the worst in the world. Instead, the unions demanded guaranteed increases regardless of whether Transnet improves its service delivery. This represents a toxic dynamic where unions treat the state as an endless ATM. Private sector unions understand that companies must remain viable to protect jobs, but Transnet's unions can make unreasonable demands knowing that management cannot afford to have their suboptimal operations interrupted as this will put a further strain on the economy Worse still, they've secured additional job security guarantees in this wage agreement, further limiting Transnet's flexibility to restructure and improve performance. The unions know exactly what they're doing. They understand that by threatening strikes at Transnet, they can hold the entire economy hostage. They know that government will always cave rather than face the economic disruption of a logistics shutdown. This is economic blackmail, pure and simple, and taxpayers are footing the bill while the economy suffers. I've written many times about the solutions we need for Transnet, including private sector investment and competition. But as long as militant unions can veto any meaningful reform through strike threats, we'll remain trapped in this cycle of poor performance and endless bailouts. The unions have made it clear they prefer protecting their members' privileges over the economic well-being of the country. The wage settlement shows just how unhelpful these unions can become to South Africa's economic prospects. We need government to finally take a firmer stance. National Treasury must demand that any future bailouts come with strict conditions that break the unions' stranglehold over Transnet's operations. Treasury must insist on performance metrics as strict as those facing any private company seeking bailout funds, and the power to override union objections when restructuring is needed. Business wants to partner with Transnet, but the unions' actions are not helpful, and they do not support the economic recovery we're all trying to achieve. Until government finds a way of confronting union militancy at state-owned enterprises, taxpayers will continue subsidising this destructive cycle while our economy stagnates. The unions need to be called upon to contribute to solutions of rebuilding our economy rather than exacerbating its challenges. Busi Mavuso, the CEO of Business Leadership South Africa. Image: Supplied * Busisiwe Mavuso is the CEO of the Business Leadership South Africa. ** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL or Independent Media. BUSINESS REPORT


The Citizen
17-06-2025
- Business
- The Citizen
Transnet capitulating to unions shows lack of leadership on both sides
Giving in to the unions makes it difficult to hold Transnet, the SOE that can grow the economy, to account. Transnet capitulated to unions threatening to strike last week and awarded annual pay increases of 6%, showing a lack of leadership on both sides of the table, with militant unions holding the country hostage with strike threats and management caving in to their demands without a fight. Busisiwe Mavuso, CEO of Business Leadership South Africa, writes in her weekly newsletter that this scenario shows that the country needs serious action and leadership from government to push Transnet in the right direction. 'While South African businesses slash costs and workers face retrenchments, Transnet workers will get pay increases of double the inflation rate, funded by taxpayers already struggling to make ends meet. 'Inflation is running at 2.8% and the economy is expected to only grow by 1.4% this year. The news came days after National Treasury agreed to give Transnet additional guarantees to enable it to manage its huge debt pile.' ALSO READ: Victory for Transnet: more cash incoming, union accepts salary increase Transnet's logistics nightmare causing layoffs in the private sector She points out that the bleak economic outlook is leading to severe belt-tightening in the private sector, with managers everywhere having to find ways to save and hoard cash to trade during tough conditions. 'Inevitably, some firms are going to fail, and workers will find themselves out of a job. Yet the unions threatened to bring the entire logistics network to a standstill unless their excessive demands were met, showing complete disregard for the economic factors that affect us all. 'It is even more shocking when you consider the role Transnet plays in perpetuating our economic predicament. Transnet's poor performance has been a major contributor to our dismal growth outlook. 'Stellenbosch University professor Jan Havenga estimated that Transnet costs the economy R1 billion every day due to its poor performance in moving goods around the country and out through our ports. That is equivalent to wiping out the entire annual budget of a midsize municipality every day. It equates to about 5% of gross domestic product (GDP).' ALSO READ: R26 billion rescue from World Bank: Can the loan save Eskom and Transnet? Transnet inefficiency affecting Goodyear, SAB and mines Mavuso points out that the unions act as if we live in a world we have not seen for 15 years, when growth was running above 5% and government boasted a budget surplus. Instead, she says, we live in a world where: Goodyear Tyres just let more than 900 workers go after having to shut its 78-year-old plant in the Eastern Cape, affecting thousands more jobs down the value chain South African Breweries is engaging with unions regarding the potential retrenchment of workers across its operations. Mines across the country are retrenching thousands because they cannot get their output to the markets. In many of these cases, Mavuso says, union action at Transnet is a direct contributor to this job carnage. 'The failure here is twofold: unions' refusal to accept performance-linked pay and management's refusal to insist on it. 'If workers were to get increases linked to Transnet's performance, we could support these. Bonuses could be tied to improvements in volumes shipped through ports and on rails, or specific metrics like international port efficiency rankings, which currently put South Africa's ports among the worst in the world.' Instead, she says, the unions demand guaranteed increases regardless of whether Transnet improves its service delivery. ALSO READ: This is where we would be if SA sustained an economic growth rate of 4.5% Toxic dynamic where unions treat state as ATM Mavuso says this represents a toxic dynamic where unions treat the state as an endless ATM. 'Private sector unions understand that companies must remain viable to protect jobs, but Transnet's unions can make unreasonable demands, knowing that management cannot afford to have their suboptimal operations interrupted, as this will put a further strain on the economy. 'Worse still, they secured additional job security guarantees in this wage agreement, further limiting Transnet's flexibility to restructure and improve performance. The unions know exactly what they are doing. They understand that by threatening strikes at Transnet, they can hold the entire economy hostage. 'They know that government will always cave in rather than face the economic disruption of a logistics shutdown. This is economic blackmail pure and simple, and taxpayers are footing the bill while the economy suffers.' Mavuso says she has written extensively about the solutions needed for Transnet, including private sector investment and competition. However, as long as militant unions can veto any meaningful reform through strike threats, we will remain trapped in this cycle of poor performance and endless bailouts. ALSO READ: Are threats against Transnet over? CCMA sends revised offer to halt strike Unions protect members in Transnet at expense of economic well-being of SA 'The unions made it clear they prefer protecting their members' privileges over the economic well-being of the country. The wage settlement shows just how unhelpful these unions can become to South Africa's economic prospects. 'We need government to finally take a firmer stance. Treasury must demand that any future bailouts come with strict conditions that break the unions' stranglehold over Transnet's operations. Treasury must insist on performance metrics as strict as those facing any private company seeking bailout funds, and the power to override union objections when restructuring is needed.' Business wants to partner with Transnet, but Mavuso says the unions' actions are not helpful, and they do not support the economic recovery everybody is trying to achieve. 'Until government finds a way of confronting union militancy at state-owned enterprises, taxpayers will continue subsidising this destructive cycle while our economy stagnates. 'The unions must be called on to contribute to solutions of rebuilding our economy rather than exacerbating its challenges,' she says.